ODDS & SODS

As the title suggests, here you can find albums by artists we don't know too much about. As our musical horizons grow, some artists may be upgraded to own pages.


REVIEWS

- Johann Sebastian Bach: TOCCATA Dm and FUGUE

- Bachman Turner Overdrive: NOT FRAGILE

- Mike Batt: TAROT SUITE

- Bee Gees and other artists: SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER

- The Go Go's : VH1 Behind The Music

- Bon Jovi: CRUSH

- The Clash: THE CLASH

- Eminem (believe it or not!): THE MARSHALL MATHERS LP

- Brian Eno: ANOTHER GREEN WORLD

- Fripp/Eno: EVENING STAR

- Daniel Fjall : HONEST BUT MODEST

- Jefferson Airplane: VOLUNTEERS

- John Lennon: IMAGINE

- Linkin Park: HYBRID THEORY

- Nirvana: NEVERMIND

- Pollyanna: HELLO HALO

- Prince: SIGN 'O' THE TIMES

- Sonique: HEAR MY CRY

- Yngwie Malmsteen : FIRE AND ICE


TOCCATA Dm and FUGUE, by Johann Sebastian Bach

Record rating: was it recorded by Bach in the 18th century?
Overall rating: 10*

Written by Richard Vasily

I think Bach is the greatest composer ever. This composition is one of his best, and my favorite. It consists of two parts: TOCCATA and FUGUE. I know some "Classical Greatest Hits" discs contained the first part of this piece only. It's a big mistake to divide this composition. I think that the first part is senseless without the second, although its melody is greater.

TOCCATA Dm/FUGUE begins with a dark but monumental intro developing into an allegro-tempo with constant polyphonic sound (of course, Bach is the greatest master of polyphony!).

The second part is a bit softer and more suitable for violin-playing. The best moments of it are the pre-coda and coda. Particularly the pre-coda, with its pulsing organ-beats and minorizing of the melody.�I'm sure the majority of you knows this great composition.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

NOT FRAGILE released by Bachman Turner Overdrive in 1974
Overall Rating: 8.5*
Best Song: Not Fragile
Worst Song: Free Wheelin'

Indeed!

Written by Joel Larsson

Let's point one thing out before I might offend anyone with my poor knowledge about the band: I don't know anything about them! I know that the band is consisting of C. F. Turner on bass, Randy Bachman on guitars, Blair Thornton on guitars (who replaced Randy B's brother Tim this year) and another Bachman brother, Robbie, on drums. Right, I'm introduced to some name confusion during the 80's, but I won't take that story here. So, the album then, is pretty much some of the most throughoutly consistent arena rock albums ever, along with some ZZ Top stuff. Now and again a good riff is delivered, or some other hook for the listener to enjoy. I can't say I'm a fan of Randy Bachman's singing, it seems quite cold and emotionless, but that might as well be a production thingy. I don't know!

Stylistically, the album varies from the distorted hard rock of the title track, over the pretty "BTO-hitmakers", particularly having the classic rock classic of "You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet" with lots of rythm guitar and some guitar riffs to back up the vocals, the average 70's riff rock, or the blues-rock, ZZ Top-like "Blue Moanin'". I must say that the songs I like most are those representing the first and last of the mentioned genres, maybe because they differ, and I'm one of those who likes differing things. Still, if there's any real problem with the album, it might be that the album is just TOO consistent, though I guess that's not really something to get annoyed about...

The opening track is as well the title track, and it opens with a pretty boomy bass line, soon with a distorded, crunchy guitar added. This might be the only track where Randy B strains, and tries to get some feeling into the songs. It reminds me of some of the earliest Black Sabbath stuff, with that dark atmosphere and the crunch at which the riffs are delivered. And sue me if Ted Nugent didn't listen a lot to thing song before writing the output to "Stranglehold"! Grrreat track!

"Rock Is My Life, And This is My Song" is more of a calm, egocentric rocker. Yeah, you know those in which the singer sings about him playing rock'n'roll, what he uses to do and so. It might be influenced by something else in the first place, but this time around I really think that the song played a big role during the making of some certain Doobie Brothers songs. The verses features vocals accompanied by those "Doobie Bros guitars", some half-acoustic ones, that is, while the choruses features a pretty strong riff. Randy B's vocals sounds WAY too robot-like for the song's best, though, just as well as it isn't really a very good track - just solid."Down On the Highway" is cooler, then, with a good drive, cool vocals, funny hook in the chorus and a good touch of 70's rock'n'roll. I like this one!

"You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet", the classic rock radio classic, has more of those Doobie-Brothers guitars, and strongly reminds me of, uh, if it is "Listen To The Music" or "Long Train Running", can't really remember. There's some riff in the choruses, but the vocals sounds cheesy and I think the song is presented in the wrong way. They should've tried to record it in a more, errm, gentle way, though of course it wouldn't have become the single and radio hit it has.

"Free Wheelin'" is an instrumental, which is made up out of, like, one riff, one scale, and some moments for each of the musicians to solo. Uh, I can't really tackle this."Sledgehammer" features one of the most classic riffs in rock history, apart from "Smoke On The Water". Just listen to it - didn't this riff, or similar ones, show up several times during the later part of the 70's and the cock-rock and hair-metal period during the 80's? Oh well. I don't know if BTO were first, but a good riff it is. Randy sings okay, too.

"Blue Moanin'" is that mentioned blues-rocker which sounds like ZZ Top. And, that's pretty much it. Groovy and funny, and with a CCR-ish chorus, can things go wrong? In "Second Hand" they try to get a pretty heavy sound going, and Randy must have spent several hours trying to get that riff in the chorus as he wanted, but the song doesn't really capture that flow. And by now, I'm getting quite tired of this heavy schtick. Up with something new, now!

"Givin' It All Away" is more a straightforward rocker, opening with some little half-good riff, but then starts sounding more like Ted Nugent later would, with three power chords and some screaming vocals. That's cool! In what I guess is the choruses, some heartless vocals sings some words, accompanied by the drums, but those moments only disturbs. I like that three-chord straightforward rock!

Yeah, right, it is by no means an amazing album in the way that it gives my higher rated albums a match, but it's a helluva solid record!

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

TAROT SUITE in 1979
OVERALL RATING: 10*
BEST SONG: "Lady Of The Dawn", but I change my opinion about this one each time I hear the album...
WORST SONG: Plainsong

An almost perfect synthesis between orchestra and rock, with VERY professional orchestral arrangements, and just as professional rock songs. Can it be much better??

Written by Joel Larsson
Heh, probably not - even if Klaatu's Hope still is a little bit ahead of this one. However, this one has got something that Hope hasn't;�a determined guy who knows exactly what he wants to do, and he does it. The Klaatu album was rather, er, how can I explain it? Well, it has a stronger resonance with me, I guess... BTW, you probably haven't heard any of the albums, so it's useless to compare them, isn't it? It's nevertheless interesting that two of my absolute fav albums�are from the punk era, and that both were developing the symphonic part of rock to perfection, quite against the fashion at the time. Anyways, I like both Tarot Suite and Hope better than Jesus Christ Superstar, did that explain my feelings about these two albums?
This guy Mike Batt, then, became known when he produced The Family's debut. Later he also made the music to an animated children's programme called "The Wombles", but not before 1977 he made his solo debut within Schizophonia. I'll do my best to find it, but Mike Batt albums are dang difficult to get here in Sweden, and this Tarot Suite record is actually a very scratched old LP I've borrowed from my aunt. Anyways, Mike Batt is a singer/songwriter/producer/arranger/keyboardist of dignity, and he even conducts the orchestra by himself. He has lived quite quietly with his family, is born in England but has his biggest public in Germany (just as co-singer Roger Chapman, BTW).
So then, after two years of work, Batt comes up with a huge concept about the Tarot cards, used by fortune tellers to tell the future. He obviously had a lot of contacts around the rock England, because he brought well-known guys like Colin Blunstone, Roger Chapman, Jim Cregan, Rory Gallagher, Chris Spedding,�Tony McPhee and�Mel Collins, not to mention all the other guys, to contribute with various guitar/sax playing and vocals on the album. This gathering of artists, the concept, orchestration and level of ambition immediately makes me associate with Jeff Wayne's The War Of The Worlds, which unfortunately isn't as good, though. One (or 'another', if you want)�thing with this album�is that the rock tunes aren't common rock songs with an orchestration added when it's finished -�these rock tunes are full-fledged classical rockers. S&M, In Concert With The Edmonton Symphony Orchestra, Caravan & the New Symphonia, f**k off.
Well, that was what needed to be said, I think - just lay down, close your eyes and let the music bring you to whichever imaginable�world of yours.
The album of course opens with and "Introduction", a wholly instrumental little overture, well-arranged and not sounding cheesy (which nothing else does, by the way). It has almost everything a rock/symphony overture should have - catchy little oboe/woodwind lines as well as a beautiful string passage, mighty horns, and a rocking part with almighty guitars by Rory Gallagher. The percussion should also be mentioned - a speedy metallic noise in perfect time, which you'll hear best with the treble raised to max. The track also comprises themes from all the other instrumentals, and that's what makes it a full-fledged overture.
"Imbecile" is a rock tune with a steady guitar rythm by Jim Cregan and vocals by Roger Chapman. Chappo, yes... If I'll ever canonize a singer, he has got to be the one. Yeah, Gabriel, and Gillan, and Lennon, but what the, I LOVE Chappo's wheezy, raw vocals! His vocals helps "Imbecile" up to a level it wouldn't have reached with ANY other singer, and together with the booming guitar and very nice orchestration, the song becomes a masterpiece. The guitar solo in the middle isn't bad, either - rather almighty, I say!
"Plainsong" is a rather uninteresting tune with ugly keyboards. What IS interesting, though, is that those keyboards are actually a "multi-vocal effect", which, in this case, is Batt's own voice mixed multiple times on the mixerboard. It doesn't sound too good, though, and there's no strong melody in the song, but luckily, it's very short, and not too disappointing.
"Lady Of The Dawn" features Batt himself on vocals, and he sings very good - did he really need to bring the other two singers onto the album? He could obviously�sing most satisfyingly himself. However, this song is a calm, cute ballad, quite retro - this could have been a 50's song! Anyways, it's totally timeless, and Batt's quite childish vocals reminds me of Dee Long and John Woloschuk in Klaatu. This song is so much cuter and quietly beautiful than anything from Hope (except of the title track), that it's unimaginable - even if Hope certainly wasn't supposed to be calm. However, the song became a lesser hit, and thank God for that - songs like this should sell instead of shitty Aerosmith ballads!
"The Valley Of Swords" is another almighty instrumental, with lots of hooks to discover - sometimes powerful, sometimes harmonic, sometimes rocking - you'll get everything you want here, and even if the track is "only" five minutes long, you have got a ton of small details to hang up on. The track is just almighty, there's no better way to explain it. That Lord Of The Rings and Titanic guy - who is he???
"Losing Your Way In the Rain" is another ballad, now featuring Colin Blunstone on vocals. That guy has a very peculiar voice - quite bright and husky, he�sounds like an alto female singer or something. It took me some time to get into his voice, but nowadays I like him almost as much as Chapman. The song as a whole is calm, with lots of beautiful woodwinds in the background - otherwise, it is a rather "common" pop ballad, only more beautiful and with a better singer than usual.
"Tarota" is a huge showcase for the co-guitars, and so it features solos by all four guitarists I've mentioned, plus B.J. Cole on pedal steel. The guitar solos aren't what makes the song so great, though - it's still Mike Batt's genius as arranger that makes it - almighty horns, beautiful strings... well, I suppose you've heard it all once before... Great song, though - and that B.J. Cole rules on country-guitar!
Then come two other instrumental tracks, of which one is called "The Night Of The Dead", and the other "The Dead Of the Night". They're both quite similar, with different moody yappings and hoo-hootings in the background, plus dang beautiful strings...and it sounds just awesome! If one instrumental song describes a battlefield, this is the one, to heck with all soundtracks available! I think you should hear it by yourself - this is indeed good enough for even the most harsh orchestra to perform! Oh, forgot to mention that the latter part of the track has got some cute little flutes besides the strings.
The song that ends up the album is "Run Like The Wind", a rousing, beautiful, mighty, er, free rock ballad, with a huge orchestration which makes the "free" feel of the song even stronger, and of course it's Roger Chapman who sings... I repeat; can it be much better??? Ooh, how I love this album! It's a true shame that this guy never became as popular as he deserves to be - but, that's the thing with most great bands, isn't it? The rather bad ones takes over the scene, and passes the superior ones to the background and to the harsher public...Anyway, I really recommend anyone to buy this and take some listenings at it - it might take some time to get into if you aren't used with classical the way I am (my mom 'n' dad are both professional musicians, and they bring me top a lot of different performances - on Thursday I'll go to hear a Brahms symphony. Will probably be great).

