To the north of prosperous Hertzliya, the capital of Israeli high-tech
industry with its plentiful sushi-bars, there is a pleasant beach below
a steep, almost Pacific bank. It is an unattended shore, without
lifeguards, and it is frequented by nature-loving foreigners and the
Palestinian families on their outing to the nearby sanctuary of Sidna
(Our Master) Ali. If you will walk even further north, beyond the signs
forbidding your advance for the very real danger of avalanche, you will
find yourself in a secluded cove, a rarity on the straight line of the
Palestinian shore. It is a beautiful place for a swim in transparent
waters of the Med. Big earth-coloured boulders guard the cove; at a
second careful look you will understand that they are not a natural
formation. They are bastions of the Crusader castle of Arsur, whose
ruins rise on the plateau well above the beach. The bastions were
overturned and dropped into the blue-green sea by Baibars, a great Arab
commander, the vanquisher of Mongols and Crusaders in 13th century. 

Some 150 years earlier, the Crusaders easily conquered the Holy Land,
and easily settled down. They built their castles and farmsteads,
married local Christian Orthodox and Armenian women, and could live
happily ever after. But they used to invite foreign adventurers and
serve as the beachhead for their landings, and proved their inability to
fit in as a good neighbour. They were given many chances, but they blew
them all and remained a potential ally to any foreign aggressor. 

Then, the ‘weak and feminine’ Levant brought forth Baibars. It is not
enough to expel the Crusaders, he ruled, for it was tried by Saladin;
but the Franks came back. The only way to get rid of them is to destroy
the shore of Palestine so they will never be able to snatch it again.
Castle after castle, settlement after settlement, city after city,
Baibars ruined the seaside of the Holy Land: Caesarea, Askalon, Jaffa,
Arsur. He regretted it, but the alternative was an eternal warfare in
the region. 

It seems that history is about to repeat itself. Unless some unexpected
turn of events will occur, the sweet land of Palestine is doomed to
perdition. The German-built, US-equipped nuclear submarines of the
Jewish state poised to wreck havoc in Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, make it
abundantly clear – there is no way Israel will become a decent neighbour
in Levant. 

The Jews were given a good chance to strike root in the land of
Palestine and make peace with the native population. But they blew it. 

The recent unprovoked Israeli air strike into the depth of Syria
reminded to those who has forgotten that the Jewish state is an
aggressive entity dangerous for the region. Thirty years of calm between
Syria and Israel were dismissed by Sharon’s generals as of no
consequence. Nobody was fooled by their clumsy attempt to connect Syria
to the bloody act of personal vengeance meted by the young woman from
al-Halil whose brother and fiancé were murdered and father refused
medical help by the Israeli military. Insightful Malaysian Prime
Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad interpreted that well: "Israel has been
urging America to invade Syria, but Americans seemed to be reluctant, so
in order to force the US hand, Israel carried out the air strike". 

The problem of Israel is not the problem of Palestinian suffering
anymore; it is the problem for the entire region from India to Ethiopia
(Esther, 1) and beyond. Indeed, the fifth column of Israel-supporters
instigates wars all over the world, from Chechnya to Philippines, from
North Korea to Cuba. They push the world straight into Armageddon. John
Bolton calls for takeover of Iran, Murawiec demands to beat Saudi
Arabia. The rabidly Zionist New York Post lifts its sights to France,
"one of America's ugliest enemies" led by Chirac, "a moral pygmy whose
lack of scruples is, fortunately, balanced by a lack of courage and
power." "France should be made to suffer, strategically and financially.
The French stabbed us in the back. In response, we should skin them
alive", continues the newspaper, and judging by the Zionist record, it
is not just a figure of speech. 

The Jewish state is an extremely dangerous bundle of goods. It is part
of Israeli military doctrine: act crazy, and people will be scared of
you. The bogus threat of nuclear Iraq was modelled on the real threat of
nuclear Israel. Its scientists practice chemical and biological warfare,
as well. They actually tried nerve gas on demonstrators in Gaza, and
water poisoning at the siege of Acre, as reported Abu Sitta in Al-Ahram.

Israel is involved in a long line of kidnapping and assassinations
carried out on foreign soil. There is no immunity from the long arm of
Israel: they killed in Norway (the notorious Lillehammer affair), they
kidnapped in Rome (Vanunu affair), they bombed British library and
American consulate (Lavon affair), they sunk USS Liberty, they tried to
assassinate Joseph Mugabe, they probably assassinated the anti-Zionist
US Secretary of State James Forrestol, were involved in the
assassination of President Kennedy, as Michael Collins Piper in the
Final Judgment makes clear, for the American president insisted on
nuclear disarmament of Israel. Recent assassination of Anna Lindh, the
Swedish Foreign Minister, who supported boycott of Israel, still remains
a mystery. 

They are not particularly secretive: today we know who assassinated
Count Bernadotte in 1948, and who committed mass murder of German POW in
1946, and who murdered the Egyptian POWs in 1956, for their perpetrators
boast about it. Tomorrow we shall know who did other atrocities. But our
knowledge won’t help, for Israel is a safe haven for criminals. Whenever
caught red-handed, Israel brushed away the world public opinion, for as
Ben Gurion, our first Prime Minister said, ‘what the goyim say is of no
importance, only what the Jews do is of importance’. 

This sad record refreshed by the air strike on Syria and the preparation
for nuclear strike on Iran proves there is no way to make Israel a
suitable member of the community of nations. It also answers the
question whether the peace efforts and attempts to roll Israel back to
its old borders are still relevant. They are not. In borders of 67’, 48’
or 73’, Israel remains a bridgehead of aggression, a threat to world
peace and a physical threat to world leaders. Like the bloodthirsty sect
of Assassins, who once plagued the region, Israel-supporters undermine
or murder better rulers, and support weaklings who are prepared to act
on their orders. Israel’s withdrawal from the West Bank will not change
its nature. The leopard can’t change his spots, as Jeremiah the prophet
had said (13:23). 

