| Cold
Fusion and Biological Transmutations
Cold Fusion and other Paradigm Shifts Home Page, email Osmo Joronen |
|
| You
will soon be hearing much more news about Cold Fusion in the media, a topic
you thought had been successfully killed and buried. What does Cold Fusion
really mean to the average person? It means a totally new world; I mean
completely new. Instead of building dams, crews will be dismantling old
ones, restoring habitats, reclaiming lands, building on them; dismantling
power lines, redesigning automobiles, and every other means of transportation;
personal power supplies to run your home for a fraction of your current
power costs; blackouts will be a thing of the past; global warming stops
completely, and the ozone hole stops growing, so humanity may be saved;
greed for oil and gas will be gone; space travel will become a reality
etc.
Well, a lot of scientists and even a president and vice-president thought they would never hear of it again. Who can dismiss the paradigm shift that I am about to reveal to you a priori? If I were a bit skeptical about Cold Fusion, I would probably ask this question: "If Cold Fusion is a fact, we would see some evidence of it in nature." A valid statement. Why not cast aside for a moment all rigid thought and allow for new ideas and see how good it feels. So what is the evidence for Cold Fusion in nature? Well, what we must prove is this: basic elements of the periodic table are not fixed, but change within living organisms as required. If we can prove that, Cold Fusion (low temperature nuclear reactions) exists. What is the evidence for such phenomenon? I ask you to consider the experiments of Louis C. Kervran, member of the New York Academy of Science. Biological Transmutations Louis Kervran proved beyond reasonable doubt that elements change readily from one to another in living organisms. This may shock you who have, like myself, been indoctrinated with the old paradigm that says nothing changes under ordinary chemical means. They mean that it must be some kind of nuclear reaction then, high radiation, heat, and radioactive waste. Otherwise the elements we have today are essentially what was here many millions of years ago. Goethe said: "One preceives the fundamental essence of life in the living, not the inanimate, in that which is changing, not what is finished." Lavoisier was a great scholar of the 18th Century. He is the father of modern chemistry. He considered the atom to be the smallest particle of matter and constant in nature, and it was assumed that no element could be created. The atom could not disappear. If it should separate from a molecule of two or more atoms, it could be found unchanged in another molecule. This paradigm allowed science to develop chemistry to the level it exists today. But are we stuck at this level or are there other newer paradigms? According to the new science of Biological Transmutations, and Cold Fusion, the answer is "yes."
In the 20th Century we saw the first contradiction: radioactive radium was finally transformed into lead. But it was thought that non-radioactive elements could not be transformed unless it is by some high heat nuclear reaction. What is a Biological Transmutation? How is it connected with Cold Fusion? The Limits of Chemistry The serious error of scientists consists in their saying that reactions occuring in living matter are solely chemical reactions, that chemistry can and must explain life. Life has a property not previously considered - which is neither chemistry nor nuclear physics. Chemists and biochemists want to apply their laws at all costs, even if they are not applicable always. (This applies to nuclear physics too, who want to use their model to explain changes in atoms, in Cold Fusion). This error translates into the scientific belief that what goes into an organism is exactly what comes out - a null balance sheet is expected using chemistry theory. But the balance sheet is never null. Today's scientists explain this away by saying something escaped them during the experiment - a confession of incompetance. Living Organisms can do What Scientists Can't What processes occur in living organisms that most scientists don't know about? Well, let's begin with chemical reactios such combining Nitrogen and Oxygen to demonstrate. Scientists can combine them, but they must have very high temperatures and pressure in vitro . Proteins are hydrolyzed in the stomach at 37 deg. C in a slightly acid medium, but this same reaction requires a 120 deg. C temperature and a highly concentrated acid medium to be realized in vitro. This does not represent a rejection of Lavoisier's Law, just the attitude that too many chemists have ie. the application of chemistry in every domain. Cold Fusion nuclear reactions at low temperatures take place in living organisms also. Get rid of your useless rigid pattern of thought and open up to endless possiblities. Don't be like the infamous person in the late 1800's who stated that the U.S. patent office should be closed down because everything had already been invented; or the early IBM statement that the world market for computers was 5. Be a possibility thinker, which is what made America great! "The essential is to get rid of deeply rooted prejudices which we often repeat without examining them." Einstein |
The
prejudices we are talking about here are those that all scientists learn
to take as gospel. We carry out experiments to confirm that these laws
always work, at least in our little test tubes. Biology is outside the
realm of standard chemistry as was previously proven by the example. Although
the example was just a chemical reaction, we can take this one step further
to the atomic level. There too, reactions occur at much lower temperatures
than would be expected in current physics and for similar reasons. Herein
lies the challenge for Cold Fusion: to create low temperature transformations
"in vitro.
