Do you not think that that fact alone would have left a story to be
recorded for posterity in the present Egypt? It wasn�t recorded in Ur
for the simple reason that it became a wasteland. It was destroyed
by the events to such a degree that they would not even have wanted
people from other cities to even know that they came from such a
cursed city. But some men did survive those days for one reason or
another and we will catch up to them later.
In the meantime, Moses and his followers reached the site opposite
the penninsula that juts out from Bahrain. Discriptions in
Velakovsky�s works discribe waters around the Persian gulf and the
Indian Ocean and as far as China rising up into the sky. Attracted
by the fly past of Venus. This would have drawn the water of both
the present Red Sea and the old 'Red' Sea that is now the Persian Gulf,
up into the air,leaving the bottom bare in both area�s. At that time
Moses would have crossed over to the other side. Anciant texts tell
of the Arabian pinninsula from Kuwait to Aden as being a veritable
garden. Most of the vegetables for Ur were supplied by this garden land. Archaeologists today are discovering the evidence of old lakes and
springs beneath the sands as well as old cities and rivers. What was
it that destroyed this land beyond recovery? I claim it was 2 things;
The events of the damage Venus did and the tribe that followed moses.
They would have eaten every plant and blade of grass for fodder for
their cattle and animals and for themselves if this was the area of
the "Wandering". Here's where the cities were that they ruined and
demolished on their mad trek.
THE PHAROH�S ARMY
Wealth beyond imagining! Their chariots were objects of conciet.
They were gold plated, bejeweled for most of the army. Precious
stones and metals adorned them and their chariots and their horses.
When the Suez Canal was dug they dredged the Red Sea to clear any
obstructions for the large ships that they expected to enter the
water way. How far down the Red Sea, I am not sure. But I think
they did go as far down as the Sinai Penninsula. If there had been
any sign of Pharoh�s drowned army we would have heard of it. It
would be world news.
As far as I know there has been no underwater examination of the
waters in the Persian Gulf, because no one is looking for Pharoh�s
army there! We have been brain washed about Egypt of today. Most
of the books had been written by Academia by the time they found
out that Egypt was a name from the time of the Hykso�s and they
weren�t about to change their story.
We are asked to believe that over a million people and animals
spent forty years treking around the Sinai penninsula. In comparing
it on a map that is an area from Nanaimo to Victoria, or 1/3 the
size of Florida. But a desert area. An area destroyed before the
Exodus according to Sitchin�s book, "Genisis Revisited." Present
day Archeaology of the Sinai has not revealed ONE SINGLE CITY IN
THE AREA from that time or any other time. Where are the cities
Moses decimated?
I maintain that they were wandering around the Arabian Penninsula.
That they destroyed lands and towns as they went. Or what was left
after the passage of Venus. The question isn�t; did they do this?
But could they have done this? Is this possible as a scenario? They
had to have a mountain to get the tablets from. Is there an extinct
volcano anywhere to the north of Bahrain? Or any mountain in that
area? I read that there was one a few years back but my maps don�t
show it as they are not showing land heights. There is an extinct
volcano in the lower section of the Arabian Peninsula that the
Arabs claim is the mountain of the exodus. And who would know better
than the descendants of the people who lived there? Certainly not
ignorant Archeologists who don't speak the language or know the
history of the people.
Before I end this section I have one more very unpleasant thing to
write about. A statement was made in the Bible that not one person,
male or female, that came out of "Egypt" would be allowed to enter
the promised land! No one seems to pick up on this that I can see
and deal with it. That would imply that there was not a man or woman
who crossed the Jordan River who was over the age of 40! What did
they do with those over 40? Did they all die natural deaths? Where
those alive sent away? How strange. In fact it is more than strange,
it is downright impossible that a child born just before the Exodus
would only last 40 years, but one born after would survive?
From the point of view of an Anthropologist I would be considering
a great number of questions.
1. How did children born on the trail, so to speak, learn how to
create a civilization when they had not lived in one and experianced
one?
2. Who was left to teach them how to build, farm , etc?
3. How could they learn the arts and ways of a village, city, etc.
while they were wandering in a desert?
4. How did they appear to others when they had no old people with them?
As you can see, the Exodus raises more questions than it answers.
Maybe the problem stems from the fact that Academics who take up
these fields do not think about the small stuff. The practicle stuff.
They don�t ask; where did they learn to do all these things on the
trail? How can you teach your son to build a house when you live in
a tent? How do you pass on farming to your son when you live hand to
mouth on �Manna� and locusts? You may be able to teach him all about
animals but you need more than that to survive on the farm. In fact
the entire story of the Exodus smells to high heaven and it's about
time the academic world took a good hard look at it.
This site contains some of the most intelligent articles on the Bible
that I have ever read. While I came to the same conclusions many years
ago, I could never have expressed it as well as this writer has.