One Man Watching
Vol. 1, no. 2
A recurring commentary on politics, faith, and culture
April 19, 2000

EDITOR'S SIDEBAR 
April 20 will mark the first anniversary of the tragic shootings at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado.  It will be a day which is sure to draw the attention of those who wish to ride on the coattails of carnage for a political purpose. 

Let's be sure that, in the midst of the photo ops and the speeches, we don't forget the real people who lost their lives: 

  • Cassie Bernall 
  • Steven Curnow 
  • Corey Depooter 
  • Kelly Fleming 
  • Matthew Ketcher 
  • Daniel Mauser 
  • Daniel Rohrbough 
  • William Sanders 
  • Rachel Joy Scott 
  • Isiah Shoels 
  • John Tomlin 
  • Lauren Townsend 
  • Kyle Velasquez 
For the last year, much has been said about what could have been done dfferently, and much debate has centered around what we do now.  For this day, though, let's put aside the debates and remember those for whom the debates and discussions will come too late. 

Brad Pardee 
Editor

If you have any feedback, I'd love to hear it. Contact me at: 
[email protected]
A Boy Named Elian
There doesn't seem to be a day that passes without a new story about Elian Gonzalez, even if the new story is to say that there still is no new story. On the one hand, we have the boy's Miami relatives saying that the boy deserves to grow up in freedom. On the other hand, we have the boy's father saying that Elian should be with him, even if it is in Cuba. 

Unfortuantely, the stories are weighing the merits of freedom versus family, with both sides claiming that the law is on their side. It doesn't seem to me, though, that either side is quite right. 

Should we say that the form of government automatically carries more weight than family? No, because then we would have a precedent that would justify kidnapping (which, despite what you have heard, did NOT happen in this case) children to bring them to America. 

At the same time, though, family should not automatically carry more weight than the government when we are taking about a communist regime where freedom is a myth. That would suggest if a mother and child are granted political asylum and something happens to the mother, we can ignore the asylum in order to send the child back to the father. 

At issue is who has custody of the child. It wasn't his father while the boy was in Cuba, so he doesn't automatically have custody now. It wasn't his Miami relatives while the mother was alive, so they don't automatically have custody now. These kinds of situations are supposed to be handled in family courts, where judges are able to weigh the best interests of the child and even appoint counsel to represent the child's interests, if necessary. 

That didn't happen here, though, because the Immigration and Naturalization Service issued rulings which stripped the family court of its legitimate role in deciding this matter. Consequently, instead of being decided by those looking out for the child's well-being, it is being decided by politicians and diplomats, and regardless who prevails in the Appeals Court, the loser will be Elian. 

After all, in a tug-of-war, the rope never wins. 


© 2000, Brad Pardee"
Return to Home PageReturn to Archive
Page last updated April 21, 2000
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1