Satanic Pictures 

(final version) 

By Israel Shamir 

The West was not amused by burning embassies in Beirut and elsewhere.
“Them there Muslims do not understand our sense of humour; they do not
understand our idea of liberty”. - droned the newspapers. Others
condemned the tactless escapade of the Danes but thought the reaction
was quite out of proportion. However the flare up was anything but
incidental. [The picture on the left: a burned embassy in Beirut]. 

A resourceful American journalist Christopher Bollyn investigated the
Danish Satanic Pictures and their procurer, one Flemming Rose, and found
out that Rose was not an innocent lover of freedom of speech, neither
was he some quaint Scandinavian collector of smut pictures with
religious connotations who kept his presentations of the Muslim prophet
next to that of a Nun-with-the-Great Dane. Rose was a devotee of the
Zionist Neo-Con cult, and made a pilgrimage to the pope of this
persuasion -- Daniel Pipes, wrote Bollyn. 

So far, so good. But the execrable Rose peddled his stuff four months
ago, and that's a long time, as the media counts. The Muslims did not
even notice his effort, as possibly not many of them read the Jylland
Pest. Like a naughty child who multiplies his effort when his
well-prepared jibe fails to annoy, eleven newspapers in seven countries
republished the pictures simultaneously. It was a show of hands: behind
various newspapers in various countries, beyond companies and
corporations, we were allowed to see the Enemy, the Not-So-Hidden Hand,
the player on the international scene across all borders. It was a
convincing show, and now we know: one will, one design rules the world
media empire. 

Who organised it? 

Who is the Enemy? Who can control media on such a scale? Sandhya Jain,
an important Indian journalist of nationalist persuasion wrote: “The
cartoons were an intentional act of religious disrespect by political
Christianity, comprising the socio-economic-political elites of Europe
and America.” Christendom was called the culprit by many other
observers. But to be sure, the same people who offended Muslims do not
think twice before offending believing Christians – it is enough to
recall the Cross changing into a Swastika on the posters of Amen, the
movie, or the crucifix in a glass of piss (an illustration to the
Talmud?) in a Brooklyn [a heavily Jewish suburb of New York] Museum.
There is no religious enmity between the Muslims and the Christians.
Ahmad Amr was right: 

“The defamatory portrayals of Islam and Mohammed by European ‘free
speech advocates’ puts Muslims at a distinct disadvantage. They can’t
very well retaliate by defaming Jesus Christ because they revere him as
much as they revere Mohammed and consider him a prophet of God.
Insulting Jesus or the Virgin Mary is considered as blasphemous as
insulting Mohammed. No true Muslim would ever consider lampooning the
Mother of Christ because they also believe in the Immaculate Conception.
In Islamic tradition, Mary will be the first woman to enter heaven. And
like the Koran, Muslims consider both the Bible and the Torah holy
texts.” 

Thus we have to exonerate Christians and look elsewhere. 

The Western media is the exclusive domain of Judeophiles: you may have
noticed it by their extensive and morbid coverage of Sharon’s demise, of
Jewish fatalities while disregarding Palestinian deaths, of the
Holocaust issue, of real or imagined attacks on Jews[1]. The Jews have a
vested interest in promoting anti-Muslim sentiment, for it fits into
their plans of subduing Palestinians and dealing with Iran. (The
Iranians immediately recognised it, and turned to anti-Jewish holocaust
jokes. Equally tasteless, it was a reasonable tit-for-tat.) Indeed, just
now the non-Zionist World Jewish Congress officially kicked off his
campaign against Iran , Haaretz informed its readers. AIPAC plans a
Washington conference titled “Now is the time to stop Iran”. Kurt Nimmo
correctly called the pictures “a deliberate provocation designed to
outrage and incite Muslims and thus engender support in Europe and
America for the manufactured “clash of civilizations” engineered by the
Straussian neocons”. The Clash of Civilisations, as well as the Satanic
Pictures affair fit well into the Middle Eastern strategy of organised
Jewry. 

