"Many of us, the critical voices of Zionism and Israel, have already
realised something: it is advisable to avoid using the ‘J’ word. Once
you use the ‘J’ word you had better expect some serious trouble. But in
fact, this is not entirely true. You can safely apply the ‘J’ word, you
just have to make sure you say the right things. As soon as you become
slightly genuine you will have to face an orchestrated smear campaign,
you will be then called an ‘anti Semite’, a ‘new historian’ and even a
‘holocaust denier’." (Gilad Atzmon ‘The J word, the J people and the J
spot’ http://www.gilad.co.uk/html%20files/jspot.html c.April 2005).
Jews-Only Religion.
It started a couple of thousand years ago when a number of jews decided
to create a fictitious god who would regard only the jewish people as
his chosen race. This god deemed all other races inferior because they
would never win his divine favour. Unlike all other religions, which
allow anyone to become a member who professes the basic principles of
that religion, judaism is exclusively for jews. It is next to impossible
for a non-jew to be admitted into the judaic religion. It is as
difficult for non-jews to become a member of judaism as it is for them
to become a jew. In other words, judaism is a jews-only religion. It is
a racist religion for a specific race of people. For millenia this sense
of divine specialness, exclusiveness, chosenness, and supremacism, has
percolated throughout jewish culture. Even secularization has not
eradicated the remnants of this belief that only jews matter, only jews
are important, and that all other races are inferior.
That judaism is a jews-only religion, which makes it difficult for
non-jews to become believers in judaism, is complicated by the fact that
converts would be entitled to immigrate to the jews-only state. The
power to allow gentiles to convert to judaism, and thus gain entry to
the jews-only state, has been tightly controlled by orthodox jews in the
jews-only state. However, this power has recently been dissipated by a
court ruling, "By a majority of 7-4, the court ruled yesterday that
gentiles who studied for conversion to Judaism in non-Orthodox Israeli
training courses, completing the process abroad, had an automatic right
to come back and obtain instant Israeli citizenship under the Law of
Return. The verdict is being seen by many as a significant step towards
recognising the right of Reform and Conservative rabbis to carry out
non-Orthodox conversions in Israel itself. In effect, it redefines who
is a Jew in Israeli civil law and threatens the iron control of the
Orthodox establishment in Israel over Jewish marriage, divorce,
conversion and burial. Would-be converts based in Israel wishing to
train for conversion in the liberal streams of the Jewish tradition are
currently unable to complete the process in the country, as a result of
pressure from the Orthodox Jewish establishment. As a result many go
abroad to convert, but up until now have been denied the privileges
accorded to Orthodox Jewish converts. David Ben-Gurion, the founding
father, explained: "It is not the state which grants the right to settle
in the state to the Jew abroad. This right is ingrained in him insofar
as he is a Jew." The first breach in the Orthodox monopoly came in 1989,
when the Supreme Court held that non-Orthodox proselytes converted in
their own countries counted as Jews for immigration and citizenship
purposes. The Reform and Conservative movements represent a majority of
American Jews and a growing minority in Britain, though they remain
marginal in Israel. They offer a less stringent entry ticket to
Judaism." (Eric Silver ‘Israel's Orthodox groups face challenge over
Jewish identity’
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=625286
April 01st 2005).
The Jews-Only State.
The modern manifestation of the jewish tradition of specialness and
supremacism was the violent creation of a jews-only state in palestine.
To jews, god had given the land of israel to the jews and the presence
of non-jews on this sacred judaic soil is sacrilegious. Ever since its
creation, the jews-only state has tried everything it could to push
palestinians into the sea so that the only people living in palestine
would be jews. The incessant jewish propaganda that palestinians are
trying to push the jews into the sea is just a projection of what the
jews are actually doing to the palestinians. The jews fabricated arab
threats about pushing jews into the sea as a projection of their own
desire to rid palestine of all non-jews.
Zionists have erected a mountain of lies over the jews-only state in
order to deceive the world into believing that it is just another
western, multi-cultural, liberal, secular, democracy rather than a
racist, jews-only state. Most non-jews would tend to accept any one of
these lies that the jews-only state uses to defend itself and thus cast
doubts about the rationality of the palestinian cause. Bulldozing these
lies out of the way to uncover the truth is almost a full time
occupation.
Jews-Only Political Rights: The Second Class Status of
Palestinian-Israelis.
One of the main lies perpetrated by the jews-only state is that all
israelis, whether jews or not, are equal. Despite the fact that there
are many palestinians with israeli citizenship, the zionist state is a
jews-only state because only jews have full rights.
Firstly, palestinian israelis have only limited political rights in
comparison to jews. They have the right to vote in zionist elections,
form political parties, hold political meetings, contest elections for
seats in the knesset, and even become members of the jewish parliament.
But, they are not allowed to form political parties which advocate a
multi-cultural state in which palestinians and jews share power, "[I]n
this "outpost of democracy," no party that opposes the existence of the
Jewish state is permitted to take part in elections. It is as if the
United States were to declare itself a Christian state, define
"Christian" not by religious belief but by descent, and then pass a "gag
law" prohibiting public discussion of the issue." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward
a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of
Palestine’ counterpunch
http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004); "The
Israeli Supreme Court has even ruled that nobody can run for membership
in the Knesset (parliament) who challenges the idea that Israel is a
Jewish state or who challenges the principle of preserving a Jewish
majority." (1989 Israeli Supreme Court ruling reported in the 1991
Israel Law Review, Vol. 25, p. 219, published by the Faculty of Law at
the Hebrew University of Jerusalem ). (John Spritzler ‘Should People
Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’
http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).
Secondly, although palestinian israelis seem to have many political
rights, they do not have the same legal rights as jews which surely
indicates the insignificance of their political rights. It also
indicates the low opinion that jews have of democracy. "The tours (of
Palestinian and Bedouin areas inside Israel) proved to be a dramatic
illustration of the discrimination and racism inherent in a system
designed specifically to maintain a Jewish majority - a system based on
the superiority of Jews over anyone else. Palestinians, including
Bedouin, living inside Israel are citizens of the state. They can vote
in Israeli elections; Bedouin, although not other Palestinians, serve in
the Israeli military. As a matter of law and of the institutional
arrangements inherent in Israel's status as a Jewish-majority state,
however, Palestinians and Bedouin, because they are non-Jews, do not
receive anything like equal rights or services from the state. Not only
do they face the kind of de facto discrimination that blacks have faced
in the U.S. - their schools are inadequate, their municipal services are
inadequate, they face job discrimination, their towns often sit next to
toxic waste dumps and other environmentally hazardous sites - but
because Israel is explicitly a Jewish state, Palestinians are unable by
law to enjoy the benefits of the state provided to Jews or in any way to
live in the state as Jews do." (Kathleen & Bill Christison ‘"Finally It
Broke My Heart": Random Impressions from Palestine’
http://www.counterpunch.org/christison09242004.html September 24, 2004);
"Not only are the subjects of the occupation for more than a generation,
38 years, not allowed inside the country without a regime of special
permits, and for the last 15 years prevented from working; and not only,
when they leave their defined territories to spend a period of time
overseas, can they lose their homes and property forever, as if they
were foreigners; but the Arabs who are the citizens of Israel lose more
and more of their civil rights, like the right to grant their children
minimum conditions to live with dignity, a public library, a cultural
center, enough nutrition." (Yitzhak Laor ‘Israel Makes It Harder for
Non-Jews to Become Citizens: Racism by Any Other Name’
http://www.counterpunch.org/laor04072005.html April 7, 2005); "Nor do we
find equal treatment of citizens in the Jewish state; the collectivist
government of Israel spends far more money on its Jewish citizens than
it does on the Palestinian citizens of Israel. For example, the housing
ministry spends about $30 on Jewish towns for every dollar it spends on
Arab towns." (Stephen j. Sniegoski ‘Sharansky, Weissglas, and the
Inaugural address: The Israeli connection continues February 2, 2005);
"Today there are about six million Jewish and one million non-Jewish
Israeli citizens; of the non-Jewish citizens about 250,000 are
classified as "present-absentees" (under the Absentees Property Law of
1950) in consequence of which they are denied - forever - all of their
property rights which were valid until the creation of the Jewish state
in 1948. A Jew, however, cannot be classified as a "present-absentee" in
the Jewish state of Israel. Non-Jews inside the Jewish state of Israel
are discriminated against in multiple ways, some de jure and many de
facto. Non-Jews are excluded from Jews-only housing and are segregated
in Arab villages and towns that receive far less from the government
than Jewish ones. The difference between the Jewish and non-Jewish
living environments is like the difference between an inner city ghetto
in the United States and an upscale suburban residential area." (John
Spritzler ‘Should People Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support
Israel?’ http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6,
2005).
Palestinian israelis are second class citizens in the jews-only state.
This situation is entirely temporary as the goal of the jews-only state
is to drive out or deport these indigenous ‘aliens’ whenever the
opportunity arises. Paradoxically, in order to win the sympathies of
people around the world, jews try to hide the second class citizenship
of israeli palestinians from the outside world as they do their desire
for a jews-only state. Whilst pretending to western audiences that the
zionist state is an open, western, secular, multicultural, society like
all other western states, zionists are doing their utmost to remove all
palestinians from their own country whenever they can get away with it.
