Does mans history tell us anything about this drop in life span? Not in so
many words it doesn�t. But in fact the behavior of mankind does tell us a
lot. I have already mentioned the concept of how the massive building was
created in order to house their Long lived ancestors who eventually became
gods in the eyes of their progeny. This occurred all over the world where
the descendants of the survivors had been transported when the Tower of
Babel was built.
Let�s use a little bit of psychology here. If you were the parent and
grandparent of children who were aging and dying before your eyes, while
you stayed young and healthy and alive, how would you feel about that?
A little sad? A little guilty at your own good fortune? A little depressed
by the sight of them? And what would you feel if you found that not only
where your progeny aging and dying, but that they were also not growing
the way they should? They were smaller than the first and second
generations.
I know what I would do. I would see them as little as possible in order
that my heart didn�t break, and in order that they didn�t break. I would
also try everything that I could in my power at first to stop this problem.
One of the things that I would try would be to breed with the later
generations in order to try and pass on an older and therefore stronger
or better gene. (And isn't that what the Greek and Roman Gods were doing?)
And one of the biggest problems that would arise would be that the
shorter life span meant less time in which to learn things. Shorter
breeding span, which was offset by a shorter youth, leading to
increased population. And with that shorter life span came the
inability to remember and learn all the things that there were to
learn. And with this shorter life span came a lessening of the fear of
dying. Hence the willingness to fight and war.
And so would be born the concept of Gods. (note; I am not equating them
with the Anunnaki.) If every center had set up or built a �home� for their
oldsters, Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and their wives, they would also
have an army of servants turn out when they came to town to visit with
them. It would be a big day in the town or city. They would be worshipped
and venerated. The stories of the gods are twisted and turned over the
centuries, but the basic is there. I am sure that Noah told them the story
of Adam and Eve. This becomes the story of Zeus and Hera and Athena in a
strange way. Hera would be Lilith maybe, and Athena would be Eve. She was
born from her fathers head. She was not born in the normal way and neither
was Eve. As for Hera. Well, there is that story going the rounds of the
first woman to be created, Lillith. She was cut from the first Genesis
story and yet it keeps showing up in the myths.
When you read the stories of the ancient Gods, they all stem from the
land of Iraq and Iran of the present day. As they traveled west they
altered a bit but not too much.
One day they were there and the next day they were gone. Why did the belief
in the ancient gods stop? Because they never showed up again. Where did
they go? Are they still alive? Did they create the cities of mystery like
Shamballa, and Xanadu? And were they the Gods like Quatzlcoatle?
NOTE; Anomalies of our world that no one has ever questioned in the
academic world but should have; Why small people would build massive
temples and thrones that were unnecessary for them? Were the first lines
larger than the following lines? Why short lived people would build
temples that would outlive not only them but many lives to come. And this
at a time when they had more to do to survive than waste time building
temples for worshipping mythical gods. Why human beings, who are supposed
to have come up from the ape, would have gods if they didn�t really exist.
Animals don�t worship things.
Animals don�t believe in Gods.
You cannot go by what we do to-day. We are the end product of many
experiences. And not all of them are understood by us to-day. I do not
deny that there is a reality that contains marvels and mysteries, but
to whom do you assign them to?
And I do not deny that our long ago ancestors had a good reason to create
the Gods and Goddesses of ancient times. I just think that what they were
worshipping was a science beyond their own. If you read some of the old
stories of these Gods and Goddesses they sound like they had access to
some of our finer things of life. There is even a mechanical man in the
old stories. And check out the mechanical gadgets in," A Thousand And
One Nights". In other words we now perform the same feats of magic and
god-like acts. Does that make us Gods? Or better still, did that make our
ancestors Gods??
Why didn�t they give their children the same sciences as they controlled?
Would you give a small child the ability to set off the nuclear rockets?
If you lived for 1,000 years and you saw that your children only lived
for half of that and your grandchildren for even less than that, you would
see them as still children when they died.
The story of Gilgamesh tells the story of mankind. But like a lot of
stories that last a long time they are seen differently by each generation.
