It is at this point that I would like to discuss the Adamic line chronology.
That our forbears should retain a geneological record of their preflood
ancestors is not that strange. What is strange is that we would ever forget
them or fail to honor that previous race of humans who died so horribly.
It becomes understandable as we delve deeper into the lost knowledge of
the old Testament.
The first problem we encounter with the preceeding information is the long
life spans of these people. Did they really live that long? Or can it be
shown that somehow time, space, and reality were not recorded right or
truly? For instance there are some people who would claim that this flood
consisted of the Black Sea overflooding for some reason and we saw that as
the whole world being flooded. Or that somehow the Mediteranian overflowed
and flooded all the lands around, and broke the lock or land bridge that
kept the two apart. Outside of their concepts of this there is no other
proof that this lake flooded the near east up to the land of Ur. Instead
there has been a report I read not too long ago that claimed that their
were actually sunken cities on the floor of the Mediteranian showing that
this body of water may not always have been there.
In fact there is little proof that has been found to show that there was
a world wide flood. At least not by modern geologists working for
Universities. But that proof is all around the globe. The problem is one
of mistakes made in time lines.
What kind of proof would you need that there was a world wide flood? What
kind of proof would you need that there had been a multitude of other
races and aliens and people before the flood? What kind of proof would you
need that there where races of high intellegence on earth before the flood?
What kind of proof would you need to show that these races were alien to
our earth? What kind of proof would you need to show that they altered our
earth long before the flood?
Those are the main questions that must be answered in order to tell us
who we really are.
So let�s start with the first question and see what we can come up with.
What kind of proof would you need to show that there was a world wide
flood about 7,000 to 10,000 years ago?
The proof is not in what you can find but in what you shouldn�t be able
to find if there wasn�t a flood. For instance, you shouldn�t be able to
find skulls burried deep beneath the earths surface by miners. Nor
should you be able to find metal artifacts buried deep beneath the earths
surface. Yet those are just a few of the things that have been found. And
the skull was not of a neanderthal. That there was collapsing of the
earths crust caused by the great openings of the earth when the waters
broke forth.
What you should be able to find if there had been no flood is millions
of years of bone piles all over the earth of animals and man. Did you
really think that the few remains you have found of Neanderthal skulls
is the normal amount for a race or races that have been on this earth
for a long time? Living and breeding and dying? Long before they became
�Modern� and learnt to bury their dead they must have been breeding a lot.
They didn�t have birth control in those days. So where did they all go
to? Skulls don�t really dissappear that fast in the dry area�s. Even
when we dig in area�s that we know were inhabited for thousands of years
we find zilch. Nor should you be able to find Oil deep beneath the surface
of the land. Oil is not a mineral. It is from living life forms. As is
natural gasses. These are all from living forms that have decomposed over
the centuries. The scientists refer to this as carbon based fluids. It
takes a lot of animals and human remains and fish remains to make the
oil that we consume. Carbon based fluids is just another way of saying
living matter.
Where do you think it came from?
Nor should you find desserts in China, India, Arabia, Egypt, Sudan,
America. Desserts are formed when water grinds the rocks to dust or sand
and deposits them in place. Leaving them in places that they don�t belong.
Or massive salt flats like in the USA and Peru. Or salt lakes like in
Utah, Peru,or Israel. Only water from the sea would leave salt on the
land. Our geologist have claimed inland seas did this. In a way they are
right, only the inland seas were left there for a short time until they
drained away or evaporated. And if there had been vast ice shields that
covered this part of the continent, how come they left salt lakes, and
not fresh water lakes?
Something or some massive event swept the people,animals and flora off
the face of this earth into the massive caverns that contained the water
that now fills our seas and then closed over them as the earth itself
ruptured and overturned and heaved up to form the land scapes we now have.
Look around you at the formations of mountains that show they were forced
straight upward. At the sheer walls of mesa's, bluffs and escarpments.
This is not the landscape of a million years of wind and rain and slow
change. This is from massive uplifting and up-heavels. And certainly the
huge piles of Dinasours that lie broken and in pieces did not die of old
age, or even of being eaten by other carnavores. I have yet to see a
single mention by any geologist or paleontologest that claimed teeth marks
or savaging of the bones. Surely there were some of these animals that
died of old age? Would they not have been natural food for others? And if
as our experts claim: these animals were here for millions of years, why
is there such a scarcity of their bones? We have been digging up and
mining this earth for some time now and why is it that we don't find them
in great numbers in mines and caverns? Because they have not been here
that long!
Something killed a massive amount of animals and deposited their bones
in huge piles in caves. It also, either killed the Dinasours at the same
time or took whatever bones of theirs were lying around and messed them
all up.
So far as I am aware of no Dinasour bones have ever been found as a
whole carcass. I do not say there aren�t any at all but surely the
paleantologist must be asking themselves by now what force moved their
bones about so much. And please; remember that these were living
creatures at the time and their bone structure was not a thing by itself.
It was a part of the creature, joined by flesh and sinew and hide. If its
bones were scattered then there are only two ways that could have happened.
1. The animal died a natural death and for some strange reason the
carnivores were not interested in eating it as its bones show no sign of
being knawed on,(or hadn�t anyone noticed that fact) and then later when
its flesh had rotted off, some water action tumbled it about. Again
without leaving abrasion marks on the bones(?).
It doesn�t wash. These animals were torn apart while the flesh was still
on them to protect the bones. Something or some massive event left huge
deposits of salt on the ground in recent times. These anomalies can only
be possible with a huge flood or tidal waves of massive proportion. Not
from a lake bed but from a sea.
What other proofs have turned up in the last hundred years of searching?
Many, many things. Massive buildings under water off of Japan, and Malasia.
In fact all around the world we are discovering massive buildings that
lie below the water level of today and these buildings are dated to over
10,000 years. Well before Ice caps were supposed to have been formed.
Yet if Ice caps were formed later, then the removal of all the water
needed would make these sites well above the water line,wouldn�t they?
Many of these massive buildings around the world, both on land and in
the ocean predate the time of the flood. One of the things that intrigued
me was the practicality of men. They don�t really build more than is
neccessary to get by with, yet here were these massive buildings both
before and soon after the flood. Human beings are small, and don�t live
long. Why would we want to kill ourselves to build massive homes too big
for us? Temples that are huge, to worship a myth? We don�t. That�s the
trouble. That is the inconsistancy of most of the worlds anciant momuments.
They don�t compute as the kids say. Not for one single minute. I do not
believe that man is any smarter or dumber today than he was 10,000 years
ago. So there has to be another explanation for the reason men did these
strange things. I will opt for two. Hope and fear. And you will understand
those later in book two
End of Book One.