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER, released by the Bee Gees and other artists in 1977
Overall Rating: 9.5*
Best Song: Night Fever
Worst Song: Calypso Breakdown

The ultimate disco record. Get ready to boogie-woogie!!!

Written by Ratko Hribar

I admit I'm kinda scared to review this one. I mean, this was the alpha and omega of the whole disco movement in the late seventies as it was filled with numerous hits. Further more, in the liner notes is clearly stated that it was sold in over 25 million copies (until 1992, that is, who knows, maybe the correct number is more along the lines of 40 millions nowadays). Anywaaaaay, it's hardly possible to forget all about this nifty soundtrack since I hear "Stayin' Alive" in commercials every day. In fact, some boyband just covered "Night Fever" and it's constantly on television... Eh, I know it was quite unexpected for me to review this one, but damn it! I love to shake my ass along those sleazy disco rhythms and the bizarre falsetto voices of those Gibb brothers (if I'm joking or not, I'll leave it to your own judgment). Actually, this ain't bad at all. Granted, disco music is maybe responsible for today's atrocities like dance, techno & trance and who knows what else, but it was also a step up from the pointless mind-numbing soul or R&B records that ruled the charts. And hey, it was fun too! Come on! Like you would be born if your parents didn't meet in the disco, got drunk and consumed their love in the toilet! Hah! Err... I appear to be losing my point rapidly. Hmm... please don't think that this outing is thoroughly magnificent or whatever, finally, this was a double-recording and you can't pull off such a pretentious package without losing yourself in lots of low grade filler. Anyway, the arrangements can vary from pretty cool to almost unlistenable, and the songwriting from a wisely structured boogie to a simplistic boogie. There are some schlocky ballads thrown in, as well as some dull lengthy plodders with no particular aim. The most important thing about this record is that it shows these Gibb fellows on their creative peak, and there's no way I can deny it. Truthfully, their numbers are the most accomplished and hook-filled of the whole lot, but there are some other gems here and there.

The very first track "Stayin' Alive" places the Bee Gees on the throne of all things disco, and makes them the procreators of the genre, if you wish. Indeed, the melody is irresistible in the true sense of the word, as it grabs you by the throat and drags you to the dance floor. The cool funky rhythm doesn't loose any of its charm through its almost five minutes of duration, and the vocal hooks can't be denied. Oh sure, so it ain't exactly intelligent and it even can be considered to be lame and shallow, but you can't say it's not well-written. Still, the second tune "How Deep Is Your Love" surely can't repeat the excitement of the opener by any means, and not only because it's a ballad. It's a rather lousy ballad, too. But then again, the vocal melody is just as much catchy as it's overly sappy, so it's not likely you'll be able to resist it. Of course, it's intolerable schlock, but it just clobbers you over the head and you can't help but listen to it with amazement. However, sometimes even the sticky vocal melodies can't save a number from becoming a total embarrassment. That is particularly visible on "More Than A Woman", yet another corny disco ballad which just brings out your best vomit. Goddamn! Those vocals are positively sickening when they start humming those bland lyrics! Sandwiched between the two ballads the ultimate disco anthem "Night Fever" is placed, and it scores a massive vocal melody and a gazillion other hooks. I think it's the best song here cause I simply can't bring myself to proclaim "Stayin' Alive" to be the highest point, since it strikes me as somewhat more generic than this one. Obviously, "Night Fever" is better just by a tiny bit, but every bit is important for yours truly. I like it more, so shoot me.

Eh, and we also have Yvonne Elliman's "If I Can't Have You" which is catchy and fun, but nothing particularly memorable, even if I do like her voice. However, what is particularly intriguing is Walter Murphy's steaming instrumental based on Beethoven's Fifth Symphony. It would be a grave mistake to write it off completely since it clearly demonstrates exactly how complex and soulful disco can be. The arrangement is impeccable with all kinds of superb instruments playing that ingenious melody without losing any artistic integrity. Of course, I'm not saying that "A Fifth Of Beethoven" is better than the splendid original, but it is just as good, only in a different way, filled with fun instead of seriousness. It's more like a successful entertaining parody than a fully-accomplished classical composition, which is good in my book. The up-tempo "More Than A Woman" by Tavares hardly possesses more charm than the Bee Gees number as it is a dumb happy ditty with passable chorus lines and gorgeous main melody. Now, David Shire's "Manhattan Skyline" is another one of those numerous, lengthy multi-part instrumentals. It starts quite climatic right away, and calms down to pleasant mid-tempo prowling featuring a neat side-kick melodies backed by tasteful well-organized orchestration. The track is exciting throughout as it shifts from a crescendo-like parts to silent passages, and flows easily. The best thing about it is that it's doesn't get tiresome at all, and it clocks slightly under five minutes time.

The following brontosaurus is a really dull plodder then. Ralph McDonald's "Calypso Breakdown" just jams for solid eight minutes and even though it's a multi-part, too, I'm practically forced to push the skip button. You see, the side melodies are constantly shifting, changing and evolving, but the main disco beat doesn't go anywhere and it really gets mind-numbingly boring. Sure, the composer made those different musical section to be interesting with cool guitar noises (a fine solo is thrown in, too), neat saxes and even a surprisingly distorted bluesy riff which pops out in the song, but the whole thing started to slip from the very beginning and it quickly descends in uniformed generic mud. A pity, perhaps, because it would even be a decent number if McDonald haven't insisted on a such routinesque disco beat. David Shire's "Night On Disco Mountain" (which is based on "Night On Bald Mountain" by Mussorgsky) is also a successful diverse cut, which at least sounds intriguing and not at all pointless or uninspired. Further more, its classic melody proved to be highly suitable for disco experiments and it comes across perfectly effective. Kool & The Gang's "Open Sesame" is a top highlight and the only tune that is just as good as the Gibb-penned material.

"Jive Talkin'" and "You Should Be Dancing" are two more blistering melodic compositions by the Bee Gees, both superbly written and hook-driven. The short but very pleasurable "Boogie Shoes" by K.C. And The Sunshine Band is a top dance track that has hit material written all over it, and the best part of it are those neat sax "riffs". The weaker link appears with yet another relatively short David Shire instrumental called "Salsation". The orchestration is impeccable as always, and the melody is terrific as always, but it seems to wonder aimlessly and it's quite a hard listen overall. The instrumental ditty "K-Jee" by the mystical M.F.S.B. deservedly found its way here since the main melody is solid, but it lacks diversity, or, to be more exact, it doesn't have particularly enjoyable side melodies and the featured sax solo isn't something astonishing. However, the track that succeeds in being the worst and the best in the same time has to be "Disco Inferno" by The Trammps, cause if there ever was a track that begs to be edited, it's this one. Everything is magnificent, from the catchy as hell melody and chorus, to the splendid songwriting, but it's just sooooo overlong. I mostly don't mind repetitive songs, but ten minutes of abusing that brilliant melody is just sickening and it can't help but become utterly dull, which is a shame cause it would be the best song here if the length was cut down considerably (as in five or six minutes).