The more that zionists try to make conditions for palestinians unlivable
in order to force them to leave palestine, the more effort that zionists
make to cover up such ethnic cleansing with the deception that the
jews-only state is just like any other western state. There are jews in
the western world who pretend to be anti-zionist in order to
surreptitiously put forward arguments in favour of the jews-only state
in palestine. They do this by suggesting that in the jews-only state,
palestinians have the same rights as jews. Supposedly anti-zionist jews
invariably expose their pro-zionist views when they claim that jews and
palestinians are equal.
Although palestinian-israelis can form their own political parties and
be elected to knesset it has to be wondered why they should bother doing
this when they can’t legislate on property, immigration, racism, roads,
settlements, planning, foreign policy, the nature of the jews-only
state, etc, etc, etc. This sole purpose of this sham democracy is to
prevent the world from understanding the racism of the jews-only state
in palestine. One can only be amazed at the sheer gall, chutzpah, of the
jews who resolutely defend the jews-only state whilst advocating a
permanent revolution to encourage more countries to become democratic.
The zionist intent is to focus on every ill in the world to prevent the
world from seeing that it is being poisoned by the jews-only state in
palestine. One of the leaders of the jews-only state, nathan sharansky,
who regards even ariel sharon as being soft on palestinians, has become
a guiding light in the formulation of the bush administration’s foreign
policies to democratize the world. Sharansky wants all countries to
become democratic except the jews-only state in palestine, "In short,
Sharansky puts the goal of Jewish exclusivism far above the ideal of
universal democracy. Ethnocentrism trumps the concept of equality in
citizenship." (Stephen j. Sniegoski ‘Sharansky, Weissglas, and the
Inaugural address: The Israeli connection continues February 2, 2005).
The Lebensraum Policy of the Jews-Only State.
The racist nature of the jews-only state is manifest from zionists’
attempts to remove all palestinians from palestine. In 1948, the zionist
military drove 750,000 palestinians out of palestine. "The Zionists knew
they had to rid themselves of the Arab majority in order to have a
specifically Jewish state. The war ended with the Zionists in control of
80% of Palestine. In the next year, nearly 400 Arab villages were
completely destroyed. This was no accident but the result of deliberate
policy, as shown in the following statement by one of the most
authoritative officials of the Zionist state: "Among ourselves it must
be clear that there is no place in our country for both peoples
together. The only solution is Eretz Israel, or at least the western
half of Eretz Israel, without Arabs, and there is no other way but to
transfer the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, transfer all
of them, not one village or tribe should remain." (Joseph Weitz, Deputy
Chairman of the Board of directors of the Jewish National Fund (JNF)
from 1951 to 1973, former Chairman of the Israel Land Authority quoted
in Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism
and the People of Palestine’ counterpunch
http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004). Since the
1948 war the jews-only state has continued its lebensraum policy against
the palestinians. For the last fifty years, it has constantly terrorized
palestinian civilians in the hope of driving them out of the country.
Only Jews Exist in the Jews-Only State.
For the jews-only state, it is not enough to remove all palestinians
from palestine. The jews-only state also attempts to completely
eradicate all signs of palestinian existence in palestine. The jewish
god gave the land of palestine to jews and this sacred land cannot be
defiled or contaminated by any evidence of palestinians’ existence. In
1948, after zionists had driven three-quarters of a million palestinians
from the country, they demolished palestinian villages to make sure that
palestinians could never return. They then wiped out all traces of
palestinians’ occupation of the land much as the nazis tried to
obliterate the existence of jews in what hannah arendt called ‘the holes
of oblivion’. The zionists then built jews-only settlements in their
place, "Moshe Dayan, former Defense Minister, stated in a famous speech
before students at the Israeli Institute of Technology in Haifa in 1969:
"Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not
even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you
because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not
exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahial arose in the place
of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the
place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman.
There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a
former Arab population." (Ha'aretz, April 4, 1969, quoted in Davis, 21).
(Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism
and the People of Palestine’ counterpunch
http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004). Since the
1948 war the jews-only state has continued to obliterate all traces of
palestinian culture in palestine.
The Jews-Only Border.
The jews-only state in palestine is the only country in the world which
refuses to define its own borders. It refuses to do this because it
doesn’t want to curb its colonialist ambitions, its lebensraum
tendencies, with specific boundaries, "Israel is unique in that it
doesn't have defined or recognized borders ... Israel has always been a
country with creeping borders - it has an insatiable urge to expand, and
thus further dispossess the native population. On May 14, 1948, the day
he proclaimed the new state without specifying its borders, Ben Gurion
wrote in his diary: "Take the American Declaration of Independence for
instance. It contains no mention of the territorial limits" A few years
later, Ben-Gurion wrote: "To maintain the status quo will not do. We
have to set up a dynamic state bent upon expansion" The current
construction of the land-grab wall is merely the latest manifestation of
these expansionist proclivities." (Paul de Rooij ‘Straw Men and Wild
Fires’ http://www.counterpunch.org/rooij02282005.html February 28,
2005); "In 1948, the Jewish colony became a state but with ever
expanding borders. Israel launched six major wars against the
Palestinian people and the neighboring Arab states. These were launched
in 1948, 1956, 1967, 1978, 1982, and 2002. In all these wars, Israel
expanded its borders. In 1948, it annexed the Galilee, Auja area, and
the Jerusalem corridor, which were Palestinian territories according to
the 1947 UN Partition Resolution 181. In 1956, Israel collaborated with
the imperialist European powers of Britain and France in invading Egypt
and the Palestinian territory of Gaza Strip. Only a firm stand from
President Eisenhower forced the Zionist Israelis to withdraw from Gaza
Strip and Sinai. In 1967, Israel invaded and occupied the Arab
territories of Sinai, Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights.
In 1978, Israel invaded and occupied South Lebanon. Then, it invaded
Lebanon, including its capital, Beirut, in 1982. When it withdrew, few
months later, it expanded its occupation of South Lebanon. In addition
to these wars, Israel launched major air raids on Syria, Lebanon,
Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, and Tunisia." (Hassan A. El-Najjar ‘Zionism:
The Highest Stage of Imperialism’
http://www.aljazeerah.info/Editorials/2002/May%202002/Zionism
,%20the%20highest%20stage%20of%20imperialism%20
By%20Hassan%20A.%20El-Najjar.htm May 15th 2002); "Unlike many countries,
including the United States, the Israeli state does not belong, even in
principle, to those who reside within its borders, but is defined as the
state of the Jewish people, wherever they may be. That peculiar
definition is one reason why the state has to this day failed to produce
a written constitution, define its borders, or even declare the
existence of an Israeli nationality." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single
State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine’
counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html
17.06.2004). This is another example of jews’ belief in their
specialness or uniqueness.
Jews-Only Land Ownership.
Another jews-only policy implemented by the jews-only state in palestine
concerns land ownership. "The state owns 94 percent of Israel's land and
holds it in trust specifically for the Jewish people, meaning that
Palestinians cannot buy land - even land they once owned before Israel
was created and they were dispossessed. They usually cannot even rent
state land." (Kathleen & Bill Christison ‘"Finally It Broke My Heart":
Random Impressions from Palestine’
http://www.counterpunch.org/christison09242004.html September 24, 2004).
Palestinian israelis, who have the right to vote, the right to form
political parties, and the right to sit in the knesset, do not have the
right to buy land because the jews-only god has given the land of
palestine exclusively to jews.
It is commonplace for the jews-only state to steal palestinian land but,
even worse is that it also expropriates the land of palestinian israelis
despite the fact that such israeli citizens are supposed to be
protected by the law. The only difference between the theft of property
from palestinians and palestinian israelis is that in the former case
jews expropriate the land illegally whilst in the latter case jews have
to carry out the confiscation legally, as the nazis did during the
second world war. "Israel has nationalised some 93 per cent of the
country's lands, by appropriating land without compensation from the
four million Palestinian refugees who live in exile and by confiscating
the lands of the one million Palestinians who live as citizens. This 93
per cent of Israel is out of bounds to Palestinians ..." (Jonathan Cook,
The Electronic Intifada, ‘Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners
inside Israel’ http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3674.shtml March
10th 2005). Palestinian israelis have no rights to stop the jews-only
state from confiscating their land.
Some zionists have become politically embarrassed about such property
theft. But what they are embarrassed about is not the racism itself but
the erroneous perception of racism by the rest of the world. So the
jews-only state is currently seeking ways to camouflage this racism to
win the approval of its supposedly anti-racist supporters in the western
world, "Since 1961, the state has administered the JNF lands through the
Israel Lands Administration (ILA). Until recently, only Jews were
permitted to participate in the tenders for the leasing of JNF land, but
Attorney General Menachem Mazuz decided last week that the ILA could not
continue this policy because it discriminated between Jews and
non-Jews." (Amiram Barkat ‘Buying the State of Israel’
www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=539278
February 11th 2005); "the Jewish National Fund … maintains and
implements Israel's discriminatory land policies. Two weeks ago,
Israel's attorney general determined that all land managed by the Israel
Lands Administration, including land owned by the Jewish National Fund,
must be marketed without discrimination or limits including to non-Jews.
According to the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, "The state prosecutor's
office believes it will not be able to defend before the High Court the
policy of allocating Jewish National Fund land to Jews only." Days
later, news agencies reported, " The Jewish National Fund and the
Finance Ministry are discussing ways to separate the JNF from the state,
to allow it to continue selling land to Jews only."" ('QUIT! premieres
latest line of "Estee Slaughter" products on Valentine's Day'
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3627.shtml February 21st 2005).
However, these political anxieties about the anti-racist sensibilities
of westerners might be misplaced given that many western governments
have given so much support to the jews-only state they are now as racist
as the jews-only state in palestine.
