WHY MUSIC 2?
THE HISTORY AND FUTURE OF ARTS EDUCATION POLICY
The following article is based on a speech by Bill Ivey, Chairman,
National Endowment for the Arts.
The arts are central to how we see ourselves, what we believe about
ourselves, and how we present ourselves to each other. The arts are
especially important in a complex democracy like ours. Democracy
offers the promise of equal participation to hundreds of cultural
traditions that shape our landscape - Native American, Asian,
European, Black, and Hispanic - and this promise translates into an
endless process of negotiation and accommodation. Art represents a
place in which borrowing, blending, and sharing can really work.
It's time we realized just how much our future depends on how well we
integrate the magic and creativity of the arts into the lives of
future generations, and that process must begin by ensuring that the
arts are essential learning for all children. But to know how far we
have to go, we have to understand how far we've come. Let's take a
brief look at some milestones in education over the last four decades.
In the 1950s, faced with Sputnik and our competition with the Russian
space program, Americans recognized the importance of science and math
and took decisive steps to improve standards in our schools. In the
1960s, our nation placed special emphasis on health through exercise
and took steps to raise the level of physical fitness among our
school-age children. By the late 1970s, we began to realize that
along with scientific knowledge and physical fitness, we needed to
feed the imaginations of students with the arts. Reports and studies
called for Americans to "come to our senses" and include the arts as
part of basic education. But in the early 1980s, we were still
grappling with the problem. An education report declared that the
United States was "a nation at risk" and that there was a "rising tide
of mediocrity" in our schools.
By the late 1980s, Congress mandated that the National Endowment for
the Arts report on the status of arts education. Then, in its 1988
report "Toward Civilization," the Endowment stated that arts education
in our schools was in triple jeopardy: (1) the arts were not taken
seriously as important subject matter; (2) arts education programs
were focused almost exclusively on production and performance and
rarely included history, critical judgement, or aesthetics; and (3)
there was no common agreement as to what all students should know and
be able to do in the arts.
Where are we now? Actually we've made enormous strides. In 1992, the
Endowment joined forces with the Department of Education and our
sister agency, the National Endowment for the Humanities, to fund a
two-year project for defining what all students - from Kindergarten
through twelfth grade - should know and be able to do in the arts.
The project, of course, resulted in the development of our national
voluntary standards in the arts.
MENC managed the standards development process for the Consortium of
National Arts Education Associations. Following the 1994 signing into
law of the Goals 2000: Educate America Act, the first federal
legislation to declare the arts a "core" subject, the consortium was
the first group to present its voluntary national standards to the
secretary of education.
An assessment framework for the arts was completed in 1994, and an
arts assessment of America's eighth graders was completed in 1997 and
reported in November 1998 in the Nation's Report Card on the Arts -
the first such report in nearly 20 years. MENC has been an important
partner in this effort.
We're experiencing an abundance of policy development in favor of arts
education. To these accomplishments, we can add more and more
research that supports what those of us in the arts have known for
years: education in the arts improves the intellectual, emotional, and
social development of our children.
Today, if we are going to move the arts agenda forward, we must work
together - policymakers at the state and local levels, business and
private communities, parents and private citizens, and cultural arts
institutions and artists. And, most certainly, we must have the
commitment and full participation of our schools - the arts
specialists, as well as classroom teachers, principals, and
administrative leaders.
All these sectors must work together to put arts into the basic
curriculum, not just in magnet schools or in high schools as
electives, but as a comprehensive, sequential curriculum taught by
qualified teachers, beginning with preschool instruction and
continuing with required courses for high school graduation - and
beyond.
We all know that standards and partnerships alone don't guarantee that
all students will have high-quality arts education programs in their
schools. We must all be advocates for the arts. Each of us must make
sure that boards of education provide the necessary time,
instructional resources, and appropriate, qualified teachers.
As we take stock of our accomplishments of the past, we must make sure
that we are preparing our children for the challenges of the future.
We must also make sure that we have nurtured the creativity of our
children, because it's our creativity that has made this nation the
strongest economic, military, and technological power on earth. The
arts are central to maintaining our national strength. They are
central to democracy because they embody America's living cultural
heritage.
Source: "The Arts Are Basic" by Bill Ivey, published in Teaching
Music, vol. 6 no. 6, June 1999.