Perhaps it's a pity that such a noble and creative genre like disco was soon turned to the utter laughing stock, especially after one notices that it actually had a lot of potential, so I beg of you that you don't make a big mistake and trash it right away. Look, it's hardly anyone's coup of tea, but let us not judge the people who actually had enough bravery to drink it.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?


VH1 Behind The Music released by The Go Go's
Overall Rating: 9*
Best Song: Our Lips Are Sealed
Worst Song: None

Written by Neal Grosvenor

I was in a pretty bad mood this weekend and was frantically searching my collection for something to suit my mood...Radiohead? Too whiny....Joy Division? Too suicidal...Napalm Death?...Too loud...after much deliberation, I threw on my copy of the Go-Go's compilation just because I hadn't played it in awhile. You know that feeling that hits you when you hear a truly great collection of songs...this is how I felt as these 80's California girls banged out their songs for me on that rather depressing night. I always knew this was a good collection, but I hadn't had a chance to actually examine it song for song.

They're always referred to as a punk band, but I think that may be stretching things a little. More poppy really...actually great pop in a style that would make Phil Spector proud. What is punk about them is the no-nonsense bare bones production, which I suppose became more lavish as their short career progressed. Most bands were experimenting with keyboards and synths back in the 80s, but this production is more late 70s than anything else. The songs on this collection prove that the Go-Go's were a stellar singles band. One which had more great songs than the hits "Vacation", "Our Lips Are Sealed" and "We Got The Beat", which are what most people remember.

"Skidmarks On My Heart" is memorable, as is "Turn To You", with its great guitar sound in the mix. It's funny because I love all the Motown stuff and girl groups, but never could get nostalgic about it because all of it was released before I was born. When I heard the opening drums and guitars to "Our Lips Are Sealed" though, it's like I was ten years old again. That's not necessarily a bad feeling when you were as depressed as I was. But..ahem..nostalgia or not, this is a really good record and highly recommended for those with a passing interest in the group because it reveals far more than what the hits did. Grab your leg warmers and banana clips girls! Get out those skinny ties guys! Well...ok there's no accounting for taste in clothes but this album is an instant party.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

CRUSH, released by Bon Jovi in 2000
Overall Rating: 5*
Best Song: I Could Make A Living Out Of Lovin' You
Worst Song: She's A Mystery

Mainstream pop-rock, should I say more?

Written by Ratko Hribar

There's one particular reason why I decided to review Bon Jovi today, namely, I really wanted to be mean and bash them senseless, and truthfully, with such laughable material it's rather expected that I'll do just that. Apparently, the band ran out of cash and thought that a fine rocking record would be just what their braindead audience would like. They were right, of course, and much of this hogwash easily topped the singles charts so the album itself was highly successful. However, if you put this abomination in your stereo you'll soon wonder if you've put Bon Jovi's latest album in or something that they've released years earlier. As it is, this is utterly unrecognizable between their previous efforts and done in an overly formulaic way. It's all here and in spades too, uniformly dumb rockers side to side with pointless sleaze-driven ballads, heavily equipped with vintage cheesy lyricism and dull performances from an generic singer.

I've put this sucker in the deck expecting nothing interesting, but then the pedestrian up-tempo opener "It's My Life" suddenly jumped out and gave me some unexpected hope, even though the keyboards are quite obnoxious. But, goddamn! That lame-ass riff is still kinda cool and that noisy but thankfully short guitar solo is also passable. Heck, and the anthemic power-pop chorus is catchy as hell in that fine eighties Bon Jovi mold, so you'll sing it in no time. The second, Def Leppard-ish number "Say It Isn't So" managed to sink my hope-filled battleship somewhat, but that mid-tempo colorful riff ain't bad. It's not flashy or dynamic but it gets the job done, and besides, the number was a big hit with that neat Hollywood-styled video. At last, there's a fine looking mellow ballad on the horizon, and for the most part it works perfectly. Come on, "Thank You For Loving Me" even starts with that mega-cool piano and the silent guitar dribbling which really doesn't sound generic in any way. IN ANY WAY. Yeah right, they even used strings! The whole songs looks like they copied it chord by chord from Aerosmith's power ballad handbook, and it's just as ineffective and radio-friendly. Plus, that unbelievably anthemic climax with the guitar solo and the loud as hell strings (how immensely original!) just explodes in lots of cheesyness. Yuck.

It's only when they try out mainstream blue-collar inspired rock like "Two Story Town" (completed with those annoying backing vocals, no less) that the results are passable and not completely lame. Naturally, the number is mighty light, even lighter than one would expect from an old eighties hair-metal dinosaur but when you look a bit further you'll see that, overall, they didn't changed one bit, just grew somewhat older and softer. Another heavier number, the lengthy centerpiece "Next 100 Years" is again, self-important and overblown beyond all reasonable borders with smashing orchestra arrangements worthy of Whitesnake and suchlike past-masters. Six minutes of balls-to-the-wall pomposity really can't sit well with me, I tell you. However, that dirty solo backed up by trumpets, ridiculous "na na na na" chanting, stupid keyboards and violins is still astonishingly effective! I can't believe my ears! Regardless, that chorus is damn hilarious in its sheer power-esque vibe so I sneered and sneered, without being able to stop for a while. It's just a pity that Jon doesn't have nearly enough self-importance for such numbers, but on the other hand, this would actually make an excellent duet with David Coverdale!

The mid-tempo "Just Older" is more of those "I'm a humble down-to-earth guy" rants that Jon enjoys so much, with yet another huge mastodontic chorus that you wont forget anytime soon. "Mystery Train" is yet another commercial ditty, and of course, it's a dreamy mystical ballad. In fact, with those gentle acoustic or whatever kind of guitars this sounds more like a second-rate Jethro Tull rip-off (but without any real emotions, flutes and Celtic influences). Try to picture it and you'll understand what I mean. Besides, even that bland melody ain't that spectacular. "Save The World" is laughably, dramatically bad. But hell, any epic ballad that starts with a tender derivative-sounding guitar solo can hardly be profound in any way, but this is sure getting quite humorous. The vocals are messy and even the hooks aren't all that memorable so I could just as well listen to eighties Bob Dylan (who is actually a far better singer than Jon, for my taste). And get this, they've inserted even more of that annoying orchestration here! Goddamn, this looks just like Metallica's S&M, but with some awfully written and arranged material. The intriguingly titled "Captain Crash & The Beauty Queen From Mars" starts with some interesting distortion and cute tiny riffs hopping around, but when Jon starts to sing you'll knew that you've heard it all before (and on this album, naturally). It ain't bad, but it ain't good either. "She's A Mystery" is the uglier-looking twin from "Mystery Train" and Jon's vocal performance has me rolling on the floor, indulging in an earth-shakin' evil laughter. Again, it's moody, melancholic, sentimental, whatever you like. Believe me, those guys will do everything, no matter how big embarrassment it is, just to empty your poor little helpless wallet. Please do me a favor and kick 'em in the balls when you see them, will ya?

"I Got The Girl" is a gigantic repetitive plodder, if I've ever heard one. This one has it all. The chorus line is sickeningly sweet, the guitars are alarmingly wussy-sounding and the drumming is an electronically-programmed tasteless joke. I bet that Tico Torres probably just stepped out for lunch when they decided to record this pile of rare shit in the desperate attempt to avoid giving him any writing credits. Oddly enough, whoever wrote the songs wisely decided to keep it to himself so the band didn't state it anywhere in the liner notes. Probably for the better, too. "One Wild Night" ignites with some funny birds-imitating swirls and then it unexpectedly explodes with some exciting guitar chops. It's a rather regular mid-tempo tune and not unlike their average eighties songs, but it's kinda amusing here (even if the backing vocals are a bit over the top). And the closing "I Could Make A Living Out Of Lovin' You" has an enjoyable intro part where... ah, buy it if you wish and hear for yourself (but it's supposedly an bonus track, so beware). Anyway, it's weird that this riff-driven track rocks more heavier and mightier than anything else on this album. Alas, I've heard that strong memorable riff before but its true whereabouts escapes me at the moment. Nevertheless, the riff is really worthwhile and despite the fact that the soloing is mediocre and that Tico Torres bashes his drum kit in an shockingly uninspired manner, this STILL makes for an exceptionally pleasant listen, even if it ain't particularly smart or deep.

I have a headache, so please don't ask of me an intelligent ending for this review. Look, this isn't even hard rock, this is just your routine derivative rock �n' roll. Oh sure, so there is more than enough decent predictable hooks throughout this disc, but I still can't bring myself to really enjoy it. Just too much mindless dragging for my taste, I guess. Maybe I would enjoy this more if I was from New Jersey or something, but alas, I'm not.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

THE CLASH, released by The Clash in 1977
Overall Rating: 7.5*
Best Song: I Fought The Law
Worst Song: I'm So Bored With The USA

The quintessential punk album: all you need about punk (and dreadfully, also something more) is here.

Written by Federico Marcon

Not so groundbreaking or violent as Nevermind The Bollocks by Sex Pistols, but more crafted and refined; the Clash are my favourite punk band, I think they are the most intelligent among the punk invasion (but maybe the Ramones are more intelligent because they refused the typically punk-ish lyrics... but in this way they aren't pure punk-rockers), and of course one of the most skilled. Not very skilled, but they have enough music knowledge to know what makes a song interesting, and have also enough talent to release a couple of interesting albums (interesting for a punk band, of course).

