Theorems:

 

 

black hole

f(x)  in relation to space

1. When collecting F(gravitation), in center of black hole, we achieve max. of f(x), i.e. in point  õ(0) -> 0 => lim f(x) -> &, =>f(x)=1/x(0), x(0)->0

                                                  x->x(0)

2. in relation to v, p and f(repulsion). V, with wich gravitation work -> &, but parallel with this and ð->&, i.e. what of fact: lim f(x)->&,  lim f(x)->&, íî è f(îòáë.), ò.å. lim f(x)->&

                                         x->v(ãðàâ.)   x->p                                           x-> f(îòáë.)

 

Corollary: from 1. and  2. coming f(x)->&, õÅ(-&,&), and in point  õ(0) we have indefiniteness (there are ð->&, v-> & => and particles -> &)=> we maybe just don’t feel them, which doesn’t mean that we don’t have contacts, but at least we now that they exist, which is very different  from nothing…

&-infinity

->-incline

=>-therefor

v-speed

p-pressure

f-power

        

                 When NUCLEUS fuel from star is going to zero,  F(gravitation) start contraction, and when is after radius of gravity, the star is going to transform to black hole. She attract even the sun shine => is possible, this F to be connect with F, which search substitute there own missing power. For example F(drawing) with V ->&, which when go to something (bigg mass, field or …), start type leveling according situation and…

 

Theorem

Nothing

Something

Every space or part, which we don’t know (don’t now that she even exists), we call nothing, but we know (logic and experimental), that this actually exists (for example infinity small parts substance, or…)

This is something, from which we know parts (properties, space values, temp., material, color, stability,…), and all those with… evolve (without borders), but it is also alive.  

Conclusion: everything is something => there are no stuff, which are without meanings (for example instead “I don’t  care”, it is very different to say “I’m not sure, that the time for this is write now”

Because of free will, everybody can have, a different relationships with It (names, and so on…) => when somebody speak with It differently, this doesn’t meaning, that there is nothing.

 

Theorem-evolution to the knowledge

Collecting all the knowledge we know, but from them going out something new, which we add to those, but from this new going out something new, and…

 

I now that:

-I love It (and wont, follow, think, feel, like, …)

-It’s worth to live (follow infinity, peacefully way with true love, wisdom, and …), which include evolution, like thoughts, which does this parallel, with this and infinity others…

 -I have free will.

-I having no fears, because of It

-I don’t believe in loneliness, because of It.

-It loves as.

- It is the best decision for everything.

-Live can’t being destruction, he just moving up, down or stay, or transform, or…, but never die. 

 

Principle of the indefiniteness

 

At least, but not last I was trying this to have approach for everybody (for every religions, science, species, …, for irreligious, …), … - for example I use the words You, It, ….  Aim for me is and to here nobody to founding something against (his, hers,…)  thoughts, fight,  I believe that the true is open for everybody. And maybe to found what we looking for is trough It

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1