Israel’s behaviour is partly connected to the Jewish superiority
complex, and its consequence, the apartheid structure. The South Africa
before Mandela also was involved in destruction of its neighbours,
Mozambique and Namibia, and in many plots elsewhere in Africa. This
superiority complex should be treated by dismantling the apartheid
state. The events of last year proved it beyond reasonable doubt.
Dismantlement by peaceful means of democratisation is the only viable
alternative to Israel’s otherwise inevitable ruination. While bringing
the brinkmanship policy to the level of ‘calculated madness’, Israeli
leaders failed to predict they will bring to life a whole generation
that does not care whether they are dead or alive. 

Until recently, fear of Israeli retaliation kept its adversaries at bay.
In 1991, the Iraqi president Saddam Hussein had powerful WMD, but he did
not use it against Israel, for he did not feel desperate. He believed
the threat of Israel to destroy Iraq if he uses WMD. He thought that he
can survive the defeat. He did not understand that Israeli idea of war
is drawn on the Jewish religious tradition that knows no mercy. If
Saddam would know that bodies of his tortured sons would lie in a
Baghdad morgue, that he would be turned into a homeless refugee, that
his country will be ruined by ten years of sanctions and afterwards
become prey to Zionist invader, he might be well tempted to do the
Samson solution, and take the Jewish state with him into nether regions
in 1991. 

Saddam Hussein is gone, but by now, every leader in the world knows what
he should expect if Israel asks its American Golem for his head.
Paradoxically, the very cruelty of Israel turned its threat into an
empty sound, for if they will do their worst anyway, it makes no sense
to surrender to their demands. 

The Jews of Israel repeated the folly of Napoleon in Jaffa. In 1799, the
young Corsican general crossed the Sinai desert and marched north into
Palestine. Rafah and Ramleh surrendered to his troops, for the
Palestinian soldiers saw no reason to fight the passing European force.
Napoleon proceeded to the port of Jaffa, where six thousand strong
garrison of the city also preferred to surrender. They thought they will
be disarmed and sent home, to their villages, but Napoleon was reluctant
to leave so many enemy soldiers behind his lines and ordered to kill
them all. It took the French three days to kill such mass of people.
They were brought in groups from the Armenian St Nicolas’ Convent to the
shore and bayoneted. 

After this massacre, all Palestine took to weapons. Napoleon’s troops
were ambushed at every orange grove, and when he came to the walls of
Acre, there was no talk of surrender. People understood that it just
makes no sense. They could as well die fighting. After a few months of
fruitless efforts, Napoleon turned back, leaving his wounded soldiers to
be slaughtered by advancing enemy. In the gentrified centre of Jaffa,
there is a squat papier–mache figure of le petit caporal in his
triangular hat reminding the tourists and the locals of backfiring
nature of cruelty, but probably the Israeli leaders did not pay it
sufficient attention when their policies brought the country on the
brink of destruction. 

The heavy feeling of looming disaster is one of the unmentioned reasons
behind the ‘One State Solution’ we proposed and advocated. True, ‘one
state’ would be good for the Palestinians; it would be good for
Israelis. But a new partition, Two States’ solution could also alleviate
the Palestinian suffering, as Prof Neumann and many moderate peace
activists rightly noted. It could be even preferred by the Israeli and
Palestinian elites, though an independent state in the West Bank and
Gaza won’t solve the problem of refugees. However, in no way the
partition would alleviate the threat to the world peace poised by the
rogue Jewish state, and it won’t prevent the imminent disaster in the
Holy Land. 

Even a smaller Jewish state will be the seat of Mossad and its
assassination unit, Kidon. Even a smaller Jewish state will possess
nuclear weapons. Even a smaller Jewish state will be poisoned by its
deeply rooted and extremely xenophobic ideology, and will remain a
source of ideological contamination. Even a smaller Jewish state will be
heavily involved in politics of subversion from Moscow to Washington,
DC. And then, it is just a question of time, when a pushed too far
leader of a state – be it North Korea, Iran, Egypt, or Russia - will
remember the bodies of Saddam’ sons and decide to follow the path of
Baibars and of Mongol sultans who removed the Assassins from their eagle
nests. For without Israel, the US forces would hang around their bases
in Georgia and Texas instead of seeking the Jew-haters in the five
continents. Demise of Israel is inevitable; the only question whether it
will be forcibly removed and the land destroyed, or it will be
peacefully absorbed in the region. 

Equality in the Holy Land – it is not only a moral demand; it is the
only way to save the country of approaching destruction. Not us, not the
do-gooders or peace-lovers, but the inevitable course of events leads us
to the choice: equality or death. 

Israeli cruelty, vengefulness and inability to respect others called
hundreds of Palestinians to the horrible martyrdom. If, or rather when a
potential martyr will be equipped with a miniaturised nuclear device
instead of home-made dynamite, the sad story of the Jewish state will be
over. 

The Jewish belt of Israel is quite small, and just two well-placed
half-megaton nuclear devices can wipe it off the face of Earth. It is
possible that in its last throes, it will make true its threat vocalised
by Prof van Crefeld of Hebrew University and ‘go down by taking the
world along’, for Israeli nuclear weapons are trained, according to van
Crefeld, at European capitals, as well as on the neighbours. But no
amount of security measures will be able to stop a nuclear suicide
bomber, and she may disregard the fate of people who failed to protect
her and her family. 

And then, some years later, the ruins of Tel Aviv will blend smoothly
with the ruins of Arsur.