|
COSA
New Zealand Inc.
Casualties
of false Sexual Allegations New Zealand Incorporated
Chairperson:
John Lindsay Ph/Fax 03 312 9212
Secretary:
364 Harewood Road, Christchurch 8005, New Zealand
Newsletter
Issue 13
May
2002
|
|
|
CONTENTS
CHRISTCHURCH
CIVIC CASE/SYSTEMIC ISSUES
Public
disenchantment grows - Systemic problems in the judiciary
- NBR-Compaq
poll finds most people think Ellis innocent.
- The
case could become an election issue
- The
final arbitrator may be the Privy Council
- Christchurch
paper reports 'new' allegations where no basis is evident, ignores
poll news
Legacy
of a decade of distortion: Still working on the Civic Case
1.
Chronicle of public discussion, from December 2001 to April-May
2002
General
observations, and sections on Police investigation, Section
23G of the Evidence Act, Psychological
evidence,
and The appeal structure
OTHER
NEW ZEALAND NEWS RELATING TO FALSE SEXUAL ALLEGATIONS -
Christchurch
Police
Sexual
allegations in Education
Sexual
allegations in the Catholic Church
Sexual
allegations in the Health field
False
allegations, false sexual allegations, 'not guilty' verdicts
Compensation
for Wrongful Conviction and Imprisonment
INTERNATIONAL
NEWS RELATED TO FALSE SEXUAL ALLEGATIONS -
|
|
|
Systemic
problems in the judiciary
NBR-Compaq poll
finds most people think Ellis innocent
New Zealand's National
Business Review reported on 3 May that its latest NBR-Compaq poll, their
'first guilt poll', found 51% of people now believe Ellis was not guilty
of sexual abuse at the Christchurch Civic Childcare Centre. It also
stated "That was more than double the 25% who thought he was guilty,
or 24% who were unsure or refused to answer." And "In Christchurch,
where feelings ran highest, 55% of people said Ellis was innocent."
The poll was conducted on 750 people over 4-8 April 2002. Although the
paper may be 'right wing', the poll was not biased as it was properly
conducted, statistically speaking. - National Business Review, 3/5/02:
'New findings in controversial Ellis case' p 2; 'First guilt poll reveals
public view on controversial case' p 16; by Deborah Hill Cone.
The case could
become an election issue
The Otago Daily
Times covered the NBR-Compaq poll results on its page 2. It reported
there that Lynley Hood said the poll results meant the case could become
an election issue. She said both political parties should be interested
in it. "If Government doesn't take it up, it could be a strong election
platform for another party given the strong electorate support."
She said the ramifications
of the Civic case should be addressed by an inquiry, to address three
areas: the conduct of the police, the problems around distinguishing
between true and false child abuse allegations, and the Court of Appeal's
great difficulty correcting judicial mistakes.
Hood's book A City
Possessed is our first examination of the case from social, psychological,
political, and legal perspectives. It has been highly praised as an
exemplary study. People from various professions have asked for authorities
to take action on the various problems it reveals.
The final arbitrator
may be the Privy Council
At the same time
as the poll results became public, Judith Ablett-Kerr QC, Ellis' lawyer,
announced that she is preparing to take the case to the Privy Council.
In the next month she will file a petition to the London-based Council,
seeking special leave to proceed with an appeal.
Christchurch
paper reports 'new' allegations where no basis is evident, ignores poll
news
'The Press' on 24
April 2002 (p 4) carried an item about a supposed new complaint against
Ellis, though it was known 2� years ago, and though after all this time,
no charges have materialised. Yet the paper has apparently ignored the
significance of the NBR-Compaq poll, so that by 13 May 2002 nothing
about it has appeared in the main newspaper of the home-city to the
case.
Only a full focus,
possibly during the election, on the judicial-systemic issues including
those behind false sexual allegations, will meet the public's requirements
that there are concerns that must be addressed and resolved.
|
|
|
Still
working on the Civic Case
After a deafening
silence from executive quarters for a couple of months following the
publication and subsequent release of A City Possessed in October 2001,
the thinking public gradually started to respond.
This was done by
extensive communication through newspapers and television, written challenges
and suggestions to the Minister, and general talk, including on radio.
The views expressed were very predominantly in favour of the book's
tenor.
Below we mention
some aspects of current debate.
|
|
|
1. Chronicle
of public discussion, from December 2001 to April-May 2002
The
ODT has asked that Justice Minister should read Lynley Hood's book,
said the paper in editorial-like opinion piece, "Justice Possessed"
(ODT, 5/12/01 p12), comparing the case to that of Alfred Dreyfus,
with its similar theme of scapegoating someone different. In Dreyfus's
case, which took place in France, his 'difference' was that he was
a Jew. In his case, and it was in 1894, Dreyfus was accused of selling
secrets to the German military attach� in Paris. After a secret
military trial he was sentenced to life imprisonment. However, in
1898 his case was taken up, including by the writer Emile Zola,
who argued that Dreyfus was a victim of rivalries amongst royalist,
nationalist and militarist elements in the French government system,
and anti-semitism and anti-clerical elements in the judicial system.
Dreyfus was retried in 1899, and found guilty again, but was eventually
pardoned in 1906.
Hood's
book is "an extraordinary book by any standards" and it "has exposed
flaws in the criminal justice system that raise very serious doubts
about whether Mr Ellis received a fair trial", said the piece, and
to the Minister's claim of the Eichelbaum report being 'the end
of the matter', it said (5/12/01 p 12):
But
of course, it is not the end of the matter, just as sending Alfred
Dreyfus to Devil's Island for life was not the "end of the matter".
Mrs Hood has laid bare systemic failures in our justice system and
Mr Goff should read it. ... [A]ny failure by a government to take
all possible steps to correct discovered defects must be seen as an
act of moral cowardice.
Only
3 days later, the ODT carried a response from the Minister of Justice
in the form of a Letter to the Editor. He tried to rebut arguments
in a general way, expressing reliance on Eichelbaum.
He
then asked Hood to let him know if she had fresh evidence. This
was virtually asking her to read him her book.
The
minister had similar letters published elsewhere (eg, Sunday Star-Times
9/12/01 p A8).
In
a keynote address in Christchurch, Lynley Hood called for a commission
of inquiry like South Africa's truth and reconciliation commission.
