The great slaughter of innocents is imminent. Very soon, hundreds of
thousands, if not millions of our brothers by Adam and Eve will be
strafed, napalmed, and nuked. Boys and girls, unborn babes and old men
will be brought to the altar of vengeance and ritually slaughtered by
the High Priest of that God, President George W. Bush. 

The time is aptly chosen, and it is hardly a coincidence. The 10 days
after Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, are called the Days of
Trepidation, all the way to the 10th day, Yom HaDin, the Doomsday. 

The very essence of Christ’s Gospel was the rejection of revenge. That
was the great difference between the church and the synagogue, these two
sisters born 2,000 years ago. This difference is built in, it is the
inherent most prominent feature of the gap between the two faiths: while
Christians are called to pray for their enemies, Jews dream of
vengeance. 

In the intended ideological confusion of last century, Christians are
taught to think that the Jews wait for Messiah who is Christ.
Christianity teaches that He came and will come again, while Judaism
considers the Messiah did not come yet, that is all the difference
according to the teaching of Judeo-Christianity. 

But reality is vastly different: Christ came to save, while Messiah
comes to take revenge. It was proven by the brilliant Israeli scholar,
Prof. Israel Jacob Yuval of Hebrew University in his new book, Two
Nations In Your Womb. 

“Vengeful salvation,” as Yuval called it, was adopted by the European
Jews from the old Pharisee sources and became the prevailing doctrine of
the Synagogue. 

Prof. Yuval quotes many ancient Jewish texts proving this point. 

“In the End of the days (when the Messiah comes) God will destroy, kill
and exterminate all the nations but the sons of Israel,” written in the
Sefer Nitzahon Yashan by a German Jew in the 13th century. 

A liturgical poet, Klonimus ben Judah, had a vision of “God’s hands full
of Goys’ corpses.” 

Even more dreadful dreams of blood and destruction precede the first
attacks on Jews in the end of 11th century. One hundred years before the
Crusaders’ onslaught on Jews, R. Simon b. Yitzhak calls on God “to take
His sword and slaughter the Gentiles.” 

In order to hasten the destruction of Gentiles, the sages of Europe
adopted curses against Christians and Christ, and introduced them into
liturgy of Passover, Doomsday and even the daily prayer. 

That is why the decision of President Bush to embark on the campaign of
revenge is not a Christian act. 

Not in vain, immediately after Wall Street was hit by kamikaze, Bibi
Netanyahu said “it is very good for us.” Not in vain, Ariel Sharon tried
to compare Palestinians to Osama bin Laden. Not in vain, Israelis demand
destruction of Baghdad and Tehran, of Korea and Sudan, of everybody who
is not taking orders from Tel Aviv or Washington. 

A mystic would not call it “manipulation,” but would accept for its face
value the arrival of Messiah of Vengeance in the unlikely figure of
George W. Bush. The Messiah of Vengeance has actually a different name
in Christian theology. He is called Antichrist. 

DAYS OF VENGEANCE 

There are two days of the Jewish calendar especially suitable for the
vengeance. One of them is Purim, the day, when according to Esther, the
Jews slaughtered 75,000 Gentiles in Persia. On Purim, Dr Baruch Gold
stein of Brooklyn and Hebron massacred the devout Muslims on the Tomb of
Abraham. On Purim, the ministers of Germany were executed in Nuremberg.
On Purim, 200,000 Iraqis were immolated by the U.S. Air Force in 1991. 

Just one minute before we declare Bush as the Antichrist and/or Messiah,
there is one circumstance that calls for investigation. We know now of
some inside trading in insurance and airline shares that imply a
previous knowledge of the forthcoming attack. We know of some advance
warnings in the Jewish-owned investment banking system. 

I cannot imagine a Muslim terrorist who would try and fit the schedule
of the Jewish High Holidays. Even less, I could imagine the apocalyptic
Antichrist and his Jewish cabalist advisers buying futures on the stock
exchange. 

Many American public figures, Jews and non-Jews alike, called for
revenge. 

“There is only one way to begin to deal with people like this, and that
is you have to kill some of them even if they are not immediately
directly involved in this thing,” said the former Secretary of State
Lawrence Eagle burger, who heads the Jewish organization for claims to
Germany at $300,000 per annum. 

“The response to this unimaginable 21st-century Pearl Harbor should be
as simple as it is swift—kill the bastards,” said Steve Dunleavy in The
New York Post. 

