To: The Editor and investigative reporter(s):
I have sent the enclosed letter to the Honorable Judge Richard E.L. Strauss, of the San Diego Superior Court and have included his response. A legal case of great substance and merithas been successfully obstructed from ever reaching subject-matter jurisdiction; and the facts, and substance, of the real and underlying actual case: have never reached the record. This case began in 1998 as an original jurisdiction action to bring into the heightened scrutiny of judicial review- ARTICLE 1 SECTION 28 utah constitution and title 77 chapters 37/ 38 utah criminal code: THE VICTIMS' RIGHTS LAWS. They operate from pre-trial onwards under the presumption that you are guilty and the accusers, (in this case false accusers committing a crime against me), are victims-before trial is even convened!??! During the six year ablation of process' due and the destruction of my life and all I hold as valuable -great harm has been wreaked upon society and visited upon our fundamental law-in part arising due to the unrestrained efforts of many in power who are willing to abuse their authorities to aid and abet in the obstructionist measures brought to bear to inhibit this case from ever seeing the light of day. This madness must end. Even if you cannot address the entire case due to it's now overwhelming complexity and scope, it is of value at least to give a good report and make yourselves and your associates in the media aware of what is going on in the legal system while everyone is asleep during this perpetual 'war on terror',(?!!?), with no end and no recognition and respect for nation state sovereignty. I also believe it is important that one observe one of the many reasons this war was brought into being as it aids those, ( both those abroad and those in positions of authority here in America), whose intent is to turn the 'American experiment in liberty'- into the 'Frankenstein monster' of a police state and empire;

" COURT CASES MUST BE HEARD IN COURT DIRECTLY; AND THEY MUST BE HEARD IN COURT
" WHEN THE GOVERNMENT ARREST A MAN; THE GOVERNMENT ITSELF IS ARRESTED

Due Processes of law are Processes due not to be withheld or obstructed- certainly not to be ablated entirely.The fifth estate exists for many reasons but at the end of the day this is definitively why the press exists- for in times of trouble we are supposed to turn to our constitution and its declarative axiomatic foundations for guidance as good Daniel Webster once arose in congress to point out. I humbly suggest that it is the declarative axiom which is the light by which we divine these constitution of government markings to ensure our ship of nation state does not founder in such times. Sadly, instead, those who have logged an oath in heaven to uphold our constitution of government torque it's meaning and grant of discretionary authorities to act as if in deconstructing constitution of government this somehow translates into depriving the individual and peoples of their GOD given freedoms and liberties. In such times it is the first and last hope of the peoples that conflicts' necessarily arising out of the sufficiencies of such abuse can be avoided and/or tempered through recourse and manifestation of the first amendment. After all it is the first; best thing, a bunch of really wise individuals could think of back in the day to provide a definitive limiting locus of the ambit of government authorities and powers so ceded by the peoples in constituting our government for the express purpose of: ACKNOWLEDGING; PROTECTING; AND MAKING MANIFEST; OUR GOD BLESSED AND GOD GRANTED LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS!

I hope you will make copies of this report and be kind enough to distribute it to any/all media outlets and associates you know whose business is to engage investigative reporting and report real substantive news whether those in power are happy and approving of the story or not. Any facts; sources; or analysis of the myriad issues- substantive and meritorious all-which this so recently, ILLEGALLY TERMINATED STANDING, (now six years delayed), represents is available at your request. You can immediately contact a Mr. Steven Stycos (401) 461 2618- of the Providence Rhode Island Phoenix newspaper he was endeavoring to write a story about the abuses suffered by myself and others. Upon signing the waiver release to be interviewed while at the ACI Rhode Island; the law library computers were disabled and I was moved out of state. Please also contact Honorable Judge Strauss (619) 531 3144 as he can verify the abuse of the legal system in the component of the case before him.

Now, it is without question that I was deported as an overstay- the INS is not accusing me of a crime - and yet from March 2001- end of June 20003: for two years and three months I was incarcerated in conditions beyond sub-human, (7 months spent being tortured and abused), as I was moved ~ 20 times to cut me off from access to resources; courts; and as Mr. Stycos can attest to- the media: ALL WITHOUT ANY CRIME; WITHOUT ANY TRIAL; OR ANY CONVICTION. THE INS KNOW I AM INNOCENT AND THAT I NEVER COMMITTED ANY CRIME, I WAS DEPORTED AS AN OVERSTAY IN ORDER TO HELP TERMINATE STANDING!

I hope you will assist in making the first amendment manifest: for my benefit, indeed, but also for the cause of liberty and freedom- true liberty and freedom for all- always ESPECIALLY IN DIFFICULT TIMES SO THAT THESE TREASONOUS HYPOCRITES WILL NOT PURPOSELY BRING HARDSHIP UPON THEIR OWN COUNTRY JUST TO FURTHER THEIR AMBITIONS FOR POLICE STATE AND EMPIRE. Good things will happen if this story is heard.

Thank you for your time and God speed. Sincerely,
Liam Brent Kelly An American in exile
[email protected]