TO CONCEIVE THE INCONCEIVABLE

 

February 25, 1977

 

     Today, I began reading the Tao Teh Ching, by Lao Tzu.  This being the founding canon of Taoism, Raminothna paid special attention.

     The opening line reads, “The Tao that can be spoken is not the true and eternal Tao.”

     “Hmm,” said Raminothna.

     On Page 2, there is a passage that says, “In the Cosmos, the Way of Man accords to the Way of the Earth, which accords to the Way of the Sky, which accords to the Way of the Cosmos – the Tao – and the Tao simply is, according to its own Nature.”

     “This is memorable, Raminothna, don’t you think?” 

     “Yes and no,” Raminothna said.

     “What is yes?”

     “The second quote.”

     “And the no is the first quote?  Why?”

     “First, tell me what the second quote means to you.”

     “It means two things to me.  One, that Man should accord his way to that of the Earth.  Currently, we are working mostly against it.  Two, that if we know what the Tao itself is, we will know what the optimal Way of Man is.  It seems to me that this Tao is the very medicine needed to heal our ailing Earth with.”

     “It is also the way to win in Cosmic Chess.”

     “Oh, yeah.  Cosmic Chess.”

     “Now then, tell me what you think now of the first quote.”

     “Yes, I see what you mean.  It does put a stop to number two, doesn’t it?  In fact, I’ve heard a Taoistic master say that ‘If one asks about the nature of the Tao and another answers, neither know it.’”

     “And so, they maintained twenty-six centuries of silence, as if they knew it?”

     “That’s a cutting way of putting it, Raminothna.”

     “I grant respect only when due.  I do grant them, however, that they discovered the existence of the Tao, which most other cultures did not even seem to have done.”

     “So, you don’t agree with their assessment, that ‘The Tao that can be spoken is not the true and eternal Tao?’”

     “It’s the most self-defeating statement I’ve ever heard.”

     “But is it true?”

     “That’s for you to find out.”

     “What do you mean?”

     “Your greater miracle, remember?”

     “What do you mean?”

     “To do the undoable, remember?”

     “Wait-wait-wait.  Hold it right there.  You’re not saying that what you have in mind all along is for me to ‘speak the “Unspeakable”, are you?”

     “Very perceptive of you, Anthony.”

     “You want me to speak the true and eternal Tao to my species, so that the Way of Man will accord directly to the Way of the Cosmos – is that it?” 

     “Of course you’ll have to conceive the ‘Inconceivable’ and know the ‘Unknowable’ first, before you can speak the ‘Unspeakable’.”

     “And of course you exactly what this Tao is.”

     “Of course.”

     “Well, isn’t that nice?  I’ll just put a pen in my right hand and let you use it to write your book with, while I read it as you write.”

     “Not quite.”

     “Why not?”

     “Earth must heal herself.”

     “So, what are you doing here?”

     “Would you rather have me not be here?”

     “No, no, I didn’t mean that.  Don’t take offense.”

     “I’m not offended, but you do have to do the work.”

     “Sure.  Philosophers have tried it for more than two millennia and failed, and you want me to do it in two decades?”

     “Well, it may take you a decade or two to speak the ‘Unspeakable’, but to conceive the ‘Inconceivable’, two months should suffice.”

     “Starting from scratch, since I haven’t got the foggiest idea where to even begin.  Why don’t you give me a clue?”

     “The clue is in the saying.”

     “Which saying?”

     “One of the two.”

     “The one ending with the word ‘nature’?”

     “The key word ‘nature’.”

     “What did you say?”

     “I said, the key word ‘nature’.” 

     “That’s what I thought I heard.  Nature.  Yes, nature, that to which the Tao itself accords.”

     “And the way to understand nature?”

     “Yes!  Science!  So then, the key to unlock the ‘Unlockable’ is science?  But if so, why haven’t the scientists unlocked it yet?”

     “What scientists?”

     “You know – science - scientists.”

     “What field?”

     “Oh, ah, well, I don’t know.  If I say Physicist, a pure physicist can talk about space-time, electricity, mechanics, but they can’t talk about life and society and consciousness, which are integral parts of human nature.  Conversely, a pure biologist can’t talk about quarks, galaxies nor relativity.  So, I guess it would have to be scientists of all the major sciences.”

     “How many?”

     “Well, I guess it should be at least one from each field of physics, chemistry, biology, sociology, ecology, geology and astronomy.  And I guess philosophy too, since Taoism began as a philosophy.  So, I would say at least eight.”

     “Or one.  One who has mastered the basics of all eight fields.”

     “And that’s me?”

     “I don’t see anyone else here.”

     “Okay, I’ve taken university level courses in physics, chemistry, biology, ecology, geology and astronomy, but I didn’t ace all that many courses.  And I can’t say I know much about sociology, nor philosophy.

     “How long have you lived in a human society?”

     “Since I was born.”

     “And how many philosophical systems, and religious systems for that matter, have found the Tao?”

     “None, that I know of.”

     “Then I guess you’ll do.”

     “So now what?”

     “What has never been done for the sciences so far?  Hint – the clue is in the question.”

     “Sciences – plural?  I think what you’re driving at is the integration of the sciences such that they collectively transcend into a single, all-embracing scientific body, All-The-Sciences-In-One.  The sciences are currently like a pile of unassembled jigsaw-puzzle pieces, which in fact has been begging for just such a transcendental integration in the back of my mind for quite some time.”

     “What should such a body of knowledge be called?”

     “The word for all-in-one is ‘omni’, so I guess we can call it OMNI-SCIENCE.  Wow, without the hyphen and it will spell OMNISCIENCE.  How appropriate.”

     “And what would you call one who studies and practices OMNI-SCIENCE?”

     “Science – scientist.  So, OMNISCIENCE - OMNISCIENTIST.”

     “And the person who first transcendentally integrates all the sciences into one?”

     “The first Omniscientist.  Ah.  Now I see what you were saying about the First Omniscientist being the greatest disillusionist.”

     “So, what do you think you will see on the assembled puzzle as a whole?”

     “I would expect some kind of big picture not seen before, a kind of universal pattern that permeates all fields.  Some new model of the Universe.  Some new Omniscientific Cosmology that embraces not just the physical sciences but the biological and social sciences as well.  And obviously, according to you, the Tao Itself.”

     “Good arrival.  Congratulations!”

     “Still, how?”

     “Somehow.  Anyhow, if you succeed, you may rightly be known as the Original Omniscientist, or the First Omniscientific Cosmologist, and be the greatest disillusionist in the world,” said Raminothna.

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1