One Man Watching
Vol. 1, no. 17
A recurring commentary on politics, faith, and culture
Nov. 12, 2000

EDITOR'S SIDEBAR 
It's now 5 days after the election, and we still don't know the who our next president will be. What we do know is that, whoever it is, they will have been elected by the thinnest of margins. Add to that the nearly 50-50 split that exists in both houses of Congress, and we have a situation which is unlike any I'm aware of in our nation's history. 

Complicating matters, though, is the fact that the events have taken such a turn into recounts, lawsuits, allegations of wrongdoing, and allegations of wrong allegations. Watching the news, it seems that there are any number of people on both sides of the political fence who think the other side is trying to steal the election. 

What should be our response in a situation like this one, where we can only observe the future of our nation taking shape? First, we remain calm. Politics excites passions, and passions don't serve us well in situation like this that require the utmost objectivity. 

Second, we pray. 

We pray for both candidates, that they would handle the situations with grace, dignity, integrity, and humility. 

We pray for the election officials, that they would be able to complete their duties in such a manner that there is no opportunity to question the truthfulness of the results they announce. 

We pray for the judges who are hearing the lawsuits, that they would have a great deal of wisdom and understanding in their application of the law. 

Finally, we pray for our nation. The nation is divided, which has given us a government that is also divided. Ultimately, the time will come to work together, not as Democrats, Republicans, liberals, or conservatives, but as Americans. That coming together will not be easy, but it's something we must do, if we are going to remain true to the Pledge of Allegiance, where we say we are one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. 

Brad Pardee 
Editor

If you have any feedback, I'd love to hear it. Contact me at: 
[email protected]
Failing Our Nation, Failing Ourselves
Numbers, numbers, numbers. They are always being tallied, reported, and analyzed at election time, and this year, with the closeness of the race between Texas Governor George Bush and Vice-President Al Gore, the river of numbers seems to be turning into a flood. 

Numbers are open to interpretation, though. In a November 8 article on the Fox News website, David Koeppel writes, "It was one of the closest presidential elections of all time and the cliffhanger scenario elevated voter turnout in battleground states like Florida and Pennsylvania." He goes on to say, "In exit polls around the country voters revealed that they believed their vote to be crucial and could make a real difference in the race." 

I'd like to look at few other numbers, though. These come from the website for the Federal Election Commission (FEC)

50.7: The percentage of the voting age population (VAP) that turned out for this week's election. 

49.08: The percentage of the VAP that turned out for the presidential election in 1996. 

32: The number of years it's been since as many as 60% of the VAP voted in a presidential election. 

36.39: The percentage of the VAP that turned out for the off-year elections in 1998. 

30.: The number of years it's been since as many as 40% of the VAP voted in an off-year election. 

Perhaps 50.7% is "elevated", but I hardly would call it a cause for national pride. I would call it, instead, a national disgrace. 

As a nation, we take pride in our position as a world leader and the lone remaining superpower. Every Fourth of July, we toast ourselves as "the birthplace of democracy," "the sentinel of freedom," and various other bits of patriotic self-congratulation. It's certainly true enough that there is some truth in each of these statements. 

However, information from the Center For Voting And Democracy (CVD) paints a somewhat different picture. Using data from the Almanac of European Politics and Congressional Quarterly, a chart on their website compares the turnout of voters to elect the main legislature of various democracies. They drew their figures coming from elections ranging from 1994 to 1998. The United States voter turnout, from 1994, was 38%. 

Here's another number. 

21: The number of countries on the CVD list with a higher turnout than the United States, led by Iceland, with 88% voter turnout in 1995. 

It gets better: 

19: The number of countries on the CVD list with a turnout of at least 61%. 

1: The number of elections since 1962, either Presidential or off-year, where the FEC records United States voter turnout as at least 61%. This was in 1964. 

We frequently hear people talk about how our government seems out of touch with its citizens, and there certainly is no shortage of instances where that seems to be the case. However, when we, as a nation, take our elections so lightly that 50% turnout is considered "elevated", perhaps that case can also be made that the citizens have not chosen to remain in touch with the government, and for that, we have nobody to blame but ourselves. 


© 2000, Brad Pardee
Return to Home PageReturn to Archive
Page last updated November 12, 2000
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1