    WHY JUDEO-CHRISTIANS SUPPORT WAR

    C. E. Carlson

    The French author, Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote Democracy in America
    when he traveled here in the first third of the 19th Century. In ringing
    tones he sang the praises of America's invulnerable strength and spirit.
    He attributed its greatness to its citizens' sense of morality... even
    with the abundant church attendances he observed in America. De
    Tocqueville wrote in French and is credited with this familiar quote:
    AMERICA IS GREAT BECAUSE SHE IS GOOD, AND IF AMERICA EVER CEASES TO BE
    GOOD, SHE WILL CEASE TO BE GREAT.

    De Tocqueville could see the power of America, but he could not have
    known in 1830 that she was soon to be under an attack aimed at its
    churches and the very sense of morality that he extolled.

    First, there was a War Between the States, which scarred the powerful
    young nation in its strapping youth. A worse attack on America was to
    commence near the turn of the 20th century. This was the onset of an
    attack on American Christianity that continues unabated against the
    traditional, Christ-following church. This attack, which author Gordon
    Ginn calls "The final Apostasy," began with a small very wealthy and
    determined European political movement. It had a dream, and the American
    churches stood in its way.

    The World Zionist movement, as its Jewish founders called themselves,
    had plans to acquire a homeland for all Jews worldwide, even though most
    were far from homeless, and many did not want another home. Not any land
    would do. World Zionists wanted a specific property that American
    Christians called "the Holy Land." But if these Zionists read "Democracy
    in America" or any of the journals of any of America's churches, which
    no doubt they did, they could not help but know that Jerusalem was not
    theirs to have. As self-proclaimed Jews, they were, according to the
    Christian New Testament, the persecutors of Christ and most of his early
    followers, and the engineers of his crucifixion. America's traditional
    churches in the 19th Century would never stand for a Jewish occupation
    of Jesus' homeland.

    World Zionist leaders initiated a program to change America and its
    religious orientation. One of the tools used to accomplish this goal was
    an obscure and malleable Civil War veteran named Cyrus I. Schofield. A
    much larger tool was a venerable, world respected European book
    publisher--The Oxford University Press.

    The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and
    promoting a pro-Zionist subculture within Christianity. Scofield's role
    was to re-write the King James Version of the Bible by inserting
    Zionist-friendly notes in the margins, between verses and chapters, and
    on the bottoms of the pages. The Oxford University Press used Scofield,
    a pastor by then, as the Editor, probably because it needed such as man
    for a front. The revised bible was called the Scofield Reference Bible,
    and with limitless advertising and promotion, it became a best-selling
    "bible" in America and has remained so for 90 years.

    The Scofield Reference Bible was not to be just another translation,
    subverting minor passages a little at a time. No, Scofield produced a
    revolutionary book that radically changed the context of the King James
    Version. It was designed to create a subculture around a new worship
    icon, the modern State of Israel, a state that did not yet exist, but
    which was already on the drawing boards of the committed, well-funded
    authors of World Zionism.

    Scofield's support came from a movement that took root around the turn
    of the century, supposedly motivated by disillusionment over what it
    considered the stagnation of the mainline American churches. Some of
    these "reformers" were later to serve on Scofield's Editorial Committee.

    Scofield imitated a chain of past heretics and rapturists, most of whose
    credibility fizzled over their faulty end times prophesies. His mentor
    was one John Nelson Darby from Scotland, who was associated with the
    Plymouth Brethren and who made no less than six evangelical trips to the
    US selling what is today called "Darbyism." It is from Darby that
    Scofield is thought to have learned his Christian Zionist theology,
    which he later planted in the footnotes of the Scofield Reference Bible.
    It is possible that Scofield's interest in Darbyism was shared by Oxford
    University Press, for Darby was known to Oxford University. A History of
    The Plymouth Brethern By William Blair Neatby, M.A.