A clear sign of Jewish involvement in the Satanic Pictures affair was
given by many headlines: though all the Muslim nations were upset, the
Jewish-controlled newspapers stressed “Palestinian attacks on
Europeans”, as in 2001 they stressed “Palestinians rejoice at the
collapse of the Towers”, though many people all over the world were
happy at the strike that smote this symbol of arrogance and money power.
The Israeli daily Haaretz wrote: the Muslim press shows Sharon and
rabbis in a disrespectful light, let them try their own medicine. This
amounts to an admission that the Judeophiles were behind the
publication. 

But our colleagues did not notice a grand plan behind this action. Much
as the Pictures fit into the plan of fighting Muslims, they fit even
better into the great offensive on freedom carried out now world-wide.
From the US to Russia, from England to Italy, our masters promulgate the
web of laws to strengthen their control and to eliminate the vestiges of
freedom. In 1968, we proclaimed “Defence de Defence”, “It is forbidden
to forbid”; but now we are entangled by many new prohibitions. We mayn’t
choose to smoke or not, to fasten sit-belt or ride carefree. These small
annoying prohibitions are a sign of our submission to Big Brother. And
do not tell me it is done for my benefit. I can list a hundred things
more urgent for my well-being. Let them ban indebtedness first. If I am
free to take a dangerous loan, I should be free to choose or miss the
sitting belt. 

Our freedoms are severely curtailed. They exist on paper, but we may not
use them. We may not say what we wish less our livelihood will be
jeopardised. So many teachers and professors found themselves out of job
for saying a word out of turn: in “democratic” Germany, a Communist
could not work as a teacher. We may not elect whom we want: when the
Austrians chose Heiger, they were beaten until they agreed to give up.
Now the Palestinians chose Hamas, and they are told they will not get
their own tax money until they repent. (In a similar vein, the Bible
provides for debt cancellation every seven years, but the Talmud allows
the creditor to tie up and beat the debtor until he insists to pay the
voided debt). Every time, be it guns for the folks in remote Montana, a
cigarette in a Dublin pub, a sitting belt for you, or a free vote for
all of us, the great opinion-making machine of mass media enforced the
prohibition. Sometimes, as in the case of the Satanic Pictures, it does
not balk at deliberate provocation to make its point clear: we are not
allowed to say what we want. 

The media machine’s devotion to the Jewish cause allows us to guess that
it is not run by oil sheiks. But let us presume (and deal with this
presumption later) that the Jews and their Judaeophile supporters built
up their media empire for another purpose. If you feel (as so many good
people do) an urgent need to exonerate the Jews, you may believe that
the Jews organised their media holding just in order to fight
antisemitism, while the evil Mammonites utilised this machine for their
own need of establishing the world dictatorship. You may consider the
Jews as the Dwarves who wrought the Ring of Power, and it was taken by
the Mammonites. They promoted the narrative of antisemitism and
holocaust in order to keep the Jews fighting on their side against the
people. They indoctrinate the Jews in belief that the normal humans want
to devour them and only the ruling Mammonites prevent it. Indeed, as I
wrote in The Third Dove, there is no antisemitism, as there are no
witches, and, alas, no Santa Claus. 

The media machine is good at enlisting allies, by the same means the
ordinary Jews are enlisted, i.e. by propagating fear. They invented
“homophobia”, so a homosexual will fear normal folks and apply for the
protection of Big Brother. They invented “male chauvinism” and “battered
wives”, so women will be afraid of their menfolk and seek the rulers’
shelter. They invented “racism”, so every ethnic minority would hide
under the guardianship of Big Brother. They created the myth of “abused
children”, so the wives will distrust their husbands. These are myths.
There is no “homophobia” – we really do not give a damn what you do at
your bedrooms, as long as you do not frighten horses. Men are naturally
protective of children and chivalrous towards women. White folks like
blacks being jolly and playing their banjo, as long as it is not all
night long. I tell you: we all are minorities, and together, we are the
people. We can do very well together without guardianship of Big
Brother. 