Jews-Only Police.
The following is a story of the way in which jewish squatters are
allowed to commit crimes against palestinian israelis and when the
latter protest about their treatment which is illegal under the
jews-only law they are fined for protesting, "In 1989, a group of armed
settlers invaded a house in the Old City of Jerusalem and occupied the
top floor; the Palestinian family managed to fend off the settlers from
the ground floor. The Palestinian house owner sought police help to
evict the invaders, but was fined NIS 500 for "disturbing the peace".
During the ensuing months, the settlers set out to make the Palestinian
family's life miserable by throwing garbage onto their courtyard,
pounding on the floor at night, and throwing boiling water onto the
children when they ventured near the front of the house. The settlers
eventually drilled a hole through the sewage pipes so that the dirty
water would drip onto the living room/kitchen below where the eleven
family members were now forced to sleep. At least two adults were forced
to stay at home all the time to prevent the settlers from invading the
rest of the house. The family resisted for more than a year, building
several contraptions to stem the sewage flow onto their ground floor
living quarters. I visited this family several times and witnessed the
menacing, bearded, armed settlers asking the Palestinian homeowner when
he was going to leave. Furthermore, this type of incident has been
repeated thousands of times throughout the occupied territories where
settlers or the army have invaded and confiscated Palestinian houses.
Such incidents are worse than house demolitions, because in addition to
their dispossession, Palestinian families are subjected to abuse and
humiliation. While house demolitions are an impersonal affair conducted
by soldiers with explosives or Caterpillar bulldozers, the home
invasions are an exercise in calculated humiliation and intimidation -
this is up close and personal. It would seem that if the intent is to
steal the houses, then this could be attained in one fell swoop. The
fact that the settler or soldier sieges last for months indicates that
their purpose is also to drive out Palestinians from the area; it is not
enough to deprive families of their houses or businesses - the intent is
to drive them out of their cities and "Israel" altogether. Besides the
house under siege, the message is also meant for the neighboring
Palestinian families." (Paul de Rooij ‘Saverio Costanzo's "Private"’
http://www.counterpunch.org/rooij05202005.html May 19, 2005). This story
is yet more proof that palestinian israelis do not have the same rights
as jews. Only zionist racists promote the idea that there is an equality
between jews and palestinian israelis in the jews-only state.
Jews-only Labourers on Jews-only Agricultural Land.
Much of the property that jews have stolen from palestinians is
agricultural land. Jews have then ensured that only jews work on
jews-only agricultural land, "The problem of building a Jewish society
among an overwhelming Arab majority came to be known as the "conquest of
land and labor." Land, once acquired, had to remain in Jewish hands. The
other half of this project, known as Labor Zionism, called for the
exclusive use of Jewish labor on the land acquired by the Jews in
Palestine. The Labor Zionists maintained this dual exclusionism (or
apartheid, as we would now call it) in order to build up purely Jewish
institutions." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism,
Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine’
http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004).
Jews-Only Employment.
The jews-only state also implements jews-only employment policies, "The
conquest of labor pertained not only to agriculture but also to
industry. The Labor Zionists formed an institution to organize Jewish
labor and exclude Arabs: the Histadrut. The Histadrut was (and largely
is) an all-Jewish combination trade union and cooperative society
providing its members with a number of services. From the beginning it
was a means of segregating Arab and Jewish labor and bringing into
existence a strictly Jewish economic sector." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a
Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of
Palestine’ http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html
17.06.2004); "The overwhelming majority of Palestinian laborers who had
been incorporated into Israel's workforce, and were therefore part of
the daily scenery inside Israel, disappeared as their right of entry
into Israel was revoked." (Neve Gordon ‘From Ghettos to Frontiers’ A
review of ‘Frontiers and Ghettos’ by James Ron
http://www.counterpunch.org/gordon05192005.html May 19, 2005).
This policy continues today, "Israel plans to terminate employment
opportunities for Palestinians by 2008. Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Moshe
Ya'alon said Israel no longer maintains a policy of encouraging
Palestinian employment. Ya'alon said the government has been phasing out
the number of jobs available to Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza
Strip in Israel. By 2008, Israel would institute a complete ban on the
employment of Palestinians, Middle East Newsline reported. The
government can ban Palestinians from entering Israel and requires entry
and work permits. "The goal is to stop Palestinians from working in
Israel by 2008," Ya'alon told the Low-Intensity Conflict warfare
counter-terrorism [LIC-2005] conference on Tuesday. Ya'alon said Israel
has been encouraging Western and other donor nations to help the
Palestinian Authority create jobs in an effort to end its dependence on
the Jewish state. He said the new policy no longer regards a peace
agreement with the PA as resulting in security." (Israel to ban hiring
of Palestinians’ WORLD TRIBUNE.COM March 10, 2005).
Jews-Only Planning Laws.
The way that jews steal land from palestinian-israelis who rightfully
own their own land is through the jews-only planning system. The
following incident is about a palestinian-israeli called ali living in a
palestinian village called sakhin. The jews-only state prevents him from
building an extension to his house on his own land, "But even so,
couldn't Ali at least find a legal way to build a house inside a
Palestinian community or inside Sakhin? The problem again is the law. In
1965, the government passed the Planning and Building Law, which defined
all the places in which Israeli citizens, Jews and Palestinians, could
live. Every community's room for expansion was circumscribed on a map of
the country in the form of a blue line marked around it. Anywhere inside
the blue line could be developed, anywhere outside the blue line could
not. In the case of Jewish communities, the blue lines were drawn
generously to allow for future expansion. The state has also been adding
new Jewish communities to its list ever since 1965. In Palestinian
communities, by contrast, the blue lines were drawn tightly around the
houses that already existed in 1965, leaving no room for expansion. (In
fact, Israel refused to draw blue lines around dozens of Palestinian
communities that had existed before the creation of Israel, thereby
"uncreating" them. Today some 100,000 Palestinians live in these
"unrecognised villages". In law all the homes in unrecognised villages
are considered illegal and subject to demolition). Since 1965, no new
Palestinian communities have been approved." (Jonathan Cook, The
Electronic Intifada, ‘Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners inside
Israel’ http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3674.shtml March 10th
2005).
Jews-Only Water.
"Jewish settlers get water for their lawns and swimming pools while the
Arabs go without …." (John Spritzler ‘Should People Opposed to Bigotry
and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’
http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).
Jews-Only Roads.
The jews-only state in palestine tries to purify its jewish essence
through the construction of jews-only roads. "Before there was
terrorism, there were the roads. Israel has established a 300-mile road
network throughout the West Bank connecting the settlements. These are
high-security roads-three football fields wide with their surrounding
security perimeters-and they are accessible only to Israelis. They
separate Palestinian population areas from each other and from their
agricultural land; in fact, before the current warfare, they segmented
the areas of semi-autonomous Palestinian control into 227 separate,
non-contiguous patches of land." (Kathleen Christison ‘Before There Was
Terrorism’ http://www.counterpunch.org/kchristison0502.html May 2,
2002).
Jews-Only Settlements/Villages/Towns/Cities.
The concept of jews-only roads should not be entirely surprising since
jews have also created jews-only settlements, villages, towns, and
cities, "They (palestinians) are not permitted, by law, to move into
Jewish cities or the Jewish neighborhoods of mixed cities. (Kathleen &
Bill Christison ‘"Finally It Broke My Heart": Random Impressions from
Palestine’ http://www.counterpunch.org/christison09242004.html September
24, 2004); "small luxury Jewish communities known in Hebrew as
"mitzpim". These mitzpim, which have extensive lands on which their
inhabitants can build, are required by law to vet anyone who wishes to
live inside them. Again by law, non-Jews are not entitled to apply to
join these communities." (Jonathan Cook, The Electronic Intifada,
‘Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners inside Israel’
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3674.shtml March 10th 2005). So,
although palestinian-israelis are legally allowed to travel on these
roads in practice this is not possible because the roads link one
jews-only settlement/town/city to another.
Jews-Only Cars.
In order for the jewish army to spot palestinians (all of whom are
suspected terrorists), the jews-only state in palestine has implemented
an apartheid licensing system for cars in palestine. Jews have one type
of car number plate, palestinian-israelis have another type, and
palestinians have a third. It is surprising that the jews-only state has
not insisted that palestinians should go around with a yellow armband
with the letter P inscribed on it.
Jews-Only Immigration The Law of Return for Jews-Only.
In the violent establishment of the jews-only state in 1948, jews drove
around three-quarters of a million palestinians from their homes and
their country. Since then, the jews-only state has refused to allow
these palestinians, or their descendants, to return to their country
their homes and land have long since been taken over and occupied by
jewish nazis. In stark contrast, any jew around the world, even those
who have never had any connection with palestine, is legally entitled to
immigrate to palestine, become a jews-only citizen, and own jews-only
property. "The first census of the state of Israel, conducted in 1949,
counted a total of 650,000 Jews and 150,000 Arabs. The legal foundation
for the racial state was laid down in two laws passed in 1950. The
first, the Law of Return, permitted any Jew, anywhere in the world, the
right to "return" to Israel. This right did not apply to non-Jews,
including the Palestinian Arabs who had recently become refugees. In
addition, the Absentee Property Law confiscated the property of Arab
"absentees," and turned it over to the Custodian of Absentee Property.