Even if this album is not very groundbreaking or particularly extremist, it has of course its historical importance: this is a sort of anthology of punk, here we have the angry and distorted riff, the basic beats, the rough voices, the shock-the-system attitude, an atmosphere... something like... uhm... "the revolution is near and we'll win!". Of course the lyrics are written in a little better way than in Nevermind The Bollocks, so even if there are obnoxious commonplaces (like in the hideous "I'm So Bored With The U.S.A."... not that I disagree, either, I partially agree with the subject, but they say the thing in a really childish and trite way), it seems to you to be inside a city riot.

The music isn't that bad, like the evocative and gloomy intro of "What's My Name", the cool reggae chords of "Police And Thieves", the minimalist guitar solo in "Clash City Rockers" (one of the few punk song with a guitar solo, even if it's a very "small" one), their manifesto in which the singer, backed by a powerful riff just slightly modified from the one of "Can't Explain" by the Who, screams with his rough voice. The guys know what they are doing with their instruments, but they are extremely uniform, extremely uniform in a genre uniform for its definition, so the result is that the album sounds very boring, with the usual trite lyrics, the usually distorted riff stolen for the Kinks, Stones and Who... However, there are some remarkable songs, like "Remote Control", with a sense of melody you can think is unthinkable for a punk band, the galloping drums and the ferocious double guitar attacks in "I Fought The Law", the vocal part accompanied by drums in "Janie Jones" (a weird thing) and, eventually, the catchy roughness of "London's Burning".

In overall a good album.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

ANOTHER GREEN WORLD, released by Brian Eno in 1975
Overall Rating: 9*
Best Song: St. Elmo's Fire
Worst Song: Becalmed

Ambient, New Age, you name it. It all starts here.

Written by Ayoze Garc�a

Since the genres mentioned above are rather worthless, at least from a rock fan perspective, you may think that this album isn't very interesting. Wrong. Another Green World, that includes guest appearances by Robert Fripp, John Cale and one Phil Collins, is a truly captivating listen, the usually short instrumentals are just as evocative and relaxing as the pop songs, and you won't find here trite lyrics about the rain or meaningless ethereal passages. The closer to that is the boring synth-fest "Becalmed", and that's why I think is the worst song of the album, but elsewhere you will be transported to far away places ("Over Fire Island"), go through scary forests ("In Dark Trees"), swim with "Little Fishes" and contemplate the "Sombre Reptiles". All these songs have very simple melodies, and sometimes feature cool percussion effects ("The Big Ship") or just appear from nowhere and fade out slowly (title track), but always make you feel something. Thus, the instrumentals are brilliant examples of musical minimalism. But don't forget that Brian used to be a great traditional songwriter too: "St. Elmo's Fire" has a blissful tune, "I'll Come Running" is a friendly chant with a, ehem, "Mediterranean" feel (there are even some castanets, I think) and a slightly silly, but really engaging chorus, "Golden Hours" is a calm ballad about "the passing of time" and "Everything Merges With The Night" is yet another slow, nice number that is followed by the eerie textures of "Spirits Drifting". "Sky Saw" is a bit rough (how many times do you think that I can use the verb "to be" anyway?), but most of the time you'll be treated to great performances (check out Fripp's restrained solos or Cale's unpredictable viola parts) that, together with Eno's originality and talent make this one of the best and most influential records of the middle seventies. Not bad for a skinny glam-rocker.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

EVENING STAR, released by Fripp/Eno in 1975
Overall Rating: 8*
Best Song: EVENING STAR
Worst Song: AN INDEX OF METALS

Written by Vasily Zavorochayev

The times have changed. Unfortunately, but KC has already went down in history (till 1981 though). But Robert Fripp and Brian Eno have joined together again for the recording of their 2nd experimental album. Apart from NO PUSSY FOOTING this album is rather less complicated and basically contains of shorter tracks. Though, as the previous Eno&Fripp�s record THE EVENING STAR is performed by only two participants (and two instruments) � Fripp�s guitar and Eno�s keyboards. The album begins with WIND IN WATER, and this name is very close to this track�s music: it really sounds as a little turbulent flow of wind in water. Second by second the sound grows louder, and �the actual wind-stream� becomes more powerful and powerful� This track is the one-of-the-closest-to-the-nature Fripp�s records. And then this short track is quietly turning into the following title track. And again this composition very closely reminds me (by this one�s name) a wonderful cloudless evening sky with bright stars by it, and the one of those stars is especially large, bright and beautiful. And this music is just about that biggest star! Look, how the star is brightly shinning; how it�s gentle, calm and warm! EVENING STAR is as if the Eastern contemplative philosophy; listening it you�re just like flying higher-and-higher-and-higher to that �star of your dream�, you�re feeling how you clearly saw that wonderful star all this time� OK, I�m gonna finish about these high transcendental substances. Then we have the 3rd track named EVENSONG (if you�ve ever listened Yes�s UNION you would remember the track from there with the same name and almost the same style). This song is even shorter than the opening track, but maybe EVENSONG is the closest to NO PUSSY FOOTING-album (especially to SWASTICA GIRLS) composition of EVENING STAR-album. It is moody and nice (as all the rest material on EVENING STAR). The 4th song WIND ON WIND seems to me the nicest here. It�s so wonderful as the best examples of 18 century classical music. Though the actual melody is rather hidden by its �slowness� and �incredibility�. But listen to this very short (short again!) track � if you have some sense of abstraction you�ll understand it and WIND ON WIND will be among your favorite music. All the 2nd side of this LP was given for the last composition AN INDEX OF METALS. It�s maybe the quintessential track of the whole album; it has all the compounds of the four rest songs, and when you listen it, AN INDEX OF METALS seems to you as if you hear the 1st side of EVENING STAR plus NO PUSSY FOOTING for just a second time, but with another musical properties and senses (I even hardly can say how to describe my impressions about AN INDEX OF METALS). But there�s another thing I�d like to say: this track has almost nothing new to me. All that I listen on AN INDEX OF METALS I�ve already heard by the previous 1,5 FRIPP&ENO albums. Anyway, this track is interesting and worthy (especially for the 1st listening to get to such kind of music � I suppose that only some hundreds of the people by the world can know about such kind of music, �cos no any media group has an interest to inform about such commercially-useless kind of art, am I right?). In conclusion I�d like to say that THE EVENING STAR album is a little bit less innovative and complete (though it�s even nicer) than NO PUSSY FOOTING, and therefore I give a one-point-lower-rating to it. Hey, it�s only one point! Every intellectual fan of music needs to buy it!

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

HONEST BUT MODEST, released by Daniel Fjall in 2002
Overall Rating: ***½
Best Song: THE DRAPES
Worst Song: RUNAWAY

Simple, memorable, well-written.

Written by Oleg Sobolev

This is Daniel's first EP (or, to be honest, a demo, but it IS an EP) and it rules. Well, not from the beginning to the end, because the song called "Runaway" is a pretty overlong (for a five minutes) and slow ballad that doesn't go anywhere with its' repeatevness. But, apart from "Runaway", Honest But Modest demonstrates pretty good songwriting. Somewhat poppy and comercial, maybe, but it is still a darn good choice for you to get. Plus, the guy's voice is something. It sounds like Bob Dylan that has just celelbrated his 150 jubilee.

It all opens with "Take Me Down" - a one minute song that has nothing but Daniel's guitar and voice. I kinda like it, though author himself hates it and says it stupid. However, he (and almost everyone who have heard his music) thinks that "The Drapes" (the next track on here, after "Take Me Down" and "Runaway") is his best. And it's true. A simple, yet beautiful, melody continues all of the way of the song, but it never gets boring. And Daniel's singing is simply wonderful. Finally, this little EP ends on "Like Me" - the obvious Roger Waters' rip-off. But it's a great rip-off! Calm little piano chords are mixed with the best lyrics that Daniel has ever written and it give some great results!

As some kind of the bonus track, Honest But Modest has a two-minute raggae piece "Left Me With The Blues" at the very end. It is too small and yet unfinished, but it is great so far. Great little percussion, awesome vocal melody and a great electric guitar solo that RULES. If we count this as a song recorded specially for the EP, Honest But Modest could get the whole four stars. But it's not a part of the EP, so I'd better give it only three stars and a half. Still, be sure to ask Daniel for a copy - it is worth your attention.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

VOLUNTEERS released by Jefferson Airplane in 1969
Overall rating: 9*
Best song: Wooden Ships
Worst song: A Song For All Seasons

Much better than �After Bathing At Baxter�s� and rarely boring either!

Written by Oleg Sobolev

Ah, after writing my After Bathing At Baxter�s review I went and bought this album. I have already heard it twice and did not find anything good at all � but why? Maybe I was deaf at the moment and didn�t recognize a lot of good songs on here? Now, I think that the album is better than Bathing for many reasons.

First of all, guys proved their songwriting skills on this one � almost not a tune (except �A Song For All Seasons� and even that was written by Spencer Dryden, who got some chances to made up noisy collages before, but nothing more) is bad or something like that � they all are classy. Seems that guys spent a lot of time (almost all of 1969, including a perfomance in Woodstock with the title track and �Eskimo Blue Day� from this album), recording, writing and jamming. And Volunteers is a result of a long-long work. It�s good.

Second, the album is a huge step from the hippie psychedelic band Jefferson Airplane was before. It is almost proggy. Moreover, �Eskimo Blue Day� and �Hey Fredrick� is your typical prog � with a lot of jamming, bombastic meaningless lyrics, twisted composition structure. And it stands far from noisy meaningless jamming Grateful Dead have done year or so earlier. The first example of American prog- rock? Whatever � I don�t really wish to say about genres or types of the music on some album, I want to listen to the music and rate it.