If we can learn to control the reactions as organisms do, (perhaps there is a clue here) we will have infinite energy. Basically Cold Fusion focuses on just one reaction: fusing two heavy hydrogen atoms to form helium. Hundreds of tests have proven that the reactions do occur, and excess energy has been obtained, but nobody has been able to put one in Wal Mart yet. When compared to Hot Fusion, which has taken billions of American dollars, and given back nothing, Cold Fusion really looks promising. Aberrant Observations in Biological Transmutations Have you ever wondered where chickens got all that calcium for their eggs? When the writer read Kervran's experiments, it was immediately clear that this man had a point. There was no way that chickens could get calcium out of their bones or food to supply the quantity required. He observed that chickens ate silica-rich mica on the ground. Sand went in too, but when the gizzard is opened, only sand is found. Where did the mica go? Into the stomach? Why was this mineral swallowed by the chicken? This is the point where Louis Kervran's theory really began, as a boy on the farm. Later, as a scientist, when he analyzed the calcium intake by the chicken against what was excreted, he realized that much more came out than went in. Read the book, which contains his scientific experiments that you can replicate. In Cold Fusion we are talking about the transmutation of two hydrogen atoms to form helium. In Biological Transmutations we are talking about the transmutation of more lighter elements by the addition and subtraction of hydrogen and oxygen. We may be able to learn from biology what we need to perfect Cold Fusion. Physics All laws of classical physics have been deduced from experiments made on dead matter. Physicists were among the first to recognize biological transmutations as if that was the natural direction their field should go next. Gyorgyi, the Nobel Prize winner stated that molecular biochemistry is not enough to understand living matter, we must go to the subatomic level which produces the unknown. Otherwise physics becomes a "science of probabilities, and biology the science of the improbable." Reduction/Oxydation Biotransmutation
Equations:
1) It appears that organic
chemistry is only the final stage of molecular rearrangement.
Potassium: the biological
regulator. Potassium (K) can be produces endogenously from sodium (Na)
and requires one-millionth of the energy of a reaction of nuclear physics
in
vitro. (in glass)
K and Ca are found in the same proportion in sea water. I will jump ahead a little
just to show you the results of Kervran's experiment on germinating lentils.
The experiments were conducted in triple distilled water. Phosphorus (P)
Total (mg):
There was a 6.25% decrease in phosphorus (in light). The conclusion is that beyond any dispute, there is a certain disappearance of phosphorus, varying with the species of seed. So, what the nuclear scientists are saying about cold fusion, namely that you can't have these kinds of reactions without the attendant high radiation and temperature, is totally wrong. And since it is, there is no reason why scientists cannot find the methods of running these reactions for the benefit of mankind - to produce cheap, clean electricity. An article published by Reader's Digest (June, 2001) states that Arthur C. Clarke predicted that the first commercial devices for producing clean, safe power by low-temperature nuclear reactions will go on the market early in the new millennium, heralding end of the fossil fuel age. The following year the motor industry will replace all fuel-burning engines with this new energy device. A bit optimistic? Perhaps. But that is what drives invention, not pessimism. For updates go to Cold Fusion - may be down at times
|
| Search:Books | Enter keywords...
|
|
© 2006 Osmo Joronen