"Closing The Gaps" - Relevant Data

Maori Over-Represented In Key Crime Statistics
Criminal Justice System Not Working Adequately For Maori
Trust And Confidence In Police Is Lower For Maori Than The General Population
Conclusions

Māori Over-Represented In Key Crime Statistics

Māori are significantly over represented in apprehension, prosecution and conviction statistics. Appendix A contains selected Police and Justice data showing widening disparities between Māori and non-Māori in the Criminal Justice system. In summary, this data shows that in 1998 Māori (aged 17 and over) were:

    1. 3.3 times more likely to be apprehended for a criminal offence than non-Māori;
    2. 3.6 times more likely to be prosecuted than non-Māori;
    3. 4.1 times more likely to be convicted than non-Māori;
    4. 1.5 times more likely to be sentenced to imprisonment on conviction;
    5. 51% of the prison population but only 14% of the general population.

Criminal Justice System Not Working Adequately For Māori

Māori feel alienated from Police and criminal justice agencies. A 1998 joint Te Puni Kōkiri and Ministry of Justice study found:

"Responses of the Criminal Justice system to offending were perceived as unhelpful for many offenders and victims, Māori offenders in particular. By not effectively dealing with crime, the Criminal Justice system may actually contribute to re-offending. Some contributing factors noted include:

More recently, a Māori lawyer described the situation as follows:

"It is the relationship between law and the community where particular attention is needed because something has gone wrong with the way in which Māori perceive the law. Māori have little concept of the NZ legal system belonging to them. They read about Her Majesty's Judges, Queen's Counsel, British justice and the laws of England. Little wonder that there is no sense of ownership by Māori in the system. [We] must turn this attitude around so Māori have a stake in the legal system and like other people, can appreciate and claim ownership of it."[Footnote 2]

Overall, the Criminal Justice system is not responsive to Māori, although some components of it work better than others.

A key reason for this lack of responsiveness is that many of the people within the organisations that comprise New Zealand's criminal justice system lack knowledge of and sensitivity to Māori values, culture, history and beliefs.

Another reason is that many Māori neither respect, nor obey the law. This has at least three negative results. Government agencies see more Māori in a negative capacity, thus reinforcing stereotypes. High offending rates sets a poor example to wider Māori, especially young Māori, and lessens the restraint element of the law. These factors in turn tend to perpetuate and widen the gaps still further.

In the context of the Crown's obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi, and given that the system needs to effectively and fairly administer justice to all New Zealanders, this lack of responsiveness means the Criminal Justice system is performing inadequately for Māori. This lessens the effectiveness of Justice system programmes and initiatives which that aim to reduce crime and victimisation. More responsive government agencies, together with better strategies, have the potential to play an important role in combating and reducing Māori crime.

Trust And Confidence In Police Is Lower For Maori Than The General Population

As Appendix B illustrates, trust and confidence in Police is lower for Māori than for the general population, although the gap in perceptions is closing. In 1997, only 36% of Māori expressed "full" or "quite a lot" of trust and confidence in Police, compared to 58% of all groups. By 1999, this gap had narrowed, with 48% of Māori expressing "full" or "quite a lot" of trust and confidence in Police compared with 61% of all groups. Nevertheless, a significant problem remains, and Police and Māori must work towards resolving it.

There is no specific data about the level of satisfaction with Māori of services delivered by Police, except a general comment in a 1995 survey [Footnote 3] which recorded:

"Overall Māori have a less positive view of Police than the other two groups (European and Pacific Island) having less trust and confidence in Police, seeing them as less approachable, and being less satisfied with their services."

Many Police and Māori hold negative perceptions of each other. (See 8.7-8.9.) The problem becomes self-perpetuating. Māori commit more crime, which fuels a negative perception within Police. That perception affects the relationship between Police and Māori, and therefore the attitude of Māori to the wider Justice sector. In turn, Māori engage less and services to them are less effective. Māori continue offending at rates higher than non-Māori.

Conclusions

This process has continued for many decades and it can be argued that a fundamentally different approach is required to break this cycle.

As this report discussesnotes, mainstream criminal justice interventions to reduce crime are not particularly effective in reducing re-offending. But However,the targeted crime prevention programmes are producing good results. More effective steps must be taken to reduce offending by Māori.

In addition criminal justice agencies, including the Police, must work to improve their responsiveness to Māori and to overcome any negative perceptions that may inhibit that responsiveness. Work has begun on effective Māori responsiveness strategies in Police and other agencies, but it is not yet fully developed or implemented.

A complementary approach by Māori is also required with improved respect for and compliance with the law. Building bridges and reducing negative attitudes is a two-way process.

Recommendation 1
As an overall goal, Government Criminal Justice agencies need to take urgent action, to reduce Māori offending rates through:


Footnotes

1.Perspectives on Responding to the Over-Representation of Māori in the Criminal Justice System. The Views of Māori Stakeholders. Justice Sector Policy Group, Ministry of Justice and the Social Policy Branch, Te Puni Kōkiri. 1998 pp 9-10.

2.Ms Donna Hall, Barrister & Solicitor, Nāgti Rangiteaorere o Mokoia Island. Aug 2000

3.Public Attitudes Towards Policing Survey. June 1995. MRL Research Group p.22


Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1