WHY JUDEO-CHRISTIANS SUPPORT WAR 

C. E. Carlson 

The French author, Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote Democracy in America
when he traveled here in the first third of the 19th Century. In ringing
tones he sang the praises of America's invulnerable strength and spirit.
He attributed its greatness to its citizens' sense of morality... even
with the abundant church attendances he observed in America. De
Tocqueville wrote in French and is credited with this familiar quote:
AMERICA IS GREAT BECAUSE SHE IS GOOD, AND IF AMERICA EVER CEASES TO BE
GOOD, SHE WILL CEASE TO BE GREAT. 

De Tocqueville could see the power of America, but he could not have
known in 1830 that she was soon to be under an attack aimed at its
churches and the very sense of morality that he extolled. 

First, there was a War Between the States, which scarred the powerful
young nation in its strapping youth. A worse attack on America was to
commence near the turn of the 20th century. This was the onset of an
attack on American Christianity that continues unabated against the
traditional, Christ-following church. This attack, which author Gordon
Ginn calls "The final Apostasy," began with a small very wealthy and
determined European political movement. It had a dream, and the American
churches stood in its way. 

The World Zionist movement, as its Jewish founders called themselves,
had plans to acquire a homeland for all Jews worldwide, even though most
were far from homeless, and many did not want another home. Not any land
would do. World Zionists wanted a specific property that American
Christians called "the Holy Land." But if these Zionists read "Democracy
in America" or any of the journals of any of America's churches, which
no doubt they did, they could not help but know that Jerusalem was not
theirs to have. As self-proclaimed Jews, they were, according to the
Christian New Testament, the persecutors of Christ and most of his early
followers, and the engineers of his crucifixion. America's traditional
churches in the 19th Century would never stand for a Jewish occupation
of Jesus' homeland. 

World Zionist leaders initiated a program to change America and its
religious orientation. One of the tools used to accomplish this goal was
an obscure and malleable Civil War veteran named Cyrus I. Schofield. A
much larger tool was a venerable, world respected European book
publisher--The Oxford University Press. 

The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and
promoting a pro-Zionist subculture within Christianity. Scofield's role
was to re-write the King James Version of the Bible by inserting
Zionist-friendly notes in the margins, between verses and chapters, and
on the bottoms of the pages. The Oxford University Press used Scofield,
a pastor by then, as the Editor, probably because it needed such as man
for a front. The revised bible was called the Scofield Reference Bible,
and with limitless advertising and promotion, it became a best-selling
"bible" in America and has remained so for 90 years. 

The Scofield Reference Bible was not to be just another translation,
subverting minor passages a little at a time. No, Scofield produced a
revolutionary book that radically changed the context of the King James
Version. It was designed to create a subculture around a new worship
icon, the modern State of Israel, a state that did not yet exist, but
which was already on the drawing boards of the committed, well-funded
authors of World Zionism. 

Scofield's support came from a movement that took root around the turn
of the century, supposedly motivated by disillusionment over what it
considered the stagnation of the mainline American churches. Some of
these "reformers" were later to serve on Scofield's Editorial Committee.

Scofield imitated a chain of past heretics and rapturists, most of whose
credibility fizzled over their faulty end times prophesies. His mentor
was one John Nelson Darby from Scotland, who was associated with the
Plymouth Brethren and who made no less than six evangelical trips to the
US selling what is today called "Darbyism." It is from Darby that
Scofield is thought to have learned his Christian Zionist theology,
which he later planted in the footnotes of the Scofield Reference Bible.
It is possible that Scofield's interest in Darbyism was shared by Oxford
University Press, for Darby was known to Oxford University. A History of
The Plymouth Brethern By William Blair Neatby, M.A. 

The Oxford University Press owned "The Scofield Reference Bible" from
the beginning, as indicated by its copyright, and Scofield stated he
received handsome royalties from Oxford. Oxford's advertisers and
promoters succeeded in making Scofield's bible, with its Christian
Zionist footnotes, a standard for interpreting scripture in
Judeo-Christian churches, seminaries, and Bible study groups. It has
been published in at least four editions since its introduction in 1908
and remains one of the largest selling Bibles ever. 

The Scofield Reference Bible and its several clones is all but worshiped
in the ranks of celebrity Christians, beginning with the first media
icon, evangelist Billy Graham. Of particular importance to the Zionist
penetration of American Christian churches has been the fast growth of
national bible study organizations, such as Bible Study Fellowship and
Precept Ministries. These draw millions of students from not only
evangelical fundamentalist churches, but also from Catholic and mainline
Protestant churches and non-church contacts. These invariably teach
forms of "dispensationalism," which draw their theory, to various
degrees, from the notes in the Oxford Bible. 