Addressing the 5th Annual NZ Early Childhood Research Network Symposium
at the Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology, she said
she researched the book to find out what happened and why. Having
done 7 years work, she found it was pretty clear to her that Ellis
was innocent. A pardon was the legal option for Ellis, and there
was a strong argument for an inquiry. - Commission of inquiry proposed
in Ellis case, Star 7/12/01 pA6
An
Editorial in The Listener called 'Whiffs of injustice,' by Bruce
Ansley (8/12/01), pointed out that while there was the possibility
that Ellis was wrongly convicted, which was bad enough, there was
the added load on him that it was over the most odious of crimes.
Ansley chronicled the sequence of legal inquiries, noting that for
the last one by Sir Thomas Eichelbaum, the terms of reference were
too narrow. Ansley said that the sequence smelled of manipulation,
and that this had 'succeeded in making the Ellis case a running
sore". He concluded:
The
play so far has only made the dilemma worse. A retreat would be a
huge loss of face for the police, courts, and government, who all
now have a vested interest in Ellis's guilt. But injustice is corrosive.
It lingers. Only a public inquiry can resolve it now.
The
provincial paper Hawke's Bay Today, with more apparent sophistication
than the minister, ran a review by Peter de Graaf (8/12/01), who
said Hood's book raised serious questions about Ellis's convictions
despite the loss at the trial and two appeals. De Graaf noted fairly
that none set out to conspire to jail an innocent man. "All were
driven by a desire to uncover child abuse and punish its perpetrators,"
he stated, but how little has anything changed between 17th Century
Salem and 20th Century Christchurch, he concluded.
Christchurch resident Nigel Hampton QC then reportedly called for
the Minister of Justice to establish an independent body to consider
claims of wrongful conviction. This would include Peter Ellis, and
others, according to the report. Mr Hampton had recently lodged
a bid for a pardon for one such person, Rex Haig. Mr Haig's case
was not an instance of false sexual allegations, but a wrongful
conviction for murder, according to what he says. Mr Hampton's application
had questions about the witnesses 'evidence' in the Haig case, and
a 100-page report from former police superintendent Bryan Rowe (The
Press 11/12/01 p5).
Lynley
Hood, in a letter in response to the earlier letter from the Justice
Minister in the Otago Daily Times, said he had misrepresented her
when he had described her as 'an advocate' for anyone involved in
the Civic case. She said eminent legal authorities have said her
legal analysis is correct, and that the Government must address
the problems in the justice system that she had identified. The
Minister could instruct the governor general to give a pardon, and
have a commission of inquiry, without the permission of the judiciary,
even although Mr Goff had tried to state he couldn't, she said.
If the royal pardon was ever to serve its proper function it meant
the Minister did have the power to call it into action, she explained.
She narrowed the issue down to it being a matter of Mr Goff "finding
the moral courage and political will to act when it is obvious that
the judiciary has made a serious mistake" (ODT 12/12/01 p 12; also
SST 16/12/01 p A6).
Printed
on the same page, R.E. Mawson added a voice to the calls for something
to be done. To date a consensus had 'merely concluded that the rules
of our current system were applied to Mr Ellis's seven convictions',
but, the writer went on:
They
have not examined the system itself to determine whether a fair
trial was even possible.
To
pardon Mr Ellis now is to find the system guilty, and I suspect
that this is the reason for the Justice Minister Phil Goff's reluctance
to read Lynley Hood's book, A City Possessed.
An
article by Jim Tucker in The Daily News, New Plymouth, was such
a thorough going-over of the book's content that even people who
did not read the book would find themselves informed on its breadth
('Justice hard to find in a city possessed', 15/12/01 p 21).
[His biography notes say: Jim Tucker (53) has been teaching journalism
since 1987. He was a working journalist in New Zealand from 1965
until 1987, when he resigned as editor of the Auckland Star to take
over the journalism course at Auckland Institute of Technology.
He taught there at diploma, undergraduate and masters levels, before
departing to his hometown, New Plymouth, to take over the Taranaki
Polytechnic Diploma of Journalism course in 1998. He completed an
MA in communication studies in 1999. He has written two journalism
textbooks, Intro (1999) and Kiwi Journalist (1992).]
Tucker
highlighted Hood's text regarding Sir Geoffrey Palmer's role in
the state of play, saying:
�
Hood is fearless in laying to blame [who is responsible] for changes
to the evidence rules that partially led to this state of affairs.
She names none other than former Prime Minister and Justice Minister
Sir Geoffrey Palmer as the politician who introduced the "reforming
legislation" � "late at night, under urgency, on what was expected
to be the last sitting day before Parliament broke for Christmas
[1988]".
Writing as if
reflecting he was convinced of the rightness of her arguments and
positions, Tucker highlighted that Hood wrote of an "ideological coup
d'etat [that had] wrenched control of � investigation and prosecution
of child sexual abuse away from the relative objectivity of the justice
system, and placed it in the hands of the clearly partisan child protection
movement," and that in the end, the court had failed to confront that
movement.
Mr Tucker also
praised Lynley Hood's courage:
This
58-year-old Dunedin scientist, writer and grandmother, has, by using
great courage, stepped outside the mainstream thought and suggested
it is not OK to distort the law, condone over-zealous counselling
and police-work, and cause collateral damage in a quest to rid the
country of child molesters. It has cost her dearly �
� Publication
of the book carries significant risk because in it she finds serious
defects in the way eight senior judges handled various appeals �
and she is scathing about the last attempt to settle the case �
by Sir Thomas Eichelbaum �
He said the 'possession'
of Christchurch by rumours about child abuse and porn was a "dangerous
precursor to the breakdown of justice and democracy". And as a result,
he concluded, many people reading the book will be inclined to agree
something needs to be done.
A letter from
Lesley Ellis, mother of Peter, said that Phil Goff's letters to newspapers
were an attempt to sway public opinion, and that some had called his
form of response unprofessional and an abuse of power. For herself,
she said, she called it outrageous, 'when he doesn't even quote the
facts'. By way of explanation she said that rather than examine actual
evidence, Sir Thomas Eichelbaum, who had never contacted her son,
had restricted his parameters to how the children's evidence was
collected. And, in contradistinction to what the Minister wrote,
she said that the appeal court judges, by suggesting that the case
would be better dealt with by a commission of inquiry, had of course
indicated that THEY WANTED such an inquiry. Lynley Hood had added
her voice to that of the appeal court judges, and now a trail
of academics, coalface QCs, lawyers, journalists and the public had
added theirs as well. (Sunday Star Times 16/12/01 p A6).