Arab refugees within their own country were termed "present absentees"
(what a phrase!), and not allowed to return to their property. A number
of refugees who attempted to do so were termed "infiltrators," and some
were shot in the attempt. Confiscated property accounted for the vast
majority of new settlements. These confiscated lands, in accordance with
the procedures that were established in the Mandate period by the JNF,
have become Israel Lands, with their own administration. This
administration, controlling 92.6% of all of the lands in Israel, only
leases these lands to Jews." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State
Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine’
counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html
17.06.2004); "Wiesel supports "the right of return" for Jews, but only
for Jews. An American Jew, who can trace his ancestors back to the
Revolutionary War, has the right to return to Israel, obtain dual
citizenship, obtain subsidized housing on land expropriated from
Palestinians, and drive to settlements on roads "for Jews only."
Palestinians who can trace their ancestors to the same land for
centuries and who have a title and key to property from which they were
driven in 1948 have no right to return." (Letter by Daniel A. McGowan,
Director, Deir Yassin Remembered - February 26, 2005).
The jews-only state allows christians to visit holy christian sites in
palestine, but it is not willing to allow them to immigrate and become
israeli citizens especially if they are palestinian christians.
Of course, all states around the world have the right to control
immigration but the jews-only state in palestine allows immigration only
from jews not from any other race or religion. In other words, the
jews-only state promotes a racist, jews-only, immigration policy.
In america, virtually all the main pro-zionists who support racist
immigration policies in the jews-only state in palestine are ardent
opponents of limits on immigration into america.
Jews-Only Cemeteries.
There are also jews-only cemeteries alongside the jews-only roads
running between jews-only settlements/towns/cities, in the jews-only
state. Jews loathe the idea of being laid to rest in the company of
non-jews as if even in death non-jews might contaminate or poison
their jewish essence. As israel shamir has pointed out, "Their separate
burial is necessary to guarantee their bodily resurrection when the
Messiah comes. A Jewish body defiled by gentile proximity won’t be
resurrected, according to the Jews. Even irreligious Jews follow this
separation rule without giving it a second thought." If non-jews are
accidentally buried amongst jews this puts all the jews at
resurrectional risk so they have to be dug up and transferred to a
non-jewish cemetery, "This squeamish attitude is particularly
unpleasant: whenever the Jews discover that a person of doubtful
Jewishness is buried among their lot they remove the body and dump it
elsewhere. It happened to an Israeli citizen Teresa Angelowitz. She was
buried in the Jewish cemetery; later on the religious authorities
discovered that she was a wife of a Jew, but not a Jew. They exhumed her
body at the dark of the night and re-buried on the dumping ground. It
happened to many Russian soldiers who died defending the Jewish
character of Israel and were refused the burial."
Many jews in the jews-only state were horrified by the tsunami which hit
south-east asia in december 2004. They were horrified by the idea that
jewish victims might end up being buried with the tens of thousands of
goy victims, "While the whole world had sent aid to the tsunami-hit
South East Asia, Israel forwarded a team entrusted with a unique task.
Not many Israeli tourists were swept away by the giant waves official
death toll stands at three, with some twenty missing; not many comparing
with the hundred thousand Indonesians or even with three thousand
Swedes. Still the Israeli teams were very active on the ground. The
highly trained experts led by Rabbi Meshi Zahav did not go to save
trapped survivors or alleviate suffering of millions; their job was to
save dead Jews from fate worse than death that is to be buried with
the goyim in the same grave. The Haaretz daily reported: "The Israeli
rescue teams in Thailand split up Thursday: one team worked on
identifying bodies in Krabi, while another worked on the same task in
Phuket. The Israeli crews - from the police and Zaka (a non-profit group
that specializes in identifying victims of disasters) - are trying to
locate dead Israelis before they are buried". They pressed upon the Thai
government to postpone the mass entombment, though it was necessary to
prevent the spread of epidemics; and Bangkok gave in. Every dead Jewish
body should be taken to Israel, or at least buried separately from
impure non-Jews. Witty Gilad Atzmon remarked: "the ‘altruistic’ Jews …
are in a state of panic, as we all know, dead Jews are precious, they
deserve a special burial. The fact that 5-10 Jews might be lost forever
among some other 125.000 gentiles is pretty horrifying, I am sure you
can see it."" (Israel Shamir ‘Tsunami in Gaza’ January 2nd 2005).
In the jews-only state, with its jews-only religion, jews-only political
rights, jews-only legal rights, jews-only culture, jews-only borders,
jews-only employment, jews-only land ownership, jews-only planning laws,
jews-only roads running between jews-only
settlements/villages/towns/cities, jews-only immigration, jews-only
cemeteries, it is absolutely imperative that, in death, every part of a
jew’s body is buried in a jews-only cemetery, "A week after the Likud
referendum, two terrible blows were delivered. An armored vehicle
carrying a large quantity of explosives entered Gaza city in order to
blow up buildings, and was hit by a roadside bomb planted by Palestinian
guerillas. It exploded, tearing the six soldiers to pieces. The day
after, the very same thing happened on the "Philadelphi Axis": an
armored personnel carrier full of explosives, which was sent there to
blow up tunnels under the border, was hit by a Palestinian rocket and
blew up with its five crew members. The power of each of the two
explosions was such that body parts were scattered over hundreds of
meters. The whole country saw on TV how Israeli soldiers crawled on all
fours, filtering the sand with their bare hands in order to gather the
body parts of their comrades. The media competed in the orchestration of
a necrophile hysteria, with endless talk about "body parts" interlaced
with scenes of funerals. (Uri Avnery ‘Busharon: The Countdown’ May 15th,
2004). There is no intention here of mocking zionists’ death rituals.
All cultures have their own rituals concerning the burial of the dead
and each must be given the same respect. However, the general respect I
afforded this ritual unexpectedly blew up in my face a few months later
when I read an article in which the commentator made an aside that
jews-only state refuses to return to their families what is left of the
bodies of palestinian suicide bombers. "When Michael Matza, the
Inquirer's Jerusalem correspondent, wrote a story headlined
"Palestinians' Remains Fuel a Bitterness," which detailed Israel's
practice of not releasing the bodies of suicide bombers, it provoked a
hue and cry from readers who felt the piece was too sympathetic to
families of the bombers. It didn't matter that Matza had written
numerous pieces sympathetic to Israeli victims of suicide attacks. He
was denounced as anti-Semitic and labeled a "self-hating Jew," a
favorite epithet for Jewish journalists." (Barbara Matusow ‘Caught in
the Crossfire’ American Journalism Review June/July 2004 issue). This is
not just a one-off policy. "As I wrote the press release I was almost in
tears because I was just going through the motions. Three youths,
apparently trying to sneak into Israel to work, had been shot at, beaten
and then (had) their organs crudely taken out of their bodies.
Unceremoniously the bodies were returned four days later, no
explanation. By any human standard, this is a massive story full of
political intrigue." (Mark Schneider 'American Media Censorship and
Israel' http://www.ccmep.org/ccmep/american031902.html 19.3.2002). This
is part of zionists’ cultural terrorism against palestinians. The
zionists show their utter contempt for palestinians by doing the exact
opposite of what is demanded of them by their own death rituals.
Jews-Only Racism: Jewish Racists in the Jews-Only State.
There is a lot of ‘jews-only’ racism in the jews-only state. There are,
of course, racists in every societies and there are even some in a few
western governments. These days, however, if western politicians were to
make a racist statement in public they would immediately be attacked by
their countries’ zionist lobby and, if they didn’t resign, they would be
sacked forthwith. This is not the case in the racist jews-only state.
Jewish politicians can make openly racist statements without anyone
bothering to condemn them. "An Israeli cabinet minister has called for
the expulsion of some 1.3 million Palestinian citizens of Israel who
constitute nearly one fifth of the state’s population. Transportation
Minister Avigdor Lieberman said during an interview with the Israeli
army radio (Gali Tzahal) on Sunday that the "Arabs of Israel" should be
expelled in case a Palestinian state was established and Jewish
settlements in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip were dismantled.
Lieberman, a former Moldovan immigrant who arrived in Israel in 1978,
suggested that the existence of a large non-Jewish minority in Israel
threatened the "Jewish identity" and "ethnic purity" of Israel. But his
explicitly racist remarks raised no ire in the Israeli political
establishment. Israeli officials, from Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon downward, refused to condemn the remarks, suggesting a sympathy
with Lieberman’s ideas. Amira Dotan, a spokeswoman for the Israeli
foreign ministry, told Aljazeera that ethnic cleansing was not "the
policy of the government". "I do not know what made him say these
things. He is a free man; he has the right to express his views."
Lieberman's racism has been well known for many years. A few years ago,
he called for the bombing of the Aswan Dam in Egypt, the Presidential
palace in Damascus and Iran’s nuclear facilities. He also called for
executing Arab Knesset members Tibi and Muhammad Baraka by a firing
squad for supporting Palestinian rights and calling for ending the
Israeli occupation. In 2002, he urged the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon to carry out "wholesale killings" of Palestinian civilians in
order to force them to flee to Jordan and other neighbouring Arab
countries." (‘Israeli Minister Wants Total Palestinian-Arab 'Cleansing'’
http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_
service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=1862 May 10th 2004).