    The Oxford University Press owned "The Scofield Reference Bible" from
    the beginning, as indicated by its copyright, and Scofield stated he
    received handsome royalties from Oxford. Oxford's advertisers and
    promoters succeeded in making Scofield's bible, with its Christian
    Zionist footnotes, a standard for interpreting scripture in
    Judeo-Christian churches, seminaries, and Bible study groups. It has
    been published in at least four editions since its introduction in 1908
    and remains one of the largest selling Bibles ever.

    The Scofield Reference Bible and its several clones is all but worshiped
    in the ranks of celebrity Christians, beginning with the first media
    icon, evangelist Billy Graham. Of particular importance to the Zionist
    penetration of American Christian churches has been the fast growth of
    national bible study organizations, such as Bible Study Fellowship and
    Precept Ministries. These draw millions of students from not only
    evangelical fundamentalist churches, but also from Catholic and mainline
    Protestant churches and non-church contacts. These invariably teach
    forms of "dispensationalism," which draw their theory, to various
    degrees, from the notes in the Oxford Bible.

    Among more traditional churches that encourage, and in some cases
    recommend, the use of the Scofield Reference Bible is the huge Southern
    Baptist Convention of America, whose capture is World Zionism's crowning
    achievement.

    Scofield, whose work is largely believed to be the product of Darby and
    others, wisely chose not to change the text of the King James Edition.
    Instead, he added hundreds of easy-to-read footnotes at the bottom of
    about half of the pages, and as the Old English grammar of the KJE
    becomes increasingly difficult for progressive generations of readers,
    students become increasingly dependent on the modern language footnotes.

    Scofield's notes weave parts of the Old and New Testaments together as
    though all were written at the same time by the same people. This is a
    favorite device of modern dispensationalists who essentially weigh all
    scripture against the unspoken and preposterous theory that the older it
    is, the more authoritative. In many cases the Oxford references prove to
    be puzzling rabbit trails leading nowhere, simply diversions. Scofield's
    borrowed ideas were later popularized under the labels and definitions
    that have evolved into common usage today--"pre-millennialism,"
    "dispensationalism," "Judeo-Christianity," and most recently the highly
    political movement openly called "Christian Zionism."

    Thanks to the work of a few dedicated researchers, much of the
    questionable personal history of Cyrus I. Scofield is available. It
    reveals he was not a Bible scholar as one might expect, but a political
    animal with the charm and talent for self-promotion of a Bill Clinton.
    Scofield's background reveals a criminal history, a deserted wife, a
    wrecked family, and a penchant for self-serving lies. He was exactly the
    sort of man the World Zionists might hire to bend Christian thought--a
    controllable man and one capable of carrying the secret to his grave.
    (See The Incredible Scofield and His Book by Joseph M. Canfield).

    Other researchers have examined Scofield's eschatology and exposed his
    original work as apostate and heretic to traditional Christian views.
    Among these is a massive work by Stephen Sizer entitled

      Christian Zionism
      Its History, Theology and Politics
      Christ Church Vicarage
      Virginia Water,
      GU25 4LD, England

    We Hold These Truths is grateful to these dedicated researchers. Our own
    examination of the Oxford Bible has gone in another direction, focusing
    not on what Scofield wrote, but on some of the many additions and
    deletions The Oxford University Press has continued to make to Scofield
    Reference Bible since his death in 1921. These alterations have further
    radicalized the Scofield Bible into a manual for the Christian worship
    of the State of Israel beyond what Schofield would have dreamed of. This
    un-Christian anti-Arab theology has permitted the theft of Palestine and
    54 years of death and destruction against the Palestinians, with hardly
    a complaint from the Judeo-Christian mass media evangelists or most
    other American church leaders. We thank God for the exceptions.

    It is no exaggeration to say that the 1967 Oxford 4th Edition
    deifies--makes a God of--the State of Israel, a state that did not even
    exist when Scofield wrote the original footnotes in 1908. This writer
    believes that, had it not been for misguided anti-Arab race hatred
    promoted by Christian Zionist leaders in America, neither the Gulf War
    nor the Israeli war against the Palestinians would have occurred, and a
    million or more people who have perished would be alive today.

