    It’s Time to re-think David Duke

    By Israel Shamir

    The great wizard and magician Rabbi Eliezer knew all about sorcery, as
    Sanhedrin members, the original Elders of Zion, were supposed to
    (Talmud, Tosefta Sanhedrin 11:5). He taught Rabbi Akiba all he knew
    about it, what is permitted and what is forbidden. But after long
    studies, Akiba said: Rabbi Eliezer explained everything, but I learned
    from him but two things: one does a trick and is liable, another one
    does a trick and he is exempt.

    A similar thing takes place in our discourse. One preaches national
    exclusivity, and is liable; another preaches national exclusivity, and
    is exempt. Consider the case of David Duke. He is supposed to be the
    Devil incarnate; just a reference to his name makes one defiled for
    seven years. But I doubt he is morally worse than an average Jewish
    nationalist, a Sharon supporter.

    No doubt, Ku Klux Klan stinks. Stinks exactly as bad as the bunch of
    Jewish settlers in Hebron. The White Nationalists’ stand against what
    they call ‘intermarriage’, as if we do not belong to one kind of humans,
    is morally unacceptable. But this expletive fits equally well David Duke
    and Debora Lipstadt, famous American fighter against ‘disappearance of
    Jews through intermarriage.”

    Past membership in any Jewish nationalist organisation does not defile.
    Indeed, ex-Jewish Defence League member Yossi Klein Halevi became a
    sought-after journalist and writes for the New Republic. But David Duke,
    who was a member of KKK at the ripe age of 20, many years ago, still is
    usually described as ‘Ku-Klux-Klan man’.

    David Duke, whatever were his positions in the past, became a man many
    Americans listen to. His is a clear and unequivocal voice against the
    criminal invasion of Iraq, against criminal plans of Washington and Tel
    Aviv to attack Syria and Iran. Duke cleaned his act re American Blacks;
    he befriended Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, the Black Nationalists.
    His appearance in Damascus was impressive. He spoke clearly and with
    vision.

    We should pay heed to Duke; not necessarily by giving him kosher
    certificate – he did not ask for it and we can’t provide it, either. But
    we may be tolerant to people on the cutting edge of resistance to the
    Judaeo-American Empire, be it Duke, Hamas, Iranian President or
    whatever. The world needs people who do not apologise to Jews. They do
    not have to be a Mr Nice Guy, though soft-spoken and somewhat effeminate
    Duke is a far cry from a Nazi Storm Trooper of Hollywood.

    Duke is not enough to overcome the flood of Judaic propaganda, to
    restore the balance between Yin and Yang. But he should be allowed into
    discourse, unless we all want to follow in footsteps of David Irving
    into jail for upsetting Jewish sensibilities. These sensibilities grow
    daily, and there is nothing like David Duke to roll them back a bit.

    We can’t afford being over-fastidious. Our adversaries gave their full
    support to the Italian fascist Fini, they turned the Butcher of Sabra
    and Shatila into a candidate for Nobel Peace Prize. This challenge has
    to be met. It won't be met by your average peace fighter like Sue
    Blackwell, who describes herself 'a shiksa socialist' and is in a
    constant search for nice Jews to keep the company of.

    Again, we are not into racism. Eugene Weixel who replied the
    Jew-obsessed shiksa in his blog, our Gilad Atzmon, our Joh Domingo are
    proving it. But this word is not going to send us, in tears, to cling to
    the skirts of Jewish overseers of the leftist discourse.

    You will find below a short compilation of recent Duke for your reading.
    It is taken from hostile sites, so the definitions are theirs, not mine.

    *****************************************************

    Following are excerpts from an interview with American white nationalist
    David Duke, which aired on Syrian TV on November 21, 2005.

    Interviewer: How do you read the ongoing US-led escalation against Syria
    within the context of re-mapping the Middle East?

    David Duke: Well, you must understand that the chief architects of the
    war were Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Pearl, Daniel Feith, Mr. Warmser,
    Elliot Abrams, in the United States. They were the architects of this
    war. Mr. Pearl, as well as Mr. Warmser and Feith, wrote a paper called
    "A Clean Break: Securing the Realm," a paper for Israel, for Benjamin
    Netanyahu. That paper said that the way to Damascus was through Baghdad.

    I believe that this is part of the ongoing Zionist effort, in their
    control of American foreign policy, to dominate the entire Middle East,
    and I believe, dominate the world. I think America is occupied in many
    ways the way the Golan Heights is occupied, the way the West Bank of
    Palestine is occupied.

    Interviewer: Dr. Duke, what impact has the worsening situation of the
    occupying forces in Iraq and the daily shipment of body-bags of US and
    allied soldiers to the USA and elsewhere, on Bush's ability to plunge
    into another quagmire?

    Duke: This war is a disaster for the United States, and I think that
    this has to put pause in some of the Zionist neo-cons about going into a
    new war. But the one wild card is that these neo-cons are crazy. They
    are insane people. [...].

    They are Jewish fanatics, extremists, they are not normal people.The
    people who are pushing Jewish supremacism, Zionism - they are absolute
    evil and they are crazy. All they know is more power, and so there is a
    real danger, I should say, for Syria, and a danger for Iran at this
    point. [...]

    Interviewer: How different is the Syria that you have seen for the first
    time from that portrayed by US and other Western media outlets?

    Duke: I have defended Syria for a long time, so I was admiring Syria, I
    have admired your president very much. I hope at some point to be able
    to meet him and shake his hand. I think he is the greatest man in a very
    difficult period, and especially with what's going on right now, in
    terms of Lebanon and its relations with Syria. But absolutely, even from
    my perspective, and it shows you how the Zionist media around the world
    controls and affects all of us. Even those of us who are aware of it -
    it's subtly affecting.

    Interviewer: How badly, can you tell our viewers, is the policy making
    process hijacked by those neo-cons?

    Duke: Well, as a patriotic American - and I come here not as a Syrian
    partisan, but as an American patriot - it's more shocking for me than it
    should be for you, because our sons and daughters are being killed in
    Iraq, are being wounded, innocent Iraqis have died, America is being
    hurt, and yet we have this policy which is only for Israel. This war is
    completely about Israel, and I would like to suggest to people in the
    Middle East... Sometimes I believe that the Zionists run a mystification
    on us. I find, with some of the leftists around the world who say this
    is a war for oil or this is an American imperialist war - No, this is a
    case of the Zionists using America to fight their war with our blood and
    our money.

    [...]

    Interviewer: Now, Dr. Duke, is there room for other than the Jewish
    extremist supremacists to actively engage in the changing of this
    pro-Zionist hegemony in the US, and how?

    Duke: Well, first off, I think we have to understand that there are
    certainly some Jews who oppose the Zionists. There is no question about
    that. But it also must be understood that every major Jewish
    organization in the United States, including the Council of Presidents
    of Jewish Organizations, supports this Iraq war. The largest and most
    powerful lobby in the United States government is the Israel lobby. Now
    as an American citizen, I find it pretty strange that a foreign country
    would have the most powerful lobby in our government.

    So I think... My book is dedicated to Israel Shahak, who is in fact a
    Jewish person. I don't consider myself anti-Semitic. But I am aware of
    the fact that I think more Jews need to stand up against the extremist
    dominance within their faith, within their nation. And until that
    happens, we cannot continue that road. But even more importantly, we -
    not only in America and Europe, but also in the Middle East - we must
    stand up and start telling the truth. If we don't talk about some of the
    realities of this conflict... You know, Israel is really an apartheid
    state in many ways.

    And Israel is a state... that we wouldn't tolerate actions of the
    American people. The New York Times is all against... It's all for
    intermarriage in the United States of America. But the New York Times
    supports Israel, where a marriage of Jewish person and a non-Jew is
    illegal, where a Jew who is a member of the Cohanim, which is the elite
    element of the Jewish tradition - they cannot even marry a Jewish
    person, a person who is a full-fledged Jew, of the Jewish faith, who has
    one drop of (non) Jewish blood. I mean, these people... Israel makes the
    Nazi state look very moderate in terms of its views.

    Interviewer: How have you been treated by American media since you have
    been taken this stance?

    Duke: Very bad. I would say that I'm treated about as bad as Saddam
    Hussein.

    [...]

    The number one problem, political, economic, and social on this planet
    now is what we call Zionism and more specifically, Jewish supremacism.
    These radical, extremist Jewish elements such as Ariel Sharon, such as
    the neo-cons in Washington, believe this strange (idea) that they have a
    right to control the world - not just Palestine, not just Syria, Iraq,
    and Iran and the rest of the Middle East, but also London, New York, and
    Toronto. All over the world you see the same pattern of control over the
    media, the same pattern of influence.

    [...]

    Interviewer: You've mentioned London. London's mayor, Ken Livingstone,
    whom I suppose that you know or have heard of...

    Duke: Yeah, I admire him...

    Interviewer: ...has actually described Sharon as a war criminal, and
    said Sharon should be tried at the Hague.

    Duke: Of course, if anyone should be tried for war crimes, it's Ariel
    Sharon. The idea that the president of my country sits down and breaks
    bread and shares wine with Ariel Sharon, to me is amazing. I mean...

    Interviewer: And he described him... Bush described him as a man of
    peace.

    Duke: Exactly. I mean, Bush is totally... Bush is not a very smart man,
    and he is totally under the thumb of the Jewish supremacists. The
    president of Canada said it very well. He said that Bush is like a
    puppet. He knows what he has to say to get the support of the media, and
    political support. I think right now, they dangled him, they created...

    The Zionists created the lies of this war. In fact, Steven Cohen was the
    CIA person who manufactured the evidence... Israel's Mossad actually put
    forward evidence to the United States about weapons of mass destruction.
    Israel itself basically (knows) that they lied, they know Bush knows
    that he lied, so now they say to Bush: OK, either you continue on with
    this program, with securing the realm, with this war, either you
    continue on with this or we will have you impeached.

    [...]

    It's interesting. This is something the Arab community also is not aware
    of. The neo-cons, the people who founded this were actually Trotskyite
    communists originally. This is not well known...

    Interviewer: Trotskyites?

    Duke: Trotskyites. Yes, exactly. Russia has worked to free itself from
    the Jewish supremacist Bolshevists.

    [...]

    Interviewer: On last week's talk show, a senior Angelican Syro-Lebanese
    clergyman cited on this show that there is a biblical background to what
    the world in general, and the Middle East in particular, is witnessing
    nowadays. What is your input on that? He was talking about the Old
    Testament and the process through which Jesus Christ was tried by the
    Jews and the way now they are treating (figures) like the Syrian
    leaders.

    Duke: I may not be the most popular person for saying what I think needs
    to be said, but many people in the Middle East distinguish between
    Zionism and Judaism. As you know from reading my book, the evidence is
    overwhelming: Judaism at its core - not all Jews, but Judaism at its
    core - is a racist religion, a supremacist religion, and non-Jews are
    considered not even of human caliber. It's not all of the Jews, but it
    is certainly something that is strong in it...

    *****************************************************

    CNN: Why Blitzer's Hysteria Over David Duke?
    News/Comment; Posted on: 2005-12-04 09:20:16
    Wolf Blitzer attacks David Duke on CNN; Dr. Duke responds.
    by David Duke

    WOLF BLITZER'S attack on me is a clear display of Zionist media bias.
    Look at CNN's caption in this screen shot: "Former Ku Klux Klansman
    David Duke Blasts U.S...."

    "Former Representative David Duke" is my proper and appropriate title.

    Robert Byrd is not captioned as "Former Klansman Robert Byrd."

    George W. Bush is not captioned as "Former cokehead George Bush."

    And as far as "Blasts U.S." is concerned, nothing could be further from
    the truth. In actual fact, I defended the American people in Syria, gave
    Syrians a good image of Americans -- and blasted Israel as the true
    terrorist nation, a nation which has made terrorist attacks against
    America.

    Blitzer, an extreme Zionist, attacked my trip to Syria on his CNN
    television program and called me a "White supremacist and wannabe
    politician." He is really reaching. Jewish supremacists are the real
    supremacists. I denounce racial, ethnic, or religious supremacism. I
    believe in the right of all people and all nations to run their own
    affairs and preserve their own heritage.

    Such a belief is the opposite of racial supremacism.

    It is the Zionists who are trying to control the policies of other
    nations. As usual, they accuse everyone else of what they themselves are
    doing.

    (For new readers of davidduke.com, please read my book, Jewish
    Supremacism (available on my site), wherein I have provided a mountain
    of quotes from mainstream Jewish sources to prove that they are the
    world's ultimate supremacists.)

    As for the statement that I am a "wannabe politician" -- what a cheap
    shot. I wouldn't say that someone who has been elected to two different
    public offices and who received a majority of the European-American vote
    in major campaigns for U.S. Senate and Governor -- as well as higher
    vote totals in Presidential primaries than did many sitting U.S.
    Senators -- is a "wannabe politician."

    And Blitzer is incorrect for another reason: I would like to think that
    I am far more of a statesman in the tradition of the American republic
    than other office holders, as I have never sacrificed my honor for
    political gain, as do most politicians who sell out on everything to get
    elected. I could have said what was popular, and perhaps been a Bill
    Clinton -- but I chose instead to tell the whole truth and be David
    Duke!

    A politician is perceived as someone who simply wants to be elected; I
    am someone who has a Cause and uses politics to advance it.