Once again, this was not a rare racist remark in an otherwise non-racist
society. "Recently, a law was passed in one of the Israeli Knesset's
many committees saying that settlers who will be evacuated following a
future retreat from the Gaza Strip will be given compensation. There was
a minimal majority of one committee member for this law, which is an
essential part of prime minister's Ariel Sharon's plan of "Gaza
Disengagement", and in order for it to be passed the balance was tipped
to the side of the government from outside the coalition by Member of
Knesset Mohammad Barake. Barake, a MK from "Hadash" party (the former
communist party) is, as his name might indicate, an Israeli Arab. Limor
Livnat, the Israeli minister of education, who had also voted in favor
of the law, was one of the most noticeable politicians in a group of
right wing Knesset members and others who had each expressed outrage
that an Arab (who had, like any other Member of the Knesset, been
elected democratically) was the one to determine the future of Israel in
such an important question. Because of Livnat's high position in the
government there was a mini uproar in the Israeli media about the fact
that the minister of education, the person who is in charge of what
children will be taught in schools, had said something so bluntly
racist. In actuality, no one was surprised. No one has any illusions
that Ariel Sharon and the rest of the ministers besides - maybe -
politicians from the Labor Party, think any differently from Livnat, in
spite of them remaining more or less silent about the subject. In any
normal "western" democracy such a thing would have become an immediate
scandal. I can only imagine that if Germany's education minister would
say something even remotely close to Livnat's statement about a Jewish
parliament member, the only question would be whether that minister
would find him or herself out of a job more quickly than it would take
the foreign minister of Israel to file an official protest." (Uri
Yaakobi ‘Limor Livnat and the Palestinian "problem"’
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3634.shtml February 23rd 2005).
There are plenty of other examples of such racism from virtually all
jews-only politicians. Racist views such as these should not be
surprising in a racist state. What is surprising is that such views
should be surprising in a racist state but then what this indicates is
the power of zionist propaganda around the world which presents the
jews-only state as being a multi-cultural society.
Racism is not just prevalent amongst jews-only politicians in the
jews-only state but amongst most jews themselves. Israel shamir quotes
matti golan, the former editor-in-chief of the leading zionist newspaper
‘haaretz’ and of the ‘globes’, the paper for the jewish economic elites.
"My problem is not only with Germany. It is with everything German,
anywhere. I neither argue nor get upset. I have simply wiped Germany and
its people off my globe". Shamir explains that, "Golan is not a
firebrand; he is not one of Jewish religious fanatics who deny goyim
even descent from Adam. Golan is not a Cabbalist and extremist but one
of the sane, non-religious mainstream influential Jewish intellectuals.
When this article was discussed on IsraelForum.com in the internet, a
typical Jewish response was this: "Matti Golan is a prominent journalist
and columnist. He represents ideas held by the vast majority of Israeli
Jews in this subject. My opinion included." If I were a German, I would
have second thoughts before providing Matti Golan's country with
nuclear-capable submarines lest he will 'simply wipe Germany and its
people off our globe'. In my view, Golan sounded a call for racist
hatred and genocide." (Israel Shamir ‘Children Of A Lesser God’
Rense.com http://www.rense.com/general52/children.htm 01.05.04).
Perhaps there ought to be a zionist lobby in the jews-only state to
enforce the charade that the jews-only state is a non-racist,
multi-cultural society.
Jews-Only Sex.
"The Zionist commitment to racial purity has led to expressions of
bigotry at the highest levels of Israeli society that would inspire
outrage in respectable circles in the U.S. An Israeli company has
required thousands of Chinese workers to sign a contract promising not
to have sex with Israelis. A company spokesman said there was nothing
illegal about the requirement. Israeli law forbids the marriage of a Jew
with a non-Jew." (Associated Press, December 23, 2003)." (Noel Ignatiev
‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People
of Palestine’ counterpunch
http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004).
Jews-Only Marriage.
At present, there is no jews-only law barring jews from marrying
non-jews it just makes it impossible for them to live together. "A new
law passed by the Israeli parliament on 31 July 2003 bars family
unification for Israelis who are married to Palestinians from the
Occupied Territories. The Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law
explicitly discriminates against Palestinians from the West Bank and
Gaza Strip. It also implicitly discriminates against Palestinian
citizens of Israel, who constitute some 20% of the Israeli population,
and against Palestinian residents of Jerusalem, for it is they who
usually marry Palestinians from the Occupied Territories. As such, the
law formally institutionalizes a form of racial discrimination based on
ethnicity or nationality. The UN Committee on the Elimination of all
Forms of Racial Discrimination has expressed concern about this new law
and has called on Israel to revoke it and reconsider its policy with a
view to facilitating family unification on a non-discriminatory basis.
The UN Human Rights Committee has likewise called on Israel to revoke
the law and to reconsider its policy with a view to facilitating family
unification of all citizens and permanent residents. Not being able to
obtain family unification for their Palestinian spouses leaves thousands
of Palestinian citizens of Israel and Jerusalem residents with two
options: having their spouse live with them illegally or moving to the
West Bank and Gaza Strip, where they would be living under Israeli
military occupation, in a situation of conflict and facing daily
incursions by the Israeli army, bombardments, house demolition, curfews
and hundreds of checkpoints, which make it extremely difficult to move,
work or carry out ordinary daily activities. In addition, it is illegal
for Israelis and Jerusalemites to enter the Occupied Territories and
those married to residents of the Occupied Territories may only do so in
special circumstances and subject to permits and stringent
restrictions."; "Thus, for Zionism's leaders, it is a terrible thing
when Jews and non-Jews in Israel/Palestine want to marry each other. God
forbid! Jewish Israelis and non-Jewish Palestinians do marry each other,
not in large numbers, but in large enough numbers that the Israeli
Knesset, on August 1, 2003, felt obliged to enact a law to block
Palestinians who marry Israelis from becoming Israeli citizens or
residents. When an Israeli Jew and an Israeli non-Jew decide to get
married, they are heading down a path made deliberately very difficult
by Israel's rulers. Israel, by virtue of the Jurisdiction of Rabbinical
Courts (Marriage and Divorce) Law of 1953, only recognizes marriages
performed by the official state religious courts: the Jewish orthodox
Rabbinical, the Islamic Shari'a and the Christian Ecclesiastic courts,
which do not perform "mixed" marriages. A "mixed" couple's marriage,
typically performed outside of Israel, is not recognized by Israel. Yet
despite all of these obstacles, there are married couples, consisting of
a non-Jewish Arab Palestinian and a Jew, in Israel. Each one of these
marriages puts the lie to the Zionist claim that Arabs are innately
anti-Semitic." (John Spritzler ‘Should People Opposed to Bigotry and
Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’
http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).
The jews-only state renewed the law in july 2004, "Also Sunday, the
Israeli Cabinet extended for six months a rule forbidding Palestinians
who marry Israelis from living in Israel. Human rights groups have
criticized the law. Arabs make up about 20 percent of the country's
population, and many Israelis are concerned about their growing
numbers." (Ibrahim Barzak ‘Palestinian Authority Offices Burned Down’
Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4324486,00.
html?gusrc=ticker-103704 July 18, 2004).
Jews-Only Naturalization.
"Meanwhile, an "emergency regulation" passed in 2003 limits the right of
Arab citizens of Israel - a right that belongs to not only every Jew in
Israel but every Jew in the world - to have their spouse and children
naturalized. That distinction is expressed in the classifications of the
Central Bureau of Statistics, which formally divides the citizens of
Israel into two categories: "Jews and others" (Jews, Christians who are
not Arabs, and people without religious classification); and "the Arab
population" (Muslims, Druze, Christian Arabs). That is the language of
the separation. It was announced this week that the government plans to
stiffen the rules for granting citizenship to non-Jews, through
amendments to the law that make it difficult to grant legal status to
Palestinians and other foreigners married to Israeli citizens. The prime
minister held a special discussion of the issue and decided to establish
a committee headed by the interior minister. The Interior Ministry
claims that some 55,000 applications for Palestinian family
reunification through marriages to Israeli Arabs have been submitted
since 1968, and that natural growth increased the "naturalized"
population to some 137,000 Arabs - about one-tenth of the Arab minority
in Israel." (Yitzhak Laor ‘Israel Makes It Harder for Non-Jews to Become
Citizens: Racism by Any Other Name’
http://www.counterpunch.org/laor04072005.html April 7, 2005).
Jews Only Nukes.
The jews-only state in palestine neither denies or admits that it
possesses nuclear weapons, "Officially, Israel does not admit that it
has nuclear weapons. Since 1965 it has "refused to confirm or deny"
claims that it possesses a nuclear arsenal. It has refused to sign the
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, saying it cannot rely on international
safeguards when it is in a permanent state of war with much of the Arab
world. In 1999 the US Department of Energy placed Israel sixth on its
list of nations possessing nuclear weapons. The document claims Israel
has 300kg to 500kg of weapons-grade plutonium, enough to produce at
least 250 nuclear warheads." (Ross Dunn ‘Sharon eyes 'Samson option'
against Iraq’ http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1223502002
November 3rd 2002). The jews-only state in palestine believes that it
should be the only country in the middle east to possess nuclear
weapons. That is why it is pushing its american colony into fighting a
zionist proxy war against iran in order to prevent that country from
acquiring nuclear weapons.
Jews-only Terrorism.
For many years the jews-only state has complained incessantly about
palestinian terrorists threatening to harm the jewish nazis carrying out
the lebensraum policy of the jews-only state in palestine. The jews-only
state never considers that anything that it does involves terrorism. And
yet, somewhat hypocritically, ariel sharon, perhaps the world’s most
famous terrorist and war criminal, has recently decided to recognize the
heroism of its very own jewish terrorists involved in the lavon affair
in 1952. "On presenting the three survivors and the families of the
deceased with official citations, Israeli Chief of General Staff Lt.