    What proof does WHTT have to incriminate World Zionism in a scheme to
    control Christianity? For proof we offer the words themselves that were
    planted in the 1967 Edition, 20 years after the State of Israel was
    created in 1947, and 46 years after Scofield's death. The words tell us
    that those who control the Oxford Press recreated a bible to misguide
    Christians and sell flaming Zionism in the churches of America.

    There is little reason to believe that Scofield knew or cared much about
    the Zionist movement, but at some point, he became involved in a close
    and secret relationship with Samuel Untermeyer, a New York lawyer whose
    firm still exists today and one of the wealthiest and most powerful
    World Zionists in America. Untermeyer controlled the unbreakable thread
    that connected him with Scofield. They shared a password and a common
    watering hole--and it appears that Untermeyer may have been the one who
    provided the money that Scofield himself lacked. Scofield's success as
    an international bible editor without portfolio and his lavish living in
    Europe could only have been accomplished with financial aid and
    international influence.

    This connection might have remained hidden, were it not for the work of
    Joseph M. Canfield, the author and researcher who discovered clues to
    the thread in Scofield family papers. But even had the threads
    connecting Scofield to Untermeyer and Zionism never been exposed, it
    would still be obvious that that connection was there. It is significant
    that Oxford, not Scofield, owned the book, and that after Scofield's
    death, Oxford accelerated changes to it. Since the death of its original
    author and namesake, The Scofield Reference Bible has gone through
    several editions. Massive pro-Zionist notes were added to the 1967
    edition, and some of Scofield's most significant notes from the original
    editions were removed where they apparently failed to further Zionist
    aims fast enough. Yet this edition retains the title, "The New Scofield
    Reference Bible, Holy Bible, Editor C.I. Scofield." Its anti-Arab,
    Christian subculture theology has made an enormous contribution to war,
    turning Christians into participants in genocide against Arabs in the
    latter half of the 20th century.

    The most convincing evidence of the unseen Zionist hand that wrote the
    Scofield notes to the venerable King James Bible is the content of the
    notes themselves, for only Zionists could have written them. These notes
    are the subject of this paper.

    Oxford edited the former 1945 Edition of SRB in 1967, at the time of the
    Six Day War when Israel occupied Palestine. The new footnotes to the
    King James Bible presumptuously granted the rights to the Palestinians'
    land to the State of Israel and specifically denied the Arab
    Palestinians any such rights at all. One of the most brazen and
    outrageous of these NEWLY INSERTED footnotes states:

      "FOR A NATION TO COMMIT THE SIN OF ANTI-SEMITISM BRINGS INEVITABLE
      JUDGMENT." (page 19-20, footnote (3) to Genesis 12:3.) (our emphasis
      added)

    This statement sounds like something from Ariel Sharon, or the Chief
    Rabbi in Tel Aviv, or Theodore Herzl, the founder of Modern Zionism. But
    these exact words are found between the covers of the 1967 Edition of
    the Oxford Bible that is followed by millions of American churchgoers
    and students and is used by their leaders as a source for their
    preaching and teaching.

    There is no word for "anti-Semitism" in the New Testament, nor is it
    found among the Ten Commandments. "Sin," this writer was taught, is a
    personal concept. It is something done by individuals in conflict with
    God's words, not by "nations." Even Sodom did not sin--its people did.
    The word "judgment" in the Bible always refers to God's action. In the
    Christian New Testament, Jesus promises both judgment and salvation for
    believing individuals, not for "nations."

    There was also no "State of Israel" when Scofield wrote his original
    notes in his concocted Scofield Reference Bible in 1908. All references
    to Israel as a state were added AFTER 1947, when Israel was granted
    statehood by edict of the United Nations. The Oxford University Press
    simply rewrote its version of the Christian Bible in 1967 to make
    antipathy toward the "State of Israel" a "sin." Israel is made a god to
    be worshiped, not merely a "state." David Ben-Gurion could not have
    written it better. Perhaps he did write it!