The whole album seems to be very political, but I can hardly hear some political stuff in the songs, except, of course, two famous anthems of Unity of America and New Generation revolution (???) � �We Can Be Together� and �Volunteers�, which opens and closes the album. They both have the same loud riff, but don�t hope to hear any other smiliarites. The first one is a long (almost six minutes) Paul Kantner�s anthem with a lote of singing, gorgeous melody and famous chours with that hillarious line �Up against the wall, motherfucker!�. Funny, but in a booklet of Volunteers we can read: �Up against the wall, Fred!�. Consider that there is a song called �Hey Fredrick� and which is kinda angry, everyone can say that the name �Fred� is the synonym of the word �Motherfucker� for Jefferson Airplane (and kinda possibly to Jefferson Starship, but they didn�t bother write songs with �Fred� in a titles � just gentle piece of crappy 70�s stuff like �Miracles�. Freds, just fucking Freds � that�s all I can say to you!). By the way, if we consider this rule, I loudly declare Right Said Fred to be the most original band title I have ever heard.

�Volunteers� is a short piece of anthemic rock�n�roll with Paul�s music and Marty�s lyrics. Jorma plays the cool solo, the best solo on the record (if �Wooden Ships� never existed, it�s certainly would be so). That�s all... Uh, wait, wait. Both of those two songs sound very dated. Especially for today. It may sound not-so-dated for 1969 � I simply don�t know. But the songs are good � catchy, have good melodies and a splendid riff and everything else, so I really need to listen them from time to time again.

Uh, the album shows (or proves � as you wish) that Jorma, Grace and Paul was a main mind of the band at that time � only one song on the album isn�t written, arranged or co-written by them. And that one song is an absolutely piece of shit � the reason why I didn�t give the album a 14. As you might guess, this is terrible �A Song For All Seasons� � a country-rocker with silly lyrics and such a weird vocal melody that you can�t remember at all � it�s even doesn�t stay in your mind. I�d even prefer some cover of old rock�n�roll tune or jamming. But not song like these, please. If I want to listen some country, I�ll take Neil Young, Creedence Clearwater Revival, some Byrds, but not Spencer Dryden � that�s for sure.

Jorma has a three songs on here, but, in fact, he had penned only one � a ballad �Turn My Life Down�, which was given to Marty to sing. Good song. Somewhat touchful, too. I don�t really care for it, but it seems to be worthy to hear someday for you.

Other Jorma-driven songs are a traditional folk song called �Good Shepherd� (good, catchy and memorable � the stuff you need from a folk song), sung by Jorma himself (I dig it! Really!) and... Oh, the other song is an anthem of Soviet Union Red Army in the time of Civil War called �Polushko-Pole� (here titled �Meadowlands�), arranged by Jorma for a Hammond Organ and played by Grace. Really funny, but it�s just a waste of time. It could be interesting if they sung it with klyrics translated to English.

Grace contributes two big epics: �Hey Fredrick� (which runs for 8:33) and �Eskimo Blue Day� (which runs for 6:36). The first one starts as a gloomy strange song with Grace vocals working in fearing the listener and later goes into five-minute jam section which... oh it surely rules. Piano and Jorma�s psychedelic guitar is here and there. Good. �Eskimo Blue Day� also has some jamming. Not so powefull as in �Hey Fredrick�, but it rules too. The song itself is going to be devoted to enviromental problems (�save-the-tree� kind of a song, a theme that later will opens on Paul and Grace album Sunfighter, I haven�t heard yet). But, gosh, give me Manfred Mann some day to write enviromental lyrics better than that.

Finally, almighty Paul went and, except of �We Can Be Together� and �Volunteers�, wrote two other songs. The first of them, �The Farm�, is a good trying to do country with funny lyrics, pet sounds (nup, not quotations from Beach Boys album) and great duet of Paul and Grace. Uh, and the second song is the one you may well know. Even I heard it one or two times on radio!

Of course, it is �Wooden Ships� � post-Apocalyptic anthem to people who runs on wooden ships from some disaster. It was co-written by Paul, David Crosby and Steven Stills (not a surprise it was recorded on Crosby, Stills And Nash album) and, I believe, with Neil Young (although he doesn�t really credited to a song, I believe he wrote something � the song sounds Young-ish overall). Paul, Grace and Marty sing for three characters which have different fates. Overall, the song is very dramatic � from singing and lyrics (sometimes romantic: �If you smile at me/ You know, I will understand/ �Cos there is something everyone does in the same language�) to beautiful Jorma�s guitar solo and catchy chours �Wooden ships on the water veryyyyyyyy freee and easy�. The song is classic, and I even prefer Jeffersons version to CSN�s one.

Uh, so that�s all. The album is long, good and professionaly-made. And the cover is cute. Buy it now � leaving your collection without this album is unforgivenable mistake.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

IMAGINE, released by John Lennon in 1971

Overall Rating : 6.5*

Best Song : Crippled Inside

Worst Song : Imagine

 Silly pop disguised as the ultimate confessional and sincere music.Doesn� t work for me and shouldn� t for you. 

Written by Federico Marcon

 This is gruesomely overrated and it also contains one of the most overrated songs ever : �Imagine�.

The seeds of Lennon� s new musical direction were already evident in Beatles� swan song, Abbey Road : songs like �Because� or �I Want You� were intentionally written to sound na�ve, simple and humble.This is a radical change, expecially if you compare these songs with the previous complicate psychaedelic trips, like �I� M The Walrus� or �Strawberry Fields� : John rejected his love for ( pseudo- ) surrealism and went for a confessional kind of songwriting in which the purpose is declaring and showing his intimate feelings, in all their evidence and clearness, without relying on complicate metaphors or subtile analysis.In fact John wanted to put himself in his songs, but there� s no way his songwriting could be called a sourt of inner analysis : it� s just a confession, he writes what he feels, without any pretentiousness.This leads to a fundamental problem, expecially if your thoughts are nothing but over-emotional rantings : John talks only �bout himself, his confession lacks of any universal feature ( apart for �Imagine� but let� s talk of it later ) ; in summa why has someone to care of what he� s saying, if the things in which he believes, exist only for himself ? Ok, I know what you� ll answer to me : he talks of problems and feelings that every person feels and he gives us his experience as example for a deep auto-analysis ; I� d tend to answer that this is an offence to me, because I never think in a such childish and stupid way, never when I was a silly and depressed teenager.Of course this isn� t a reasonable and smart answer, and it isn� t neither a proof against the universality of his songs.The sad fact is that John speaks in a generic and trite way �till the point that the things he says can� t be universal ; the categories in which he divided the human spirit are so rough and big that none can claim himself out : basically he says �I� m happy�, �I� m sad�, �I� m jealous�, �I�m angry�, �I� m in love��of course, I� m not denying the importance of these feelings and also you have to consider that everything, when is backed by a solid argument, is worth listening to.But, as I� ve already said, John doesn� t write analysis, he write confessions and this means here you won� t find WHY he feels in a particular way.Howewer, even if you write a confession, it is possible to express the reasons of your feelings, like John did with �Because� : there the lyrics are well written and you can see that the cause of his happiness and calm and the pantheistic view of the world.Here not.Here the lyrics are generic, dreadfull trite and they don� t get past their written meaning ; why ?Because, as John didn� t understand, �simplicity and humbleness� doesn� t mean to write anything you feel without using the reason and the brain, it doesn� t mean to fulfill the lyrics with overabused clich�s involving love, pain and suchlikes, it doens� t mean to write directly and roughly the things you feel without thinking a way to give them another dimension, an inner meaning or a deep truth.From this point of view Imagine sucks and all of the confessional numbers ( like �Jealous Guy�, �Oh My Love�, �How?� and �Oh Joko� ) suffer of these problems and when a song, based on the confessional lyrics, has so silly and trite words and ideas, I can� t stand it.Another speech is reserved to the anthems or the political songs ; in these kinds of songs Lennon shows an embarassing, not to say childish, vision of the world : the goods and the bads, the white and the black�c� mon, how can you seriously take his political statements?The only good verse on �Imagine� is ��imagine all the people/living for today�� , the rest is the quintessential pacifists� rantings ; and take the violent �Gimme Some Truth� : it� s ridiculous!Someone, to defend these silly ideas, is used to say : �But he� s sincere!�.What?!?!? This is not a merit, this is a fault!If you write such things to earn money I can understand, if you write such things because you believe in them�poor you!

 

If the confessional lyrics don� t work, the confessional music works : the intimate mood of the music in this album is surely its best feature.Each instrument is produced giving particular attention in order it sounds smooth and delicate, not to mention inoffensive and absolutely not violent.The pop structures are diluited, the stress on the rhythm is reduced in comparison with some of his songs with the Fab Four and the strings are used with gusto to underline some of the most sweet and moving moments ( even if �sad and smooth ballad needs strings� was a clich� from �Yesterday� ).For some aspects ( the repetitive musical structures based on simple guitar chords or piano lines ) this album reminds me the third album by Velvet Underground, in which, in order to accomplish to the intimate purpose of the music, each song was transformed into a delicate lullaby.Here the songs are not exactly lullabies, they seems more hazy dreams of a child, expecially the painful and melancholic �Jealous Guy�, with his desperate intro, and �How?�, in which the chorus is sung in a vey soulful way.Of course the music is quite good, but not outstanding and I feel the lack of the great pop sensibility of a Macca, able to enlight with his funny bass, his ability for writing hooks or to arrange trite pop structures to make them sound interesting.Sometime Lennon seems to have learned the lesson, and so he gives us a pop-gems like �Crippled Inside�, with its happy and ringing melody and a funny and well built piano-guitar interplay ( and the same applies for �It� S Hard� ).Phil Spector created a good wall of sound on �I Don� T Wanna Be A Soldier Mama�, an hypnotic pacifistic chanting, in which I like very much the scarying echo on drums and G. Harrison prove to be not a bad guitarist with his burning slide-guitar solo on the rocking �Gimme Some Truth�, a violent song, maybe out of place in this album, but still a solid offer, in which Lennon sings with his version of �punk-vocals�.The vocals melodies are strong as ever, expecially in �Jealous Guy� and �How?� ( expecially in the latter ).�Oh My Love� and �Imagine� are smooth and delicate, but not as the previous two songs, even if the piano line of �Imagine�, very well interlaced with the strings, it� s a good example of  �shymphonic pop� ( in which John seems to have assimilated the lessons of Brian Wilson and his Pet Sounds ).