Gen. Moshe Ya'alon averred, "This is historic justice for those who were
sent on a mission on behalf of the state and became the victims of a
complex political affair." Justice? What about justice for the victims
of those bombs, which exploded in a post office, a couple of movie
theaters, and the American library in Cairo? I guess they don't count."
(Justin Raimondo ‘Israel Goes Extremist’
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=5495 April 8, 2005). One of the
terrorists being honoured even called for his terrorist activities to be
taught in schools. The jews-only state is declaring itself independent
of all other nations around the world, bound only by its own jews-only
morality only jews are allowed to practice terrorism. Interestingly
the israeli traitors in the bush administration never condemned sharon’s
recognition of the lavon terrorists.
Jews-Only Prerogatives in International Law.
Jews-only prerogatives exist on the international level as much as they
do on the level of the jews-only state. The main jews-only prerogative
is that the jews-only state does not have to abide by united nations’
resolutions. There are varying estimates as to how many un resolutions
the jews-only state is flouting. But worse than the jews-only state’s
refusal to live up to these resolutions is the refusal of the western
world to insist that the jews-only state lives up to its international
obligations. Throughout the 1990s the american and brutish governments
made incessant demands for saddam hussein to abide by un resolutions but
they never once demanded that the jews-only state in palestine did the
same thing. Both governments also made incessant demands for saddam
hussein to abolish his (non-existent) weapons of mass destruction but
never demanded the jews-only state in palestine abolish its very real
weapons of mass destruction. Even worse than this is that the only
countries which the western world insists must abide by un resolutions
are the enemies of the jews-only state. Worst of all, however, is that
america and britain launch an war against iraq with no united nations’
sanction in order to protect the jews-only state in palestine. In other
words, having demanded incessantly for 15 years that countries abide by
un resolutions they then go ahead with a war for the sake of the
jews-only state that has not been sanctioned by a un resolution. The
fact that the jews-only state refuses to abide by un resolutions
indicates clearly its belief in jewish uniqueness, that jews are a
special, chosen people superior to all other races. The people who
adhere to the jews-only religion refuse to live by man made laws. They
will abide only by laws handed down to them by their jews-only god and
inscribed in their jews-only religious books.
These are not the only jews-only international laws, "On December 13,
2004 the EU General Affairs and External Relations Council approved the
EU-Israel Action Plan as part of the EU's New Neighborhood Policy - one
step below full membership in the EU. According to the released
EU-Israel Action Plan: "The EU and Israel are now closer together than
ever before and, as near neighbours, will reinforce their political and
economic interdependence. Enlargement offers the opportunity for the EU
and Israel to develop an increasingly close relationship, going beyond
co-operation, to involve a significant measure of economic integration
and a deepening of political co-operation." Despite European declarative
positions affirming Israel's obligations in international law, and
dismissing Israel's rejection of them, and despite Israel's shocking
human rights record, the EU-Israel Action Plan states that the "EU and
Israel share the common values of democracy, respect for human rights
and the rule of law and basic freedoms." Worse, the EU-Israel Action
Plan might even lead to Israel deciding on EU policies themselves. It
stated "the possibility for Israel to participate progressively in key
aspects of EU policies and programmes." It provides "an upgrade in the
scope and intensity of political co-operation." Concrete steps include
that the "EU will continue its efforts to ensure that the condemnation
of anti-Semitism will become a part of international norms through,
inter alia, appropriate UN resolutions." Considering Israel's policy to
equate anti-Semitism with criticism of Israeli state practices vis-a-vis
Palestinian civilians, this has meant that the EU will censure itself
when it comes to address Israeli violations of human rights. The
EU-Israel Action Plan formalised the facilitation of Israel's violations
of human rights and international humanitarian law by shielding Israel
from legal and political accountability, and by helping it escape the
normal penalties or costs that would result ordinarily from the
violations." (Arjan El Fassed, The Electronic Intifada, ‘In bed with
Israel: EU's close relationship with Israel supports abuse’
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3600.shtml March 11th 2005).
The Nazis’ Jews-only Slaughter.
The jewish sense of specialness, chosenness, and supremacism, over all
other peoples, nations, and races makes itself apparent in jewish
opinions about what happened during the rise of totalitarianism and the
second world war. Although the nazis sent jews, communists, POWs, the
aged, the sick, homosexuals, seven day adventists, slavs, serbs, czechs,
italians, poles, ukrainians, gypsies, etc. to the extermination camps
many jews believe the nazis slaughtered only jews, "The centrality of
the Holocaust in Jewish consciousness caused the Jews to insist on its
absolute exclusiveness. We are shocked and furious when somebody tries
to remind us that the Nazis exterminated other communities too, such as
the Roma, the homosexuals and the mentally ill. We get very angry when
somebody comes and compares "our" Holocaust with other genocides:
Armenians, Cambodians, Tutsis in Ruanda and others. Really! How can one
compare?" (Uri Avnery ‘Memory of the Holocaust - from Jewish property
into human possession’ http://www.gush-shalom.org/archives.html#articles
March 19th 2005).
Only the Jews-only Holocaust happened during the Second World War.
It has been estimated that over 50 million people died during the rise
of totalitarianism and the second world war; that the nazis slaughtered
21 million people during their reign in power; and that around twenty
million russians were killed during the second world war. And yet to
jews this colossal slaughter has been reduced one reality - the
so-called jewish holocaust i.e. the jews-only holocaust in which
apparently the only people who died were jews or perhaps what they
mean is that only the deaths of jews mattered. Whatever the real figures
for russian and jewish fatalities during the second world war, far more
russians were killed than jews. And yet how many events are there
outside russia which lament the slaughter of russians? It is impossible
to discern from the ridiculous propaganda of the jews-only holocaust
that any other people died during the rise of totalitarianism and the
second world war than jews. The phrase ‘jews-only holocaust’ is the
epitome of jewish racism.
Jews-Only Compensation for the Jews-only Holocaust.
Another example of jews-only privileges which extend beyond the
jews-only state in palestine is jews-only holocaust compensation. The
jews-only holocaust industry was set up to obtain compensation for
jews-only survivors of the nazi concentration and extermination camps.
The moral bankruptcy of the jews-only holocaust industry is transparent
from the fact that it has fought for reparations only for its own people
- not for any of the other social groups which also suffered under the
nazis. Jewish americans used america’s substantial political and
economic clout to force firstly, european governments to pay
compensation to jews who suffered during the second world war and,
secondly, european banks into returning jewish assets deposited with
them during the second world war. This campaign for compensation
degenerated into what daniel finkelstein has described as an "extortion
racket". Even abba eban, a zionist politician, has mockingly said about
the jews-only holocaust industry, "There's no business like Shoah
business." (Shoah being the hebrew word for holocaust). Who on Earth
could possibly have believed that jews would have ended up exploiting
the biggest disaster in their own history? It is, without doubt, one of
the most shocking episodes of moral depravity in ooman history. Even
more lamentable is that whilst the jews-only holocaust industry is
demanding reparations for the loss of property suffered by jews during
the second world war, they are refusing to compensate palestinians whose
homes have been demolished, and their land stolen, by the jews-only
state in palestine. In other words, jews were demanding reparations from
european governments and banks whilst at the same time denying such
reparations to the people they were dispossessing. That’s jews-only
chutzpah.
Jews-Only Lies.
It has already been pointed out that the jews-only state has erected a
mountain of lies with which to protect its interests. These lies are
promoted by virtually all jews whether they live in the jews-only state
or not. Perhaps the most well known is that prior to the second world
war when jews were thinking about moving to palestine to establish a
jews-only state, they frequently argued that nobody was living there,
"Israel Zangwill's 1901 assertion that "Palestine is a country without a
people; the Jews are a people without a country". It hopes to create a
land entirely empty of gentiles, an Arabia deserta in which Jewish
children can laugh and play throughout a wasteland called peace."
(Michael Neumann ‘What is Antisemitism?’
http://www.ukar.org/neuman/neuman01.html June 4, 2002).
Another jews-only lie is that in 1948 jews did not drive palestinians
out of palestine - they left of their own accord, "Mr. Ben Gurion's
first claim that the Arab exodus from Palestine was provoked by
directives from the leaders of the surrounding Arab states has been
shown by overwhelming historical research to be false." (William Martin
‘Who is Pushing Whom into the Sea?’
http://www.counterpunch.org/martin03112005.html March 11, 2005); "But
Wiesel cannot even bring himself to tell the truth about what caused
their diaspora. He continues to spread one of the most insidious myths
in Zionist discourse saying, "Incited by their leaders, 600,000
Palestinians left the country convinced that, once Israel was
vanquished, they would be able to return home." Wiesel knows Arab
leaders did not tell their people to leave; that lie was thoroughly
disproved by historians years ago. Second, he knows that the best
estimates are that 750,000 Palestinians fled in 1948. (Note the outrage
by Wiesel and others whenever anyone dares to question the number of 6
million Jews killed in the Holocaust.) And third, these original
Palestinian refugees did not just leave; they were driven out, often by
the very terrorists for whom Wiesel proudly worked. The massacre at Deir
Yassin was emblematic of this." (Letter by Daniel A. McGowan, Director,
Deir Yassin Remembered - February 26, 2005).
The third major jews-only lie is that despite being driven out of
palestine, the palestinians threatened to drive the jews into the sea,
"On 11 October 1961 Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion declared in
the Israeli Knesset: 'The Arabs' exit from Palestine...began immediately
after the UN resolution, from the areas earmarked for the Jewish state.