In The Washington Post, Rich Lowry proposed, “If we flatten part of
Damascus or Tehran or whatever it takes, that is part of the solution.” 

The best quote goes to Ann Coulter, “This is no time to be precious
about locating the exact individuals directly involved in this
particular terrorist attack . . . We should invade their countries, kill
their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren’t punctilious
about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We
carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That’s war. And this
is war.” 

She wrote it in The New York Daily News, the newspaper of Mortimer
Zuckerman, the current head of the Presidents’ Conference of American
Jewish Organizations. 

This vengeful spirit of the American press is an aberration of the
Western discourse. If you sift the world literature of the Christian and
Muslim lands, you would discover that revenge appears rarely as the main
subject of an important book. 

Nikolai Gogol wrote a Gothic short story called The Terrible Revenge.
Prosper Mérimée wrote a novelette Colomba on Corsican vendetta. 

“Vengeful” is a negative word in every Christian and Muslim culture. The
Jewish culture, au contraire, is saturated with the idea of vengeance,
as it draws straight from the Old Testament, without the redeeming
filter of the New Testament or Koran. 

We Jews know it better than anybody. A brilliant American Jewish
journalist, John Sack noticed it in his Eye for Eye, a chilling book
about horrible revenge exacted by Jews on German civilians after WWII.
This book tells of tortures, “extra-judicial killings,” mass poison and
other horrors. You are not likely to get this book, as the Jewish
establishment succeeded to suppress it and keep it out of bookshops. 

Not surprisingly, Israel promoted vengeance into its daily policy. Its
attacks on Palestinians were called peulot tagmul, the acts of
vengeance. 

One of these acts was perpetrated by the Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on
Oct. 14, 1953, when he and his soldiers murdered some 60 peasants—women
and children—in the village of Qibya. 

The invasion of Lebanon in 1982 with its 20,000 murdered Lebanese and
Palestinians, Christians and Muslims, was an act of revenge for the
attempt to assassinate the Israeli ambassador in London. 

During the last intifada, every act of Israeli terror is called
“retribution” or “retaliation” by Israelis and by American Jewish-owned
media. 

This Jewish infatuation with vengeance survived the hazardous crossing
of the Atlantic. 

A grandson of Trier Rabbi, who grew in the church, Karl Marx actually
prophesied in the 1840s that America will become a Jewish state, and
will embrace the Jewish ideology of greed and alienation. It explains
successes of Jews: it is just natural that in the Jewish state, Jews
succeed more. 

This explanation allows us to answer the question we posted previously,
does America support Israel because of the Jewish lobby or because of
the “true interest of American corporations.” The answer is, the Jewish
lobby is a superfluous body supportive of the Israeli right-wing, while
America as a whole is a grander Jewish state with interests outside the
Middle East as well. 

This presumption explains away a lot of queries. It explains incredible
99 percent vote for support of Israel. It explains endless Holocaust
museums, Holocaust studies and Holocaust films. 

An offense to the Jewish community is not considered a form of racism,
as ordinary racism is tolerated with great ease, especially if it is
directed towards Arabs or blacks. It is treated as a lese majesté. In
the years of Jewish ascendancy in the Soviet Union, 1917-1937, people
were shot for an anti-Jewish remark. 

While speaking to students in Harvard, Emory and other Ivy League
universities, I noticed that they do not know the name of Arnold
Toynbee. 

The greatest British philosopher of history in 20th century made an
error: he spoke of the tragedy of Palestinians. He also mentioned
African slavery as a tragedy on a par with the Jewish holocaust. As a
result, he was erased and disappeared from American conscience. 

This totality of control over public discourse explains obedience of
American and European intellectuals. For an intellectual, it is better
to be called a pedophile, but not an anti-Semite. 

In the Jewish American state, the Jews are the most successful group of
society. This sudden rise to glory and riches should not be a cause for
vertigo and self adulation. 

Following the line of thought of the great American philosopher,
Immanuel Wallerstein, I shall say: material success in our days is a
sign of moral failure. “Success” and riches is not a sign of God’s
benevolence. Anyway, not of a God who blessed the poor. A man who
succeeds in the robbers’ gang, fails in the eyes of God. 

Our world with its starving millions and over-prosperous minority is
immoral and anti-Christian, as anti-Christian as the “Crusade” of
President Bush.