First N. Gillespie
asked why Karen Zelas has not responded to the book, taking a
letter by Zelas on another subject as an opportunity to ask. Then
G. Mutch (p 8, 18/12/01) took Gillespie 'to task', saying she
shouldn't have concentrated on Zelas, noting that the silence has
'reigned over virtually everyone involved in the injustice to which
it refers. "Who can blame them?" he went on. "It must be enormously
embarrassing, not only that Peter Ellis suffered such needless injustice
but that thinking adults actually embraced the absurd notions surrounding
it". He hoped it would not be only the parents for whom the book confirms
'what they must already have come to realise' - ie, that they were
wrong when they once believed that their children may have suffered
abuse.
Between-times,
Ed Hitchcock (16/12/01 p 15) said that at least the system
was open and Hood could write what she wrote. He asserted this did
not apply to the Family Court where the occurrences of many of the
issues Hood identified happened regularly, but where nobody is entitled
to observe or report publicly about the proceedings. B.H. Howard
on the same day said the Minister was 'not reading' the book for fear
he would have to face that aspects of legal procedures needed to be
investigated. The more that this state continued, he wrote, correspondingly
ever-more was the law made to look an ass.
The following
day Chris Neale said Justice Minister Goff ought to be ashamed,
and the situation would remain a case of justice denied if, from his
'dyslexia', the Minister continued to refuse to read Hood's book (20/12/01
p8).
This heading nearly
said it all (The Press 19/2/02 p 3), but really what Ellis did was
make a renewed call for an inquiry. It came after he heard
on the grapevine that the New Zealand Law Journal was to highlight
flaws in the way his case was handled, in its February 2002 issue.
According to the grapevine the editorial was going to say that Sir
Thomas Eichelbaum's judgment, when leading the ministerial inquiry
into the case, was either wrongly directed or at fault. And it was
also thought that the editorial would call for the repeal of a section
of the Evidence Act, and would question whether the appeal process
really worked. (We duplicate the authoritative editorial itself later
in this issue.)
Mr Ellis said
Mr Goff should 'honour the word' of the Court of Appeal, which would
be better addressed by a commission of inquiry.
Professor Michael
Corballis, Senior Lecturer in psychology at the University of Auckland,
wrote a favourable review of Hood's book in New Zealand's 'Listener'
magazine early this year. He highlighted moral panics/witchhunts,
saying 'these bouts have increased, if anything, with advances in
technology and the trappings of enlightenment'. His pointed criticisms
were broad, including post-modern rhetoric, cultural relativism, the
disdain for quantitative methodology, and 'the sexual abuse industry'
(Listener 26/1/02 p 60).
[Dr Corballis
has been described elsewhere as having helped establish a committee
to assess the intake for Auckland University's doctorate of Clinical
Psychology professional training course. The course runs under the
co-directorship of senior lecturers Dr John Read and Dr Fred Seymour,
on an alternating basis. This seems to relate to current debate/s
in psychology, such as whether psychoanalysis and cognitive behavioural
therapy are mutually exclusive paradigms, or not.]
Of Hood, although
'her indignation occasionally shows', Dr Corballis said he believed
her 'conclusions are if anything understated', and noted Hood had
a position that was not unsympathetic to the situation of sexual abuse
workers, in the past, when they were assailed by apparently authoritative
statements by some of the more zealous members of the industry. He
contrasted this with the succumbing of the police and the judiciary,
to these same pressures, which he said was achieved 'frighteningly
easily'. The succumbing of the police was something not easily sympathised
with.
Corballis said
definition of sexual abuse is still unclear, and the harm was difficult
to define because what badly hurts one complainant may not do the
same to another.
Corballis noted
the hunt for child abuse at the Civic had put an end to the City Council-provided
child-care service, leaving instead of it 'a society bitterly divided
by suspicion and recrimination'.
He concluded that
the book should be compulsory reading for counsellors, clinical psychologists,
psychiatrists, the police, the judiciary and ministers of the Crown.
An 'increasingly
distressed' Anne Else of Auckland, in a short piece in National Radio's
'Sunday Supplement' (27/1/02), felt the need to take Dr Michael Corballis's
Listener review to task. That she was referring to Corballis was only
made quite clear by a copy of the transcript, including references,
kindly supplied by Phil Smith of Radio New Zealand. Ms Else firstly
tried to take Corballis, and perhaps others, to task for using the
derisive term 'the sexual abuse industry', because, she asserted,
it didn't exist. She went on to respond to Dr Corballis's remark that
a lot of harm has been done seeking to find child sexual abuse, more
than by the abuse itself, real or imagined. Ms Else, in the programme
where community commentators can get on their soap-boxes, even setting
up straw horses if they wish, retorted:
� [If]
real sexual abuse of real children does not do any real harm at
all - certainly nothing comparable to the harm done by those who
try too hard to stop it happening or continuing - then the implication
is clear. Instead of trying to detect it, we should all just sit
back and let it happen. The risk of harm would be much less.
Perhaps such an
idea was ever only in her imagination. She also asked that people
don't misrepresent sexual abuse as trivial.
Bernard Gadd, in a Letter
to the Sunday Star Times (20/1/02 p A6), pointed out to the public
in the context of "Lynley Hood's meticulous investigation of the Peter
Ellis case" that a recent study had demonstrated clearly that testimony
regarding sexual abuse from children as young as those in the Civic
case cannot be relied upon. This study, referring to what children
report after they are exposed to misinformation from parents, is from
Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied Vol 7, p 27. (For an abstract
see www.apa.org/journals/xap/xap7127.html;
it dates from March 2001.)
"The worrying
thing is that the same "counsellors" and others who provided the evidence
for the Ellis case are still appearing in court using the same flawed
procedures in the same sort of cases with apparent success and that
lawyers are still urging people to claim childhood sexual abuse in
order to win large sums of cash from ACC", said Gadd. It was time
for Phil Goff to face reality, and bring those dealing repeatedly
in accusations of sexual abuse of small children to account.
[The
Christchurch Star of 14/12/01 noted that START (Sexual Abuse Therapy
and Rehabilitation Team), a community organisation notorious for its
relationship to the Civic case from 1991 onwards, was to be the recipient
of donations out of the paper's City to Surf fun run in March 2002.
It is galling to see the agency partly responsible for the Civic case,
if it has done nothing to recompense or to properly educate itself
so that it does not tend to support sex allegations even when they
are false, getting this endorsement.]
National MP Katherine
Rich didn't pay much attention to the Civic case when it ran during
1992-93, and she thought the justice system would probably get it
right. So, after first shying away from reading Hood's new book, it
was a surprise to her that when she did pick it up she found it 'unputdownable'.