    The Oxford 1967 Edition continues on page 19:

      "(2) GOD MADE AN UNCONDITIONAL PROMISE OF BLESSINGS THROUGH ABRAM'S SEED
      (a) TO THE NATION OF ISRAEL TO INHERIT A SPECIFIC TERRITORY FOREVER"

      "(3) THERE IS A PROMISE OF BLESSING UPON THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND NATIONS
      WHO BLESS ABRAM'S DESCENDANTS, AND A CURSE LAID UPON THOSE WHO PERSECUTE
      THE JEWS." (Page 19, 1967 Edition Genesis 12:1-3)

    This bequeath is joined to an Oxford prophesy that never occurs in the
    Bible itself:

      "IT HAS INVARIABLY FARED ILL WITH THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PERSECUTED THE
      JEW, WELL WITH THOSE WHO HAVE PROTECTED HIM." and "THE FUTURE WILL STILL
      MORE REMARKABLY PROVE THIS PRINCIPLE"(footnote (3) bottom of
      page19-20Genesis 12:3)

    None of these notes appeared in the original Scofield Reference Bible or
    in the 1917 or 1945 editions. The state of Israel DID NOT EXIST in 1945,
    and according to the best dictionaries of the time, the word "Israel"
    only referred to a particular man and an ancient tribe, which is
    consistent with the Bible text. See "Israel," Webster's New
    International Dictionary 2nd (1950) Edition.

    All of this language, including the prophecy about the future being
    really bad for those who "persecute the Jews," reflects and furthers the
    goals of the Anti-Defamation League, which has a stated goal of creating
    an environment where opposing the State of Israel is considered
    "anti-Semitism," and "anti-Semitism" is a "hate crime" punishable by
    law. This dream has become a reality in the Christian Zionist churches
    of America. Only someone with these goals could have written this
    footnote.

    The State of Israel's legal claims to Arab lands are based on the United
    Nations Partitioning Agreement of 1947, which gave the Jews only a
    fraction of the land they have since occupied by force. But when this
    author went to Israel and asked various Israelis where they got the
    right to occupy Palestine, each invariably said words to the effect that
    "God gave it to us." This interpretation of Hebrew scripture stems from
    the book of Genesis and is called the "Abrahamic Covenant". It is
    repeated several times and begins with God's promise to a man called
    Abraham who was eventually to become the grandfather of a man called
    "Israel:"

      "[2] AND I WILL MAKE OF THEE A GREAT NATION, AND I WILL BLESS THEE, AND
      MAKE THY NAME GREAT; AND THOU SHALL BE A BLESSING:"

      "[3] AND I WILL BLESS THEM THAT BLESS THEE, AND CURSE HIM THAT CURSETH
      THEE: AND IN THEE SHALL ALL FAMILIES OF THE EARTH BE BLESSED." Genesis
      12:3, King James Edition.

    It is upon this promise to a single person that modern Israeli Zionists
    base their claims to what amounts to the entire Mid-East. Its logic is
    roughly the equivalent of someone claiming to be the heir to the John
    Paul Getty estate because the great man had once sent a letter to
    someone's cousin seven times removed containing the salutation "wishing
    you my very best."

    It is tempting to engage in academic arguments to show readers the lack
    of logic in Scofield's theology, which has led followers of Christ so
    far astray. It seems all too easy to refute the various Bible references
    given in support of Scofield's strange writings. But we will resist the
    temptation to do this, because others have already done it quite well,
    and more importantly because it leads us off our course.

    It is also inviting to dig into Scofield's sordid past as Canfield has
    done, revealing him to be a convicted felon and probable pathological
    liar, but we leave that to others, because our interest is not in
    Scofield's life, but in saving the lives of millions of innocent people
    who are threatened by the continuing Zionist push for perpetual war.