Among more traditional churches that encourage, and in some cases
recommend, the use of the Scofield Reference Bible is the huge Southern
Baptist Convention of America, whose capture is World Zionism's crowning
achievement. 

Scofield, whose work is largely believed to be the product of Darby and
others, wisely chose not to change the text of the King James Edition.
Instead, he added hundreds of easy-to-read footnotes at the bottom of
about half of the pages, and as the Old English grammar of the KJE
becomes increasingly difficult for progressive generations of readers,
students become increasingly dependent on the modern language footnotes.

Scofield's notes weave parts of the Old and New Testaments together as
though all were written at the same time by the same people. This is a
favorite device of modern dispensationalists who essentially weigh all
scripture against the unspoken and preposterous theory that the older it
is, the more authoritative. In many cases the Oxford references prove to
be puzzling rabbit trails leading nowhere, simply diversions. Scofield's
borrowed ideas were later popularized under the labels and definitions
that have evolved into common usage today--"pre-millennialism,"
"dispensationalism," "Judeo-Christianity," and most recently the highly
political movement openly called "Christian Zionism." 

Thanks to the work of a few dedicated researchers, much of the
questionable personal history of Cyrus I. Scofield is available. It
reveals he was not a Bible scholar as one might expect, but a political
animal with the charm and talent for self-promotion of a Bill Clinton.
Scofield's background reveals a criminal history, a deserted wife, a
wrecked family, and a penchant for self-serving lies. He was exactly the
sort of man the World Zionists might hire to bend Christian thought--a
controllable man and one capable of carrying the secret to his grave.
(See The Incredible Scofield and His Book by Joseph M. Canfield). 

Other researchers have examined Scofield's eschatology and exposed his
original work as apostate and heretic to traditional Christian views.
Among these is a massive work by Stephen Sizer entitled 

  Christian Zionism
  Its History, Theology and Politics
  Christ Church Vicarage
  Virginia Water, 
  GU25 4LD, England 

We Hold These Truths is grateful to these dedicated researchers. Our own
examination of the Oxford Bible has gone in another direction, focusing
not on what Scofield wrote, but on some of the many additions and
deletions The Oxford University Press has continued to make to Scofield
Reference Bible since his death in 1921. These alterations have further
radicalized the Scofield Bible into a manual for the Christian worship
of the State of Israel beyond what Schofield would have dreamed of. This
un-Christian anti-Arab theology has permitted the theft of Palestine and
54 years of death and destruction against the Palestinians, with hardly
a complaint from the Judeo-Christian mass media evangelists or most
other American church leaders. We thank God for the exceptions. 

It is no exaggeration to say that the 1967 Oxford 4th Edition
deifies--makes a God of--the State of Israel, a state that did not even
exist when Scofield wrote the original footnotes in 1908. This writer
believes that, had it not been for misguided anti-Arab race hatred
promoted by Christian Zionist leaders in America, neither the Gulf War
nor the Israeli war against the Palestinians would have occurred, and a
million or more people who have perished would be alive today. 

What proof does WHTT have to incriminate World Zionism in a scheme to
control Christianity? For proof we offer the words themselves that were
planted in the 1967 Edition, 20 years after the State of Israel was
created in 1947, and 46 years after Scofield's death. The words tell us
that those who control the Oxford Press recreated a bible to misguide
Christians and sell flaming Zionism in the churches of America. 

There is little reason to believe that Scofield knew or cared much about
the Zionist movement, but at some point, he became involved in a close
and secret relationship with Samuel Untermeyer, a New York lawyer whose
firm still exists today and one of the wealthiest and most powerful
World Zionists in America. Untermeyer controlled the unbreakable thread
that connected him with Scofield. They shared a password and a common
watering hole--and it appears that Untermeyer may have been the one who
provided the money that Scofield himself lacked. Scofield's success as
an international bible editor without portfolio and his lavish living in
Europe could only have been accomplished with financial aid and
international influence. 

