Home Title

Discuss how geographers have contributed to our understanding of culture

Nick Drake

24-Apr-02

 

Geography as a broad definition is concerned with the Earth and everything that is on the planet; man’s place within environments, how populations develop in different areas, economics of the world, and the natural world around us.

Geography also encompasses many different specific subject areas, such as Physical geography which is concerned with the physical and natural Earth, they way in which ecosystems and environments operate and how man fits into this tight equilibrium of existence. Human geography which deals with man and his place and effect on the world. Cultural geography is another discipline of geography which deals with the different populations across the globe in terms of how materials and objects through beliefs and values can define and shape a new cultural population.

 

Culture is not a new area of study, since the late 1800’s, Darwin and other early explorers have been distinctly involved in the exploration and identification of new, vibrant and differing cultures. These newly identified cultures would contain practices, languages, indigenous behaviour, foods, religious beliefs and history than had been seen before. For example, the anthropologist Marshall Sahlins was describing the Western surprise of the  Indian’s belief that the cow is a sacred animal, it’s path is never interrupted and the animal although edible is never eaten. As ‘weird’ as this may be for a Western person to understand the ethics behind worshipping a cow, equally an Indian person may be as perplexed as to understand how we (the West) worship and care for the dog.

The underlying point to this is that we cannot assume that there is a similar trend or similar characteristics within all populations. All populations must defend themselves, find and produce food, establish a religious belief system, and in differing degrees operate a hierarchical system of government and politics. Each nation and each nation’s cultures finds these answers in differing ways, adding to the global diversity of he world’s cultures.

 

What may be sacred to one culture may be worthless to another. It is for this reason that historically, different cultures have battled against each other in an effort to prove who’s cultural beliefs are ‘better’. What develops cultural understanding is the combining of cultures together in areas such as a city centre; where millions of people from many different backgrounds work and play together, all undergoing the perils of traffic and pollution but all learning to live with the constraints of a society that they cannot change. In this way, with people living and working together we see how different cultures learn to adapt to different environments and surroundings. Working together, different cultures may have advantages in different areas, and so group work or tackling a problem using the indigenous advantages of different cultures can yield a wealth of different answer, solved in different ways.

 

Pierre Bourdieu in 1984 said that all cultures were a mixture of colours and sounds until one learnt the rules that guide and make sense of it. For instance, the Japanese culture, language and images are distinctly different from those of the American media led Western styles.

 

What we are loosing in the twenty first century is cultural diversity in the West, Globalisation and the creation of enormous powerful businesses whose marketing and products line shopping arcades throughout the West are influencing and defining the culture in which we live. For instance, with the buy-out of Asda by the world’s biggest retailer Wall*Mart, Britain’s suburbs will be lined with yet another American superstore, challenging the local, traditional business which have influenced and defined the cultural identity of that area. The high street would look like an American street with Burger King and Mc.Donald's close by, with GM cars driving on the street and American music being bought up in the music shops. Why do we look for and choose to limit our cultural diversity? The creation of identity, and the personal feeling of a social existence is based upon the marketing and products which we believe we cannot live without. Without the media, TV and advertising, how different would our lifestyles be? Would we really need to have Corn Flakes to start a healthy fun day? Or how about the 11 o’clock Diet Coke break? have another break, have a Kit-Kat. So much of how we live our lives is already determined for us, the drive to make money, the greed associated with the accumulation of money is so strong that it corrupts many people, we see money as the root to solving many problems. Sex for instance is a tremendously powerful tool, people are given the wrong impression that money and wealth is a belonging that can resolve and answer other problems. How accurate is this? Not at all, money is merely a object that restricts opportunities for people in so many ways. Money is also something, people work like slaves to obtain. “If I had a million pounds, I would be happy” many people would say. Why? If you have a million pounds are you incapable of hurt, pain, loss, suffering, jealousy, being the subject of jealousy, or ridicule, violence, do you not feel the pain of loosing someone you love? Why not concentrate on what is important to yourself at that time, yes money is a great security knowing that bills and liabilities can be paid but why seek to use money to buy material objects that reduce our individuality.