    Instead, we will examine the words on their face. The words in these
    1967 footnotes are Zionist propaganda that has been tacked onto the text
    of a Christian Bible. Most of them make no sense, except to support the
    Zionist State of Israel in its war against the Palestinians and any
    other wars it may enter into. In this purpose, Zionism has completely
    succeeded. American Judeo-Christians, more recently labeled "Christian
    Zionists," have remained mute during wars upon Israel's enemies in
    Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia and elsewhere. It is past time to
    stop the spilling of more blood, some of it Christian blood.

    Now, for evidence of the intent of the Zionists deception of Christians,
    let us examine some Scofield's notes THAT HAVE BEEN ALTERED OR REMOVED
    by Oxford after his death. In 1908 Scofield wrote in 1908:

      "THE CONTRAST, 'I KNOW THAT YE ARE ABRAHAM'S SEED' - 'IF YE WERE
      ABRAHAM'S CHILDREN' IS THAT BETWEEN THE NATURAL AND THE SPIRITUAL
      POSTERITY OF ABRAHAM. THE ISRAELITISH PEOPLE AND ISHMAELITISH PEOPLE ARE
      THE FORMER; ALL WHO ARE 'OF THE PRECIOUS FAITH WITH ABRAHAM,' WHETHER
      JEWS OR GENTILES, ARE THE LATTER (ROM 9, 6-8; GAL, 4-14. SEE 'ABRAHAMIC
      COVENANT' GEN 15, 18, NOTE)." ( Scofield's 1945 page 1127, note to John
      8:39)

    Compare that with the Oxford note substituted in the 1967 Edition:

      "8:37 ALL JEWS ARE NATURAL DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM, BUT ARE NOT
      NECESSARILY HIS SPIRITUAL POSTERITY, CP Rom 9-6-8, Gal 3: 6-14" (Note
      (1) P1136, Oxford 1967 Edition, note to Jn 8:37.)

    How, pray tell, can "all Jews" be "natural descendants of Abraham," a
    Chaldean who lived some 3000 years ago? Persons of all races are Jews
    and new Jews are being converted every day from every race. One might as
    well say all Lutherans are the natural descendants of Martin Luther; or
    that all Baptists come from the loins of John the Baptist. This note
    could only have been written by an Israeli patriot, for no one else
    would have a vested interest in promoting this genetic nonsense. Shame
    on those who accept this racism; it is apostate Christianity.

    The original Scofield note was far out of line with traditional
    Christianity in 1908 and should have been treated as heresy then. Yet
    Scofield had failed to go far enough for the Zionists. Scofield clearly
    recognized what the book of Genesis states, that the sons of Ishmael are
    co-heirs to Abraham's ancient promise. Did not Scofield say "the
    Israelitish people and Ishmaelitish people are...the natural posterity
    of Abraham"? The Oxford Press simply waited for Scofield to die and
    changed it as they wished.

    And what is it that Scofield said that did not satisfy the Zionists who
    rewrote the Oxford 1967 Edition?

    The answer is an easy one. Most Arab and Islamic scholars consider Arabs
    in general and the Prophet Mohamed in particular to be direct
    descendants of Ishmael, Abraham's first son and older half-brother of
    Isaac, whose son Jacob was later to become known as "Israel." Many Arabs
    believe that through Ishmael they are co-heirs of to Abraham's promise,
    and they correctly believe that present-day Israelis have no Biblical
    right to steal their land. Jewish Talmudic folklore also speaks of
    Ishmael, so the Zionists apparently felt they had to alter how
    Christians viewed the two half brothers in order to prevent Christians
    from siding with the Arabs over the land theft.

    The Zionists solved this dilemma by inserting a senseless footnote in
    the 1967 (Oxford) Scofield Reference Bible which, in effect, substitutes
    the word "Jews" for the words "The Israelitish people and Ishmaelitish
    people," as Scofield originally wrote it. The Israelitish and
    Ishmaelitish people lived 3000 years ago, but the Zionists want to claim
    the Arabs' part of the presumed birthright right now! Read it again;
    "all Jews are natural descendants of Abraham, but are not necessarily
    his spiritual posterity."