 

In overall a solid offer, surely not intelligent or deep ( and sometimes trite, when the simplicity is not backed by solid musical ideas ), with embarassing lyrics but a confortable and delicate music.

 

HYBRID THEORY, released by Linkin Park in 2000
Overall Rating: 6.5*
Best Song: I dunno, they're all very even. Maybe Papercut.
Worst Song: Crawling

Faceless and bland, but not amateurish, with some nice steaming moments. The overall feel is kinda eerie, although the guys really should vary their tone a bit.

Written by Ratko Hribar

Is this horrendous hookless garbage or not? Actually... it's not. Of course, the fact that this album is still on the second place of the U.S. charts really demands some eyebrows to be raised, but it's not a shit-to-the-wall attempt at rocking out that I expected to hear. They even managed to sound enjoyable at times. Granted, just at some rather RARE times, but nevertheless, you can even listen to this and not choke with your own vomit, which is a very unlikely thing with, say, Limp Bizkit. Ah well, let us stop with the Bizkit bashing and get to the tasty stuff. Oh my, I forgot, I'm reviewing Linkin Park... uh... to the quasi-tolerable stuff then.

And would you believe it? Linkin Park is actually a refreshing change from all the sickness-inducing wankerish rap-metal bands out there. Apparently, the record company found a bunch of so-so talented wimps (preferably the ones that already showed up on the audition for O-Town, but were turned down because they were too rebellious-looking) and formed a money-grabbing pop-metal band. As you might expect, the actual musicians here aren't outstandingly talented but they did a solid all-around job, which is kinda surprising, come to think of it. You know, there are some good things about rap-metal too. For one, they don't indulge in overlong noodling that we all know and love under the name "soloing". Thusly, the songs are brief and the whole album is short as hell, clocking under forty minutes. That cartoonish figure that the record company enlisted as a guitarist is almost intolerable, as he can't do anything besides playing a few simple power chords on a horrendously de-tuned guitar. Wowie. You can't hear that everywhere. Actually, you CAN. No master guitar-work here, I'll guarantee that.

The band even has two lead singers; one with a smooth boybandish voice and a knack for singing fine vocal hooks, and the other whose sole purpose is to back him up with some mindless but listenable rapping. Of course, both of them will have the ladies on their knees, but there's one thing they WON'T have, and that's me admiring their crapful attempts at music. They sure won't have that. Overall, you've heard it all before. The songs are short and catchy, relatively repetitive. The lyrics are hogwash of the highest order since they're overly fixated on pain, anger, emptiness and suchlike topics. And although it all sounds very moody, it's not particularly aggressive (less than average rap-metal acts anyway). Thusly, the band slumps along with some eagerly awaited heavy-pop ditties that are somewhat messy sounding. Yes, those lame songs are mostly infectious, but they're redundant as hell and they tend to end in a similar way.

And hey, here's something goddamn funny I�ve found on the web, read on: "I loved everything about this album--especially the fact that you don't have to buy it edited, because, shock and amazement, THEY DON'T CUSS. That's right. The lyrics are so awesome and well written that they don't need swear words--they have something better to say." Believe me, THIS had me laughing my ass off for a good half an hour. Funny little people... they don't realize how ridiculous they sound, especially since those lyrics sound like they were written by a 10 years old kid. However, their chorus lines are anthemic and intense, so much so that they sometimes reach the very edge of grotesque.

The opening track "Papercut" starts off nice 'n' aggressive with some cool electronic noises and carries on with lots of tight rap beats. Bennington gives a rather generic performance throughout, but it's not his show anyway as the track mostly relies on Shinoda's rapping. The lyrics are as shallow as they get, but both of the guys sing okay and the whole package sounds quite acceptable. "One Step Closer" is also very decent as the band ignites with more of those fresh and exciting riffs. There's quite a lot of bearable mixing on the track so I guess that the DJ is also quite professional. Of course, both of the singers are doing a fine and note-hitting job again. "With You" features yet more of those electronic noises and yet more of those samey snarling grooves. Bennington does some adorable "I'm gonna throw up all over the mike" screams throughout and the overall effect is, again, pretty satisfying.

"Points of Authority" is another one of those raunchy confrontational numbers that has a feeble melody but it still manages to be quite non-disappointing. "Crawling" is... well... it's one of the singles off the album and it was a big hit. It's more in the classic metal vein, although it's essentially just a dumb pop tune with Bennington singing like he's in the Backstreet Boys or something. It's probably the weakest cut here too. Ya know, although all of the tracks here suck donkey ass, some suck it more intense than others and this particular song is a real black hole in the terms of suckidity. "Runaway" is also one of the more blowish ditties that are presented here, but "By Myself" makes up for it since it has a nice hard-hitting atmosphere around it. Then the band displays their sensitive side with "In the End" by using a piano-driven intro!!! Ain't that original? Of course, don't expect that the industrial-type darkness will be any weaker on that tune. It wont, but it's at least an interesting break from all those tiresome noises they produced in spades so far.

"A Place For My Head" cooks nicely but it's rather unmemorable. "Forgotten" thumps in the same way and it really sounds like they forgot the meaning of the word melody when they recorded it. The generic "we'll blow you away" chorus line is just as catchy as always, but I guess that the biggest problem here is that it sounds not-unlike any other song on the album. "Cure For The Itch" is a bizarre instrumental with lots of electronic noises and beats going on. The melody is oriental-sounding in places, so it's kinda interesting too. In a fodderish way, naturally. The closing track is "Pushing Me Away". It's the same as most tracks but maybe a tincy bit more memorable.

To tell you the truth, I could never become a fan of such music, but after all, they�re better than most metal-imitating bands around nowadays. I mean, if nothing else, someone in their camp sure knows how to stitch together a nice pop hook. And before I go, I gotta say that Chester Bennington won't have any problems when this soft-rocking combo finally collapses and ends in the waste bins of rock history. I'm sure that the Backstreet Boys will be glad to enlist his sugary choirboy voice in their lines. In the meantime, although I gave it an extremely high rating, please do try to avoid this album at all costs (unless of course you're a Bizkit fan, cuz in that case this will be a giant step up for you, buddy). It's not bad, but why should you buy it when you can get some better contemporary albums like, say, the last two Alice Cooper offerings. Yeah, better buy those. After all, Cooper's sick humor is much cooler than anything the rap-metal factories could ever produce.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

NEVERMIND, released by Nirvana in 1991
Overall Rating: 5*
Best Song: Smell Like A Ten Spirit
Worst Song: None, even if this doesn't mean they are all good, simply they go on the same boring level

Written by Federico Marcon

I bought this album for fun: made curious by all positive reviews I had heard, I decided to buy the album that according to a great number of people REVOLUTIONED the rock in the 90's. Uhm... from the first listen I've never managed to achieve a good feeling towards this record but I said "My ears are more trained in 60's music, maybe with a couple more listens I'll get into it"; now I think to be able to judge it. The most remarkable feature is without doubt the particular mood: from this point of view the highlight point of the album is listening to Curt singing with his dark and depressed voice "I'm so happy..." (the song is "Lithium"). Most of the song are well built, the riffs are often solid (I don't want to investigate if Nirvana stole them or not; maybe they did, but I don't care, I think it's hard to found new hard-rock riff after the passage of Who, Kinks, Stones, Cream and all the punk bands of the late 70's), the lyrics are sometimes deliciously depressed and full of frustration and rage, often well written even in the case they mean nothing (just think of "Come As You Are"); well, those guys want to communicate us their frustration but for what worth that is, who cares? I can't stand people saying "They are great because they are sincere", how can you say this!?!? You know they are sincere? How? Really, I'm not joking, just explain me why. If their frustration had an universal meaning, I'd stand their songs, but who really cares of personal feelings? Plus this record express of a sense of... like this "I'm depressed, I'm angry, but without any reason except for the sake of unhappiness". I'd be glad if anybody would be able to explain me this. To be honest, Nirvana has some -few- merits; the first is that they create highly energetic music, a furious reaction to all the nodless virtuosism of 80's heavy metal, a pure and simple brutal assault; their music can make aggressive even the most peaceful hippy! Second, Cobain is an average but prolific songwriter, able to express all the possible nuances of grunge and this is a good thing, because the genre's ways of expression are very limited and uniform (think to another grunge group, Pearl Jam and how they abandoned the pure grunge in order to be more expressive, and listen to this quest in their album Vitalogy). But even if the songs are average and energetic, and the lyrics are quite good, the album is boring. Well produced, very good work on drums but nothing more (Nirvana are not a band famous for the virtuosity of its members); you see, it's too uniform and it's also overlong: I'd give it a higher rating if it stopped after "Polly", in fact the second part of the album it's a rip-off of the first and the boredom grows. Is this enough to call the album revolutionary? What did it carry to music? Simple but efficient songs built on heavy riffs? Stones did it in the early 60's. A savage behavior and a "shock the system" attitude? Led Zeppelin and The Stones were savage and the punk generation was much more "shocking" than Nirvana. Highly distorted and furious guitar? The Who did it first and Hendrix did it better. Strange noises? Where?! Originality? Well, you see they rip off most from the "Big" of the 60's/70's, plus what do Nirvana have that other grunge groups don't have? They were lucky to find a producer and become famous. Good and diverse songs? You will be bored of the uniformity of an album, just try to listen to a couple of them. Musical skill? No, in this ground the guys are not excellent and never try to be. What does make this album revolutionary? The only thing Nevermind can revolutionize it's my waste-basket when I throw in it.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