This connection might have remained hidden, were it not for the work of
Joseph M. Canfield, the author and researcher who discovered clues to
the thread in Scofield family papers. But even had the threads
connecting Scofield to Untermeyer and Zionism never been exposed, it
would still be obvious that that connection was there. It is significant
that Oxford, not Scofield, owned the book, and that after Scofield's
death, Oxford accelerated changes to it. Since the death of its original
author and namesake, The Scofield Reference Bible has gone through
several editions. Massive pro-Zionist notes were added to the 1967
edition, and some of Scofield's most significant notes from the original
editions were removed where they apparently failed to further Zionist
aims fast enough. Yet this edition retains the title, "The New Scofield
Reference Bible, Holy Bible, Editor C.I. Scofield." Its anti-Arab,
Christian subculture theology has made an enormous contribution to war,
turning Christians into participants in genocide against Arabs in the
latter half of the 20th century. 

The most convincing evidence of the unseen Zionist hand that wrote the
Scofield notes to the venerable King James Bible is the content of the
notes themselves, for only Zionists could have written them. These notes
are the subject of this paper. 

Oxford edited the former 1945 Edition of SRB in 1967, at the time of the
Six Day War when Israel occupied Palestine. The new footnotes to the
King James Bible presumptuously granted the rights to the Palestinians'
land to the State of Israel and specifically denied the Arab
Palestinians any such rights at all. One of the most brazen and
outrageous of these NEWLY INSERTED footnotes states: 

  "FOR A NATION TO COMMIT THE SIN OF ANTI-SEMITISM BRINGS INEVITABLE
  JUDGMENT." (page 19-20, footnote (3) to Genesis 12:3.) (our emphasis
  added) 

This statement sounds like something from Ariel Sharon, or the Chief
Rabbi in Tel Aviv, or Theodore Herzl, the founder of Modern Zionism. But
these exact words are found between the covers of the 1967 Edition of
the Oxford Bible that is followed by millions of American churchgoers
and students and is used by their leaders as a source for their
preaching and teaching. 

There is no word for "anti-Semitism" in the New Testament, nor is it
found among the Ten Commandments. "Sin," this writer was taught, is a
personal concept. It is something done by individuals in conflict with
God's words, not by "nations." Even Sodom did not sin--its people did.
The word "judgment" in the Bible always refers to God's action. In the
Christian New Testament, Jesus promises both judgment and salvation for
believing individuals, not for "nations." 

There was also no "State of Israel" when Scofield wrote his original
notes in his concocted Scofield Reference Bible in 1908. All references
to Israel as a state were added AFTER 1947, when Israel was granted
statehood by edict of the United Nations. The Oxford University Press
simply rewrote its version of the Christian Bible in 1967 to make
antipathy toward the "State of Israel" a "sin." Israel is made a god to
be worshiped, not merely a "state." David Ben-Gurion could not have
written it better. Perhaps he did write it! 

The Oxford 1967 Edition continues on page 19: 

  "(2) GOD MADE AN UNCONDITIONAL PROMISE OF BLESSINGS THROUGH ABRAM'S SEED
  (a) TO THE NATION OF ISRAEL TO INHERIT A SPECIFIC TERRITORY FOREVER" 
  
  "(3) THERE IS A PROMISE OF BLESSING UPON THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND NATIONS
  WHO BLESS ABRAM'S DESCENDANTS, AND A CURSE LAID UPON THOSE WHO PERSECUTE
  THE JEWS." (Page 19, 1967 Edition Genesis 12:1-3) 

This bequeath is joined to an Oxford prophesy that never occurs in the
Bible itself: 

  "IT HAS INVARIABLY FARED ILL WITH THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PERSECUTED THE
  JEW, WELL WITH THOSE WHO HAVE PROTECTED HIM." and "THE FUTURE WILL STILL
  MORE REMARKABLY PROVE THIS PRINCIPLE"(footnote (3) bottom of
  page19-20Genesis 12:3) 

None of these notes appeared in the original Scofield Reference Bible or
in the 1917 or 1945 editions. The state of Israel DID NOT EXIST in 1945,
and according to the best dictionaries of the time, the word "Israel"
only referred to a particular man and an ancient tribe, which is
consistent with the Bible text. See "Israel," Webster's New
International Dictionary 2nd (1950) Edition. 

All of this language, including the prophecy about the future being
really bad for those who "persecute the Jews," reflects and furthers the
goals of the Anti-Defamation League, which has a stated goal of creating
an environment where opposing the State of Israel is considered
"anti-Semitism," and "anti-Semitism" is a "hate crime" punishable by
law. This dream has become a reality in the Christian Zionist churches
of America. Only someone with these goals could have written this
footnote. 

