Spirituality: Notes towards the new research theme of the Dutch Flemish Association for Intercultural Philosophy (for the meeting of the NVVIF Research Group on 17.9.99) Henk Oosterling |
During the June
1999 meeting of the Research Group I proposed seconded by
with Wim van Binsbergen and Jan Hoogland -- to develop the
structure of research program concerning as I prefer to qualify
it Spirituality. In the back of my mind there a practical reason
was more or less decisive: in 2001 Rotterdam will be European
Cultural Capital and one of the research program will be A
Spiritual Map of the area. Although or rather: because -
the presuppositions appear to be rather conventional added
to the Dutch fragmented religious map a bit of Winti, of African
religious variations an of course the Islam our research
into this field could add apart from a substantial
philosophical dimension a more up to date spiritual
dimension: the apparent need for spirituality within a
materialistic consumert society. So the more conventional and
institutional question of religion can be informed by a
intercultural perspective. However, non by embracing New Age
spirituality but by introducing a cosmopolitic/al or
dimension in which more than a
harmonious sensus communis a more conflict, tension or to use a
Lyotardian term: differend oriented spirituality is explored.
To start the
preliminary discussions on this topis Wim asked me to kick
off. For a symposium to be held in november of this year I
am working on a paper that is not ready by now. But the
perspective is given in a few article and parts of books I
published recently:
· Een wereld van Verschil. Over zingeving en (spi)ritualiteit in postmoderrne tijden in: Scherven brengen geluk. Identiteit en geloven in een wereld van verschillen. André Lascaris, Leo Oosterveen, Ad Willems (red.), DSTS, Nijmegen/Zoetermeer 1996, pp. 13-32.
· Levenskunst. (Spi)ritualiteit van het nihilisme in: Kunst na de dood van God. Jan Hoet (red.), Gooi en Sticht, Baarn 1997, pp. 32-54.
· Aporie als existentiële ervaring: (spi) ritualiteit in: Door schijn bewogen. Naar een hyperkritiek van de xenofobe rede. Henk Oosterling, Kok Agora, Kampen 1996, pp. 626-631.
(The
articles are added to the e-mail, the Hoet text is lost, but I
included the lecture on which it is based)
Of course Wim
asked me to write an article as a kick off in English
but I not only have to restrict myself and even prefer to
give some indications for a kick off in order to give members of
the research group the possibility to indicate their personal
expertise and preferences.
-
defining the object: are we opting for a religious
experience that difffers from or lacks the traditional,
conventional meaning? In how is spirituality related to this
experience?
-
In what sense is this experience interculturally interesting or
inter-ested? Can it be related to a sensus communis? And if so
how can it be connected to our last project on sensus communis?
-
Is their a connetion between spirituality and rituality as I
suggest in the neologism: (spi)rituality? To be more precise: is
the practice of a spatio-temporal collective structure of
behavior constitutive for a spiritual experience or is there a
personal experience still available in our consumer
society that nevertheless is not part of the useful circulation
of goods, services and experiences?
-
How does antropology fit in to this project?
Perhaps this
and the articles, but alas in Dutch suffices for
the moment.
Henk Oosterling