Evolutionary Mechanisms
As we stated at the beginning of our discussion on evolutionary principles,
evolution involves changes that occur in the frequency of a gene's alleles in a
population from generation to generation. Each individual member of a population
inherits a set of genes. He or she can not evolve or change the alleles
inherited. But the contribution he or she makes to the population's gene pool
through reproduction, relative to the contribution other members of the
population make, can change the population's genetic composition from generation
to generation. The collection of genes in a population is called the gene pool.
For a population's gene pool to change, there must be some mechanism that
promotes differential reproduction (or differential survival that is reflected
in reproduction. When such change occurs, we have evolution.
To relate this to Darwin and Wallace, we can use the example of the single
gene for the inheritance of flower color as discussed in your text. In a
population of plants, there are two pre-existing alleles for flower color:
purple and white. Purple is dominant. The two flower colors have been reproduced
year after year. Then one year, a new predator happens into the environment.
This predator sees the purple color as desirable and eats plants with purple
flowers. The purple-flowered plants rarely get pollinated, since they are eaten
before they can set seed. Within a few generations, only white flowers remain.
The predator, as a grazer, has been the selection force behind the change in
allele frequency for flower color in this plant.
We can see this and explain this today, because we know how genes and alleles
are inherited. In the 1800's, they did not know this, and for about 50 years
after Darwin's publications, scientists and others searched for mechanisms of
evolution.
In the early 1900's Mendel's work was rediscovered by a number of
researchers, who, at first, tried to use genetics to disprove Darwin's theory of
gradual evolution through slow selection of beneficial characteristics. The
"Mendel" group promoted the idea that changes would occur rapidly via mutations,
and that natural selection had no role in changes that occurred in populations
through time. It took many years to bring together genetics, population biology
and natural selection as means of evolution.
The first real "breakthrough" came from the collaboration of a mathematician
and a doctor in 1908, but as is common, took a while to gain acceptance.
The HARDY-WEINBERG principle for genetic
equilibrium
Hardy and Weinberg demonstrated that the equation for a
binomial expansion
(p2 + 2 pq + q2)
could be used to calculate gene frequencies within a population. They first
showed the gene frequency for genetic equilibrium , the
condition in which gene frequency would not change from generation to
generation.
Genetic Equilibrium Formula
Where: p = frequency of 1 allele for the gene (A)
q = frequency of the 2nd allele for the gene (a)
and:
p + q = 1
Where: p2 = homozygous (AA)
q2 = homozygous alternative (aa)
2pq = heterozygous (Aa)
and:
p2 + 2 pq + q2 = 1
The allele frequencies and genotype frequencies will be stable (genetic
equilibrium) from generation to generation as shown by this equation.
In an ideal population there would be genetic equilibrium (no change in gene
frequencies), and no evolution would occur.
Hardy and Weinberg then proposed the conditions that would be needed in a
population to have genetic equilibrium.
The conditions needed for
such genetic equilibrium are:
Population must be "infinitely" large (large enough to eliminate chance or
random gene frequency fluctuations)
Population is isolated from other such populations (no immigration or
emigration; no gene flow)
Mutation does not occur, or if mutation occurs, forward and reverse
mutations are equal, so the gene pool is not modified
Mating is random
All genotypes are equally viable; natural selection is absent
Any change in gene frequency from generation to generation can then be
documented and we can look for the reasons or agents responsible for the change.
As a result of the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium, biologists could search
for the "agents" of evolution, or those factors that result in the change of
gene frequency. You can see why evolution is now defined in genetic terms, since
it is a biological phenomenon of population genetics.
Based on their
work, there are five major causes of change in populations:
- Mutation
- Migration - gene flow
- Small populations
- Non-random mating
- Natural selection
Agents of Evolution:
Factors that bring about change
- Mutation
- Inheritable changes in the DNA sequence
- Can be induced for study
- Original source for infinite numbers of small changes in
genes
Recombination
- Natural occurrence in meiosis so that no two gametes are
identical
- Gene Flow or Migration
Migration is the flow of genes from one
population of a species to another population. This is also called gene flow.
Dispersal to new geographical areas
- Fledging of young
- Transport of pollen, spores, etc.
Gene flow also maintains a gene pool over larger geographical areas with
nomadic patterns of travel. Gene flow usually decreases genetic differences
between populations by routinely adding and removing individuals.
Gene flow tends to keep populations of species from varying too much by
continually "mixing" the alleles of the species.
In contrast, isolated gene pools are important factors in speciation, since
they minimize gene flow.
- Random Drift and Small Populations A population can be subject to
rapid and random changes which can be caused by chance events. When a
population is large, chance events are less likely to impact the gene
frequency (although over time they can). With small populations random events
can have a much greater impact. Such random changes in gene frequencies are
known as genetic or random drift.
Characteristics of Genetic (Random) Drift
- Rapid and random (chance) changes in gene frequencies of populations can
result in a localized reduction in variation for that population.
- More rapid when the gene pool is small and/or isolated
- Genetic drift tends to reduce variation within one population, but
increase genetic variation between different populations.
