Claus Oldenburg is shit
Fragments of a Critique of Environmental Art
The intention of these pieces is to explore the way in which art and the artist can act as a form of mediation between humans and the rest of nature. Wild nature becomes an object for passive consumption. It becomes a commodity.
These works also explore our tendency to attempt to domesticate wild nature; to capture it and treat it as a resource or product.
We no longer engage in dialogue with nature, but impose our will and tame it.
Environmental/Earth/Landscape art too often attempts to ?transform? nature into ?art?. To permanently stamp our signature and authorship upon it.
Obvious examples are the works of Claus Oldenburg which are typify the arrogant disregard for nature of both society and its artists who work within it.
Other artists such as Andy Goldsworthy cheerfully reproduce the logic of the opencast quarry as they stripmine the environment for coffee table photography and banal ornamentation.
There is always a political dimension to this. Not just on the part of the artist, but in the pathology of civilisation that turns living nature into dead economic figures.
?The land is everything. It is the source of our existence. It?s where the spirits live. It is not a commodity that can be bought or sold.? Joe Sanchez
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1