Having read it, she is left with 'unsettling doubt and a gnawing feeling
that neither a fair trial for Ellis nor justice was achieved'. If
all the evidence had been heard, the jury wouldn't have found Ellis
guilty beyond all reasonable doubt, and "The case (the full case)
needs to be reviewed and Goff must acquaint himself with the book,
perhaps via an official", she wrote. She compared Goff's situation
to Rob Muldoon's over Arthur Alan Thomas, where he ordered a QC to
report, overturned the verdict, and paid compensation (ODT, 31/1/02
p 2 'The Rich Report').
Lynn Crook is
a prominent 'survivor' in the US. [Lynley Hood wrote
(in a message to an internet group): The recovered memory case
of Lynn Crook, author of the letter to the Listener in response to
Corballis's review of A City Possessed, features in chapter 6 of Ofshe
& Watters' book Making Monsters. Ofshe & Watters disguised Crook's
identity, but she was identified by name in a lengthy review of the
book in the L.A. Times. Also, Crook has identified herself and made
her case public on a number of high-profile occasions. �Crook also
made a high-profile complaint to the APA against Elizabeth Loftus
that brought the falling-out between clinicians and scientists in
psychology to a head [it saw Elizabeth Loftus leaving the APA and
helping form another organization]. Ofshe, Watters & Loftus have rejected
Crook's claims of misrepresentation. In any event, the basic elements
of her case are undisputed: that she went into therapy complaining
only of problems with her new boss, and recovered memories of horrendous
abuse by her parents during years of therapy. She successfully sued
her parents on the basis of her recovered memories. The alleged abuse
included having to insert her arm into a horse's anus when she was
four years old, and having to do a similar act to her father. (In
court the defence called a vet to describe the horse's likely reaction
to having an arm forced into its large intestine.) Crook 'remembered'
that her father made her eat a bowl of her own faeces, and forced
her to chew 20 times after each bite.
Lynn
Crook (who has an M.Ed (Richland, WA, USA)), in the rebuttal, defies
Ofshe & Watters for what was said about her in 'Making Monsters',
but she is selective, mentioning only the more-believable accounts
of her possible abuse. The rebuttal is: Crook, L. 1995. Letter from
Lynn Crook, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse Vol. 4(2) 115-11; it may
be seen at http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Taubman_Center/Recovmem/crookletter.html]
Lynn Crook responded
in the Listener (in the 9-15/2/02 issue), to Dr Corballis' review
of Hood's book, alleging he had taken a provocative stance, stating:
Discussing
sexual contact between adults and children, he writes: "There are
serious, still unanswered questions as to when affectionate touching
becomes sexual, when sexual activity becomes abuse, and precisely
what kinds of abuse are likely to cause serious psychological harm,
and to whom."
However, Corballis
was not discussing sexual contact between adults and children before
the quote as she so arranges, but generally about the lack of any
as yet clear differentiation between affectionate contact and sexual
contact.
Corballis also
had listed other factors about which there are still unanswered questions,
such as 'precisely what kinds of abuse are likely to cause serious
psychological harm, and to whom'. One aspect of this set of unanswered
material may have age as an element, including about pubescent and
post-pubescent youths who yet are legally children, ie, under 16.
Ms Crook seems
to reflect some of the problems that some people have, over the fact
it is legitimate to discuss what might separate say affection, and
sexuality, from abusive sexual behaviours. This is reflected, for
example, by the fact that in the research, some people who are defined
by some as sexually abused, haven't defined themselves as such and
haven't felt abused. It is reflected in the fact that although some
people agree they've been sexually abused, they say they have got
over it without that much harm, whereas advocates may say that sexual
abuse always causes a lot of harm.
|
|
|
Reprinted
from The New Zealand Law Journal, February 2002, Page 1, Editorial,
for educational purposes and not for profit
The Ellis Case
The Minister of
Justice appears proud to say that he refuses to read Lynley Hood's book
A City Possessed. This is unfortunate as there are numerous lessons
to be learned from the saga that are of value today, regardless of the
issue of Ellis's guilt. On that issue alone, we are witnessing the kind
of establishment obstinacy and public dissatisfaction that led in Britain
to the Criminal Cases Review Commission.
The Minister shelters
behind the Court of Appeal and the report by Sir Thomas Eichelbaum,
but this is not good enough. One of Lynley Hood's achievements, as a
non-lawyer, is an astute criticism of the shortcomings of the various
methods available to review criminal convictions. Each of the reviews
and appeals suffered from some limitation, self-imposed or otherwise.
A City Possessed is the first attempt at a review of the whole case
from the investigation onwards.
The first issue
obviously is whether Ellis should have been convicted. No one who has
read the confusion and contradiction displayed by the witness statements
that Hood recites can be happy that the convictions are safe. The Court
of Appeal confessed to having read only extracts of the statements,
but this is not enough to make one content with them, whereas relevant
extracts are sufficient to show that witnesses were confused, self-contradictory
and unreliable. Either Sir Thomas did not read those statements because,
like everyone else he restricted himself to the filleted evidence that
the Judge allowed in, or, with respect, his judgment is at fault.
Regardless of that
issue, however, there are several systemic matters which clearly require
attention and which, it seems, require attention today just as much
as a decade ago.
Police investigation:
the investigation in the Ellis saga suffered from a clear fault which
was that it was driven by a junior officer with a bee in his bonnet.
Senior officers seem almost never to have exercised independent judgment:
they evidently regarded themselves as the heavy guns to be wheeled out
whenever the OiC needed. It is clearly inappropriate that a multiple
victim case involving serious criminal allegations, important legal
and policy questions relating to evidence, and major budgetary issues,
should have been conducted by an officer of the rank of Detective. Exactly
the same thing seems to have happened again in the Sotheran Dash-8 crash
case, where either the Detective concerned was being used as a front
to shelter the real decision makers or another hugely expensive and
complex investigation was conducted without any leadership from supervising
officers.
Section 23G of
the Evidence Act: this section is meaningless nonsense. This is
not hindsight, it was said at the time it was passed. The section authorises
the giving of evidence about whether behaviour is consistent or inconsistent
with sexual abuse. "Inconsistent" means "logically impossible in combination
with" and "consistent" simply means "not inconsistent". There is no
behaviour that is inconsistent with sexual abuse and so the DSAC manual
instructed doctors to report all behaviour as "consistent with sexual
abuse". This is clearly not understood by most lawyers and police, who,
surveys show, think that "consistent" means "provides supporting evidence
for". Sadly, the Law Commission draft Evidence Code just reiterates
this nonsense verbatim. It should be repealed. The kindest thing that
can be said for those responsible for it is that they cannot have known
what they were doing.
Psychological
evidence: little psychological evidence stands up to serious scrutiny.