HELLO HALO, released by Pollyanna in 1997
Overall Rating: 8*
Best Song: Brittle Then Broken
Worst Song: Butterman

Written by Neal Grosvenor

My friend from Australia created a mix tape for me back in 1998 with a bunch of Aussie bands that were more or less popular at the moment. It was a real education for me, as I had no real knowledge of the more obscure artists from down under, as anyone who has visited there from abroad has found that the music community seems to exist in a world of its own, oblivious to the rest of the world. That's kind of a bad thing because there is so much to get excited about. Anyway, my friend, being a music geek like myself, chose the artists on this mix tape based on her personal taste, rather than what was momentarily getting massive video or radio play. Pollyanna were on there, and the song "Peachy Keen" really stood out for me. At first listen, they reminded me of the best of Teenage Fanclub crossed with Bob Mould's post Husker Du band Sugar. They were loud, but controlled, with most of the emphasis being on singer/guitarist Matt Handley's songwriting. Formed in Melbourne, they are a power trio, and at last check, do not have a European or North American record deal, so I could be the only person in Canada who owns at least two of their albums. Anyway, on a trip to Oz in 1999, I picked up their album "Delta City Skies" and was totally floored. I recently picked up "Hello Halo" and so have decided to review it first.

I guess this is what you would call a no nonsense guitar record, which I suppose many of which were available in a post-Nirvana world in 1997. However, when compared with the many, Handley's songwriting definitely stands out. He's kind of like a hyper Neil Finn with more punkish tendencies. The is a more country rock feel on songs such as "Cooling Your Heels", but he quickly shifts gears into pop mode on "Effervesence" and "Cinnamon Lip". The album does hold together pretty well as a whole, with not too much of one style to bore the listener. "Brittle Then Broken" is probably the "rockingest" song on the record and I believe was one of the singles off this album. This song actually reminds me of The Posies for some reason. Could be the chord progression reminds me of the latter bands' "Dream All Day". The production is minimal, that is, there are no complicated string sections or bells and whistles, just much "amplifier overkill" that would make Bob Mould proud (or more deaf), and a heavy Steve Albini-type drum mix.

Pollyanna are still together and released an album last year (2002) so I hope they decide to tour these parts soon. Highly recommended for those who are serious about their songwriting. Hadley is definitely a diamond in the rough.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

SIGN 'O' THE TIMES, released by Prince in 1987
Overall Rating: 7.5*
Best Song: The Cross
Worst Song: Hot Thing

Messy and sprawling, this doesn't exactly highlight Prince's strenghts.

Written by Ayoze Garc�a

Prince, and that's how I'm gonna call him until my keyboard includes the sign he wants to be represented by, is an accomplished musician, that's out of discussion: great singer, songwriter and multi-instrumentalist, he's got it all, but his ego is so enormous that makes Todd Rundgren seem humble in comparison. Speaking of what, I don't think that Sign 'O' the Times marks any improvements over the crazy-ass-melting-pot-of-styles genre pioneered by the author of "Hello, It's Me" (who had taken himself the idea from Zappa's We're Only In It For The Money, credits where credits due). This is probably Prince's most ambitious effort ever (let's not mention the Emancipation three record extravaganza): a double-album-one-man-band-in-the-studio masterpiece. Or so I'm told. Let's see: the title track grooves just fine, with a lazy melody and a cool bass line, and "Play In The Sunshine" will surprise you with its childish a capella coda, but then... yuck. "Housequacke" is just stupid, tuneless hip-hop and "The Ballad Of Dorothy Parker", Joni Mitchell references aside, is nothing really memorable. "The Cross" (as good as The Who's "Behind Blue Eyes", no less) is the only song here that doesn't come across as the creation of some soulless machine churning out flawless but insincere ballads ("Slow Love", the overblown "Adore"), tired funky mantras ("It", "Hot Thing") or catchy, by the numbers pop songs ("Starfish And Coffee", the Phil Spector-ish "I Could Never Take The Place Of Your Man"), that simply leave me cold with all those mechanical dance beats and dull keyboards. Sing 'O' The Times may well be an everlasting testimony of Prince's boldness and all, but that's not enough to maintain my attention for eighty minutes. Avoid it unless you happen to find funny his - controversial to say the least - lyrics, and dig his often strained voice.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

HEAR MY CRY, released by Sonique in 2000
Overall Rating: 5*
Best Song: Sky
Worst Song: Drama

There's good dance music and there's bad dance music. I haven't got a clue what this is!

Written by Ratko Hribar

Yeah, it's weird that I decided to review modern pop music, and yes, I'm quite aware it's a useless and somewhat stupid thing to do. But the truth is, I just couldn't help it. Sonique is one of those rare pop divas (if you pardon this slightly inappropriate expression) which I actually had some respect for. Mind you, I said HAD. This offering here gave me a few much needed lessons to be sure. I've heard her big infectious dance hit "It Feels So Good" and I was naturally quite pleased with it, so I did my best to borrow this album from someone. And while I did succeed in that respect, I must say it was a remarkably disappointing listen. Call it a typical thoughtless act or whatever, I've put it in the disc and was blown away to see how dreadful it exactly was. No doubt, the little lady is foxy enough and her voice is nice and soulful, but the songs just aren't any good, with the overall energy level being very, very low. Almost below ground. I naturally thought that it was a dance album, but it really isn't. After a hopeful start with three exciting beat-driven disco numbers things unexpectedly calm down with an intimate (overly intimate, if you ask me) R&B atmosphere and some slightly catchy grooves (not catchy enough, I'm afraid). The difficulty is that there's too much uninspired soul-meets-funk ditties on this outing. By the way, as expected, the production values are luxurious and slick as hell.

The opener "It Feels So Good" forces me to admire the clever use of strings (sampled or otherwise) and the fine structuring of the song. The dance beat is interesting and somewhat untypical, and the electronic noises are too cool to take (especially the pleasant buzz), and the chorus! Powerful and gentle in the same time, soulful enough to be an obvious smash. It also builds up in a cool way, I must add. The next explosive dance track is the roaring cover of Jay Hawkins's "I Put A Spell On You", which is smoothly updated for the millennium and very memorable. Strangely enough, it ignites with a wise and exciting use of strings and continues with a classic dance beat (a bit generic, obviously). "Are You Ready?" has a suspicious beginning, but a neat groovy beat soon takes the stage and the track flows nicely from there. It uses some cool sax "noises" in the chorus part (again, probably sampled) and the tune is just your average night boogie anyway. The immensely dragging "Cold And Lonely" relies on a dance beat too, but it's rather dark and disturbing, and it doesn't really move you anywhere. On the other hand, I'm not terribly fond of pessimistic-sounding tracks like this one, and her echo-driven vocals leave me cold. I presume it's well-written, but I like my disco uplifting and this just makes me suicidal. Thank you Sonique, but I hope you wont mind if I don't blow my brains out just yet.

Songs like "Drama" set me in panic as Sonique mercilessly performs an astonishingly generic mellow duet with a certain Calvin Richardson, and the whole nasty incident is ear-shatteringly sappy and cheesy with lots of badly outdated eighties music effects. Richardson has a classic smooth voice that you'll find on many contemporary British stars like, say, Craig David, so it looks like an enormous embarrassment very much in the vein of Dionne Warwick's most sleaziest duets with Jeffrey Osbourne, Kashif and the likes of them. And like you haven't guessed it already, it's a formulaic uninspired ballad that only relies on Sonique's fine soulful vocal to earn it a passing mark. Still, Sonique doesn't truly save the ditty so it's one of the most violent offenders here. The mid-tempo "Move Closer" is a return to form, I guess. Let's see. You have your techno-inspired beat, some echoic vocals by Sonique, some allegedly "cool" electronic noises throughout, some depressive lyrics and a bearable vocal melody. The chorus is rather dumb and ineffective, and the disco beat is pedestrian and annoying. Not much of a track really. "Can't Get Enough" on the other hand, is a true return to the enjoyable party vibe of the beginning. Granted, it starts dull with some silent wailing and an overused disco beat, but it does get a trifle better later on as it reaches the climatic chorus. It's not unlike the previous one but it's simply speedier and plainly more entertaining. I don't know if it flows more or anything, but it's effective with those bombastic chorus lines and expectedly silent echoic vocal passages.