And so we have many versions of the Gilgamesh story. One thing that it does
show; the Annunaki were still interfering in our lives. This story must be
contemporary with the time of Abram. The saddest thing I have ever
experienced was to find the Gilgamesh story treated by us as a children�s
fable. It is far from a fable. It is a history of our ancestors of a time
of great tragedy. The end of lives that were long. The beginning of death.
When did that deserve to be a children�s fable?
According to this dating system Noah died 350 years after the flood at the
age of 950 while a sixth and ninth generation descendant had died before
him. Time to panic.
What form did the panic take? Not very extreme. There was nothing that
could be done except one. There had to be a way to set up a system to keep
alive the memory of how things used to be. In case they ever had the
chance to bring it back again. And that was by setting aside a line of
descent where their only job would be to remember and to keep records of
this event and their lineage and history.
We have only a few records of how people were existing in the early times;
the Epic of Gilgamesh, and the Bible are among them. Both contradicting
each other to a certain extent and both supporting each other. They
contradict each other by the gods being ancestors in Gilgamesh, and they
both support the flood story and Noah.
I ask you to consider this: If man was created by aliens and we are due
to see them soon, what does the story of Gilgamesh tell us about them?
That they are responsible for the flood and the early deaths of mankind.
The Bible on the other hand, as we have come to view it, tells us that
the creator did all this horror. If the aliens did it then they are not
really interested too much in how we are doing. And if God did it then
why would he be interested in how we are surviving?
That leaves us with just one question. Why was Abram chosen to create
this group? Well, when we look at his story he seems to be a throwback
to some long lived genes. He comes closest to living a long time or
breeding later. Or maybe there were just things about Abram that we will
never know that were conducive to this task. He was a fighter. That we do
know. So let�s follow his story and see how close it matches to what I
have claimed.
12-1 Now the Lord has said unto Abram, get thee out of thy country, and
from they kindred, and from they father�s house, unto a land that I will
show thee. According to the Bible he was heading for Haran. The first
settlement of Noah's family.
Why separate him from his own people? And is this coming from the Annunaki?
They are separating him so that he will follow new orders. In this society
they have learned to obey the patriarchs of the family above all others.
He must not be divided in his obedience to the new leader. This work is
above family and clan. It goes to the very heart of survival. Therefore he
must learn new ways and BE the leader himself. For he is to take with him
all the books and the knowledge of the old ones and the story of mankind
so that it is never lost.
This information comes from Shem, through Noah directly, since it is certain
that Abram was around Noah during the move to Haran with his fathers group.
And it had to have been the Annunaki that created this division because as
the leader of this clan, Abrams father would not have divided it by letting
him leave on his own accord. In numbers there is strength, and at this time
it seems that they are fighting for power already. OR..this part of it was
put in afterwards to give special meaning to Abram. OR..this was the
Creator! I cannot rule that out, although, in view of the following an alien
presence that is capable of space travel may also have time travel.
12:2 And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee and
make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
12:3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth
thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
Only in the end times will we come to understand those words fully. But
for now, it is only from the jews that Christianity was born, and in this
manner the concept of love for thy brother and all mankind. Neither
Bhudism or Mohamadism teach kindness and love to thy fellow man. Nor
charity. Bhudism teaches self love, and Mohamadism teaches one to pay its
debts at the end of the year. That is not charity or love for mankind.
12:4 So Abram departed, as the Lord had spoken unto him; and Lot went with
him: and Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran.
(If the preflood survivors had the same science as before then they would
have been able to test Abrams sperm count to find out why he wasn�t breeding.
They would have found out that he was a throwback to the earlier generations
that did not breed until they were in their second century or a bit earlier.
This would have made him a good candidate for the patriarch of a new line.
And there must have been the same evidence in Sarai also, which is why she
conceived so late in life compared to the later generations. There is also
some evidence in anciant Hebrew scrolls that claim that Sarai was also his
sister.