Psychologists have managed to con the system for years with nonsense
such as "offender profiling" which has no scientific basis whatever.
The fact is that psychology completely lacks a general theory of human
behaviour and the divisions between schools of psychology are as deep
as argument about whether the earth goes round the sun or vice versa.
Few psychologists understand the logical structure of evidence they
are giving, as surveys of numerous cases, listening to them speak on
this and other issues at seminars, and personal experience of trying
to train them in evidence-giving, demonstrates. Almost no statements
made by psychologists are backed up by the population data necessary
to give the evidence probative value. The so-called "prosecutor's fallacy"
is endemic. Recently a psychologist on television suggested that many
premature births are due to stress events in pregnancy. To prove this
she interviewed mothers who had given birth prematurely and discovered
that some high proportion of them had suffered stress events in pregnancy.
This, she said, proved her theory. Much psychological evidence in real
Court cases in New Zealand and elsewhere has been as unintelligent as
this. The mystical hold that psychologists seem to have over the legal
system should be broken.
The appeal structure:
The position in a criminal appeal appears to be this. If you are an
undoubted criminal caught red-handed but you can point to some defect
in police procedure, the Court of Appeal will exercise a power it has
arrogated to itself and which Parliament never intended it to have,
to rule the evidence inadmissible and set you free. If on the other
hand, you argue that you are innocent and have only been convicted because
of misjudgments by the trial Judge and by the jury, the Court of Appeal
will refuse to exercise the power Parliament intended it to have to
revisit the conduct of the trial and the evidence available. This is
not how to create confidence in the criminal justice system."
|
|
|
A group of Hawkes
Bay teenagers have been tried and convicted over violating a schoolmate
with a broomstick. An item in a Christchurch paper noted the judge's
remarks, as in the paragraph-extract following:
"The
only explanation I can find for it is that this was group or mob hysteria
which fed upon itself, whipped up because of senseless notions that
macho male behaviour, ritual, or schemes, sanctioned this as being
what men do on occasions. Well, decent men don't and if they do then
the law will exact a stern response" - Justice Gendall told
the High Court in Napier". (The Press 4-5/5/02 'Mainlander' p 1,
"Reining in the bullies").
Substitute a few
words into the same statement and it could equally have applied to the
Civic case a decade ago.
"The
only explanation I can find for it is that this was group or mob hysteria
which fed upon itself, whipped up because of senseless notions from
some parents and unprofessional advisors, supported by homophobic
ritual, and faulty systemic schemes, which sanctioned this as being
what PC communities do on occasions. Well, enlightened communities
don't and if they do, then the law should exact a stern response."
Alas we are still
waiting for such wisdom to prevail.
Justice
Gendall in February 2002 was appointed a Master of the High Court, according
to an announcement made on 26 February by the Attorney General Margaret
Wilson, and his term was to run from 13 March 2002 for five years.
The
various forms of what historically has often been called hysteria, as
Justice Gendall calls it, are examined by Lynley Hood in her new book
on the Civic case, 'A City Possessed'. She distinguishes mass hysteria,
mass psychogenic illness (and mass psychogenic illness by proxy), moral
panic, and scapegoating. She gives ritual some coverage, but generally
in the context of fabulations.
'A
City Possessed' is now available at amazon.com.
|
|
|
Jim
Millar was head of Christchurch's CIB during the Civic case, which started
in 1991. Problems in the police became evident by and during that time,
and have been the subject of specific and general criticism. Millar
conducted the PCA inquiry that investigated Detective Eade who had been
leading the inquiry into the Civic case for a period of time from late
1991 (as covered in Lynley Hood's A City Possessed, pp 325-8). The PCA/Millar
inquiry outcome was made plain in a press heading in 1998: "Creche cop
cleared by top level inquiry" (Sunday News 14/6/98).
But
this outcome was patently unsatisfactory and it did nothing to right
the wrongs perpetrated against people smeared by the allegations.
Two
years ago, Joe Karam won a defamation case taken against him by two
members of the Police, over evidence they gave in the Bain murder case
in Dunedin, which he said was incorrect in certain respects. Former
Det Sgt Milton Weir, and then-current Det Sgt Kevin Anderson were ordered
to pay Karam $350,000, after the jury decided Karam hadn't defamed either
of them when he implied that evidence in the case involved perjury.
By this the police had their reputation tarnished, especially since,
via their own Police Complaints Authority, they had already done an
investigation that exonerated themselves for their conduct.
More
recently, various reports have continually referred to ructions in the
Criminal Investigation Branch (CIB) of the Canterbury Police. The CIB
deals with homicides and other serious crime, including sex allegations.
Until recently it had Inspector Rob Pope at its helm, with a group of
about 150 officers. This was the department hardest hit by a detective
exodus, according to a report, which went on to say that the flow had
finally now been stemmed (Jarrod Booker, The Press 10/10/01 p5).
An
announcement in February 2002 said that a new District Commander for
the Canterbury Police, Sandra Manderson, had been appointed to replace
Superintendent John Reilly who retires in March. She would be the first
woman district commander in New Zealand (The Press, 27/2/01 p 1).
Originally
from Canterbury, she has management and CIB experience, and was seconded
to the office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet for 3� years as director
of the crime prevention unit.
She
has a BSc and an MSc (Hons), in geography, and an MBA (Masters in Business
Administration). She was awarded a Queen's service medal for her work
in Christchurch on a project to curb fear of crime, and has an extensive
sporting background.
Acting
NZ Police Commissioner Steve Long, commenting on staff speculation,
said that Manderson had won the position fairly and squarely. Mr Pope
said he looked forward to his stint in Napier and to returning to a
productive relationship with the new district commander (The Press 6/3/02
p 2).
We
can only hope that the new appointment may help upgrade staff's professional
performance.
A reflective
piece about the now-retired Millar, 55, was published in The Press early
this year (1/1/02 p 20). Now, four years since he conducted a PCA inquiry
into the Civic investigation, he - perhaps tellingly - said that over
the last 20 years the police have become confused about their central
aim. Issues in community policing such as in health, employment and
education, might best be passed to "other organizations that are best
suited to dealing with them", he said. Taking up side issues has seemed
to mean that the police in recent times haven't always been able to
respond to calls as promptly as they would have wished, he said. The
upshot was, he said, that the police need to visit their priorities,
starting with what their prime focus is. This is perhaps encouraging
for clearer demarcation of the Police from advocacy groups, as they
should be.
Putting
the best slant on the compromised office, he said that despite the high
turnover of staff in the Christchurch police, there were still 'top
people' in middle management in the CIB office.
