| Search: | Enter keywords... |
|
| Cold
Fusion and Biological Transmutations
Cold Fusion and other Paradigm Shifts Osmo Joronen, email Osmo Joronen |
|
| You
will soon be hearing much more news about Cold Fusion in the media, a topic
you thought had been successfully killed and buried. Those scientists who are afraid of this topic, because it got some "bad press" don't want any of the dirt to rub off on themselves, and avoid it like the plague. All they care about is their big fat cheques. They call everyone associated with Cold Fusion and Biological Transmutations that we will discuss "dangerous crackpots." What does Cold Fusion really mean to the average person? It means a totally new world; I mean completely new. Instead of building dams, crews will be dismantling old ones, restoring habitats, reclaiming lands, building on them; dismantling power lines, redesigning automobiles, and every other means of transportation; personal power supplies to run your home for a fraction of your current power costs; blackouts will be a thing of the past; global warming stops completely, and the ozone hole stops growing, so humanity may be saved; greed for oil and gas will be gone; space travel will become a reality etc. Well, a lot of scientists and even a president and vice-president thought they would never hear of it again. Who can dismiss the paradigm shift that I am about to reveal to you a priori? If Cold Fusion is a fact, wouldn't we see some evidence of it in nature? A valid question. I will answer that question. Why not cast aside for a moment all rigid thought and allow for new ideas and see how good it feels. So what is the evidence for Cold Fusion in nature? Well, what we must prove is this: basic elements of the periodic table are not fixed, but change within living organisms as required. If we can prove that, Cold Fusion (low temperature nuclear reactions) exists. What is the evidence for such phenomenon? I ask you to consider the experiments of Louis C. Kervran, member of the New York Academy of Science. Biological Transmutations Louis Kervran proved beyond reasonable doubt that elements change readily from one to another in living organisms. This may shock you who have, like myself, been indoctrinated with the old paradigm that says nothing changes under ordinary chemical means. They mean that it must be some kind of nuclear reaction then, high radiation, heat, and radioactive waste. Otherwise the elements we have today are essentially what was here many millions of years ago. Goethe said: "One preceives the fundamental essence of life in the living, not the inanimate, in that which is changing, not what is finished." Lavoisier was a great scholar of the 18th Century. He is the father of modern chemistry. He considered the atom to be the smallest particle of matter and constant in nature, and it was assumed that no element could be created. The atom could not disappear. If it should separate from a molecule of two or more atoms, it could be found unchanged in another molecule. This paradigm allowed science to develop chemistry to the level it exists today. But are we stuck at this level or are there other newer paradigms? In the 20th Century we
saw the first contradiction: radioactive radium was finally transformed
into lead. But it was thought that non-radioactive elements could not be
transformed unless it is by some high heat nuclear reaction. "The essential is
to get rid of deeply rooted prejudices which we often repeat without examining
them." Einstein Next Column |
The
prejudices we are talking about here are those that all scientists learn
to take as gospel. We carry out experiments to confirm that these laws
always work, at least in our little test tubes. Biology is outside the
realm of standard chemistry as was previously proven by the example. Although
the example was just a chemical reaction, we can take this one step further
to the atomic level. There too, reactions occur at much lower temperatures
than would be expected in current physics and for similar reasons. Herein
lies the challenge for Cold Fusion: to create low temperature transformations
in vitro. If we can learn to control the reactions as organisms do, (ie. perhaps there is a clue here) we could have infinite energy. Basically Cold Fusion focuses on just one reaction: fusing two heavy hydrogen atoms to form helium. Hundreds of tests have proven that the reactions do occur, and excess energy has been obtained, but nobody has been able to put one in Wal Mart yet. This has been taken as "proof" that cold fusion is hog-wash. People jump to negative conclusions from the silliest evidence when they really don't want to believe something. When compared to Hot Fusion, which has taken billions of American dollars, and given back nothing, Cold Fusion really looks promising. Aberrant Observations in Biological Transmutations Have you ever wondered where chickens got all that calcium for their eggs? When the writer read Kervran's experiments, it was immediately clear that this man had a point. There was no way that chickens could get calcium out of their bones or food to supply the quantity required. He observed that chickens ate silica-rich mica on the ground. Sand went in too, but when the gizzard is opened, only sand is found. Where did the mica go? Into the stomach? Why was this mineral swallowed by the chicken? This is the point where Louis Kervran's theory really began, as a boy on the farm. Later, as a scientist, when he analyzed the calcium intake by the chicken against what was excreted, he realized that much more came out than went in. Read the book, which contains his scientific experiments that you can replicate. In Cold Fusion we are talking about the transmutation of two heavy hydrogen atoms that occur naturally to form helium. In Biological Transmutations we are talking about the transmutation of more lighter elements by the addition and subtraction of hydrogen and oxygen. We may indeed be able to learn from biology what we need to perfect Cold Fusion. Physics All laws of classical physics have been deduced from experiments made on dead matter. Physicists were among the first to recognize biological transmutations as if that was the natural direction their field should go next. Gyorgyi, the Nobel Prize winner stated that molecular biochemistry is not enough to understand living matter, we must go to the subatomic level which produces the unknown. Otherwise physics becomes a "science of probabilities, and biology the science of the improbable." Reduction/Oxydation Biotransmutation Equations: Ca - H = K Na + O = K Ca atomic number = 40 H atomic number = 1 K atomic number = 39 This is one small example of a process that is going on in living organisms constantly. From our knowledge of biological transmutations we can state the following: 1) It appears that organic chemistry is only the final stage of molecular rearrangement. 2) The nucleus of the atom in light elements is quite different from what nuclear physics regards as the average type, the latter having value only for the heavy elements. 3) Nature moves particles from one nucleus to another - particles such as hydrogen and oxygen nuclei being added or subtracted and, in some cases, the nuclei of carbon and lithium. This is how transmutations occur. 4) Biological transmutation is a phenomenon completely different from the atomic fissions or fusions of physics, it reveals a property of matter not yet seen prior to this work by Louis Kervran. Potassium: the biological regulator. Potassium (K) can be produces endogenously from sodium (Na) and requires one-millionth of the energy of a reaction of nuclear physics in vitro. K + H = Ca If there is too much K in the presence of H it will give calcium (Ca). The presence of H (hydrogen) is linked to acidity (low pH). An excess of H ions signifies an acidity that might become dangerous for the cell. However in that case K can join an H nucleus to produce Ca thereby establishing alkalinity and an optimum Ca/K ratio. The agent of equilibrium is thus K. K and Ca are found in the same proportion in sea water. I will jump ahead a little just to show you the results of Kervran's experiment on germinating lentils. The experiments were conducted in triple distilled water. Phosphorus (P) Total (mg): June 23.....112 June 27.....111 June 30.....110 July 4 .......105 There was a 6.25% decrease in phosphorus (in light). The conclusion is that beyond any dispute, there is a certain disappearance of phosphorus, varying with the species of seed. So, what the nuclear scientists are saying about cold fusion, namely that you can't have these kinds of reactions without the attendant high radiation and temperature, is totally wrong. And since it is, there is no reason why scientists cannot find the methods of running these reactions for the benefit of mankind - to produce cheap, clean electricity. An article published by
Reader's Digest (June, 2001) states that Arthur C. Clarke predicted that
the first commercial devices for producing clean, safe power by low-temperature
nuclear reactions will go on the market early in the new millennium, heralding
end of the fossil fuel age. The following
year the motor industry will replace all fuel-burning engines with this
new energy device. A bit optimistic? Perhaps. But that is what drives invention,
not pessimism. |
| Search: | Enter keywords... |
|
|
