| The following rows were suggested to me by the humankind and His knowledge: Reading the Help of the Attrasoft Predictor for Windows 95 version 2.4, I saw there: "If you want to predict"... (something - my note) "for the next week, you must first be able to predict"... (the value - my note) "for this week, using all (my underline) the data available before (my underline) this week" For a prediction to be made: "You must formulate your problem in such a way that you have enough data to support your prediction". Therefore, a good prediction can be made only by those who have ALL data to predict. Thus a "Predictor" denises itself (himself). How can you have all data before now available? Because all is such an abstract concept. Also in the abovementioned Help you may read: "Usually, the amount of data available to you is not infinite, therefore, no matter how much information you have, there will always be a breaking point at which your data will not support your prediction. If you formulate your problem in such a way that you go beyond this point, the prediction will not work. You can always start with a simple problem, gradually increase the complexity of your prediction by adjusting the three parameters: * The variable in your data set; * Quantization, i.e., the number of neurons allocated to a variable, and * N-day trend. Even if you have enough data, do not pass the limit of neural network." I'm saying: Yet, you may make any prediction you want. The humankind will think and find solutions for such prediction. See Jules Verne, the great author of anticipation books. Suggest such prediction subliminally and the brain will find solutions. And how may you suggest subliminally a problem in order the brain to find a solution? Say it "Prediction", or "Polls". Give brain no chance to consciously analyze it. Then, you would have passed such problem to a brain, to be analyzed and a solution to be found. And how may you suggest a problem to a brain to be unconsciously analyzed? By subliminal messages, by hypnosis and by other means: economic and financial coercion or physical coercion. While the later ones may, or not, be avoided, especially the first one may and can not be avoided. That's because the process of learning works exactly as a subliminal message (see Charley Reese) . It is accepted uncounsciously by the brain who lacks enough data to judge it, and because it (the brain) is openned to such message. If you find a way to defeat (protect) the brain against subliminal messages, means either that you gave the brain all data and means in order to consciously analyze a subliminal message, or you made such brain not only to learn nothing furthermore but to be blocked to any inputs of data. And how long no brain or neural network could have all data, Then: All brains are openned to subliminal messages. They can be manipulated by subliminal messages. And that's how our humankind works and evoluates on the way of progress! In the name of evolution, some may do anything they want! Yet, in the name of humankind survival, are they any who are doing something? Do they conflict those two concepts, evolution and survival of humankind? Think about the nuclear bomb and not only! |