"Hear My Cry" is a basic slow disco plodder with sleazy backing vocals and a thoroughly dumb-ish vocal melody (especially the nagging and repetitive "heeeeeeear my cry-aaaaaaay-aaaaaay-aaay-yeeeah" part). Musically, it drags badly with too much uninteresting electronic noises, echoes and God knows what else. The slow techno ballad "Empty (Hideaway)" is a real shocker since Sonique completely deserts the happy disco vibe and goes totally dark, dreary and depressive. It starts with doomy electronic beats so I get the impression that she wanted to make a haunting atmosphere, in which fully succeeded, too. The backing vocals put the whole thing over the top with their unnecessary "we hideaway" intrusions, but without them this would sound thoroughly creepy, especially with the use of a certain, pretty spooky, oriental-ish electronic effect. In fact, this is menacing enough to serve as a intro to some Alice Cooper song. Subsequently, the party time is back on with "Love Is On Our Side", an full-tilt up-tempo number with a obligatory climatic chorus, and the whole track seems quite anthemic overall. Of course, there's the second gigantic hit off the record, "Sky". Believe it or not, that one is actually the best by far. You can look at it from any angle you wish, and it's still the coolest ditty here. The chorus and the vocal melody are unbeatable and anthemic. Besides that, the disco beat on "Sky" is one of the most intriguing on the record, and those electronic effects are catchy and somewhat mysterious.

Unfortunately, the piano-driven sugary ballad "Learn To Forget" is a total low point since it makes me cringe like any contemporary Diana Ross number would. It's just overly sleazy and sappy with silent strings in the background (or keyboards, I dunno which is correct) and it's not even mediocre or passable, but repulsive and sorrowful. Naturally, it's completed with corny lyrics and tiresome backing vocals so the overall generic atmosphere is firmly set in place. The closing track is a club mix of "It Feels So Good" and it's a good one, too, with an atmosphere very reminiscent of classic seventies disco. However, it's a sad thing that they wasted the overall potential it had by stretching it out too far and for too long.

As for the final word, I'll say this much. This offering is very inconsistent with some tunes being splendid, but others... eh, others are solidly produced but unmeasurably dumb and well, predictable. This isn't so bad like I feared, but then again, it sounds acceptable now, but how will it look twenty years from now? My bets are hardly optimistic when it comes to the future. Meanwhile, for today's dance music this is as good as it gets, so if you're willing to give it a chance, then you probably should, but don't forget this isn't truly a good-time party album by any means.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?

FIRE AND ICE, released by Yngwie Malmsteen in 1992
Overall Rating: 9*
Best Song: Fire And Ice
Worst Song: All I Want Is Everything

Distinctively European in flavour, it remains one of the Swedish guitarist's greatest works

Written by Howard Kelly

Yngwie Malmsteen is a European guitar legend and songwriter, albeit considerably more celebrated for his skill in the former, who has always found it difficult to receive the recognition he deserves in the USA. Alas, the Swede's arrogance is almost as legendary as his guitar playing and, while this is not seen as a big problem in Europe (in the UK a lot of us would be happy to have someone in the modern music industry with a spine), it continues to bring Malmsteen unwelcome negativity and a degree of disdain from some who overlook his music in favour of his personality. But then, Yngwie couldn't care less. Fire And Ice is my favourite Malmsteen album by quite a way and seems to get better with every listen. You can always expect the trademark fast and skillful guitar playing in all of Malmsteen's albums, but often the songwriting is of a much inferior standard and this brings the album down considerably in my reckoning. Fans have often said, "Who buys an Yngwie album for the songwriting?", but I say that the underlying quality of the songs must not be simply overlooked no matter how well Malmsteen plays on the album.

Fire And Ice is the most Scandinavian sounding of Yngwie's albums, although to an extent all his albums sound European, and this is mostly due to the fact that all those who feature on Fire And Ice are Swedish. This album also marks a degree of musical experimentation from Malmsteen as it features a string section which is heard throughout the album (and is even given its own "solo" sometimes), Yngwie plays a sitar, and Lolo Lannerback appears on flute. All the music on the album is written by Yngwie Malmsteen although some of the song lyrics are written by, or co-written with, G�ran Edman - an excellent progressive rock songwriter. The album opener "Perpetual" is an instrumental which serves to accustom the listener with the style of the album, a style which is quite radically different to Malmsteen's previous recordings. "Perpetual" itself is fairly unorthodox compared to Yngwie's many other instrumentals in the way which it utilises both drums and keyboard - usually only drums are used - to compose the backdrop on which the guitar will shine. This is one of Malmsteen's most complex instrumentals and one of my personal favourites but its not for the purist. "Dragonfly" is one of the most musically interesting songs on the album and one of my favourites overall. Again, G�ran Edman's lyrics and singing shine through along with Yngwie's guitar, which in the majority of places here is somewhat unusually relegated to the background of the musical ensemble, and Mats Olausson's wonderfully experimental keyboard work. The song is distinctly northern European in sound.

"Teaser" is another interesting track but not in the same way in which "Dragonfly" is interesting. "Teaser" takes the form of a pop hit - but it is too fast paced. It also takes the form of an anthemic rocker - but it is too soft. In many ways it sounds almost like a quickened version of "I Wanna Be With You" by Bruce Springsteen but lighter and with a more manufactured feel. In short, not good at all. "How Many Miles To Babylon" opens with an almost two-minute long coda consisting of strings and acoustic guitar before developing to include Yngwie's electric guitar. The song truly begins when Bo Werner's drums enter the fray with G�ran Edman not far behind. This track is reminiscent of "Gates Of Babylon" by Rainbow but I am not sure about G�ran Edman's performance here as he sounds rather strained. Overall, an average creeping slow-rocker where Yngwie really doesn't do all that much. "Cry No More" is an enjoyable ballad-esque song which includes some fine atmospheric drumming from Bo Werner and good background work from Yngwie. The string section solo directly preludes Malmsteen's fitting guitar solo and this same musical introduction is used throughout the album. "No Mercy" is an example of the total lack of imagination that Malmsteen sometimes displays with his songwriting as far as lyrics are concerned. I always allow that some leeway must be given for songwriters who are not speakers of English as a first language but here, considering Yngwie has lived in America for a good few years, this quality of songwriting is barely forgivable.

"C'est La Vie" is one of the best songs that Yngwie has ever written. It is a step down in pace from a lot of Malmsteen's work but this seems to suit him as he is allowed more time for expansion on his guitar solos during the progression of this Rainbow style, Middle-East influenced, power-ballad. Although the lyrics for this song are co-written between Malmsteen and Edman, I would have to say that Edman probably had more input here as they are closer to the progressive rock side than Yngwie's hard-edged influences. This song also features Yngwie playing the sitar at the start albeit only briefly heard. "Leviathan" is the second of three instrumentals on the album and this time it is the more predictable style of Malmsteen instrumental, i.e. Drum and guitar. All in all, nothing overly special from Yngwie here but nevertheless a high quality instrumental featuring the mercurial Michael Von Knorring on drums The title track is one of the best songs on the album purely for songwriting skill and is one of the closest things to a "pop song" that Yngwie has ever written. I like it, and I have spoken to many people who also like it despite not being fans of the genre. Malmsteen lays off on the guitar until the later stages of the song - wait for the solo - as he leaves it to the power of Bo Werner's drums and Mats Olausson's keyboard to carry the track along. Excellent in its own right and a fine example of the more "accessible" side of Yngwie's work. "Forever Is A Long Time" is a song with clear G�ran Edman influences both lyrically and musically and contains an effective strings solo as a prelude to Malmsteen's guitar solo. It is an excellent Euro-sound fast, inevitably guitar-driven, rocker.

"I'm My Own Enemy" is undoubtedly, in my mind, the best traditional ballad Yngwie Malmsteen has ever written and played. Many critics have criticised him for his supposed lack of emotion in his playing and his lack of songwriting skill - this is the song with which to refute their slurs. That said, the lyrics here are from G�ran Edman as is apparent because they are quite simply a class above anything Malmsteen has ever written. Yngwie sticks to what he is best at commendably and plays his own music with feeling and great skill. After the highs of the last track we were destined to be right back down to earth for "All I Want Is Everything". This song is almost amusing in the way it unintentionally mocks stereotypically American early-70s rock. I say unintentionally, you really need to hear it to understand what I mean, in the way the song jibes with the ever heavily accented vocals from G�ran Edman and the laughably poor lyrics courtesy of Yngwie Malmsteen - for instance: "You always thought that you were so cool, You used to say that I was a fool, And all this time you were just a tool, You couldn't see that I made the rules". Now please, those lyrics really only serve to insult the intellectual capacity of the listener. Yngwie take note - if you are going to write any more lyrics like that then please make sure you write more instrumentals in future.

"Golden Dawn" is the penultimate track of the album and the final instrumental. This is a medieval sounding acoustic guitar solo, a little bit similar to some of Vinnie Moore's work, and is rather enjoyable. "Final Curtain" draws the album to a close with its effective stormy opening, intelligent lyrics, and Yngwie's creepy guitar playing. Actually this is one of the few Malmsteen songs to display use of sound banks to any real extent and the rain sets up this haunting power ballad perfectly as does the use of the the strings section during the choruses and guitar solos. A great song to end a fine album.

Fire And Ice is the most musically rich album from Yngwie Malmsteen due to the willingness for experimentation. For example, Yngwie's use of a string-section to add atmosphere to tracks such as "Final Curtain" and to play a musical introduction for Yngwie's guitar solos. The production quality is, as usual with Malmsteen, excellent and G�ran Edman always sounds as though he is putting his heart into the singing even when there is a distinct lack of imagination in the songwriting department such as in "All I Want Is Everything". I must reveal that I am a G�ran Edman fan however but nevertheless his exemplary performance here does improve one area where Malmsteen's work has been considerably lacking in the past - vocals. It is quite hard to believe that Fire And Ice was recorded in 1992 because to me it sounds a few years older. Yngwie has said before that does not care about the so called "music scene" and that his own music is in his own personal style and I congratulate him on this. To sum up - a quality Euro-sound hard-rock album with some particularly outstanding tracks that I would recommend to any fan of Scandinavian rock or, to a degree, any fan of the work of Rainbow during the Joe-Lynn Turner era.

Any comments or reviews to grant us with?


Return to the Index page!

...or to the Reviews page

1
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws