    Saddam Bound

    By Israel Shamir

    - Turn on the TV, - my wife, alerted by a phone call, yelled from the
    kitchen. On the screen was George W. Bush's mug photo with a caption reading
    'Bush - the former dictator is arrested'.

    I can't deny it was a moment of great elation. Indeed, Mr Bush deserved to
    be arrested and tried - for his invasion of sovereign Iraq and Afghanistan,
    for the thousands of dead and tortured men and women wherever he took his
    War on Islam, for his support of ENRON, and for his doubtful role in
    September 11. In light of the Patriot Act which gave the government broader
    surveillance authority and erased the traditional American liberties, and
    for the unconstitutional way he got to the White House, Mr Bush can indeed
    be called 'a dictator'. But 'former'? Had the people of the United States
    shown themselves the worthy heirs to George Washington and Thomas Jefferson,
    risen up in arms and removed the tyrant?

    Alas, no such luck. The former dictator referred to was, of cause, the
    deposed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. What an anticlimax! Pictures of the
    humiliated Hussein, bearded, tired, confused, treated like a captured tiger
    in a Zoo, were repeating endlessly. He opened his mouth, and we were forced
    to look in. He looked human and frail; too human, his dishevelled beard and
    large innocent eyes make him akin to Leo Tolstoy or Alexander Solzhenitsyn.

    Indeed, if in December 1941, Hitler's army had not been stopped by the 39
    Red Guards of Panfilov on the outskirts of Moscow, this would have been the
    fate of Joseph Stalin; to be brought in an iron cage to Berlin and presented
    as 'the captured, bloody dictator'. And it would have been Mao Zedong's
    fate, too, had the Chinese soldiers not stopped General Macarthur's hordes
    on the banks of Yalu River in 1950. Vae victis, woe is defeat, especially a
    defeat to the ruthless and arrogant enemy.

    I crossed the street to a Palestinian café, where Jerusalem artists and
    teachers mingle with   villagers on business in the big city over backgammon
    and cardamom coffee. Gloom was hanging over the low tables like a rain cloud
    in the December air. The Palestinians were distressed and spoke in hushed
    tones. Their best feelings were hurt by the dishonourable display of the
    captive ruler. Whether one liked Saddam Hussein or not, he was the
    legitimate President of a great Arab nation, and his humiliation was the
    humiliation of all Arabs.

    He was not the first captured ruler in the world's bloody and long history.
    More than 800 years ago, the great West European Crusader princes were
    captured by a victorious Arab army. Then, however, the Arab commander,
    Saladin, treated the captives courteously. He did not parade them with an
    open, red-painted mouth in front of his troops. But Chivalry and Honour, so
    dear to an Arab heart, are not American virtues: the US dared to attack Iraq
    only after ten years of UN sanctions disarmed it.

    The Palestinians had additional reasons to worry. Iraq was a big and
    independent Arab country. It was by no means a counterbalance to the united
    might of Israel and the US, but its existence could stay the Zionist hand
    from particularly wild actions. In 1948, Iraqi volunteers stopped the
    Israeli army expelling the Palestinian residents of Jenin and Nablus, and
    saved them from the fate of homeless refugees. In 1973, the Iraqi presence
    stopped Israelis moving on to Damascus. Since then, the Iraqis have
    supported Palestinians, collecting money to sent to Palestinian widows and
    orphans of the resistance.

    But the American-installed regime in Baghdad is rabidly anti-Palestinian and
    pro-Israeli. Ahmad Chalabi, the American protégé, called to establish
    friendly relations with Israel; plans to send Iraqi oil to Haifa refineries
    are being discussed, and the occupation forces expelled Palestinian refugees
    from their temporary homes in Baghdad. Saddam Hussein could not do much; his
    anti-Islamic policy did not endear him to religious Arabs, but he was a
    friend, and an independent Arab voice.

    Israelis in a nearby pub were excited. For them, Hussein's capture was good
    news politically and economically. Since the US-led victory, the Israeli
    companies have aggressively moved into Iraq. "All inquiries about doing
    business in Iraq are referred to a select list of intermediaries issued by
    the American authorities", I was told by an Australian businessman. "All are
    Jewish and most of them are Israeli. Heading the list is the Israeli law
    firm that Douglas Feith (an American extreme-Zionist official) is a partner
    in". The Iraqi Jews have presented multi-billion dollar claims for
    properties they claim were confiscated from them. Hussein's capture will
    undermine the Iraqi resistance and allow the Israelis to increase their
    share of the war spoils.

    But Israeli politicians foresee an even better outcome. "Deposed Iraqi
    dictator Saddam Hussein could be offered a deal in which he would give his
    captors information on . how he smuggled some of the weapons of mass
    destruction into Syria," said the military observer of the Israeli daily
    Haaretz. "In exchange, he would face life imprisonment and not be executed
    for war crimes", It will save George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony
    Blair' bacon, following accusations that they lied to their people to
    justify war. More important, it would accomplish an old wish of Israeli
    leaders: the US tanks would roll into Damascus. With the conquest of Syria,
    the next stage of the Middle East subjugation to Israel would be complete,
    and the road to Saudi oil riches would be open.

    In short, Hussein's capture will not bring peace to Iraq and the Middle
    East. Most probably, it will be used to jump-start the new round of war in
    the troubled area.