The State of Israel's legal claims to Arab lands are based on the United
Nations Partitioning Agreement of 1947, which gave the Jews only a
fraction of the land they have since occupied by force. But when this
author went to Israel and asked various Israelis where they got the
right to occupy Palestine, each invariably said words to the effect that
"God gave it to us." This interpretation of Hebrew scripture stems from
the book of Genesis and is called the "Abrahamic Covenant". It is
repeated several times and begins with God's promise to a man called
Abraham who was eventually to become the grandfather of a man called
"Israel:" 

  "[2] AND I WILL MAKE OF THEE A GREAT NATION, AND I WILL BLESS THEE, AND
  MAKE THY NAME GREAT; AND THOU SHALL BE A BLESSING:" 
  
  "[3] AND I WILL BLESS THEM THAT BLESS THEE, AND CURSE HIM THAT CURSETH
  THEE: AND IN THEE SHALL ALL FAMILIES OF THE EARTH BE BLESSED." Genesis
  12:3, King James Edition. 

It is upon this promise to a single person that modern Israeli Zionists
base their claims to what amounts to the entire Mid-East. Its logic is
roughly the equivalent of someone claiming to be the heir to the John
Paul Getty estate because the great man had once sent a letter to
someone's cousin seven times removed containing the salutation "wishing
you my very best."

It is tempting to engage in academic arguments to show readers the lack
of logic in Scofield's theology, which has led followers of Christ so
far astray. It seems all too easy to refute the various Bible references
given in support of Scofield's strange writings. But we will resist the
temptation to do this, because others have already done it quite well,
and more importantly because it leads us off our course. 

It is also inviting to dig into Scofield's sordid past as Canfield has
done, revealing him to be a convicted felon and probable pathological
liar, but we leave that to others, because our interest is not in
Scofield's life, but in saving the lives of millions of innocent people
who are threatened by the continuing Zionist push for perpetual war. 

Instead, we will examine the words on their face. The words in these
1967 footnotes are Zionist propaganda that has been tacked onto the text
of a Christian Bible. Most of them make no sense, except to support the
Zionist State of Israel in its war against the Palestinians and any
other wars it may enter into. In this purpose, Zionism has completely
succeeded. American Judeo-Christians, more recently labeled "Christian
Zionists," have remained mute during wars upon Israel's enemies in
Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia and elsewhere. It is past time to
stop the spilling of more blood, some of it Christian blood. 

Now, for evidence of the intent of the Zionists deception of Christians,
let us examine some Scofield's notes THAT HAVE BEEN ALTERED OR REMOVED
by Oxford after his death. In 1908 Scofield wrote in 1908: 

  "THE CONTRAST, 'I KNOW THAT YE ARE ABRAHAM'S SEED' - 'IF YE WERE
  ABRAHAM'S CHILDREN' IS THAT BETWEEN THE NATURAL AND THE SPIRITUAL
  POSTERITY OF ABRAHAM. THE ISRAELITISH PEOPLE AND ISHMAELITISH PEOPLE ARE
  THE FORMER; ALL WHO ARE 'OF THE PRECIOUS FAITH WITH ABRAHAM,' WHETHER
  JEWS OR GENTILES, ARE THE LATTER (ROM 9, 6-8; GAL, 4-14. SEE 'ABRAHAMIC
  COVENANT' GEN 15, 18, NOTE)." ( Scofield's 1945 page 1127, note to John
  8:39) 

Compare that with the Oxford note substituted in the 1967 Edition: 

  "8:37 ALL JEWS ARE NATURAL DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM, BUT ARE NOT
  NECESSARILY HIS SPIRITUAL POSTERITY, CP Rom 9-6-8, Gal 3: 6-14" (Note
  (1) P1136, Oxford 1967 Edition, note to Jn 8:37.) 

How, pray tell, can "all Jews" be "natural descendants of Abraham," a
Chaldean who lived some 3000 years ago? Persons of all races are Jews
and new Jews are being converted every day from every race. One might as
well say all Lutherans are the natural descendants of Martin Luther; or
that all Baptists come from the loins of John the Baptist. This note
could only have been written by an Israeli patriot, for no one else
would have a vested interest in promoting this genetic nonsense. Shame
on those who accept this racism; it is apostate Christianity. 