Much
of Millar's career was spent working in the Police Complaints Authority
office, which explains how he came to have investigated Det Eade's handling
of the Civic case. Millar defended the PCA's record of operation. He
said the authority being internal, which meant the police investigated
their own complaints, was the best arrangement, because only senior
police officers were in a position to know how to do an investigation
of police procedures. To do it any other way would amount to too big
an undertaking. He asserted that generally in the police there is an
intolerance of corruption.
The
COSA editors feel that while the police may be resistant to some sorts
of temptations towards corruption, it is clear that they have, possibly
inadvertently, moved towards an unprofessional stance around sexual
abuse allegations and their investigation.
Serious
inquiries are sometimes distorted in the public's mind, Millar went
on, by reports that are wrong, and he said that it made it very difficult
for the police officers involved. "Often the stuff written could be
compared to a novel rather than the truth' he said. 'No officer would
be concerned about fronting up � and establishing what is alleged to
have occurred, but it's pretty tough on staff, when�a lot of the stuff
[printed about cases] is based on novels'.
Thinking
of the Civic case, we know that 'A Mother's Story' by Joy Bander reads
like this. Incidentally, Joy Bander is the alias for the person Lynley
Hood calls Mrs Dogwood in A City Possessed, whose son eventually came
out with statements that became responsible for charges against Ellis
and others.
"Men
should never think their partner's violence is their fault. Just as
men make a choice to be violent against their partners � so do women.
She chooses whether she will slap a man's face ... She chooses whether
she will lash out and scream at the family because she is feeling unwell"
(NZ Police Managers' Guild, Family Violence booklet, October 2001).
Sometimes,
we might think, a grown-up woman ends up transferring some spite, stress,
disappointment, or any of a number of other things that underpin expressions
of violence, to false sexual allegations. This can occur in her own
household, or be directed to someone outside it, and it can consist
of allegations to a person currently in her social sphere, or someone
from the past.
Whatever
the case, the allegations, if false, act like a violation. We wonder
if such cases are covered by the scenario referred to in the Police
Guild booklet. If not, something is needed to cover these.
|
|
|
Sexual
allegations in Education
The New Zealand
Teachers Council, which came into existence in February this year, has
announced that it has the responsibility for coordinating the police
vetting of non-teaching staff and contractors regularly employed in
schools, kindergartens and early childhood centres (see http://www.edgazette.govt.nz/notices/show
notices.cgi?notice_type=1&index=true&issue=126).
An 'Administrative
Advice' document there says for positions with substantial contact with
children, Boards need to apply for Police checks. To do this the applicant
needs to sign a consent form, but:
As the
vets are legally compulsory it is technically unnecessary for the
person to give "permission" to a vet but the police require that the
individual being vetted signs the consent form for privacy purposes.
However, we wonder
- if the applicant doesn't mind talking about his or her case - whether
s/he really does need to sign a consent form, as there is a question
of whose ends are being served by privacy, such as in the case of people
who have had false allegations result in their conviction.
The crimes identified
as relevant to the check are crimes against persons, specifically 'past
history of sexual abuse of children', 'conviction for any crime in which
children were involved', and 'history of any violence or sexually exploitative
behaviour'. If relevant convictions (not just arrests) are found, the
policy says the Board might disqualify the person's application, but
not necessarily. The Advice at the same time goes to some lengths to
suggest that old offences of some kinds (eg, convictions arising out
of the 1981 tour) and old and minor drug-related offences, need not
be used by boards to disqualify an applicant from holding a position.
|
|
|
Sexual
allegations in the Catholic Church
New Zealand Cardinal
Tom Williams said in a news item that the Catholic Church in New Zealand
had developed detailed procedures for handling complaints of sexual
abuse. Catholic communications director Lyndsay Freer said she understood
the church's complaints committees had dealt with four cases of inappropriate
sexual conduct by priests in recent times. Three cases did not involve
children or teenagers and the fourth, which did, was historical and
the alleged perpetrator had since died. There were no Catholic clergy
in prison for sexual offences, she said. - The Press April 2002.
Cardinal Williams
was also interviewed on Radio New Zealand (Nine to Noon, 24/4/02). He
was reassuring in his message, saying that priests know their responsibilities
and their duty. He wondered how many priests there are in the US, and
how many are alleged sexual abusers. He distinguished between pedophilia
and ephebephilia, implying the latter was where most of the allegations
fitted.
~
Pedophilia
is an attraction to prepubescent children.
Ephebephilia
is an attraction mainly of males to teenagers who are pubescent.
Because
of the acceptance of homosexuality, the term ephebephilia is said to
be almost obsolete. While pedophile actions have no place in society,
ephebephilia may have become one form of sexuality whose expression
is acceptable to some. However, if coercively expressed, it is no more
acceptable than any other form of sexual abuse. What is more, if the
person has a religious role in the church, he or she has several issues,
including older age (most likely), proper behaviour congruent with the
power of their position, especial moral responsibility, especial sexual
rectitude in the light of their vocation, and, in the case of Catholic
priests, sexual abstinence in the light of their unique celibacy vows.
COSA
knows of a case in this arena that fits the category of false allegations.
~
Some anti-gay
lobbies in the US have equated the sexual allegations in the Catholic
Church with gays in the priesthood, but the fallacy behind this argument
has been attacked, leading one advocate to assert, tongue-in cheek,
a radical solution:
"If
you want to use profiling to weed out pedophiles, there's a far
more effective way [than falsely targeting gays in the church -
readers can appreciate that while aberrant pedophiles may sometimes
be gay, this does not mean all gays should carry the can for the
different set of bad apples, pedophiles].
"One
hundred percent of sexual abuse by priests is committed by men.
So is nearly all sexual abuse of children. While it's hard to tell
who's gay, it's easy to tell who's male. The ideal solution would
be to ban men from the priesthood. The modest alternative would
be to admit women. If conservatives were serious about protecting
kids, they'd begin with that step.
-
'Cardinal virtues, cardinal sins, The hypocrisy of blaming sexual abuse
by priests on gays' by William Saletan, slate.com, 24/4/02 at http://www.msnbc.com/news/743068.asp?0na=x22684Q0-
|
|
|
Sexual
allegations in the Health field
According
to a press article, an Auckland human rights lawyer Clare Bear has recently
completed a report on doctors behaviour related to sexual matters, that
concluded:
Between
350 and 900 doctors may be breaching sexual boundaries with their
patients at some level, an independent review of the Medical Council's
policies and procedures estimates.