Some Genetic Drift Methods
- Population bottleneck
Some catastrophic event causing a
"bottleneck" (drastic reduction in size of a large population caused by some
unfavorable condition). The few survivors' genotypes will be the source of
the subsequent generations.
- Founder Effect
A small number of individuals disperse or move
to an area isolated from the original population. The new population, with a
small gene pool, will be established with a preponderance of a few
genotypes. (like the bottleneck). The dispersed frequency will determine the
character of the new population, which may differ significantly from the
original population (which is how the founder effect differs from a
bottleneck; in the bottleneck, the gene pool consists of the survivors from
the original pool, rather than migrants). An example of this is the
frequency of polydactyly in the Pennsylvania Dutch of the United States
- Non-Random Mating and Mate Selection
For the Hardy Weinberg to
work, each gamete produced by any male would have an equal chance of combining
with any gamete made by any female (of that species). This occurs very rarely
in populations. Differential reproduction is a significant part of the
Darwin-Wallace theory, and mate selection. is an important part of natural
selection.
There are "bazillions" of examples of mate selection strategies, some of
which will be discussed later, as well as species which use other means of
non-random mating, such as those animals which are harem forming.
Sexual (or Mate) Selection - A special case of Selection
Sexual
selection involves any trait (adaptation) that gives an individual a
preferential advantage in mating. Such sexual selection is very important to
non-random mating.
- Some examples are:
- Sexual dimorphism
- Mating behaviors
Competition for mates among harem animals
Courtship Behavior
(Display and Choice)
One could give a course's worth of examples of
mating behaviors
Just a few are:
Bower birds
Gulls
Mammal rutting behaviors for harem
breeders
- Natural Selection (and selection, in general)
In the
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, all individuals must be equally adaptive in their
environment for all of their genetic characteristics. In real populations this
is not the case.
- The many variants in a population will have different responses to the
common environment in which they live.
- The conditions of the environment enhance the survival of certain
phenotypes so these individuals have greater reproductive success.
- This differential reproduction results in passing more of the successful
genes into the gene pool affecting the gene frequency of the next
generation
- Natural selection is the result of this differential
reproduction. Evolution by natural selection occurs whenever these conditions
are met in populations. Documentation of this abounds in the field of ecology
where studies of competition are common.
Although natural selection acts on phenotypes, recall that the phenotype is
the expression of the genotype, and it is the specific alleles which are
passed on to the next generation.
Natural selection does not cause
genetic changes within an individual. An individual cannot evolve. Natural
selection acts on the individual. The population evolves as a consequence of
differential reproduction.
Moreover, evolutionary change is not, in and of itself, something that is
good or more valuable (or bad). Evolutionary change occurs because a specific
environmental condition favors one genetic combination over another. If the
environment changes, the genetic combination favored may also change.
How does Natural Selection Affect Population
Patterns?
There are three basic patterns that emerge in populations
through time, as a result of selection pressures (or forces). They
are:
Directional Selection
- The population consistently moves in one direction as one phenotype is
favored at the expense of others. This differs from stabilizing where extremes
are reduced at both ends of the variation continuum.
- Directional selection is typically a response to a changing environmental
condition or to a new environment.
- Examples
- Peppered moth in England - a dimorphic population where the shift has
been to the dark form in response to pollution
- Resistance to
pesticides
Stabilizing
Selection
- A narrow range of phenotypes, often those that are intermediate and
usually more common, are favored over extreme variants. Extremes tend to
decrease from generation to generation.
- This is more common in stable habitats, where the environment is
predictable.
- It is believed that stabilizing selection is more common for more traits
in populations than other evolutionary
patterns.
Disruptive
Selection
- Extremes are favored at the expense of intermediate forms of a trait, so
that the frequencies of extremes increase.
- A patchy environmental condition promotes disruptive selection
- Polymorphism is a common result of diversifying selection.
- It is possible to have polymorphism within a single habitat, if there
are balances that favor more than one type. This is called balanced
polymorphism , and the morphs that are adaptive are stable
phenotypes.
- Examples
- The finches in the Galapagos (different beak shapes for different food
sources)
- Swallowtail butterflies (different predators)
- Sickle cell anemia in areas with malaria
Adaptive Radiation
is a term that is often used when a single ancestral type eventually evolves
into many similar species, each with specific differences, such as the
Galapagos finches
Features
(traits) that are subject to selection: Adaptations
In general
terms, adaptations are characteristics that help an individual survive
and reproduce in its environment. The environment includes both the physical
environment and the interactions with other organisms.
This section overlaps with the study of ecology, the relationships of
organisms to their surroundings. Many of the relationships of organisms deal
with survival strategies: competition for resources, or predator and prey
interactions, or symbiosis. A few examples will be
discussed.
