15:1 After these things the word of the LORD came unto Abram in a vision,
saying, Fear not, Abram: I am they shield and thy exceeding great reward.
The use of hypnoses, or drugs to brainwash or to create a situation of awe
is not mystical at all. We do it today.
15:2 And Abram said, Lord God, what wilt thou give me, seeing I go childless,
and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus?
15:3 And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one
born in my house is mine heir.
15:4 And, behold, the word of the LORD came unto him, saying, This shall
not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels
shall be thine heir.
If Abram is one of the last of the long lived descendants of Noah, then
the Anunnaki would be aware of when he would be at an age to father children. It would be much later than this age. Or it might even be that Sarai is the
one of long life and she will not come into her menses at this time.
15:5 And he brought him forth abroad, and said,Look now toward heaven, and
tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So
shall they seed be.
15:6 And he believed in the LORD: and he counted it to him for
righteousness.
15:7 And he said unto him, I am the LORD that brought thee out of Ur of the
Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it.
15:8 And he said, Lord God, whereby shall I know that I shall inherit it?
15:9 And he said unto him, Take me an heifer of three years old, and a
she goat of three years old and a ram of three years old, and a
trutledove, and a young pigeon.
Again we have these animal sacrifices. To what purpose would a god of
creation use these same animals for sacrifices? Christian teaching would
have it that this form of sacrifice is to herald the appearance of Christ
and his crucifixion. Then that would mean that the Roman method of
crucifying people was set up by God! That it was an ends justifying the
means? That in order for Christ to redeem us in this manner thousands of
innocents must die in this horrible way before Jesus does. Are they all
then not also Christs according to the Church? It seems man is expendable doesn�t it? And how does man know he is redeemed by this method? Just
because the church has evolved a method for letting us know is not a good enough answer. What if the church never got off the ground? And does this
mean that people who don�t know about the sacrifice don�t get saved? No!
It is my belief that animal sacrifices were also introduced to get men
used to the idea of human sacrifices! To immure them from the horror of
killing each other.
15:10 And he took unto him all these and divided them in the midst and laid
each piece one against another: but the birds divided he not.
15:11 And when the fowls came down upon the carcasses, Abram drove them away.
15:12 And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram: and lo,
an horror of great darkness fell upon him.
In this last paragraph we have a description of something terrible that
overcame Abram. It was a horror that had a voice though, for it speaks.
And how did it get recorded? Does Abram record these happenings?
Questions with no answers. This is obviously hypnoses, or a post hypnotic
suggestion.
15:13 And he said unto Abram,"Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a
stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them: and they
shall afflict them four hundred years" :Note that the descendants of Abram
that are to go to Egypt (Ur) have never been there before, even if Abraham
came from there.
15:14 "And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and
afterward shall they come out with great substance". At this point I would
like to point out that either this god does not keep promises or we have
deffinitly been looking at the wrong area for the Exodus since Egypt was
never Judged very harshly, however if you look at Ur as the scene of the
Exodus then they were judged harshly as Ur disappeared at the time of the
Exodus. In fact no nation except the Hebrews ever mentioned or wrote the
name of Ur after this.
It seems that this "Lord� has time travel. He can see into the future.
But there were two times that the Hebrews were in captivity. But only in
Egypt(Ur) are they slaves for 400 years. Which certainly explains why
there is no sign of Hebrew weaving, pottery,or words in Egypt of the Nile.
15:15 And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried in a
good old age.
15:16 But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the
iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full.
This is definitely a phrase that suggest that they will again become
captives or slaves. And the people who enslave them are called Amorites.
The other time that the hebrews were enslaved was in "Egypt". And the
Amorites are referred to as if they were the original enslavers of Abrams
people. This points to the land of Babylon and the descendants of Ur. Not
Egypt of the Nile, but Egypt of Ur and the Euphrates. At the time that is
spoken of here, Egypt of the Nile was called by other names. Khem, Tamera,
Khemet. (Egypt was the name given to a temple area on the upper Nile built
by the Hyksos at a later period.)
15:17 And it came to pass, that, when the sun went down, and it was dark,
behold a smoking furnace, and burning lamp that passed between those places.
(This has the appearance of some kind of aerial vehicle moving around. The one that carried the "Lord"? Or his 'angels'?)
15:18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto
thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great
river, the river Euphrates:
This is a section that needs to be looked at far more closely than has been
done before. This is supposed to be the God of Creation talking here. And
these are HIS PROMISES! If the words are supposed to be the truth from the
creator then he is saying that the land between the Nile river in Egypt and
the Euphrates river in Iran are to be the land of the Hebrews. We know this
is not the case and never was. At least not up to this day! Was this put in
at a later date? Was someone backdating a claim for the future? Or, if Ur
was the original 'Egypt' then he is speaking of the area between the
Euphrates and the Tygris! We will follow this change closely.
15:19 The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites.