And we have explicit documents testifying that they left Palestine
following instructions by the Arab leaders, with the Mufti at their
head, under the assumption that the invasion of the Arab armies at the
expiration of the Mandate will destroy the Jewish state and push all the
Jews into the sea, dead or alive'. The phrase "push all the Jews into
the sea, dead or alive" has acquired a life of its own as it is invoked
by Zionist supporters on a daily basis in order to justify the
aggressive policies of Israel as well as its recalcitrance in continuing
the occupation of the Palestinians of the West Bank, Gaza, and East
Jerusalem. It is a highly emotive phrase invoking images of the
Holocaust, though adapted to a Mediterranean setting. Mr Ben Gurion
gives no attribution for this phrase, nor does he claim that it is a
quote from an Arab source. It is expressed here as if it is his personal
surmise as to the Arab army's intentions. The phrase has been variously
attributed by Zionist supporters to Yasser Arafat, Gamel Abdul Nasser,
or any other of Israel's enemies, but none whom I have challenged,
including U S Congressman Henry Waxman who made the claim in a letter to
me, attributing the phrase to Nasser, have been able to provide any
documentation of support for their claim. The speech by Mr. Ben Gurion
appears to be the origin of the phrase. The phrase, thus, has a Jewish
origin and not an Arab origin. Mr Ben Gurion is the originator of the
phrase, in all likelihood." (William Martin ‘Who is Pushing Whom into
the Sea?’ http://www.counterpunch.org/martin03112005.html March 11,
2005).
The Taboo against Criticisms of the Jews-only State.
It has to be wondered, how much further this jews-only trend will go? In
america, the zionists have created a political taboo against criticisms
of the jews-only state. "Although criticism of specific Israeli policies
is permissible in the United States, it is more or less forbidden to
express fundamental criticism of the Zionist state, of America's basic
policy of support for Israel, or of the Jewish-Zionist grip on the US
media or America's political and academic life. (Remarkably, this is in
contrast to the situation in Israel itself, where Jews and even Arab
citizens of the Zionist state have much greater freedom than Americans
publicly to criticize Zionism and Israeli policies.) Prominent persons
who dare to violate this prohibition are immediately castigated as
"anti-Semitic" (that is, anti-Jewish), and pay a heavy price in damage
to their reputations or careers. Politicians who publicly speak out
against America's support for Zionism risk almost certain political
ruin. Among the political or governmental figures whose careers were
destroyed because they violated the powerful taboo have been US Senators
William Fulbright, Adlai Stevenson III, and Charles Percy, Congressmen
Paul McCloskey and Paul Findley, and Deputy Secretary of State George
Ball." (Abdullah Mohammad Sindi ‘How the Jewish-Zionist Grip on American
Film and Television Promotes Bias Against Arabs and Muslims’ Institute
for Historical Review http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n5p-2_Sindi.html
c1999).
The Jews-only Global Anti-Discrimination Law.
This american taboo is not enough for zionists. They want to pass
legislation in america which firstly equates criticism of the jews-only
state in palestine with anti-semitism and, secondly, outlaws
anti-semitism - thereby making criticism of the jews-only state illegal.
The americans are then willing to enforce this law against any
individual around the world. There is no other people in the world who
insist that their government should be protected against all criticisms.
What such zionist-induced legislation in america will do is to create
the only state in the world which is beyond criticism even though it is
the most racist society on Earth. "Coincidentally, a letter to the
editor by the same rabbi appeared the following day. It was in the same
vein, observing that the critical letters to the editor had taken away
her sense of belonging to the Santa Fe community, and concluding that
the Jews’ two millennia of persecution should be taken into account when
considering Israel’s actions, that we do not have the right to talk
about the conflict because we don’t live there, and that in the end
"What makes most sense is not to offer an opinion about this complicated
and painful conflict." The notion that no one who does not live there
can criticize Israel is a common escape for people like this. These same
people never have trouble criticizing the Palestinians in the West Bank
and Gaza although they don’t live there either." (Kathleen Christison
American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of Israel’
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/02/1676420.php February 07, 2004).
The Jews-Only American Media and the Jews-only American Politics.
In america, the zionist domination of the media is so great it is almost
on the verge of becoming a ‘jews-only’ industry. In american politics,
the zionists are taking over more and more departments of state. "The
neoconservatives are the greatest threat America has ever faced, and
they control the Office of the President, the Office of the Vice
President, the Department of State, the Department of Defense, and the
police-state apparatus known as "Homeland Security." (Paul Craig Roberts
‘Outfoxed by bin Laden’ http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=4898
February 21, 2005). Wayne madsen has suggested they’re aiming to take
control of the super secret National Security Agency (NSA) - America's
premier electronic surveillance body. "What has some NSA officials
worried is that with pro-Israeli neocons now engrained within the CIA,
Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), State Department, and National
Security Council, NSA is ripe for penetration by Israeli intelligence.
With outside contractors now permeating NSA and a major Israeli
espionage operation being discovered inside the Pentagon, once again
there is a fear within NSA that foreign intelligence services such as
the Mossad could make another attempt to penetrate America's virtual
"Fort Knox" of intelligence treasures and secrets." (Wayne Madsen ‘The
neocon power grab at NSA and an attempt to stifle the press’
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/052405Madsen/052405
madsen.html May 24th 2005). The chances of a moslem or arab person
getting a job in an american administration are virtually zero. If
current trends continue then we are headed for a ‘jews-only’ american
state where the only non-jews permitted will be shabbat goys who support
everything done by ariel sharon.
Isn’t the Phrase 'Jews-Only' Racist?
It might be argued that the above criticisms of the jews-only state,
with its jews-only religion, jews-only political rights, jews-only legal
rights, jews-only culture, jews-only borders, jews-only employment,
jews-only land ownership, jews-only planning laws, jews-only roads
running between jews-only settlements/villages/towns/cities, jews-only
immigration, jews-only cemeteries, jews-only racists (openly racist
jewish politicians), jews-only marriages, jews-only prerogatives in
international law, the nazis’ jews-only slaughter, the jews-only
holocaust, the jews-only holocaust compensation, jews-only fantasies,
jews-only taboos, the criticism free jews-only state, etc. might have
some merit but this is undermined by the use of the word ‘jew’ which
suggests such criticisms are at the very least anti-semitic if not
racist. Kathleen and bill christison avoid any charge of anti-semitism
or racism by talking about "Israeli-only settlements, Israeli-only
roads" (Kathleen and Bill Christison ‘On Israel/Palestine An Exchange
with Bennie Morris’ http://www.counterpunch.org/christison10022004.html
October 2/3, 2004). But, as has been suggested above, this is not
technically correct. Although palestinian-israelis may theoretically be
allowed to travel on these roads, in practice this is not possible
because the roads link one jews-only settlement/town/city to another. It
is much more accurate to say that they are jews-only roads running
between jews-only settlements. John Spritzler agrees, "This is why
Israel makes Palestinians prisoners inside of refugee camps and inside
areas surrounded by military checkpoints, why it subjects them to harsh
curfews, excludes them from Jews-only roads …." (John Spritzler ‘Should
People Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’
http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).
But surely, it might be countered, the use of the phrase "jews-only" is
wrong since it implies that such policies are supported by all jews in
palestine when such policies are the responsibility of only the zionist
elite. It has to be pointed out however that, "By integrating all Jews
in Israel into a society that is entirely based on racist principles -
that Jews should live on land taken away from non-Jews, that Arab
villages should be plowed under and made to vanish without a trace, that
the state should be for "the Jews" rather than for all of its people,
and that people should be identified as a "problem" merely because they
are not Jewish (especially if they might become a majority!) - the
Zionist project makes Jewish civilians seem to many Palestinians, quite
understandably, just as culpable in the oppression of Palestinians as
are Israeli soldiers who carry out the actual violence and terror.
According to an article in the October 2002 issue of Outpost (published
by Americans for a Safe Israel), "A recent public opinion poll found
that more than one-third of Israelis favor the transfer of Arabs from
Judea, Samaria and Gaza [i.e. the occupied territories] to neighboring
Arab countries. That figure may rise or fall in response to specific
events in the months to come, but one thing is now undeniably clear: the
transfer solution is a serious proposition that can no longer be
ignored." Another source reports, "Polls conducted in February 2002 in
Israel demonstrated that 46% of respondents supported the transfer of
Arabs from Judea, Samaria and Gaza, while 60% were inclined towards the
transfer of Arabs from Israel proper."" (John Spritzler ‘Should People
Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’
http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).
It might also be countered that the use of the phrase "jews-only" is
wrong since it implies a condemnation of jewish people around the world
for what is being done in their name by the jews-only state in
palestine. Aren’t such "jews-only" criticisms blatantly wrong because
they have got nothing to do with jews outside the jews-only state in
palestine? Two points need to be made.
Firstly, some of the jews-only phenomena outlined above refers to jews
outside the jews-only state. For example, the jews-only holocaust
compensation, the jews-only lies, jews-only taboos, the criticism free
jews-only state, the jews-only american media, the jews-only american
political system, etc.
