It is my belief that the incident of the rainbow was used by the Anunnaki
to allay the fears of Noah and his family. The entire group must have
been in terrible fear for their lives from these alien gods. They had to
be reassured that it wouldn�t happen again, and at the same time
establishing control over them by taking credit for the event. We really
have no firm idea of the cause of the Flood.(SEE MY NEW ARTICLE:HISTORY
UNMASKED on the home page.)
After this section of the Bible there is a detailed list of their lineage
and the races they form as well as the lands they end up with. It then
goes on to the story of the Tower Of Babel incident. But what happened
between those dates? It was not until I read Ron Wyatt�s research on the
Ark in his site that I listed earlier, called Anchor Stones, that we get
a picture of those last times.
Since the Ark landed on a mountain top there must have been water all
around them. It may have taken weeks and months to drain enough for them
to even think of leaving the Ark. And as for letting the animals go, under
those conditions, was impossible! Where would they go? What would they
eat? They would not have survived without help. And they probably would
have eaten each other. And a few acres of mountain top is not going to
feed a diverse group of animals.
After thinking about it I have come to the conclusion that they would have
released only the cattle and sheep to graze on what grass sprang up. The
rest of the animals would have to wait for pens to be built, the ground
to dry enough to grow fodder and food for all of them. I think that
during the year they floated on the new waters a lot of the animals were
already breeding in their pens. This must have happened with those
animals that came into heat on a monthly bases and during that year. It
certainly would not be something that was discouraged.
The question then arises; during the crises did they use these animals
for food for themselves and some of the animals? Certainly, the sentence
that says the animals would fear them is caused by some form of change
in the group. Their body odor is all I can think of that would make such
a drastic change. And that would change if they became meat eaters.
Archaeologists that have been studying the puzzling farming methods of
the South American tribes, have come to the startling conclusion that
these small fields, that are built in tiers up high mountains where
nothing grows because of the cold today, make sense only if there was
a flood! The tiers being formed at the top of mountains surrounded by
water. As the water receded, the tiers were built lower and lower as
ground became available.The only other explanation is that the tiers
were built on low land and the mountains kept rising on them. Either way
it presents a problem for the Geologists still living with the 'Stable
world theory'. I find it interesting that this form of mountain or hill
farming is seen all over the world where it is mountainous.
The fact that Mr. Wyatt found these huge rock pens near the site of what
he believes is Noah's Ark makes sense. They could not be cooped up in the
Ark any longer than was neccessry. They needed fresh air and sunlight.I cannot begin to imagine the labour that those eight people went to in order to preserve life on this planet. The size of these pens and the size of the stones used for them bears out my belief that along with the long life of these first humans they were also of a very large build. They may have been kept in these pens until the waters completly drained. Maybe two or three years or even more. The land need to recover. And there is also the possibility that not all of the animals survived. That no one of any note in the historical or Archaeological field is interested in this site speaks volumes to me. Science does not mind paying lip service to the Church funded Universities they work for but to prove there was a flood is not in their agenda of the stable Earth concept.
We will never know how long it took for the waters to recede enough to
disperse the animals, but the concept of them all being freed at the site
of the landing is ridiculous. Another anomaly that created doubt about
the story of the flood as we became more educated after the 16th
century. Without the knowledge though of the Alien presence on Earth, it
is unthinkable that they would survive long enough to make it to lands
far away, let alone onto the other continents and Islands of the world.
They were dispersed over time in the same manner in which they were
collected for the Flood. By the airships of the Aliens. And with their
knowledge and planes they knew when and where to take them to survive.
Before we go into the next Genises story of Babylon, there are two items
I want to mention here; Haran is mentioned as being the home town or city
of Terah, Abraham�s father. This makes sense if it is at the foot of the
mountains of Ararat. In fact it is situated almost directly below the Ron
Wyatt site of the Ark. If it was one of the settlements that Noah and sons
built as they expanded outward, it would have a lot of meaning to Noah�s
family. It would have been the first city built after the Flood! What
does it's land hide of those days! Ron's site mentions a that when the site
of the pens was found there was a huge wall built of glazed clay tiles with
pictures or writing on them. The next time he went to the site these were all
gone. Taken by the locals. Or destroyed by someone. In fact over time the
whole site appears to be vandalized and destroyed. One can only weep for the
loss of history destroyed. The inheritance of all mankind.
The second item is the date of the Flood. If we go by Sitchin�s dates
from his interpretations of the tablets, the Flood took place around
10,000 BC. That's about 12 thousand years ago.
If we go by the genealogy dates of Noah�s family to the time of Abram
and then on to Moses, the flood took place in 3,000 BC. That doesn�t make
sense at all. So one of those dates is wrong. But which one?
Sitchin�s tablets and research claim that the Sphinx and the Pyramids
were built soon after the flood. The claim made recently that the sphinx
is about 10,000 years old, if it can be proven, would back up Sitchin�s
claim of the dates of the Flood. If that is true then the time of
Abraham must be moved back in time and also the time of Moses. Is that
possible? I will answer that question later.
There is one last thing. After the flood it would have taken Noah�s
family too long to build up enough people to be of use to the Annunaki
in their rebuilding program. It is my belief that Enki and Ninhursig
went back to cloning more natives for use in his Africa. All he had to
do was take the pairs of animals he used the first time, from the ones
Noah saved. That would account for the fact that the Africans do not
have a flood story that is indiginous to their region. And there is
nothing that would deny that they may have done that in other regions
also. Only by now they were getting very good at it where'nt they?
But when allmost every other nation has a flood story except Africa
it is something to think about.
FOR MORE ON THE FLOOD GO TO "LINKS" ON THE INDEX PAGE AND ACCESS THE
VELIKOVSKY SITE AT THE BOTTOM.