    And there is more of such boondogglery in the Oxford bible. On the same
    page 1137 we find yet another brand new Zionist-friendly note referring
    to the New Testament book of John 8:37.

      "(2) 8:44 THAT THIS SATANIC FATHERHOOD CANNOT BE LIMITED TO THE
      PHARISEES IS MADE CLEAR IN 1Jn3:8-10" (note SRB 1967 Edition, P1137 to
      John 8:44)

    Let us look at the verse Oxford is trying to soften, wherein Jesus is
    speaking directly to the Pharisees, who were the Jewish leaders of his
    day, and to no one else:

      "YE ARE OF YOUR FATHER THE DEVIL, AND THE LUST OF YOUR FATHER YE WILL
      DO. HE WAS A MURDERER FROM THE BEGINNING, AND ABODE NOT IN THE TRUTH,
      BECAUSE THERE IS NO TRUTH IN HIM. WHEN HE SPEAKEST A LIE, HE SPEAKEST OF
      HIS OWN; FOR HE IS A LIAR, AND THE FATHER OF IT." John 8:44 King James
      Ed.)

    Those are plain words. No wonder the Zionists wanted to dilute what
    Jesus said. Not only did Oxford add a new footnote in 1967, but they
    inserted no less than four reference cues into the King James sacred
    text, directing readers to their specious, apostate footnotes. It seems
    the Zionists cannot deny what Jesus said about Pharisees, but they do
    not want to bear the burden of being "sons of Satan" all by themselves.
    Now here's the text of the verse to which Oxford refers in order to try
    to solve this problem:

      "HE THAT COMMITETH SIN IS OF THE DEVIL; FOR THE DEVIL SINNETH FROM THE
      BEGINNING. FOR THIS PURPOSE THE SON OF GOD WAS MANIFESTED, THAT HE MIGHT
      DESTROY THE WORK OF THE DEVIL." (1Jn3:8.King James Edition)

    Fine, but this verse, spoken by Jesus to His followers in a speech about
    avoiding sin, in no way supports Oxford's argument that Jesus was not
    talking directly to and about the Pharisee leaders when he called them
    "Sons of Satan" in John 8:44. It is a different book written at a
    different time to a different audience. This is typical Christian
    Zionist diversion.

    To find out to whom Jesus is speaking you must read the rest of John 8,
    not something from another book. Furthermore, John 8:44 is only one of
    some 77 verses where Jesus confronted the Pharisees by name and in many
    cases addressed them as "satanic" and as "vipers." Oxford simply ignores
    most of these denunciations by Jesus, adding no notes at all, and the
    Christian Zionists go along without question.

    These are a few examples of Zionist perversions of scripture that have
    shaped the doctrine of America's most politically powerful religious
    subculture, the "Christian Zionists" as Ariel Sharon calls them, or the
    dispensationalists, as intellectual followers call themselves, or the
    Judeo-Christians as our politically-correct politicians describe
    themselves. Today's Mid-East wars are not caused by the predisposition
    of the peoples, who are no more warlike than any human tribes. Without
    the pandering to Jewish and Zionist interests that is carried out by
    this subculture--the most vocal being the celebrity Christian
    evangelists--there would be no such wars, for there is not enough
    support for war outside of organized Zionist Christianity.

    Reverend Stephen Sizer of Christ Church (Christ Church Vicarage, Virginia
    Water, GU25 4LD, England) is perhaps the most dedicated new scholar
    writing about the Scofield Bible craze, popularly known as Christian
    Zionism. He has quipped, "Judging Christianity by looking at the
    American Evangelists is kind of like judging the British by watching
    Benny Hill."

