    The Moral Values may unite Muslims with the Red States, writes Joh Domingo in

    Toppling Liberty

    When the imperial American forces were searching for a symbolic image to
    celebrate the initial success of their invasion of Iraq, they settled
    for the image of a toppling statue of Saddam Hussien. With the
    deconstruction of Communism, it was the statues of Soviet icons that
    were craned amidst great fanfare. What icon shall we choose to symbolize
    the fall of the American Empire? Who will be the liberators, and who
    will wallow in despair? It is a question that has crossed my mind
    frequently since the spectacle of mass democracy in America on Nov 2,
    2004.

    It is plain that the vast majority of Americans are attached to their
    murderous, tyrannical State. Most of them voted for either John Kerry,
    who vowed to continue the imperial wars, or George Bush jnr., who vows
    to continue the imperial wars. Clearly there was a microscopic segment
    that refused to partake of this depraved spectacle, but let us face it,
    most of them were not `progressives'. Progressives were clearly
    motivated by the larger issues, to fight for the right of their lesbian
    daughters to marry their partners. They were crushed when both their
    aging war liberal, and the attempt to legalize homo-marriage, failed.

    For the rest of us, those not encumbered by American citizenship, it is
    a no-win situation, whoever won. Our predicament however does not mean
    that we should be blind to the situation, there are significant
    differences between those who voted for Bush, and those who voted for
    Kerry. Both sides have their freaks, but it is the core we should
    concern ourselves about; what is it that really drives them, and are
    they really `normal' as is suggested, but delusional?

    By now, we have had a glut of left apologia; about why they partake in
    imperial rituals disguised as `democracy'. If we are to have an
    International Imperial dictator, they aver anyone but Bush will do.
    Failing to realize that what they are saying is that; if we are to have
    freedom and `values' shoved down our throats, better it be Kerry's (and
    their) values. Ignoring the indigestion either would entail, I beg to
    differ, better to have Conservative values, if we must have war from
    both. I rather suspect many Bush voters intelligently deciphered the
    issues in this manner as well. Given the bi-polar choice of succumbing
    to Christian values of Bush, and secular atheist values of Kerry,
    Christian values would be more palatable to Muslims - just as Christian
    values are more palatable to American Reds. In a war between Islam and
    Christianity, Atheist win.

    Let us not underestimate the appetite for war of the conservative base,
    and unmistakable sign is that they are sending their sons and daughters
    to die for the imperial cause. An examination of US casualties indicates
    that Kerry's `Blue States' are underrepresented in proportion to Bush's
    `Red States'. This would suggest that Americans in Red States would
    `support the troops', because they are their own, even if they are
    ambivalent about the war. Blue warmongers, on the other hand, are
    ideologically pre-disposed to war, because they don't fight in them, and
    more often than not, do not even know anyone fighting in Iraq. In the
    electoral contest, Conservative antiwar voters had no other option but
    to vote for Bush. At least he pretended to stand for their values. Kerry
    promised a vaudeville freak show in comparison.

    Given the absolute brainwashing and mind-control of American society, it
    is hard to decipher if the canon-fodder belatedly realize the extent of
    the subversion of their culture and values. We are therefore reduced to
    taking to heart even the faintest indication that a backlash is brewing.
    Do not expect an American Revolution anytime soon; if one were to brew,
    it will not emerge from the vociferous chattering class, but would come
    from the red heart. In this electoral battle, the warmakers won, as they
    always were going to, but the cultural imperialists lost. In doing so
    they provided for us an incompetent Commander in Chief, and a faltering
    of cultural dissolution.

    Cultural dissolution is the chief aim of many unconnected liberal
    warmongers. Red Staters don't care if Muslim women wear the veil, or if
    Dictators rule Arab Countries - Cultural Dissolutionists do. Red Staters
    care about abortion, and they would object if people were bombed to
    force them to allow the murder of the unborn. They would object, if
    homosexuality were enforced at the barrel of a gun. Liberals might
    sometimes object to war, if a conservative initiates it, but they
    approve the enforcement of Abortion, and homosexuality. For them, it is
    the only positive that might emerge from the whole sordid affair. But
    liberals don't fight imperial wars, Red Staters do. It is to this core
    that the warmakers appeal, both Kerry and Bush. It is time that we
    undermined that appeal, by exposing the cultural dissolution agenda of
    the warmakers.

    It is not Muslims that aim to kill their children, it is Bush that
    presided over the murder of almost four million American babies during
    the first four years of his Presidency. Kerry proposed to do nothing
    about it either. Muslims don't hate homosexuality, they regard it as a
    disease, and is hardly something to celebrate, and be `gay' about.

    Too many antiwar people expressed disappointment that the main `issue'
    of this electoral farce was moral values. But it was probably the most
    fundamental expression of solidarity with the Muslim world to emerge
    from America in recent years. Far from discouraging it, Muslims should
    amplify this convergence of values, and champion the liberation of
    American Families from the parasitic scourge of liberal cultural
    dissolution. Perhaps this will go some way towards stopping them from
    hating us so.

    It will be hard to imagine for Americans, but despite any sincere
    intentions of the French; they did them no great service when they
    exported the lady Statue of Liberty to their shores. It signified the
    birth of Liberty, Justice and Equality in the newly liberated colony,
    but it was a secular Justice, Equalized moral/immoral actions, and it
    Liberated people from the confines of ethical values developed over
    centuries. Far from welcoming immigrants into an equal society, it
    farewells imperial adventures to exotic lands. Time to topple it into
    the sea.

    JohD