There is nothing to fear abroad, either. In the days of my youth,
Americans were frightened by the Domino theory. After the Communist
takeover of Vietnam and Cambodia, they would proceed to California, run
the writ. It came to naught. The fear of Communism destroyed trillions
of dollars of national product across the globe and eventually ruined
the great social experiment. The victorious mice judge the slain lion:
at the initiative of Poland and the Baltic states, The Council of Europe
Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) condemned “horrors and crimes of
Communism.” Now the machine plays up the fear of Islam. Islam was
provoked and its response was presented as the proof of its depravity. 

The great fear-producing machine won’t stop at the Middle East, or at
the narrow Jewish causes, and for a good reason. A tank can be used as a
nut-cracker, but it has more functions than that. The unified and
perfected Jewish media machine can be utilised for much more important
tasks than fighting off holocaust jokes. Its main goal is to bring us to
the Brave New World, to the new spiritless totalitarianism, while
smaller tasks are incidental to the great one. 

Last month there were a few important but apparently unconnected
developments. The British PM, Tony Blair, made a step towards total
control over his population. England introduced a new computer system
that collects and stores data of car traffic. Connected to ubiquitous
video cameras, it allows the Big Brother to trace your movements from
your work to your girlfriend and to your home. It passed without a
hitch. Then it tried to pass the Internet Terror Bill, that would have
given police the power to shut down websites which “promote terrorism”.
The House of Lords blocked it. Last month the Lords threw out plans for
a new offence of “glorifying” acts of terrorism. The Government was also
defeated when peers voted to redraft ministers' version of the offence
of “intentionally” or “recklessly” disseminating a “terrorist
publication”. And the best of all, the indomitable Lords blocked the
bill against “religious hatred” which was supposed to close the only
loophole for criticising Jews. 

After that, the Adversary splashed the Satanic Pictures. The predictable
and predicted reaction of the offended Muslims will force the
parliaments to accept the new set of ‘anti-hate’ laws. Surely these laws
will not protect the feelings of Muslims and Christians, who, after all,
encompass only a few billion humans. The Jews, the preferred mascot of
the Mammonites, will feel better protected (and more vulnerable), but
more important, freedom of speech will receive another blow. 

This great freedom was the advantage of the West over the Soviet East,
for one of the less savoury features of the Soviet regime was its
infamous Article 58 of the Criminal Code “Anti-Soviet propaganda”. In
the early Stalin’s days, one has to express sympathy with the enemies of
the Republic to be sentenced; in his heyday, a joke would suffice; in
Brezhnev’s era it was used to ensure conformity in the society. Even in
the very end of the Soviet days, the Damocles’ sword of Article 58
influenced all discussion and eventually allowed Gorbachev to carry out
his transformation of Russia without a debate. He eliminated the social
achievements of the Soviet era, surrendered Russian industry and oil to
a few Jewish crooks, gave the keys of the Russian might to the CIA and
broke up the country into feuding successor states. The only positive
feature of Gorbachev-Yeltsin transformation was the removal of Article
58. Now it is creeping back. 

Some time ago booby-trapped anti-Jewish billboards appeared in Moscow.
When a passer-by tried to remove it, the explosive device went off. The
government rushed an ‘anti-hate’ bill through the parliament, and lo! No
more anti-Jewish billboards came to be. A month ago, there was an
extremely fishy incident in a Moscow synagogue, and a new reinforced
‘anti-extremism’ bill was introduced into the Russian parliament. 