12:5 And Abram took Sarai his wife, and Lot his brother�s son, and all
their substance that they had Gathered, and the souls that they had gotten
in Haran; and they went forth to go into the land of Canaan; and into the
land of Canaan they came.
In reading the above sentence we come to realize that slavery has already
taken place, or a form of it. They had either gotten a group of workers or
slaves or an army. Or all of them. This is not a group of wandering
shepherds but a rich family on the move. Wealth means power. Before they
went to Haran, they had come from Ur. One of the largest and mightiest
cities of its day and age. Home of the Anunnaki.
Now, at this point I want to stop and do a bit of Geological measuring to
set the North and South poles. And the directions on this map of the Near
East.
We all know that the pyramids of Egypt are set perfectly due North and
South. However we have a tilt to the actual north pole and so the line of
travel of the sun is not exactly due east or west. So it does not matter
whether the sun rises in the east or the west as Velikovsky claims,
everyone will use the same terms of going up or down according to this
line of the suns path. Up is above it, down is below it. Or is it? I have
always been puzzled by the fact that the Egyptians called the head of the
NILE the upper NILE, while they called the part that ended at the
Mediterranean the lower NILE. On our maps it should be the other way
around. It is after all above the meridian line of the middle of the earth.
And because of that the NILE empty's up toward the northern half of the globe.
The only River to do that. It is possible that this came about because
the world was flipped when this was named. And the north pole was the
bottom of the world. Directions would reflect this. Also the sun would rise
in the west instead of the east. This puts a whole new slant on the story
of Abraham. We can no longer read the story the same way. But it also
depends on how far back in time that this occurred. I will put myself on
line now as claiming that this all took place on a time line running from
the time of the Flood going back 10,000 years. So we are looking at a
date of 10,350 and some odd years after that. It is just after Noah died.
(I had an American teacher write me to tell me that they had rivers that
flowed North! I was talking about rivers EMPTYING NORTHWARD. The Nile is
the only river to do that. Lot's of river's flow towards the North before
emptying to the South.)
I have not gone so far as to alter the directions of south and north but
I have been far more accurate as to getting the directions of sunrise and
sunset, which leads to a more accurate direction of up and down. All these
people would have had for direction would be the suns journey across the
heavens to tell them directions. And the stars at night. When you follow
that method you find that the directions of up and down are very odd in
the Bible. For one thing, you do not go DOWN to Egypt from the land of
Canaan, you go across to Egypt. Also the land of the Nile was never known
as �Egypt� until a much later date. It was originally known as the land
of Khemm. But what most people do not know, as the Archaeologists have kept
it quiet this long, is that the land of Chaldea was once known as "Egypt"
and their kings were known as Pharaoh�s. And they had a habit of marrying
their sisters to keep the blood line pure. In history only three lands did
that; Ur, Egypt, and Hawaii. And it is strange that Hawaiians had the
same head gear shape that the Greeks used. There were some boats of
Alexander�s that disappeared in the Gulf of Aden. Or from India. And if
they were Alexander�s men then they may have been recruits from the Persian
army they had defeated. Soldiers are not known for knowing anything else
with which to earn a living. If they landed on the islands of the Indian
ocean they would have gone back to their own style of Kingship.
12:6 And Abram passed through the land unto the place of Sichem unto the
plain of Moreh. And the Canaanite was then in the land.
There is a question in my mind as to whether this name of Canaanite is a
rendition of Cainanite. Was this land that belonged to Cain�S offspring?
And is that why they were shoved off their land?
In the genealogy tables I will show how Cains line re-emerges with the line
of Adam again. After the flood there are indications that Cains line is
still extant. Why else would they record it in the geneological tables?
To keep track of HIS line. I guess we will never know for sure.
12:7 And the Lord appeared unto Abram, and said, "Unto they seed will I
give this land; and here builded he an alter unto the Lord, who appeared
unto him.
12:8 And he removed from thence unto a mountain on the east of Beth-el on
the west, and Hai on the east: and there he builded an altar unto the
lord, and called upon the name of the Lord.
12:9 And Abram journeyed, going on still toward the south.
