To access Index go to bottom of page and click on "home".
Notes for "the 12th Planet" by Sitchin;
1. P. 14= In the section where he has a list of the signs for
language, all the signs in the first list are laying flat.It would
appear that at a later date the signs were reversed. Would that
coincide with a reversal or shift in the planet itself.(see later
note). They may have changed them to coincide with the new
orientation of the Earth if it did a flip.
2. P.25=In the original Sumerean script man is standing, then the
earth shifts and he is sideways to the original position. Ditto for
women. This makes sense only if the off-world aliens gave us the
alphabet. Only they could see the change of the Earth from its
original position to the plane of the ecliptic,(or position of Earth
to the Sun and Planets.)One minute man is standing upright on the
globe and then he is sideways.
= Sign for Earth in original Sumerian resembles the Earth if you
admit there are openings at each pole. That they saw Earth as lying
sideways. The turned Earth may indicate a time when they realized it
had shifted. The mountains had also lost place and are now sideways.
3. P. 60=In the Veda's, they mention the god who brought fire down
from heaven to mankind. The story of fire being brought down from
heaven for mankind has always been a hard one to swallow unless of
course you read the Bible correctly. In the opening lines of Genisis
Two we read,"Ch. 2:5for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon
the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. Ch. 2:6 But
there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of
the ground." It is my contention based on research that there had
never been rain upon this earth before the deluge. That there was a
cloud cover above the earth of moisture held in suspension. That there
had not been any volcanic activity of any kind on this earth before the deluge,therefore there was no natural fire on this earth, which is
why the story of a god or man bringing the gift of fire is in the
mythology of every nation. This was a shallow water world with a low
gravity field. How else can a class of animals like dinosours evolve.
They need a fast growing water plant to survive. They need the bouancy
of water to uphold their large frames. Like elephants and hippo's of
today. They could never have survived the present day surface of the
Earth with its uneven terrain.
4. P63=I found this section very interesting since my research shows
that Moses was born in the Euphrates valley, Ur was the city of
destruction, and the time was just before the Hyksos, (who came from
the destroyed city of Ur) invaded the land they renamed after their
own country- Egypt.
A great many of the Hebrews went towards India during the exodus.
The split came when moses led the main body across the Gulf of
Arabia, which at that time was refered to as the 'Red Sea'. During
the forty years of wandering they laid waste the entire land of Punt,
Felix Arabia, and the land of what is now known as the "silent quarter".
Why did Alexander go to Abydos and then to India? What tale was he
following? Was Abydos the first Temple of Solomon? Why did Alexander
bypass the Jewish Temple of Jerusalem if it was supposed to be so
great? In fact no one before the time of Jesus went out of their
way to visit Israel except to use it as a land bridge.
5.P65= Figure 28. The two men on the left have the same clothing
style of pants as figures in Hindu temples. This is a very unique
style of clothing not seen any where else but only on the temples
in india. One pant leg is long and the other is short. The fabric
appears to behave in the same way as a knit, or elastic fabric. And
as a tailor for forty years I can tell you right now that cutting a
form fitting pair of trousers is one of the most complicated feats of
engineering there is. This form of clothing was not known in the
western world until the 17th century. Until then pants were fairly
wide or baggy . Only when we invaded India did we learn how to make
the legging for trousers.
6. P72= Aryans linked to Abraham and Moses. Was Moses of Hurrian
descent? And Abram going to Harron is going to his origins? My research
shows that Abram never went to Palastine. And certainly not to the
Nile. His people returned to Ur (also anciently known as Egypt. And
its kings were known as Pharohs. Also they married their sisters.) And
his story takes place farther back in history than is figured on.
Say 2700B.C. And was Moses in Ur also a Hurrian?
7.P78=Was Baal-Able? Was El- Adam?
8. P84= The Gods of Egypt came from Summer.
9. P100=Note the cresent moon in figure 46 is shown sideways
instead of up and down as present moon is portrayed today.
This could only be possible if you traveled to Earth from outer
space and noticed the change in the Earth's position and its
correlation of its moon to the sun and the earth.
10.P101=Note the story of EA. Twice human life was spared by a God.
Once in the Garden (apple), once with Noah at the flood.
11. P102= Was EA the snake in the Garden?
12. P112= The destruction of Ur is the destruction spoken of in
Moses. After the Gods destroyed this city it was never mentioned
again by people. We would never have known of it if it wasn't for
the record in the Bible. This is strange when you realize that there
were lots of cities that were destroyed that were still mentioned in
history. But not Ur. This for a city that was the hub of a country?
The gateway to the west? At the same time the lands of Dilman that
supplied the food for them was never heard of again.
13. P130= If the Moon is depicted recumbent, does that mean the
Earth lies sideways? That would make the lower world North America!
14. P267=This doesn't make sense! If a year of life is 3,600 yrs our
time, and they come by every year, why make a long trip from outer
space in a Shem? Why not wait till it goes by Earth every 'year'?
15. P285=Just because there is oil in Persian Gulf area now doesn't
mean it was there 450,000 years ago. (See Vilakovsky's ,"Earth in
Upheavel") Also would the terrain after the flood still be the same?
Would the Rivers be in the same place? To say yes to this question
implies that the flood was not quite as drastic as it is claimed.
16. P295= Why would they need so much protection? Were there other
people or forms on the Earth at the time? Were the beings we call
fairies, knomes, elves, etc. the original holders of this planet?
That is no more a far fetched story than alians landing. In fact
genetically there is more proof of those beings in our lives. It
accounts for the dwarfs, midgets, cloven feet, etc. that we keep
producing. How do they fit into your scenario?
17. P376=Was this child Noah to bring relief (see page 390-1) because
he was a son of Enlil or Enki? (see the 'Book of Enoch" as to Noah's
skin color.) In my research I came to the conclusion that these "Gods"
had broken a Cosmic rule when Eve became 'human' (sexually viable). Up
until then Adam and Eve were produced as drones. Maybe there is a rule
among the planets that you can create life forms just as long as they
cannot reproduce, then they become members of the Galaxie with rights
and rules. It seems to me that we will have to evolve some laws like
that here on Earth now that we have broken the barrier to creation. I
am sure that out in space that would have been a given. Don't you???
18. P378= What about the 'Book of Enoch'? It states that Noah's
parentage was in doubt? That he was a Gods son!
19. P382= Could the reason for the flood be that the Earth had been
stripped of fertile soil and food for the Aliens planet? And the
flood was to replenish the fertility and at the same time get rid of
the humans on it? They were breeding like rats!!!
I am not much of a mathematician but even I got an overload of life
on the planet in the short time from Adam to Noah. I lost the count
after the fifth generation. My figures came out with at the least 5-6
billion people on the face of this earth. Try it yourself some time,
always remembering that every one of those people were not ageing and
therefore they could breed on a continuous basis. The fact that they
never mention the names of mothers implies that all were fair game to
all generations and genetic position. In fact when I really thought
about it a lot of ugly thoughts rose in my mind. I admire Velikovsky
and his books make a lot of sense to me, as do yours. But all those
dead bodies give me the hint that there may be another cause for all
the underground oil deposits. Fat people or just fat???? But then I
have trouble about the bones. What did happen to all the bodies of
the flood? If we can find dino bones why have we never found large
deposits of bones from the flood? In fact a bit of odd ball research
I did left me wondering what on Earth has happened to ALL the bodies
from all the battles fought in the middle East since history began?
When the Greeks spoke of going to the "Elysian fields" when they died,
maybe they were not being poetical. Maybe bodies were used to make
fertilizers???? Again we may have to do that ourselves in order to
replenish a dying land.