Secondly, with some notable exceptions on what is regarded as the
political extremes, no mainstream jewish organization anywhere around
the world has demanded an end to the jews-only state; criticized the
jews-only state’s jews-only policies; opposed jews-only racists from
entering the jews-only government; insisted that the jews-only state
abides by un resolutions; or asked that the jews-only state gives up its
weapons of mass destruction in the same way as these organizations
demanded such things of saddam, "Leading pro-Israeli organizations in
the United States have pointedly refused to condemn Ariel Sharon's
inclusion in his new government of the National Union alliance parties
whose members ran for election on a platform openly advocating the
"transfer" or ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. The National Union
is made up of three parties, Moledet, Tekuma and Israel Beitenu and won
seven seats in the recent Israeli election. The Anti-Defamation League
(ADL), which boasts of "90 years fighting anti-Semitism, bigotry and
extremism," also remained publicly silent. The very high tolerance for
racist and potentially genocidal ideas that Foxman evinces when they
come from Israelis is not evident in other, lesser cases. For example,
when the far-right Freedom Party made gains in Austria's elections in
2000 on an anti-immigrant platform, Foxman issued a statement saying,
"It is astonishing that a significant portion of the [Austrian]
population is ready to embrace a party and leadership that espouse
xenophobic and nativist positions and statements." (ADL press release, 1
February 2000)." (Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada,
http://electronicIntifada.net/v2/article1210.shtml 3.3.2003).
In america very few jews have objected to the racism of the jews-only
state in palestine so it would seem safe to assume they support what is
happening. David horowitz’s extreme racist views are probably common
amongst the jewish community in america. Most jews support what gilad
atzmon calls the ""lachrymose" view of Jewish history: the inevitability
of Jewish suffering at the hands of non-Jews". Given that such a racist
view is the basis of the jews-only state in palestine then this suggests
that virtually all jews support the jews-only state and its racism. It
has been pointed out above that jews all around the world are legally
entitled to immigrate to palestine and become citizens of the jews-only
state. Their unwillingness to renounce their ‘de-jure’ citizenship of
the jews-only state indicates their support for that state. The number
of jews outside the jews-only state who have made any criticism of the
state’s jews-only policies is so miniscule as to be politically
irrelevant. In other words, virtually all jews around the world support
the jews-only state in palestine, the racism of the jews-only state, and
the jews-only state’s flouting of international law.
Kathleen christison paints an accurate picture of widescale jewish
support for the jews-only state in palestine. She starts off by talking
about the views of the jewish historian benny morris. "This was a day or
two after this paragon of dispassionate Israeli scholarship had
expostulated in an interview published in Ha’aretz on the benefits (if
you’re Jewish) of ethnic cleansing, the critical miscalculation of David
Ben-Gurion in not having completed the total ethnic cleansing of
Palestine from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River in 1948 when he had
a chance, and the barbarity of Arab and Muslim culture. "The Arab world
as it is today is barbarian," Morris declared. Islamic and Arab culture
is "a world in which human life doesn’t have the same value as it does
in the West," in which freedom and democracy are alien, in which there
are "no moral inhibitions." He was speaking in sweeping terms, of entire
cultures, of the mass of individuals in the Arab and the Muslim worlds,
not merely of governments that are oppressive or undemocratic.
Palestinians in particular, Morris believes, are barbaric, "a very sick
society," and should be treated "the way we treat individuals who are
serial killers. . . . Something like a cage has to be built for them."
(Kathleen Christison ‘American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of
Israel’ http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/02/1676420.php February 07,
2004).
Morris’s comments are blatantly anti-palestinian and racist, and yet he
regards himself as still being a leftist. If leftist jews hold such
views then just imagine the views of those on the right of the political
spectrum. Christison concludes, "Benny Morris - who still considers
himself a leftist, still favors establishment of a Palestinian state in
part of Palestine, still exposes Israeli atrocities against the
Palestinians in his examination of early Israeli history - is one of
those people Meir Kahane was describing, and he speaks for large numbers
of his fellow Israelis and his fellow Jews throughout the world.
Morris’s blunt soul-bearing has lifted the last barrier of propriety to
the open expression of raw Arab hatred. One longs for some gigantic
outcry of opposition or disgust over this confession of deep bigotry,
but there has been none. Except for a few letters to the editor of
Ha’aretz from American Jews, the interview has aroused little attention
in the Jewish-American community: no denunciation, no shock, little or
no discussion on any but the most progressive Jewish e-mail lists. You
have to assume that, however awkward Morris’s blunt language may be, he
is speaking for a large segment of American Jews who say they oppose the
occupation, say they hate Sharon, say they hate Israel’s oppression of
the Palestinians, but who do nothing about any of these things and who
in the end would not grieve, either for the Palestinians or for the
Jewish soul, if Israel wiped the Palestinians off the map." (Kathleen
Christison ‘American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of Israel’
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/02/1676420.php February 07, 2004).
Michael neumann reaches similar conclusions to christison but from a
philosophical standpoint, "Do we want to say it is antisemitic to
accuse, not just the Israelis, but Jews generally of complicity in these
crimes against humanity? Again, maybe not, because there is a quite
reasonable case for such assertions. Compare them, for example, to the
claim that Germans generally were complicit in such crimes. This never
meant that every last German, man, woman, idiot and child, were guilty.
It meant that most Germans were. Their guilt, of course, did not consist
in shoving naked prisoners into gas chambers. It consisted in support
for the people who planned such acts, or - as many overwrought,
moralistic Jewish texts will tell you - for denying the horror unfolding
around them, for failing to speak out and resist, for passive consent.
Note that the extreme danger of any kind of active resistance is not
supposed to be an excuse here. Well, virtually no Jew is in any kind of
danger from speaking out. And speaking out is the only sort of
resistance required. If many Jews spoke out, it would have an enormous
effect. But the overwhelming majority of Jews do not, and in the vast
majority of cases, this is because they support Israel. Now perhaps the
whole notion of collective responsibility should be discarded; perhaps
some clever person will convince us that we have to do this. But at
present, the case for Jewish complicity seems much stronger than the
case for German complicity. So if it is not racist, and reasonable, to
say that the Germans were complicit in crimes against humanity, then it
is not racist, and reasonable, to say the same of the Jews. And should
the notion of collective responsibility be discarded, it would still be
reasonable to say that many, perhaps most adult Jewish individuals
support a state that commits war crimes, because that's just true. So if
saying these things is antisemitic, than it can be reasonable to be
antisemitic. In short, the real scandal today is not antisemitism but
the importance it is given. Israel has committed war crimes. It has
implicated Jews generally in these crimes, and Jews generally have
hastened to implicate themselves. This has provoked hatred against Jews.
Why not? Some of this hatred is racist, some isn't, but who cares? Why
should we pay any attention to this issue at all?" (Michael Neumann
‘What is Antisemitism?’ http://www.ukar.org/neuman/neuman01.html June 4,
2002).
Gilad atzmon has stated, "Today, knowing that the vast majority of
Israelis support the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian population;
that most Israelis support Sharon's latest genocide of innocent
Palestinians; that the "Jewish state" is the first "democracy" to
conduct an ethnic cleansing within its borders; that 100,000 French Jews
have gone out into the streets of Paris to show their support for
Sharon, we should ask ourselves what is Zionism? What is modern Judaism
all about?" (Gilad Atzmon ‘On Blindness’
http://www.gilad.co.uk/html%20files/blindness.html May 2005). Jeff
blankfort has concluded, "the distinction that we are always careful to
make between being Jewish and being Zionist is essentially deceptive and
that while all Jews are not Zionists, the organized Jewish communities
throughout the world, despite whatever differences they may have, are
totally behind the Zionist project. To pretend that these organizations
do not speak for the overall Jewish community, one, that without any
doubt, supports Israel as a Jewish state, is illusory." (Quoted in John
Spritzler ‘Do Jews Really Rule the World?’
http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Do%20Jews%20Rule_1.htm December 6,
2003).
Paul eisen is clear that most jews are complicit in the crimes of the
jews-only state in palestine, "Indeed, almost the entire organised
Jewish establishments throughout the western world, in Israel, Europe
and North America have used their power, influence and, most
importantly, their moral prestige to support Israel in its attempts to
subjugate the Palestinians. And not only have they offered their support
for these crimes. These same groups and individuals are also telling the
rest of the world that it's not really happening, that Israel is not the
aggressor, that Israel is not trying to destroy the Palestinian people,
that black is white. And not only do they deny this reality, anyone who
dares say otherwise is branded an anti-Semite and excluded from
society." (Paul Eisen ‘In Sight of Yad Vashem…. Jews and Deir Yassin
Remembrance - January 2003). He points out the dangers of such a stance,
"The crime against the Palestinian people is being committed by a Jewish
state with Jewish soldiers using weapons with Jewish religious symbols
all over them, and with the full support and complicity of the
overwhelming mass of organised Jews worldwide. But to name Jews as
responsible for this crime seems impossible to do. The past is just too
terrible. All of us know of the hatred and violence to which accusations
against Jews have led in the past. Also, if we were to examine
critically the role of Jews in this conflict, what would become of us
and of our struggle? Would we be labelled anti-Semites and lose much of
the support that we have worked so hard to gain?" (Paul Eisen ‘Jewish
Power’ http://www.righteousjews.org/article10.html August 19, 2004). As
hannah arendt once argued, "If you do not dissent then you consent."
The jews-only state in palestine and its racist policies are the
manifestations of perennial jewish religious belief in their divine
chosenness, that as people of the book they should abide only by laws
handed down to them by their jews-only god, and their divine superiority
over all other races on Earth. Even secular jews uphold the
non-religious counterpart of such supremacist attitudes in so much as
they believe in the jews-only state in palestine, the racist policies of
the jews-only state, and that the jews-only state in palestine should be
the only state in the world which is racially pure. All western
societies, and most other societies around the world, are becoming
increasingly multi-cultural. Only the jews-only state is going in the
opposite direction of ethnically cleansing its population to produce a
racially pure state.
http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/MCtfirm/10tf26/10tf26mg.html