The original Scofield note was far out of line with traditional
Christianity in 1908 and should have been treated as heresy then. Yet
Scofield had failed to go far enough for the Zionists. Scofield clearly
recognized what the book of Genesis states, that the sons of Ishmael are
co-heirs to Abraham's ancient promise. Did not Scofield say "the
Israelitish people and Ishmaelitish people are...the natural posterity
of Abraham"? The Oxford Press simply waited for Scofield to die and
changed it as they wished. 

And what is it that Scofield said that did not satisfy the Zionists who
rewrote the Oxford 1967 Edition? 

The answer is an easy one. Most Arab and Islamic scholars consider Arabs
in general and the Prophet Mohamed in particular to be direct
descendants of Ishmael, Abraham's first son and older half-brother of
Isaac, whose son Jacob was later to become known as "Israel." Many Arabs
believe that through Ishmael they are co-heirs of to Abraham's promise,
and they correctly believe that present-day Israelis have no Biblical
right to steal their land. Jewish Talmudic folklore also speaks of
Ishmael, so the Zionists apparently felt they had to alter how
Christians viewed the two half brothers in order to prevent Christians
from siding with the Arabs over the land theft. 

The Zionists solved this dilemma by inserting a senseless footnote in
the 1967 (Oxford) Scofield Reference Bible which, in effect, substitutes
the word "Jews" for the words "The Israelitish people and Ishmaelitish
people," as Scofield originally wrote it. The Israelitish and
Ishmaelitish people lived 3000 years ago, but the Zionists want to claim
the Arabs' part of the presumed birthright right now! Read it again;
"all Jews are natural descendants of Abraham, but are not necessarily
his spiritual posterity." 

And there is more of such boondogglery in the Oxford bible. On the same
page 1137 we find yet another brand new Zionist-friendly note referring
to the New Testament book of John 8:37. 

  "(2) 8:44 THAT THIS SATANIC FATHERHOOD CANNOT BE LIMITED TO THE
  PHARISEES IS MADE CLEAR IN 1Jn3:8-10" (note SRB 1967 Edition, P1137 to
  John 8:44) 

Let us look at the verse Oxford is trying to soften, wherein Jesus is
speaking directly to the Pharisees, who were the Jewish leaders of his
day, and to no one else: 

  "YE ARE OF YOUR FATHER THE DEVIL, AND THE LUST OF YOUR FATHER YE WILL
  DO. HE WAS A MURDERER FROM THE BEGINNING, AND ABODE NOT IN THE TRUTH,
  BECAUSE THERE IS NO TRUTH IN HIM. WHEN HE SPEAKEST A LIE, HE SPEAKEST OF
  HIS OWN; FOR HE IS A LIAR, AND THE FATHER OF IT." John 8:44 King James
  Ed.) 

Those are plain words. No wonder the Zionists wanted to dilute what
Jesus said. Not only did Oxford add a new footnote in 1967, but they
inserted no less than four reference cues into the King James sacred
text, directing readers to their specious, apostate footnotes. It seems
the Zionists cannot deny what Jesus said about Pharisees, but they do
not want to bear the burden of being "sons of Satan" all by themselves.
Now here's the text of the verse to which Oxford refers in order to try
to solve this problem: 

  "HE THAT COMMITETH SIN IS OF THE DEVIL; FOR THE DEVIL SINNETH FROM THE
  BEGINNING. FOR THIS PURPOSE THE SON OF GOD WAS MANIFESTED, THAT HE MIGHT
  DESTROY THE WORK OF THE DEVIL." (1Jn3:8.King James Edition) 

Fine, but this verse, spoken by Jesus to His followers in a speech about
avoiding sin, in no way supports Oxford's argument that Jesus was not
talking directly to and about the Pharisee leaders when he called them
"Sons of Satan" in John 8:44. It is a different book written at a
different time to a different audience. This is typical Christian
Zionist diversion. 

To find out to whom Jesus is speaking you must read the rest of John 8,
not something from another book. Furthermore, John 8:44 is only one of
some 77 verses where Jesus confronted the Pharisees by name and in many
cases addressed them as "satanic" and as "vipers." Oxford simply ignores
most of these denunciations by Jesus, adding no notes at all, and the
Christian Zionists go along without question. 

These are a few examples of Zionist perversions of scripture that have
shaped the doctrine of America's most politically powerful religious
subculture, the "Christian Zionists" as Ariel Sharon calls them, or the
dispensationalists, as intellectual followers call themselves, or the
Judeo-Christians as our politically-correct politicians describe
themselves. Today's Mid-East wars are not caused by the predisposition
of the peoples, who are no more warlike than any human tribes. Without
the pandering to Jewish and Zionist interests that is carried out by
this subculture--the most vocal being the celebrity Christian
evangelists--there would be no such wars, for there is not enough
support for war outside of organized Zionist Christianity. 