    Reverend Sizer's remark brings to mind another Benny; his name is Benny
    Hinn, not a British comic, but an American evangelist spouting
    inflammatory hate-filled words aimed at Muslims everywhere. Hinn was
    speaking to the applause of an aroused crowd of thousands in the
    American Airline Center in Dallas when he shocked two Ft. Worth Star
    Telegram religious reporters covering the July 3d event by announcing,
    "We are on God's side," speaking of Palestine. He shouted, "This is not
    a war between Jews and Arabs.. It is a war between God and the Devil."
    Lest there be any doubt about it, Hinn was talking about a blood war in
    which the Israelis are "God" and the Palestinians are "the Devil."

    Benny Hinn is one of hundreds of acknowledged Christian Zionists who
    have no problem spouting outright race hatred and who join in
    unconditional support for Israel without regard for which or how many of
    Israel's enemies are killed or crippled. His boldness stems from his
    knowledge that the vast majority of professing Christians from whom he
    seeks his lavish support-the Judeo-Christians, or Christian Zionists--do
    not shrink at his words, because they have been conditioned to accept
    them, just as Roman citizens learned to accept Christian persecution,
    even burning alive, under Nero. Several evangelists in attendance
    affirmed their agreement with Hinn - "the line between Christians and
    Muslims is the difference between good and evil."

    An amazing number of professing Christians are in agreement with the
    fanatical likes of Hinn, including Gary Bauer, Ralph Reed, James Dobson
    and hundreds more. Yet Hinn's profit-seeking fanaticism is not as
    shocking as that of men like Richard Land of the Southern Baptist
    Convention who occupy the highest positions in the area of conservative
    religious thought. Land may have stopped short of branding all Muslims
    as devils, but he attacked their leader and Prophet and stated that,
    according to Baptist Bible interpretation, the Palestinian people have
    no legal rights to property in Palestine.

    The more politically conservative and libertarian the speaker expressing
    hatred for Islam, the more shocking the statement sounds. One example is
    Samuel Blumenfeld, a veteran textbook author and advocate of home
    education. His attack on Islam in a story entitled "Religion and
    Satanism" in the April 2002 conservative Calvinist Chalcedon Report
    leaves little room for civil liberties and freedom of thought. He
    writes, "Islam is a religion ruled by Satan," and asks, "Can anyone
    under the influence of Satan be trusted?" Blumenfeld shows poor judgment
    and a lack of morality when he allows phrases such as "willing agents of
    Satan," "another manifestation of Satanism" and "the willingness of
    Muslims to believe blatant lies," to spill from his pen.

    How can anyone interpret these words by Land, Hinn, Blumenfeld, and yes,
    our own President, as anything less than race hatred? Who would make
    such generalized and transparently false statements against any other
    minority except Muslims?

    About 100 million American Christians need to recover their true faith
    in Christ Jesus, who never denounced any individual on account of his
    group. Jesus even tried to save the Pharisees, and only denounced them
    when they showed themselves to be deceivers. There is not a word in the
    New Testament that urges any follower of Jesus to murder one child in
    Iraq or condemn Palestine to death. Race hatred is a Zionist, not a
    Christian, strategy.

    Christian Zionism may be the most bloodthirsty apostasy in the entire
    history of Christianity or any other religion. Shame on its leaders:
    they have already brought the blood of untold numbers innocent people
    down upon the spires and prayer benches of America's churches.

    WHTT asks every Christian to share this article with pastors and church
    leaders, especially lay leaders. We ask every Muslim and Jew who reads
    it to do the same. You might wish to suspend giving money to any
    organizations that preach Zionist race hatred in any form, especially
    under the cover Jesus Christ. And lastly, We Hold These Truths invites
    your informed comments and questions.

    Listen to: Kulture Klash II, How Oxford University Press and CI Scofield
    stole the Christian Bible, WHTT "Internet Talk Radio" - also available
    on tape.

    Copyright 2002, may be reproduced in full with permission.

    We Hold These Truths (WHTT)

    P.O. Box 14491

    Scottsdale, AZ 85267

    480-947-3329