|
THE ORIGIN OF THE FASCIST
MENTALITY - (3)
Darwinism Prepared
the Foundation for Fascism
The myth of evolution, a legacy of Sumerian
and Greek paganism, was introduced into the Western agenda with Charles
Darwin's The Origin of Species, published in 1859. In this work, as
in The Descent of Man, he discussed certain pagan concepts that had
disappeared in Europe under Christianity, and gave them "justification"
under the guise of science. We can outline these pagan concepts which
he attempted to justify, thus preparing the groundwork for the development
of fascism, as follows:
1) Darwinism provided the justification
for racism: In the subtitle to The Origin of the Species, Darwin
wrote: "The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life."
With these words, Darwin was claiming that certain races in nature
are more "favored" than others, in other words, that they were superior.
He revealed this dimension of his ideas regarding human races in The
Descent of Man, where he proposed that European white men were superior
to races such as Africans, Asians and Turks, and were permitted to
enslave them.
2) Darwinism provided a justification
for bloodshed: As we have seen, Darwin proposed that a deadly
"struggle for survival" takes place in nature. He claimed that this
principle applied to both societies and to individuals, that it was
a struggle to the death, and that it was quite natural for different
races to try to eliminate others for its own sake. In short, Darwin
described an arena where the only rule was violence and conflict,
thus replacing the concepts of peace, cooperation, self-sacrifice,
that had spread to Europe with the advent of Christianity. Darwinism
thus resurrected the notion of the "arena," an exhibition of violence
devised in the pagan world (the Roman Empire).
3) Darwinism brought the concept
of eugenics back into Western thought: The concept of maintaining
racial supremacy through breeding, known as eugenics, which the Spartans
had implemented, and which Plato defended by the words, "Our warrior-athletes
must be vigilant like watch-dogs," re-emerged in the Western world
with Darwinism. Darwin devoted whole chapters in The Origin of Species
to discussing the "improvement of animal races," and maintained, in
The Descent of Man, that human beings were a species of animal. Some
time later, Darwin's cousin, Francis Galton, was to take his uncle's
claims a step further, and put forward the modern theory of eugenics.
(Nazi Germany would be the first state to implement eugenics as official
policy).
As we have seen, Darwin's theory seems
to be a concept that concerns only the science of biology, but it actually
formed the basis for a totally new political outlook. Within a very
short time, this new attitude was redefined as "Social Darwinism." And
as many historians have come to accept, Social Darwinism became the
ideological basis of fascism and Nazism.
The effect of Darwinism's portrayal of
war and conflict as necessary has been analyzed in great detail in Paul
Crook's Cambridge University publication Darwinism, War and History:
The Debate over the Biology of War from 'The Origin of Species' to the
First World War. Crook has made it clear that by presenting war as a
"biological necessity," Darwinism formed both the formal justification
for the First World War, as well as for various other warlike tendencies
in fascism. Crook writes:
Darwinist discourse conferred approval
on a range of doctrines glorifying power, status, elitism, conquest
and repression. Differences between cultures, genders, classes and races
were reduced to fixed biological differences, imprinted in humans during
eons of selective struggle. Darwin's conflict model generated militarist
and racist extrapolations that conferred approval on war and imperial
struggle as 'biological necessities'.9
From such [Darwinist] assumptions, a
variety of unpleasant consequences could be derived... War is rationalised...
As Frederick Wertham has argued, if violence 'is all in
human nature, and if we are all guilty, then nobody is guilty. And if
we are all responsible, no man is responsible' ...The First World War
was portrayed as the final vindication of the mythology of bestiality,
encoded anew in terms of neo-Darwinian genetics and instinct theory.10
Darwin thought of using Hobbes's phrase
'war of nature' as a heading to his chapter on struggle in his projected
'big book' Natural Selection ...He spoke of creatures 'overmastering'
one another: 'through his continual use of highly dramatic language
representing the life of organisms in nature as some heroic war, with
attendant battles, victories, famine, dearth, and destruction, Darwin
creates the image of a great literal struggle for existence - an image
which pervades the Origin.'11
As Crook has stated, Darwin not only
proposed that human beings were a "species" descended from animals,
but portrayed war and conflict as "the origin of species." This fallacy
would be the justification for the promotion of war and the ideology
of conflict, in fact, for the growth of fascism itself.
Friedrich Nietzsche:An
Ill Mind Who Praised Violence
There was another 19th century thinker
influenced by the neo-paganism attendant to Darwinism, and who expanded
on it, thus helping to establish the foundation for fascism: The German
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.
Nietzsche was born in a village near
Leipzig in 1844, and was fascinated by Greek culture, learning Greek
at an early age. In 1868, he began studying philosophy in the Swiss
city of Basel. Nietzsche hated divine religions, such as Christianity,
Islam and Judaism, but was fascinated by the pagan culture of ancient
Greece. He formed a close friendship in Basel with Wagner, the best-known
composer of the age. Wagner, who had come to fame with his Die G�tterd�mmerung
(The Twilight of the Gods), was a German racist who was also fascinated
by pagan culture and hated divine religions. (Wagner would be regarded
as Germany's greatest cultural genius throughout the Hitler period).
