The Far Wrong in Politics

Multi-racist propaganda seriously pollutes the cultural and intellectual environment of Western society these days . Disguising itself as liberal philosophy, it corrupts the native language in its efforts to ignore all the evidence of science, history, evolution and common sense . Like Humpty Dumpty, it chooses to invest words with its own tendentious connotation. Such semantic forgery, like the monetary version, is rooted in worthlessness and threatens the stability and cohesion of any society. This being so, we all have a duty to be especially vigilant when issues like race and nationhood are under discussion. There follow some examples of the terms commonly misused by liberals in their social engineering follies.

‘Race’ refers to a human classification based on certain physical characteristics

like skin colour, bone structure and hair texture . Liberals contend that racial differences are entirely superficial ; a contention which fails to explain the very wide differences in intellectual performance and cultural development which have separated the different races throughout history.

‘Nation’ refers to a homeland occupied by many generations of the same racial ancestry, with a common language and cultural heritage. The related term ‘society’ is similarly defined; from which it follows that the so-called ‘multi-cultural’ society is a

contradiction in terms . Not surprisingly then, multi-racist propagandists commonly

employ the counterfeit word ‘society’ when what they are really describing is a mixed

population . And of course ‘population’ can apply to any temporary or

circumstantial concentration of people , from airline passengers to ‘inner city’ areas.

The modern world has many pseudo-nations with populations sharing little more than an

arbitrarily-defined territory , as witness the recurring inter-racial and inter-tribal

massacres of the post-colonial era.

‘Discrimination’ means recognising real differences, which may or may not influence

personal preferences. The term is indivisibly linked with loyalty , since that word

denotes discrimination bonded to preference . What is commonly referred to as ‘racial

discrimination’ is therefore neither more nor less than loyalty to one’s own kind. And

this is surely just as much a human right as anything in the democratic charter.

Like authority and responsibility, therefore, loyalty and discrimination are the

indivisible sides of any honest coinage in human society; you can’t have one

without the other.

‘Integration’ means the combination of different elements into an entity which could not otherwise exist . Thus the yolk is integral to the egg as the egg is to the omelette.

It follows that manifestly alien races cannot be ‘integral’ to British society, since that society has been demonstrating its ability to exist very successfully without them for many centuries. In down-to-earth language, therefore, British society does not need alien immigrants, and their recent arrival is indicative of their need,not ours. When liberals speak of ‘integration’, therefore, what they really have in mind is an entirely synthetic ‘nation’ altogether different from what the world has always recognized as distinctively British. So be very clear about this : ‘integration’ of Third World immigrants necessarily involves the dissolution of British identity .

‘Unity in Diversity’ , is the parrot-cry of liberal propagandists everywhere. How strange that this utopian state of affairs has somehow eluded the Arabs and Israelis, Serbs and Croats, Hindus and Muslims, Ulster Catholics and Protestants, African tribes and indeed all the other disparate groups of humanity , notwithstanding centuries of physical proximity. Of course, the fatal flaw of this liberal slogan is its assumption that the factors making for diversity will always give ground to those making for unity.

Tell that to the millions of Muslims in the UK for whom the sharia(Islamic law)

takes precedence over British law and custom. Tell it to the victims of tribal , racial and religious genocide in Africa , Asia , Palestine and Iraq, for example. (But only if you use the telephone ).

‘Community’ . Another liberal buzz-word implying an identity of interest and purpose where none actually exists among disparate racial and religious groups . The liberal propagandist invariably applies this fraudulent term to multi-racial areas.

‘Asylum’ denotes a place of safety from some actual or perceived danger. The liberals would have us believe that Britain must provide such refuge for people the world over, even if they have to cross continents and oceans in order to take up residence in this small over-crowded country off the northern coast of Europe. But as we all know by now, affluence and not ‘asylum’ is the goal of these immigrant opportunists.

‘Fascist/neo-Nazi/right-wing extremist’ is shorthand for anyone at all dissenting from the liberals’ globalist and multi-racist ideologies. Such labelling tactics always identify the users as people who know they will lose all the political arguments that really matter.

‘Democratic mandate’ is the Labour government’s pious imposture, since it gained office with less than one in four votes . On issues like immigration and the European Union , for example, this government is totally unrepresentative of the public interest.

‘Globalism’ is a concept which sees all national considerations being dissolved by

an emergent international consensus of some kind yet to be defined. The ‘solvents’ are identified as modern transport ,communications technology, multi-national business corporations, economic factors, environmental concerns and multi-racial politics. But this ‘melting-pot’ scenario is repudiated by almost every world news bulletin reflecting the same old racial , religious and ideological issues dividing the world. The best anybody can hope for in this world is international cooperation to mutual advantage, led by those nations with the best record of socio-economic and cultural achievement.

Which makes it imperative to preserve Western civilization at its best if the world is to have a worthwhile future ; and the rest of the world can only benefit, as it always has,

from the achievements of this enlightened racial nationalism.

‘Identity’ is a subject which clearly agitates liberals and immigrants a great deal, whereas the rest of us see no reason at all to question who and what we are . That Third World immigrants feel they don’t belong in British society is perfectly understandable : it’s because they don’t. Hence sad specimens like ‘Darcus Howe’, a prominent negro

operative in the Race Relations Industry ; still wearing his plantation-name,

flourishing a white wife , and whingeing his way through the media in search of some

definition of ‘British’ which might include people like himself. Needless to say, he’ll

never find one . . The continuing exodus from what describes itself as the Conservative

Party is only one example of the British people’s attitude towards ‘inclusiveness’ at any

price. Anyone unable to recall his or her identity is properly regarded as mentally

-3-

afflicted ; and by the same token a nation that loses its sense of identity is unfit to face

the world. Indeed, whatever may be predicated about that ‘nation’ becomes, like a

sentence without a subject, totally meaningless.

To conclude, one must be just as alert for politicians using counterfeit words as for people using counterfeit money , since the failure to identify either is bound to be ruinous. And as Socrates so ably demonstrated, wisdom very largely consists not in propounding one’s own doctrines but in exposing the falsity of other people’s. The truth shall make us free.

F Kimbal Johnson

November 2005

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws