| The
true motivations of the military invasion there are not
the President Bush lies, but there are exclusively of
economic-strategic character
PANAMA, 22 DEC. 89. The USA military intervention could be foreseen. On the contrary, all it is reported by the world paint was rough and nasty in the confront of the reading public. USA want to recover ground against Europe about middle-american economic relationship. The Panama-american invasion must be watched under a sole profile: the Panama Channel control. Within a decine the Channel territorial surface, on which it is in force the Washington jurisdiction could have been to pass under the total national sovereignty of the small middle-american State. Most understand that the United States are disposed to recognize the national sovereignity of any Country on condition that last has making the Washington interests! Where they don't manage the resources of american pillage, where the United States monopolies don't manage to "disembowels" the local economies, that countries become "communist" or "totalitarialist" or "against democracy" systems" When the objective conditions can afford it the U.S. don't hesitate to intervene with military "liberations" invasions...: replacing opposed statesmen with one's men and, after, they proclaim the democratic accesion... The most important examples have been the Marcos's expulsion from Philippines (for his protectionist policy) and also the invasions in Salvador, Grenada etc. Besides, we cannot forget the determinant role that United States has got in the Reza Phalavi removal. The United States aversion in the confront of the Persian king was motivated by Iranian opening to the Europe. The american support for Komeinist Revolution (1979), through the Soviet Union, was addressed, just, to break the privilegious relationships between Iran and Europe. A confermation of that thesis is partially gone out with the IRAN-GATE. With the "Gulf War" (which was a colossal business, in 1980 we can observe that the iranians were been armed, principally, by Americans yet Irak was been armed, principally, by European military industries. The so-called "Gulf War", have got", pratically, the stop task of the European Economic development in the Middle East. Before talking on Panama, we must understand the the Marcos's expulsion from Philippines (for his protectionist policy) and also the invasions in Salvador, Grenada etc. Besides, we cannot forget the determinant role that United States has got in the Reza Phalavi removal. The United States aversion in the confront of the Persian king was motivated by Iranian opening to the Europe. The american support for Komeinist Revolution (1979), through the Soviet Union, was addressed, just, to break the privilegious relationships between Iran and Europe. A confermation of that thesis is partially gone out with the IRAN-GATE. With the "Gulf War" (which was a colossal business, in 1980 we can observe that the iranians were been armed, principally, by Americans yet Irak was been armed, principally, by European military industries. The so-called "Gulf War", have got", pratically, the stop task of the European Economic development in the Middle East. Before talking on Panama, we must understand twhat is the problem. When Noriega was a friend of Bush in CIA, he was a gentleman. When Noriega was a member of CIA, his various traffics was tolerated by Americans. But, when Noriega begun to act against the economic interests of USA there are started the problems: the bank-boikotting of 1988, the isolation campain. The economic vampirism by United States has democratically destroyed the economic policy of Latino American States, forcing them to an irreversible inflaction. 24 December 1989: The military invasion is costed any decine of marines dides and 2 thousands of civil did victim of the USA bombs. The territory is under the Washington control. THE NORIEGA's ERROR. Mr. Noriega is refused near the Vatican consolate. The Noriega's error was them of thinking of can to blackmail Vatican. Vatican had two week of time for to verify the dangerousity of Noriega's documents. After Pope decided to conseign to American. What contein the Noriega's secrets, we will never know it. We can only self-ask: what are the Noriega's secrets? A Vatican connection? A Bush responsability in the drug world traffic? A new "Irangate"? All those questions are in the mind of the normal people. by Patty V. Hershey, London. |