Thus, under the cover of fighting extremism, terrorism and hatred, the
remainder of freedom on our planet shrinks from day to day. Eugene
Rostow, “a Kennedy’s Huntington”, predicted in 1960s that the two
systems, Communism and Capitalism would eventually converge, and bring
forth the best features of both systems. Now the Convergence has
actually taken place. Once, the Red East was socially secure, but at the
expense of personal freedom, while the West was free at the expense of
equality and social guarantees. Now they have converged: the Russians
have lost their free schools and health and have received the freedom to
sleep under the bridge, while the West now has its own Gulag and its own
political dissidents. East and West reinstalled Article 58 under the
guise of anti-hate, anti-terrorism, anti-extremism laws. 

The grand plan of world domination is unveiling. On its first stage, the
power of old elites and of the church was broken. The Mammonite enemy
used democracy and liberty as his weapons against the old order, and we,
the Left and the Liberals, enjoyed his support. The adverse vote in the
House of Lords (albeit reshuffled and remoulded) proves that the old
system with all its faults had some positive qualities. But that stage
is over. Now the enemy is fighting against democracy and liberty,
employing fear and (anti-)racism. 

The enemy has the advantage of infiltrating both left and right, of
mainstream and alternative media, of interaction on the global scale.
Following a defeat in England they can attack in France and provoke in
Gaza. They can cause grief and feign horror at your response. As long as
this machine is intact, war and fear are unavoidable for they are its
products. Moreover, this is the reason why the powerful Mammonites – not
Jews at all – use and support this machine. The machine produces fear,
and allows them to usher in their dictatorship. But we have to win
unless we want our children to live in the world of slaves and masters.
You do not have to care about Muslim sensibilities or Jewish prejudices
– it is your freedom at stake. We have to think globally because our
enemy acts globally. We must defeat fear and discord, the main tools of
the enemy. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Pictures are indeed not 'strong stuff' but I do believe you miss the
point. The publication of these pictures is not the big deal; editors
that publish them in Jordan and elsewhere in the Muslim world face
misdemeanour charges, at most a penalty of three months imprisonment.
The Insult intended is more serious, but few Muslim countries would have
evoked the maximum penalty allowed under Islamic law. Pictures have
appeared before, some penned by Muslims, but none of them were
officially sanctioned. 

Few Muslims are demanding the censorship of the Press, or insisting that
freedom of Speech be suspended; what they are doing is exercising their
right to be insulted, and demanding an apology. They could have done
this on a multitude of issues before this; Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan,
9/11; a whole host of transgressions against Muslims by the west. They
have settled on what seems to be a minor issue in comparison, for very
good reason; every Muslim can identify regardless of political leaning,
regardless of whether one was Shi'ite or Sunni; Hanafi or Shafiyah. 

It is perfect because it demonstrates clearly the arrogance of the west
in their belief that they can prescribe to Muslims how they should
react. It is perfect because it is an issue the west cannot divide
Muslims on, only the extremely marginalized would agree that the
reaction is out of order. Muslims for Homosexuality perhaps, or Muslims
against Islam. 

I, for one, am satisfied that it is a grievous error on the part of the
Zionist; they sought to cement the anti-Islam bigotry of the West,
hardly a noteworthy achievement in itself since the West is extremely
bigoted against Islam already. But they did serve to demonstrate to
Muslims that they can indeed act in unison, and when they do, it cannot
be easily contained. That is a lesson that is not missed, believe me,
and once exposed, is a genie that is hard to put back into the bottle. 

From this will evolve informal action committees: to implement boycotts,
to lobby for the ejection of diplomats, sanctions against countries ...
a whole host of resistance type activities. Always, people will be
reminded of the arrogance with which the Prophet was insulted. This
campaign was launched on an international scale utilizing the Mosque
pulpit. Previously, when people attempted to introduce politics into the
service, there were objections. This time, there was absolutely no
objection. The boycotts will stick, and Denmark will not be allowed free
movement in Islamic countries again. Such a thing will blow over in
west, it will not in Islamic countries because it is grassroots driven,
and every action against a Muslim, will be linked to this action against
Islam. It is a small thing; with big consequences. 

JohD 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------