Reverend Stephen Sizer of Christ Church (Christ Church Vicarage, Virginia
Water, GU25 4LD, England) is perhaps the most dedicated new scholar
writing about the Scofield Bible craze, popularly known as Christian
Zionism. He has quipped, "Judging Christianity by looking at the
American Evangelists is kind of like judging the British by watching
Benny Hill." 

Reverend Sizer's remark brings to mind another Benny; his name is Benny
Hinn, not a British comic, but an American evangelist spouting
inflammatory hate-filled words aimed at Muslims everywhere. Hinn was
speaking to the applause of an aroused crowd of thousands in the
American Airline Center in Dallas when he shocked two Ft. Worth Star
Telegram religious reporters covering the July 3d event by announcing,
"We are on God's side," speaking of Palestine. He shouted, "This is not
a war between Jews and Arabs.. It is a war between God and the Devil."
Lest there be any doubt about it, Hinn was talking about a blood war in
which the Israelis are "God" and the Palestinians are "the Devil." 

Benny Hinn is one of hundreds of acknowledged Christian Zionists who
have no problem spouting outright race hatred and who join in
unconditional support for Israel without regard for which or how many of
Israel's enemies are killed or crippled. His boldness stems from his
knowledge that the vast majority of professing Christians from whom he
seeks his lavish support-the Judeo-Christians, or Christian Zionists--do
not shrink at his words, because they have been conditioned to accept
them, just as Roman citizens learned to accept Christian persecution,
even burning alive, under Nero. Several evangelists in attendance
affirmed their agreement with Hinn - "the line between Christians and
Muslims is the difference between good and evil." 

An amazing number of professing Christians are in agreement with the
fanatical likes of Hinn, including Gary Bauer, Ralph Reed, James Dobson
and hundreds more. Yet Hinn's profit-seeking fanaticism is not as
shocking as that of men like Richard Land of the Southern Baptist
Convention who occupy the highest positions in the area of conservative
religious thought. Land may have stopped short of branding all Muslims
as devils, but he attacked their leader and Prophet and stated that,
according to Baptist Bible interpretation, the Palestinian people have
no legal rights to property in Palestine. 

The more politically conservative and libertarian the speaker expressing
hatred for Islam, the more shocking the statement sounds. One example is
Samuel Blumenfeld, a veteran textbook author and advocate of home
education. His attack on Islam in a story entitled "Religion and
Satanism" in the April 2002 conservative Calvinist Chalcedon Report
leaves little room for civil liberties and freedom of thought. He
writes, "Islam is a religion ruled by Satan," and asks, "Can anyone
under the influence of Satan be trusted?" Blumenfeld shows poor judgment
and a lack of morality when he allows phrases such as "willing agents of
Satan," "another manifestation of Satanism" and "the willingness of
Muslims to believe blatant lies," to spill from his pen. 

How can anyone interpret these words by Land, Hinn, Blumenfeld, and yes,
our own President, as anything less than race hatred? Who would make
such generalized and transparently false statements against any other
minority except Muslims? 

About 100 million American Christians need to recover their true faith
in Christ Jesus, who never denounced any individual on account of his
group. Jesus even tried to save the Pharisees, and only denounced them
when they showed themselves to be deceivers. There is not a word in the
New Testament that urges any follower of Jesus to murder one child in
Iraq or condemn Palestine to death. Race hatred is a Zionist, not a
Christian, strategy. 

Christian Zionism may be the most bloodthirsty apostasy in the entire
history of Christianity or any other religion. Shame on its leaders:
they have already brought the blood of untold numbers innocent people
down upon the spires and prayer benches of America's churches. 

WHTT asks every Christian to share this article with pastors and church
leaders, especially lay leaders. We ask every Muslim and Jew who reads
it to do the same. You might wish to suspend giving money to any
organizations that preach Zionist race hatred in any form, especially
under the cover Jesus Christ. And lastly, We Hold These Truths invites
your informed comments and questions. 

Listen to: Kulture Klash II, How Oxford University Press and CI Scofield
stole the Christian Bible, WHTT "Internet Talk Radio" - also available
on tape. 

Copyright 2002, may be reproduced in full with permission. 

We Hold These Truths (WHTT) 

P.O. Box 14491 

Scottsdale, AZ 85267 

480-947-3329