- Call for policy changes, The Press, 11/2/02
[According
to the Auckland Women's Centre page at http://www.womenz.org.nz/tmln/civil_union_b.htm
'Clare Bear' is a 'bisexual Wellington lawyer' (although the article
says she hails from Auckland). And why her sexuality is of any interest
is hard to reckon.]
The
item's expression 'may be' indicates guesswork, and, linked as it is,
to a range of something like 250%, seems simply alarmist. We hope the
'data' do not affect people in the way exaggerated sexual abuse statistics
did, to create myriad sets of false sexual allegations, all over the
world.
The
background to the report appears to be that the Medical Council - the
body that registers doctors to practice; sets standards for education,
conduct and health; and handles disciplinary matters - had asked for
free and frank advice to help it improve its policies and processes.
The
report made 160 recommendations in 26 categories.
Council
president Tony Baird said many of the report's findings were 'very worrying'.
Medical
Association chairman John Adams moved to reassure the public the following
day that the vast majority of doctors behaved ethically. He noted that
the issue of sexual boundaries did not just affect doctors, but all
health professionals (The Press 12/2/02).
A Hastings
doctor failed to detect, allegedly, sexual abuse in a 4 year old, carried
out by a care-giver at a kohanga reo, because she didn't know the New
Zealand guidelines.
Police
reportedly advised that they hadn't been able to bring a case over the
abuse report due to 'legal technicalities'.
Hastings
District Health Board community pediatrician Russell Wills, who had
later examined the boy and made the finding, appears to have been the
complainant behind the finding over the doctor's alleged handling of
the case.
The
doctor was new to the country, but Commissioner for Children Roger McClay
said there could be no excuse for such a blunder. No-one at the medical
practice would comment (Press 13/3/02 p 9).
This
sounds like a local dispute with political overtones, and the matter
should be resolved.
|
|
|
False allegations,
false sexual allegations, 'not guilty' verdicts
Police
may charge the 16-year-old girl who claimed she was sexually abducted
from a Porirua park and sexually violated by three men, a report said.
She sparked a manhunt when she told police she was grabbed, forced into
a car, blindfolded, sexually violated after being taken to an unknown
location, and then dumped back at the park. The police, after investigation,
including interviewing two men, are not seeking anyone else, and were
not satisfied the sexual violation took place (Press 15/1/02).
A jury
took 30 minutes, a report said, to return a not guilty verdict in a
trial where a man had been charged with sexually violating his nephew.
The 49-year old man was discharged after a 2-day trial in the Christchurch
District Court. - The Press 8/5/02 9/5/02
A
woman made a false complaint to police in order to get back at her partner,
the Christchurch District Court was told.
Sarah
Maria Arps, 25, admitted making a false statement that assault had been
committed. Constable Chris White, prosecuting, said that on November
1 Arps made a written statement that she had been assaulted by her de
facto partner. The man was arrested soon after and charged with assault.
The matter was set down for a defended hearing, but Arps failed to turn
up at court, and later admitted she had made up the complaint in order
to get back at the man. Arps, who contended in her own defence that
she had taken the course that had been advised by the police, was fined
$250. The Press 3/4/02 p 8.
A
16-year-old woman who alleged she was pack-raped in a central Wellington
alleyway was alleging something that did not happen, police have found.
They said the false allegation had resulted from a traumatic event which
they declined to elaborate on. The police said she had not acted in
a vindictive or obstructive manner, and that no charges would be laid.
The Press 20/4/02 p 4.
Christchurch
police will not lay charges against any member of the Cronulla Sharks
after a lengthy investigation into sexual misconduct claims, said The
Press (3/4/02 p 3). The investigation had been launched after the Sydney
rugby league team's stay at the Racecourse Hotel in February. A female
kitchen worker at the hotel, who has since left the job, claimed she
had been sexually violated by several of the Sharks players. The head
of the investigation, Inspector John Doyle, who traveled to Sydney with
detectives to interview the team's members, said all of the parties
involved in the matter had been spoken to, police had decided not to
lay any charges, and "The matter is now at an end". He would not discuss
any details of the investigation, but confirmed that the 19-year-old
had not withdrawn her complaint.
It
was because the complainant during a 1997 rape trial revealed that police
had told her of a previous rape allegation against the man, that a new
trial was ordered for him. The witness had not been told the man had
been acquitted of that charge (although it was irrelevant to the order).
The
man, former Mangakino policeman Colin Andrew McLean, had recently been
retried and acquitted, with the reasons for the previous trial abandonment
still suppressed. Only when the retrial had been completed (Rotorua,
April 2002), were the reasons allowed to be made public.
The
jury at the 1997 trial had been directed by the judge to disregard the
comments that they had heard in court about an earlier case involving
the man, but that direction was found by the Court of Appeal to have
been insufficient to avoid a miscarriage of justice. The Court of Appeal
said in their decision that the judge should have abandoned the trial.
The
earlier case in 1994 had involved a rape charge. As noted, he was also
acquitted of that.
-
The Press 30/4/02 p2; 'Ex-policeman not guilty of rape,' Otago Daily
Times 20-21/4/02 p A27
A man
who faced charges in 1993 had been convicted and sentenced to 9 months,
even although the step-daughter who made the allegations had retracted
them to foster parents before he appeared in court. The court on that
occasion had not heard this although the foster couple had already passed
that information to Children and Young Persons' Service (CYPS).
The
man served 5 months after pleading guilty to sexually violating the
girl. He did that, he said, from not knowing what had happened: he said
he was too drunk to remember, but thought he should rely on what the
girl said happened, which included molesting her and his 1-year old
child. The man's excuse for being drunk was that he had been drinking
heavily after a close friend died.
The
man's conviction was quashed last year and now the man is seeking compensation.
The family has been split, with the man being disowned by some family
members, and he has also been threatened by some in the community, according
to his lawyer Rob Harrison.
According
to 'new government guidelines', the man could receive around $100,000.
CYPS
knew that in subsequent years the girl made and withdrew allegations
about four other men, said the report.
This
included further allegations against the step-father in 1998, involving
an allegation of sexually abusing her in 1998. Both the man and his
wife were charged with attempting to pervert the course of justice over
that, when they told the complainant to change her story. They hired
a private investigator whose report prompted a review of the case. The
girl admitted she made up the story because her mother did not have
time for her any more.
Police
withdrew charges. The case was referred to the youth aid section with
a view to prosecuting the girl for the allegations she made in 1993.
She wasn't charged. - Sunday Star-Times 24/3/02 p A4.
|
|
|
"Following
a Law Commission report on the issue, a new system for handling claims
for compensation from people who have been wrongly convicted and imprisoned
is up and running. A wider range of people can apply for compensation
but with a stringent test of innocence before a claim is approved.