Here is where I have trouble with the modern concept of this land. With the
way the sun moves he would have been going due west, not south if he had
been in present day Palestine. He would have been heading towards the Jordan
River, and the Jordan river might have been there but the Dead Sea was not
at this time part of the landscape. In my book he was heading towards the
city of Ur. Most of the sites claimed by archaeologists are not proven
except in their own minds. Some of these cities may have been in the area
of Iraq, which they would have been traveling through. This is a man with
many hundreds of people and thousands of cattle and sheep. You don�t head
for the sand and rocks with sheep. They need good grazing land and it was
not to be found in Palestine even in those days. Nor would he have headed
south towards heat. It just doesn�t make sense, and never did to me.
12:10 And there was a famine in the land: and Abram went down into Egypt
to sojourn there: for the famine was grievous in the land.
If as I claim, the land of Ur was also known as Egypt, then this is a
sensible direction to take as the plains are well watered and there are
low hills to the east of the city. And this is the area where wheat was
first grown. And from anywhere in the land below Haran it would be down
in direction. Ur was situated down from the plains of the Euphrates River.
12:11 And it came to pass, when he was come near to enter into Egypt,
that he said unto Sarai his wife, Behold now, I Know that thou art a fair
woman to look upon;
12:12 Therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee,
they shall say, This is his wife; and they will kill me, but they will
save thee alive.
12:13 Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister: that it may be well with
me for thy sake: and my soul shall live because of thee.
Well, we have quite a bit of news in those lines. I. Abram was aware of
what went on in �Egypt" even though he was not supposed to have been there
before? However if he was referring to the �Egypt of Ur" then he was
aquanted with it as he had lived there before. 2. Even though Sarai was
getting on in years she was still considered desirable enough to cause her
husbands death? Come on..... No, but if she had some of those long lived
genes then she was not aging like other women. She was like Abram. Both of
them did not show their ages. 3. Abram was not above deception nor was his
Lord God who was supporting him. Quite frankly he was willing to lie to
save his own skin and let his wife commit adultery, which may not have been
a sin at that time?? Survival skills in a way. And was she really his sister?
This may indeed be the truth.
12:14 And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the
Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair.
Does this sound like an old woman to you? And yet in a later verse she is
not much younger than Abram. And Abram is supposed to be over 75 years of
age. Had he married a younger woman? Not according to later verses. And yet
she is still fair to the eye. This denotes that she was not aging as fast
as the others, that she had a genetic makeup that was closer to the earlier
generations. And so did Abram.
12:15 The princes also of Pharaoh saw her, and commended her before Pharaoh:
and the woman was taken into Pharaoh�s house.
Not only did she have to be beautiful for these men to notice her but also
young looking.
12:16 And he entreated Abram well for her sake: and he had sheep, and oxen,
and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels..
12:17 And the Lord plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues
because of Sarai Abrams�s wife.
12:18 And Pharaoh called Abram, and said, What is this that thou hast done
unto me? Why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife?
12:19 Why saidst thou, she is my sister? So I might have taken her to me
to wife: now therefore behold they wife, take her, and go thy way.
12:19 And Pharaoh commanded his men concerning him: and they sent him away,
and his wife, and all that he had.
When we know the manner of Abram�s life and his direct relationship with
Noah, who was in the party that left Ur, then we have to doubt that he
would deliberately lie. Therefore for him to refer to his wife as his
sister may not have been a lie. That there had been cross breeding with
brothers and sister in the early days is not out of the question. And the
setting for Ur may be where this took place. It was well known that they
married their sisters in Ur in order to keep the line pure. (we will
follow this belief later on).
It may also be that they were trying to breed back to the original genetic
material in order to find some way to prolong life. And that Abram and his
sister were long lived and not aging shows that they may have been on the
right track, except for one problem. She was not getting pregnant. This is
what may have triggered the next move to preserve the knowledge. The
Anunnaki may have known that they would have to resort to artificial
insemination in the end if they wanted to preserve the knowledge. For them
that was not a problem, after all their knowledge had created this race in
the first place.