Morphological
Adaptations
Shapes, patterns, size, colors
Mechanical
Protection
- Spines, thorn, hairs, prickles
- Very common on plants
- Common on some small animals, too
Warning patterns
- Striking pattern or colors that signal to potential predators that you are
to be avoided (don't sample me)
"Protective
Patterns" (A continuum of sophistication)
- Camouflage patterns
- Pattern blends in with surroundings
- Examples
- Drab plumage of young and of nurturing females
- Walking Stick insects
- Ptarmigan in rocks or in winter, in snow
- Cryptic patterns (very similar) but tricky in nature
- Prey resembles something else which is not a prey item
- Examples
- Industrial melanism -- looks like tree bark and lichens
- Leaf Hoppers -- look like leaf-cutter ants on the trail
- Insect which resembles a crocodile head
- Trick eyes
- Significant spots (on tail, for example)
- Mimicry - (the very best) Often involves many strategies
- Resemble something else that has a bad association, so no one eats you.
You might be most delicious. Overlaps with cryptic patterns (which also
allow you to avoid predation).
- Examples
- Monarch and Viceroy
- Syrphid flies and Bees
- In some plants, a reproductive
strategy
Behavioral
Adaptations
- Distraction/Confusion Behavior
- Examples
- Mother Bird with broken wing
- Twisting and turning when fleeing
- Enlarging body or presenting largest dimension to predator
- Rearing up on hind legs to look bigger
- Other Common behaviors
- Nocturnal-diurnal behavior
- Sunning on rocks - "alpine bees"
- Warning sounds. Predator recognizes a sound in a manner that indicates
that predator might be harmed by encounter
- Examples
- Rattlesnake
- clicking beetles
- growling
Altruism
Behavior
that endangers the individual to protect other members of the population. This
occurs most commonly among closely related individuals, and is called kin
selection. To understand altruism in the evolutionary context you need to
remember that what counts in the contribution of alleles to the next
generation's gene pool. If "my" behavior results in the next generation's gene
pool having a higher frequency of similar alleles to mine, it can be favored.
This assumes the ability of organisms to recognize closely related members.
This is observed in many social animals, such as wolves. In a wolf pack, only
one pair breeds. All others help to protect and raise the single litter.
Physiological Adaptations
Some Examples
- Metabolic water requirements for desert organisms
- Altitude survival (rbc # increases)
rbc doping is sometimes used by
athletes.
- Antifreeze chemicals for Arctic survival
- Heat-resistant enzymes in bacteria
- Toxic metabolites (poisons or distasteful chemicals)
- This works well for plants since animals can sample the plant without
causing permanent damage to either. Sampling an animal often causes its
death. Animals more often use chemicals for offensive behavior.
- Examples
- Slugs and tobacco.
- Skunks, fire ants or scorpions which spray or
sting
- Second-hand toxins
- Animal incorporates a toxin or defense mechanism from something it
eats.
- Example
- Monarch on milkweed glycosides
- Nudibranchs and
nematocysts
The
Adaptive Strategy of Symbiosis
In a symbiosis, two types of
organisms become closely associated with each other so that survival depends on
both organisms. Symbiosis can be
- Mutually beneficial (mutualism )
- Beneficial to one, but neutral to the second
(commensalism )
- Harmful to one, but beneficial to the second (parasitism
)
Some examples of mutualisms are
- Nitrogen fixing Rhizobium and Legumes
- Cleaner Fish and Sharks
- Clown Fish and Anemones
- Corals and Dinoflagellates
- Ants and a variety of mutualistic partners
- Entire subject of pollination biology for reproductive success in
flowering plants
Some examples of commensal
relationships are
- "Demodex", our facial mites
- Intestinal and skin bacteria
- Decorator crabs, which benefit from the organisms they attach to their
carapace to camouflage themselves. Being carried around on a crab's back seems
to have no effect on the "decorations".
- Thousands of Epiphytes
There are "thousands" of examples of
parasitic relationships. For many humans, the debilitating
effects of parasites reduces their survival so that common illnesses become
life-threatening.
It is obvious that we could discuss adaptations and
successful survival mechanisms for many days, and by now we should be clear on
how the selection of phenotypes which have beneficial adaptations for their
surroundings can result in population changes from generation to generation, so
that species can change over time.
Remember, it's crucial to look at any
adaptation in the context of its surroundings. Features with adaptive value in
one habitat many be negative in a
second.
Extinction
We have discussed
a number of adaptations and given examples of successful adaptations. What about
species which lack adaptations in their environment, and lose to those who are
better adapted? Adaptations can affect not just populations of one species, but
natural selection can also lead to the loss of a species by
extinction.
When we look at extinction, the most significant cause of
extinction is change in habitat. Today we often discuss loss of habitat, but
this loss is generally not a physical loss of geography, but a change in that
habitat which results in an area no longer suitable for the individuals who
originally lived there. Humans have done much in the past few centuries to alter
habitat, to the detriment of thousands of species.
Geographic changes and
accompanying climate changes have also been responsible for loss of populations.
Catastrophic geological events such as volcanic eruptions or massive earthquakes
cause major environmental alterations. It is speculated that a meteor may be
responsible for the extinction of dinosaurs, along with numbers of other
organisms which lived in that era.