    Deconstructing Blair

    by Ian Buckley

    In Washington, some days ago, Tony Blair finally acknowledged that the
    Iraq war had "split the world". Now a quibble is in order over the use
    of the term 'war'. To use the memorable words of David Icke, this 'war'
    was the equivalent of putting your granny into the boxing ring with Mike
    Tyson. Nor did this unequal conflict split the world. There was the Axis
    of Idiocy on one side ( plus minor players who could bribed or cajoled
    into providing troops) and the rest of the world on the other. Indeed,
    many citizens of Britain and America opposed this grotesque outburst of
    state violence, an astonishing number when one considers the
    mind-moulding qualities of the modern mass media.

    They are few, and we are many; although admittedly it doesn't often feel
    like that.

    I said state violence - but would not the correct word be terrorism? But
    Blair only applies that latter term to incidents ( largely manufactured,
    by the way) which are purportedly directed against the
    Anglo-American-Zionist imperium. For this mostly artificial growth of
    ersatz terrorism, the apparent remedy is the "universal application of
    global values". Ah, we get the drift - disco bars, KFC and Coca-Cola in
    Mecca and Medinah perhaps? They have ways of making you enjoy yourself!
    Although it isn't real enjoyment, more a melancholy distraction in the
    commercialist wasteland that has shredded the true culture of Europe to
    ribbons.

    But then 'global values' lead on inevitably to a 'global agenda'. He
    tells us that this 'global agenda' is largely already agreed. Surprise,
    surprise! The salient question is : who makes this global agenda? Most
    probably not Tony, who hasn't had an original thought in his head since
    Gideon Meir introduced him to Michael Levy back in '94. Incidentally,
    this pre-formed global agenda makes a mockery of all the insincere
    pro-forma references to 'freedom' and 'democracy'.

    But what sort of democracy do we have here :
    http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1784694,00.html ? As the
    writer says, a pernicious mix of big business and busybodies now rules
    over William Blake's old Albion. Unlike the old USSR, there is no
    bedrock of security to compensate for the lack of freedom. The National
    Health Service in Britain is dismantled piecemeal, by stealth and hardly
    exists in certain areas of treatment - a simple tooth filling now
    costing £40. America, of course, has no health service to lose, the
    'wallet biopsy' having been the norm for years. But, dear me, the old
    Iraq - before the ghouls were unleashed to annihilate an entire society
    - had a quite adequate public health service.

    "Globalisation begets interdependence. Interdependence begets the
    necessity of a common value system to make it work." Here the leader of
    Britain's fake Labour party begins to replicate the cadences of the
    boring bits of the Old Testament. No doubt this is to acclimatise us to
    the more, shall we say, interesting Biblical stuff awaiting us - like
    Armageddon!

    But the major emphasis of the speech of the great blabber was on some
    new concept entitled progressive pre-emption. Now that useful euphemism
    stands in the place of a reality that is presumably very nasty indeed.
    This progressive pre-emption must resemble the 'whacking' of the Cosa
    Nostra, but upon a massive and global scale. Instead of revolvers,
    blackjacks and concrete shoes, thermobaric bombs and Cruise missiles!

    Consigliere Blair of the New World Order has a good line in smooth
    menace, a little like an effete version of George Sanders. Consider his
    chilling reference to "a far more concentrated and concerted strategy
    across the whole region". Translated into proper English - as opposed to
    globalist marketing-speech - does this mean Haditha massacres for Syria
    and Iran too? See through the illusion. Beyond the podium and the Armani
    suits, the gouts of blood on the desert sands, and the minaret
    pockmarked with M-16 bullets.

    Indeed, Blair explicitly stated in the speech that : "I don't believe we
    will be secure unless Iran changes.' As with Tonto asking the Lone
    Ranger, "What's all this we, paleface", we are entitled to ask who is
    this 'we'. Certainly not the thousands of car workers made redundant in
    Britain, or the 2.8 million Americans now imprisoned in jail. This 'we'
    is the globalist elite, which has largely sponsored, controlled and
    maintained Blair throughout his entire career. No wonder he has to
    please them with a speech that plainly contradicts reality.

    WAR IS PEACE

    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

    BLAIR HAS SPOKEN!
    -----------------------------------------
    A fuller account of the speech than anyone would ever want to read can
    be found at :

    www.epolitix.com/EN/News/200605/150f6988-648b-4896-a148-bc7fcb709a1f.htm

    From the List Publisher:

    Our readers also recommended to look up these articles:

    (1)

    http://www.counterpunch.org/clark06032006.html

    June 3 / 4, 2006, How It All Began: Truman and Israel, By HARRY CLARK

    (2)

    http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/05/my-jewish-problem-cted-my-tribe-
    is-no-longer-a-progressive-p.html

    (3)

    http://www.marek.glogoczowski.zaprasza.net/

    Site of our friend Marek Glogoczowski, something in English, something
    in French and something in Polish - very interesting political
    philosophy.

    (4) http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/

    Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ.

    This is a request for prayer.

    On Monday June 5 we have a final hearing before the Federal Court in
    Sydney. This is the climax of twelve years of persecution we have
    received through all forms of national media and on the internet. Please
    remember me and the Church is prayer, and Pray for the Jews, Mr. Jeremy
    Jones and the board of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, for
    their Jewish legal team R.M. Goot SC, Mr.R S.E.J. Prince and Mr. Steven
    Lewis, as well as Judge Conti.

    To God be the glory.

    Your brother-in-Christ, Anthony Grigor-Scott

    Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered
    full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their
    congregations in other countries. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny
    congregation, and is available to teach in your church.

    (5)
    http://www.ziopedia.org/components/com_mambowiki/index.php?title=
    Elie_Wiesel

    Non-Zionist version of wikipedia, ziopedia, is on the way, with this
    article on Elie Wiesel.

    (6) http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HF02Ak01.html

    Alas in Wonderland...

    (7) Jews against Christ:

    http://www.jewsonfirst.org/

    (8) http://newdemocracyworld.org/Revolution/National%20Interest.htm

    DO AMERICANS HAVE A "NATIONAL INTEREST?" by John Spritzler June 2, 2006
    [newdemocracyworld.org]

    (9) On American Gulag:

    http://observer.guardian.co.uk/columnists/story/0,,1782114,00.html