Nietzsche's publisher, Peter Gast, called
Nietzsche "one of the fiercest anti-Christians and atheists."12 Another
testament to Nietzsche's hatred of religion is the title of his book
Anti-Christ. In his book Thus Spake Zarathustra, he tried to set up
an ethical system beyond divine religion. According to H. F. Peters,
Nietzsche's biographer, his philosophy rested on Roman and Greek paganism,
and in his writings he called for "a new Caesar" to transform the world.13
Nietzsche had a particular hatred of
the ethical views of Christianity, Islam and Judaism. In his opinion,
concepts such as love, compassion and humility, must be abandoned and
replaced with a so-called "master morality" which accepted the warlike
and ruthless state of nature. In Thus Spake Zarathustra, he wrote, "Of
all that is written I love only what a man has written with his blood.
Write with blood, and you will experience that blood is spirit."14
Nietzsche was also a racist. He maintained
that one part of mankind was composed of �bermensch (superman), and
that the others had to serve and obey them. Furthermore, he claimed
that these so-called "supermen" would found an aristocratic world order,
a theory which was put into practice by Hitler's armies at the start
of the Second World War in 1939.
These two aspects of Nietzsche's philosophy,
his racism and reverence for violence, are allied closely to Darwinism.
Nietzsche's thought was in fact strongly influenced by Darwin. Darwin's
discrimination between the different races conformed closely to Nietzsche's
perception of "superior and inferior peoples." Nietzsche also adapted
his hatred of religion with the atheism of Darwin.
In his book Darwin's Dangerous Idea,
the Darwinist writer Daniel C. Dennett describes Darwin's influence
on Nietzsche in the following way: "Friedrich Nietzsche saw �an even
more cosmic message in Darwin:...If Nietzsche is the father of existentialism,
then perhaps Darwin deserves the title of grandfather."15 Dennett explains
in great detail how Darwin and Nietzsche's ideas run parallel, and although
Nietzsche seems to criticize Darwin in some of his writings, he gives
many examples where Nietzsche clearly approves of Darwinist thought.
After Nietzsche's death, the most important
exponent of his philosophy was his sister, Elisabeth Nietzsche. She
stood out as an avowed supporter of Nazi ideology in Hitler's Germany,
and announced that her brother's model of the "Superman" had been brought
to life by Hitler.16
Nietzsche's influence on Nazi ideology
is a reality that has been stressed by a great many historians. W. Cleon
Skousen writes that, when "Hitler wrote Mein Kampf, it was as though
Nietzsche was speaking from the dead."17 Another historian, George Lichtheim,
writes, "It is not too much to say that but for Nietzsche the SS-Hitler's
shock troops and the core of the whole movement-would have lacked the
inspiration to carry our their programs of mass murder in Eastern Europe."18
As the historian H. F. Peters puts it,
many have cursed Nietzsche as "the father of fascism."19 In his book,
The Myth of the 20th Century, the Nazi ideologue Alfred Rosenberg openly
praised Nietzsche. Hitlerjugend (Hitler Youth), the youth wing of the
Nazi movement, took Nietzsche's Thus Spake Zarathustra as a sacred text.
Adolf Hitler had a special monument erected in Nietzsche's memory, and
incepted the foundations of an educational center and library "where
German youth could be taught Nietzsche's doctrine of a master race."20
Finally, the Friedrich Nietzsche Memorial Building was opened by Hitler
in August 1938.
Nietzsche's influence was not limited
to Germany, it was also important in Italy, the birthplace of fascism.
The poet Gabriele D'Annunzio, who may be regarded as the inspiration
behind Mussolini, was greatly influenced by Nietzsche's philosophy.21
Historians note that D'Annunzio's successor, Benito Mussolini acknowledged
a debt of gratitude to Nietzsche as well.22
The disasters inflicted upon mankind
by fascism, which Nietzsche had inspired, provide historical evidence
of just how harmful were the German philosopher's Darwinist ideas. Nietzsche,
who opposed the divine morality that God revealed to mankind to show
it the true path, and who proposed taking mankind to the modern age
by replacing that morality with a brutal and oppressive society, had
put forward Darwin's idea that man is a species of animal, and divided
man into superior and inferior races, is the best example of the dark
reality into which a lack of religion draws individuals and societies.
Moreover, Nietzsche's life itself serves a warning. At 44 he was taken
to a mental hospital, where his illness grew steadily worse, until he
died raving mad. In 1902, a doctor called P. J. Mobius warned people
"that they should beware of Nietzsche, for his works were the products
of a diseased brain."23 But the Germans had great respect for the diseased
philosophy of this disturbed mind, and so Nazi Germany was born.
Nietzsche died of syphilis in a state
of mental decay in a lunatic asylum. His private life was no less troubled
or diseased than his philosophy.
Like all those who have ever denied the
existence of God, he met a very unpleasant end.
Do not let those who rush headlong into
disbelief sadden you. They do not harm God in any way. God desires to
assign no portion to them in the hereafter. They will have a terrible
punishment. Those who sell belief for disbelief do not harm God in any
way. They will have a painful punishment. Those who disbelieve should
not imagine that the extra time We grant to them is good for them. We
only allow them more time so they will increase in evildoing. They will
have a humiliating punishment. (Koran, 3:176-178)
-
|