15:20 And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims,
15:21 And the Amorites, and the Cananites, and the Girgashites, and
the Jebusites.
Between 15:18 and 15:19 there seems to be missing words. The list of names
has no connection to what has gone before. Were they supposed to be names
of tribes that would inherit the land? It doesn't say.
BOOK TWO, CHAPTER 16
16:1 Now Sarai Abram�s wife bare him no children: and she had an
handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar.
At this point in history there was no Egypt of the Nile valley. The land
of Egypt was a small area around the Tigris and the city of Ur. The
river was then known as the Nile but it was not the main river of the
Euphrates. So when it is claimed that Sarah had an handmaid that was an
Egyptian, she was from the area of Ur. At this point in time there is no
mention of Abraham EVER being as far south as the Nile Valley of Africa.
Sarah would have gotten her slave somewhere along her journey so far.
16:2 And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the Lord hath restrained me
from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain
children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai.
16:3 And Sarai Abram�s wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram
had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband
Abram to be his wife. (Is this the first event in history of a man having
two wives? I am surprised that no one has noticed this earthshaking event
of human history. It sets a precident!)
16:4 And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived: and when she saw that
she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes.
We now know that it is Sarai who is not breeding. And this cannot be
because of old age but from delayed menses. If her mistress had been old
in her eyes, then Sarai would have been sympathised with and not dispised.
16:5 And Sarai said unto Abram, My wrong be upon thee: I have given my maid
unto thy bosom; and when she saw that she had conceived, I was dispised in
her eyes: the LORD judge between me and thee.
16:6 But Abram said unto Sarai, Behold, thy maid is in thy hand: do to her
as it pleaseth thee. And when Sarai delt hardly with her, she fled from her
face.
16:7 And the angel of the LORD found her by a fountain of water in
the wilderness, by the fountain in the way to shur.
Although it is impossible at this late date, it would be interesting
to find where this wilderness was really located. That we have
given that name to any area doesn�t mean a thing as over the centuries
great changes have come about in the area of the Bible stories.
16:8 And he said, Hagar, Sarai�s maid. whence camest thou? and whither
wilt thou go? And she said, I flee from the face of my mistress Sarai.
16:9 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Return to thy mistress,
and submit thyself under her hands.
16:10 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, I will multiply thy
seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.
Isn�t it interesting to contemplate the role women play in the existence of
men, not to mention the history of men. All humans stem from us, yet we are
the lowest of the low in some countries. What is the hidden anger that
leads men to this outlook? It appears to be deep-seated and hidden. Or can
it stem from the anger of the Anunnaki who created us? Because we screwed
up THEIR LIVES? Because of the apple incident that changed their history?
If so they have very good reasons to hate us. And don�t forget that with
their long life span, these events are still within their own personal
history of the original group that created us!
16:11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child,
and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath
heard they affliction.
16:12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and
every man�s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all
his bretheren.
Now we are led to believe that this boy is the father of all the Arab
nations. And his future is set! Since I am aware that God gave mankind
the gift of freewill, even he does not control the future. That is the
whole point of creation. Yet this "Lord� knows the future! Why? Because
he has time travel? Only someone who has gone into the future would have
the ability to tell the future.
16:13 And she called the name of the LORD that spake unto her, Thou God
seest me;for she said, Have I also here looked after him that seeth me?
(Is she refferring to a time when she waited on them in Abram's tent?)
16:14 Wherefore the well was called Beer-lahal-roi; behold, it is between
Kadesh and Bered.
16:15 And Hagar bare Abram a son: and Abram called his son�s name, which
Hagar bare, Ishmael.
16:16 And Abram was fouscore and six years old, when Hagar bare
Ishmael to Abram.
That is 86 years old if I�m not mistaken. Not unheard of and not unusual,
but very suspect. Supposedly this is the beginning of the Arab race. Yet
the mother of this boy already came from a slave group. Who or what or why
taught the post deluvian world about slavery? We know that Noah cursed and
condemned Ham and his progeny to be the slaves of his brothers; but why? What
really was the crime that Ham committed? Seeing his father naked cannot have
been the sole reason for such a sentence to be given. Did he use his father?
Sodomize him? It had to have been something very serious and Noah had to
have the agreement of his other sons on the sentence that was proposed.In
other words they must have been aware of the nature of the crime.
Note: It has occurred to me that if the Moon was originally farther away
from the earth and had little or no affect on the tides this Earth would
be totally different. If the moon was used to alter the earth by creating
a force that created tides, this might have altered many things upon the
Earth, including the creation of a monthly menses for women instead of a
yearly menses as all larger animals on this earth normally have. Why, if
women or mankind is of this earth, do we have a different breeding cycle?
To be fertile every month is not normal for our breed. The length of time
we gestate, and the time after birth when our young are helpless does not
point to a natural cycle for our menses. That we are dictated to by our
moon in this regard is obvious.
