Home

Views and Opinions

 

Afghanistan: The immoral Alliance
- Dr Jassim Taqui

The United States is facing a dilemma in its war against terrorism. Washington feels compelled to avoid massive deployment of forces in Afghanistan to avoid casualties that might agitate the American public opinion. Instead, the American decision makers are cooperating with the Northern Alliance as a fait accompli.

Washington's decision to renew friendships with the Northern Alliance for its war against al-Qa'ida and the Taliban is creating a paradox for both George W Bush and Tony Blair. On the one hand, the Americans and the British have waged a war against terrorism. On the other, they are cooperating with the Northern Alliance(NA), which is described as a "confederacy of warlords, patriots, rapists and torturers," by the very Western media. Here is the irony and the controversy. Here is the paradox. The NA is essentially the same people who ravaged Afghanistan in the 1990s after the Soviet-backed regime collapsed, paving the way for the seizure of the capital by the Taliban in 1996. That the arrival of the Taliban was widely welcomed by the people of Afghanistan as a relief from the depredations imposed by the Northern Alliance-or Mujahideen, as they were then known- provides some indication of the modus operandi of the West's new friends.

The citizens of Kabul, especially women, have good reason to regard the prospect of their return with horror. Switch to 1989. In Afghanistan the anti-Soviet Mujahideen fighters are on the verge of driving the Red Army from their country. The strategy of the CIA to recruit, arm and finance the most cruel and fanatical Afghani warriors they could find was paying dividends. Cheered on by the Mujahideen's supporters in the West, Afghanistan's "freedom fighters" began to visit Western capitals to shore up their support.

A favourite and the largest recipient of US aid-was Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, leader of Hizb-i-Islami, who was described as a "nut, an extremist and a very violent man". Hekmatyar gained notoriety in the '70s for throwing acid on the faces of Afghan women who refused to wear the veil and later as one of the region's leading narco-traffickers. He is allegedly a close friend of Osama bin Laden. The former American President Ronald Reagan lobbied for Hekmatyar and wanted the Western nations to receive him and extend full support to him. But, later it were the Americans who dumped Hekmatyar due to a new discovery about his involvement in criminal activities and due to a record of atrocities and drug running. And when Hekmatyar fell from the grace, one discovered all of a
sudden his atrocities. The Western media which shielded him started to unveil his crimes against his own people as well as the people of Pakistan. For, he played a major role in smuggling drugs to Pakistan to sustain his war machine and the civil war in Afghanistan. Today, there are 4.5 million drug addicts in Pakistan, mainly due to the drug traffickers like Hekmatyar and his ilk. Only a month after liberating Kabul from the Soviet-backed regime in April 1992, Hekmatyar turned on his fellow Mujahideen because he felt they were not offering him enough power in the new government. For the next two years Hekmatyar's forces shelled the capital with their US supplied weaponry, killing more than 25,000 civilians and wounding 100,000 others, while more than half of the population fled the city in misery and desperation. The city's water and electricity supplies were cut off by Hekmatyar, who took the lead in bombing and terrorising civilians. More than 70 per cent of Kabul was reduced to rubbles in a conflict between warlords.

Amid these bloody conflicts the Taliban, emerged in 1995 and soon drove the splintered Mujahideen into exile in Iran and into a small slither of territory in northern Afghanistan, where they have remained until now. Today, Hekmatyar remains in exile in Iran, worried that he is being frozen out of efforts to establish a post-Taliban political order in Afghanistan. As a consequence, he has declared war on just about everyone-the US, the Northern Alliance, former president Burhanuddin Rabbani, and the Taliban-which suggests he is as unstable as he is ungrateful. But one should not be surprised if the US, Russia and Iran agree to bring him back into play in a "loose federation", which should also include some Taliban elements. Here, there are many questions, which remain
unanswered: How can these immoral personalities, warlords and the bunch of criminals dictate their terms on the Afghan people? For how long the United Nations would permit big powers to impose their form of government on the people of Afghanistan? What are the guarantees that these warlords would not repeat their past history?

How can these warlords and smugglers put an end to terrorism and drug smuggling? Why does the democratic West stop believing in holding a free , fair and impartial elections in Afghanistan under the UN supervision?

Comment Dr Jassim Taqui, Pakistan Observer, Fri Nov 16 '01

 
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1