Muffie's Blog
"The road to stupid is paved with good intentions." Mandy from The Grim Adventures of Billy
Buddhism and homosexuality
photo

A question asked at Yahoo!Answers:

Does Buddhism accept homosexuality?

One of the laws of the Eightfold path says "Practice Right Livelyhood" and that means to make sure that your Way of life does not harm anyone directly or indirectly. and i know that some parents and siblings get hurt indirectly when their children "come out" so is buddhism really that accepting of homosexuality?

My answer (right, wrong, or indifferent):

This interpretation is a little too Western, that is to say, dualistic and culturally adapted from monotheistic ethics.

Samma-ajiva, or right livelihood, is the portion of the Eightfold Path you're discussing. The word Samma (right) is important here because translations are misleading. It's not right as in right v. wrong, but right as in "seeing" v. "non-seeing" or "in touch with reality" (Third Noble Truth) as opposed to being deluded by our own prejudices, thoughts, beliefs, or desires (the Second Noble Truth).

Yes, it may hurt to find out that your loved one is a sexual orientation that's not acceptable to you. (You as in the general people, not you specifically.) In Buddhist mindset, though, it's far more harmful to deny reality in favor of deluding oneself and others with what they'd rather see than what is actually there. Taking what is preferred or desired for reality rather than what actually is, is Dukkha, the First Noble Truth (aka suffering).

Homosexuality is not against Buddhism. Some sects may be against it, but the core teachings of Buddhism have only one thing to say explicitly on sexuality, the Fourth Precept, do not engage in sexual misconduct. Of course, misconduct is not defined, but there are guides to deciding what is misconduct. Here are three:
(from: http://www.buddhanet.net/homosexu.htm )

What might be called the universalisability principle - to act towards others the way we would like them to act towards us.

The Buddha makes this same point in the Dhammapada: "The deed which causes remorse afterwards and results in weeping and tears is ill-done. The deed which causes no remorse afterwards and results in joy and happiness is well-done."

The third way of determining right and wrong is what might be called the instrumental principle, that is, that behaviour can be considered right or wrong according to whether or not it helps us to attain our goal (the Buddhist goal is Nirvana).

The link leads to an excellent essay on Buddhist ideology regarding homosexuality.

In any case, homosexuality is not something Buddhism defines as "wrong" because homosexuality is "wrong." Homosexuality is "wrong" in the Buddhist view if it is part of one's path that embodies the Second Noble Truth: not-seeing. And, here we return to Samma of Samma-ajiva ("right livelihood") or living in a way that is not being deluded by our own prejudices, thoughts, beliefs, or desires.

2007-06-27 04:36:48 GMT
Comments (1 total)
Author:buddhamonkeyboy
Your sex life is not the same as your Livelihood, so in my understanding of the dharma I would not answer this question based upon one of the eight spokes of the dharma wheel, but rather on one of the five precepts: (1) No killing. (2) No taking what is not given. (3) No sexual misconduct. (4) No lying/harmful speech. (5) No intoxicants. These are kind of the Buddhist "10 Commandments," only we get the job done with 5 instead of 10!

Anyway, #2 "No sexual misconduct" refers to sexual conduct that causes suffering. This is classically interpreted as (a) no adultery, because of the suffering it causes to families, marriages and communities; (b) no sex with children because their vulnerability and the suffering that causes; and (c) no sex without consent, i.e. rape, because of the suffering that causes. In western terms, sex between mutually consenting adults that is not adulterous is OK, and it just doesn't matter whether this is heterosexual or homosexual.

I don't think the logic that "yes, but this will upset someone and therefore cause suffering" sticks. My practicing Buddhism might upset someone, but their suffering is from their own delusion and not from my right action or skillful practice.
2007-06-27 16:28:12 GMT


Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1