 

Individuality is something we are taught from being a child, everyone is different, and special in different ways. The goods and services offered to us in the Western world do not serve to broaden our cultural diversity, we are slowly becoming one culture in the west, and increasingly throughout the developed world.

The West and more specifically the American influence on culture relates to the ideologies of superpower control and existence. Without the internationally exported brand labels of MNC’s, (multi-national-corporations) which find themselves marketed into different cultures with the same slogan of advertising, suggesting when and where to use it, suggesting that without it you are not as good as someone who does use it; the US would not be as powerful or have the ability to affect our cultural identity to such a great extent.

 

Geographers as scientists, have worked for many years to identity and explain the patterns of cultural spread throughout the world. Geographers attempt to appreciate the balance of nature, the environment and people together. If analysis of culture was done by scientists who did not appreciate the interrelationship between nature and humans, and the reasons for this cultural diversity, then our understanding of culture would be significantly different. Through using geography and it’s teaching research methods we learn more of a culture’s history, how that culture has learnt from others, how it provides food for it’s people and manages self-sufficient economic systems than we would if the research had been carried out by political or economic scientists.

A cultural geographer looks not only at objects such as clothing, material possessions and lifestyles but also would make reference to the belief system that keep the community or culture together. It is this aspect that is overlooked by other disciplines, which attempt to define and understand cultural diversity. Cultural diversity comes not only from the possessions which we own but the ideas and thoughts in our head, which show that different people from around the world believe in different things, worrying about different things and being happy from different things.

 

Culture may also mean the ‘high-culture’ of expressionism and representation of cultural identity through the use of theatre, art, opera, literature or poetry. What must be remembered is that these expressions of culture are stored and remembered in museums, galleries and books for other people to read and base a historical inaccurate picture of previous generations. For example, the objects of expressionism left from the seventieth century, inaccurately portray a lifestyle of large mansions, great estates and castles for all. What we do not see is the representation of a larger group of people whose lifestyle was plagued with ill-health and a poor standard of living. Without a true representation of a culture it is difficult to truly understand the ways in which the society worked and the ideologies of those who controlled it/them. Present day study of a culture is therefore easier, for we have the opportunity to first hand experience these expressions of ‘high-culture’ from every different source. For example, if a ‘high-society’ snapshot was taken from every county in the UK then we would have a great representation of the nations culture as a whole, and give insight into regional differences in thought, beliefs and the interrelationship of man and the environment.

The history of a country such as the UK brings with it the celebration of meaningful events form the past. For example, in the UK we celebrate Guy Fawkes Night in memory of the failed attempt to blow up parliament in the 1600’s. However for what reason do we remember this figure from the past? We purchase fireworks from shops that whistle and go bang, but how does this relate to Guy Fawkes? Are we celebrating him as a great figure of the British people? We merely remember him because there is the opportunity to profit from his memory through the sale of fireworks. Equally the Royal Family in this country; What purpose do they serve? None, although any law passed must be signed and officiated by the Queen, do her views and thoughts really make a difference? After going through parliament, the house of lords and numerous other lengthy procedures is the Queens objection to a national law, going to make a difference, no. The Royal Family in this country is a support for the biggest industry in the world, tourism. Without the Royal Family, would London be such a tourist destination? Think how many Americans would miss out on buying up everything that contains a union jack flag or could be eaten. Now think of the loss of revenue to this country if all aspects of the Royal Family were removed, now also think how many businesses and peoples lives depend on the sale of these goods devoted to the Royal Family. So inertia of an inaccurate ‘high-culture’ and tradition with the past; can benefit a country.

The identification of cultures continues today because cultural diversity is a constantly changing thing that is influenced by external features, which may have never existed before.

And so the job of a cultural geographer in the 21st century is to appreciate the exported goods and thoughts from different cultures as the world becomes more of a mixed place with a greater number of people moving location and living in a different place than ever before.

 

Word count: 1,874

 

Bibliography

 

·          Introducing Human Geographies – Paul Cloke, Philip Crang, Mark Goodwin

·          Cultural Geography – Mike Crang

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1