"People
eligible for compensation are those who have had their convictions quashed
on appeal to the High Court or Court of Appeal, without order for retrial,
or who have received a free pardon. Other eligibility criteria include
that:
- the
applicant must have served a period of imprisonment; and
- claimants
must establish beyond reasonable doubt that they are innocent, but
they don't have to produce a new fact establishing a miscarriage of
justice.
"The assessment
process will be conducted by a Queen's Counsel. Firstly the Counsel
will assess whether the claimant is "innocent beyond reasonable doubt".
If that test is met, the Queen's Counsel then makes a recommendation
to the Minister of Justice on the appropriate level of compensation
payment. The final decision on each claim will continue to be made by
Cabinet.
"The level of compensation
will take into account such things as the way the prosecution was handled,
the claimant's own conduct, and the nature of the losses suffered by
the claimant. Although the Law Commission recommended that the new criteria
be established in statute, it has been decided that the new system will
remain within the Crown prerogative for the next 3 years."
-
Rural Bulletin of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Feb 1999;
http://www.maf.govt.nz/mafnet/publications/ruralbulletin/rbfeb99/rbfeb99-23.htm#P846_82316
The
compensation announcement was even noted in the US, as the following
item shows:
"On
December 9, 1998, the New Zealand Ministry of Justice instituted a system
to compensate people whose convictions of crimes had been overturned
on appeal." - "Compensate the Unjustly Convicted" by Susan Sarnoff,
DSW, in "Justice: Denied", at:
http://www.justicedenied.org/compensate.html
|
|
|
INTERNATIONAL
NEWS RELATED TO FALSE SEXUAL ALLEGATIONS
"When
Ted Wendling did his December 1999 investigative series on psychology
boards nationwide he found that New Hampshire had one of the highest
rates of disciplined psychologists. As I am about to publicly prove,
this relatively high rate had very little to do with actual protection
of the public or maintenance of professional standards since the NH
Board secretly protected some pretty horrendous practices. The NH
Board obtained relatively "good" disciplinary statistics only because
it regulated a small number of psychologists and conducted a couple
of horrendous witch hunts which I am also in the process of exposing
for what they really were."
This commentary,
from a contributor to the witchhunt newsgroup (on 10/4/02), comes after
a consumer-group 'Public Citizen's Health Research Group' assembled
disciplinary action rates of state medical boards for most US States.
However, in his experience the 'discipline' can be wrong:
"My
own experience � leads me to be very skeptical of disciplinary rates
for another reason: boards may be sanctioning the wrong professionals
(eg, protecting practices and practitioners favored by board members
and harassing those not in favor) without impartial regard for safety,
efficacy, or unbiased ethical considerations."
He may mean a board
has disciplined a psychologist because the psychologist, with due care,
supported a client's subjective reality of 'recovered memories of sexual
abuse' but not their objective reality. If so the psychologist is to
be commended and the board's actions questioned.
Jeffrey T. Pierce,
40, who spent 15 years imprisoned on a rape conviction, and who was
exonerated by DNA tests, has filed a $US75 million ($170 m) lawsuit
alleging a police chemist conspired with a prosecutor to produce false
evidence against him. "I'll prove that they knew I was innocent from
the day they arrested me" he said. - The Press 20/4/02 p 9.
Barbara C Johnson,
Advocate of Court Reform and Attorney at Law in Massachusetts, has announced
her candidacy for Governor in the state of Massachusetts in the election
on 5 November 2002. Her candidacy site is http://www.barbforgovernor.com/.
She writes in her signature file:
The judicial
system is very broken. It must be fixed.
There
are four people who can do the job:
Everybody,
Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.
Everybody
thinks Somebody will surely do it.
It is
a job Anybody can do. But Nobody is doing it.
At least
I'm trying. What are you doing?
She has galvanised
others into action on the basis of her policies and independent platform.
Two landmark civil
decisions, arising out of the sequelae of recovered memory therapy being
equated with believable accounts of past trauma, in a case, have been
made in a court in Arnhem, in the province of North-Brabant in the Netherlands,
in February and March 2002.
The background,
from translated reports, is that a woman entered therapy for serious
psychological problems. Her therapist had put the woman under hypnosis,
used dream analysis, repeatedly raised the possibility of incest, and
told her that hitherto hidden memories began to re-surface indicating
a history of sexual abuse by her parents followed by an illegal abortion.
The parents were arrested and spent nearly 3 weeks in detention. The
court then investigated the allegations, later ordering charges be dropped.
However, she later launched a claim for 40.000 Euro against her parents.
That court case
was heard up to late February '02. Dr R Bullen, professor of child and
adolescent psychology at the Free University for Amsterdam, who investigated
at the request of the court, deemed the daughter's incest story to lack
credibility and the therapy to be very far below standard, and the woman's
claim was denied. The parents' attorney, F. van Veghel, said this was
a landmark decision.
Meanwhile, the parents
had entered a reparation claim against the therapist, for 50.000 Euro.
This led to the second landmark decision, a few days later in March:
the woman's therapist, who was from Druten, was ordered to make reparation
payments of 19.000 Euro to the parents of his client. The basis according
to the Arnhem court was that his actions led the client to falsely accuse
her parents of incest; the therapist owed a duty of care not just to
his client, but also to her parents; and the therapist should have warned
his client against the possibility of making false accusations. Attorney
F van Veghel called this a spectacular breakthrough. - Reformatorisch
Dagblad, 6/2/02, 'Judge does not believe incest story'
Also, a commentator
said the verdict would cause therapists to be more careful. Insurance
companies reportedly had raised premiums for malpractice insurance.
The Netherlands Institute of Psychologists (NIP) should condemn the
therapy. The case involved a social worker who had encouraged ideas
that caused this client to develop beliefs that gross violations involving
incest and the forced consumption of fetuses had taken place in her
youth. So while it had been thought that 'quasi helpers and halfwits'
working in the professions did little harm, it wasn't so. "They are
capable of totally destroying the lives of both parents and adult offspring".
A spokesperson for 'Workgroup Fictive Therapies' said people who remember
sexual abuse, seemingly out of the blue, nearly always were in therapy,
and that it was hard to accuse therapists. They hide behind confidentiality
and are shielded by the profession.
|
|
|
COSA
has received support from Christchurch Community Trust and Christchurch
City Council
If
you want to send us a newsletter contribution by email, please do so
to [email protected]
Opinions
expressed in this newsletter are not necessarily those of COSA
New Zealand Inc.
|
|