    CNN also labels me a "former Klansman," but for some reason or other the
    media don't label George Bush as a "former cokehead," or Teddy Kennedy
    as "the hero of Chappaquiddick," or Sen. Robert Byrd as "former
    Klansman," or some of the members of the Black caucus as "former Black
    Panthers" -- though all of that is undeniably true.

    They don't call Ariel Sharon "the Butcher of Beirut" or Nelson Mandela a
    "former terrorist."

    They make sure never to give my proper title of Dr. David Duke, but they
    almost always give the "Dr." title in discussing "Dr. Martin Luther
    King." Yet, by any standard, my doctoral degree is more legitimate than
    his.

    When they don't like you, they can pull out all the stops.

    Blitzer even has the gall to criticize the media in the Mideast for not
    calling me a "former Klansman," "White supremacist," or "tax offender."

    Could you imagine them ending a news piece on Bush saying: "The media in
    Britain didn't mention the fact that Bush once was a habitual user of
    cocaine." Or "The media there didn't point out that Bush, who lied
    American soldiers into war, himself avoided Viet Nam with a cushy job
    back home. " Or "The media didn't mention that George Bush has
    authorized mass torture of suspects and stripping away of fundamental
    American rights with the Patriot Act."

    Get the picture?

    Such is the power of our Jewish-dominated media.

    But now, through my response, you can see how they manipulate the
    American people.

    In addition, they even try to bias their watchers by their caption in
    the news report: "Former Klansman Blasts U.S." In fact, I never blasted
    the U.S. I repeatedly stated in every public appearance that I was an
    American patriot, even an American partisan. I said that the American
    people don't want war and want friendship with all, and that it is only
    the Zionists and their servants who want war and therefore must, with
    lies, manipulate the American people into war.

    I pointed out that the only Mideast nation that has made terroristic
    attacks upon America was Israel. Israel made terroristic firebomb
    attacks against American installations in Egypt in the Lavon Affair and
    the surprise, murderous attack on the USS Liberty. Israel recently
    awarded -- and called "heroes" -- the Jewish terrorists who attacked
    American facilities in Egypt.

    I also pointed out that there have been no agents of Mideast governments
    except Israel convicted of major spying against the U.S. and doing great
    damage to the U.S. -- while Israel lauds their spy who did so harm
    America, Jonathan Pollard. I pointed out the current espionage cases
    involving AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee). I
    pointed out the terrible harm done to America and the Mideast in the
    Iraq War, a war orchestrated by the neocons for the benefit of Israel.

    It was generally accepted by everyone present who was quoted on the
    subject of my speech in Syria that my speech helped lessen anti-American
    feeling in the Mideast by showing that the American people, in contrast
    to the Zionist-controlled politicians, want friendship and peace with
    the world.

    The fact that the entire non-Jewish Mideast media were completely
    supportive of my visit and uttered not a negative word -- that they just
    simply reported the news as it happened -- should be encouraging to us.
    For if the media in these countries is free of Jewish extremist control,
    think of the opportunities we have to educate hundreds of millions of
    people on the real dangers of Jewish supremacism, something that will
    certainly rebound back into White countries. Many world scholars,
    leaders, and media personalities are beginning to express the ideas and
    facts found in my books.

    Read Jewish Supremacism again; read the last two chapters on Jewish-led
    immigration policies and the Jewish worldwide threat. If this becomes
    common knowledge across the world, a great blow will have been struck
    not only in the battle of these independent nations against Jewish
    supremacy, but also in our own homelands.

    The world is changing, my friends!

    The leading journalist in the Mideast said:

    "Israel has always wanted to deflect anger from themselves to America
    and others. Dr. Duke's presence focuses attention on the true danger to
    both European-Americans and Arabs -- Jewish Extremism.

    "David Duke's message here makes all Americans wherever they are sleep
    safer and easier. His exemplary courage in speaking out against Zionism
    has done more for the American image in the Arab world than any other
    American I can name. And his book, Jewish Supremacism, is by far the
    best book on the subject from either an Arab or Occidental source. If
    American foreign policy wasn't run by Israeli partisans, they would
    appoint him as America's ambassador at large to heal the anti-American
    sentiment growing around the world."

    Of course, the Jewish supremacists don't want the anger of the people of
    the Mideast to be directed away from America to where it rightfully
    belongs: the Jewish supremacist State of Israel and their partisans who
    have so much influence in American and European media and government.

    The Zionists at CNN such as Wolf Blitzer would much rather see Americans
    suffer from violent attacks rather than Israel. In fact, they routinely
    cover up the mischief and damage Israel does to America. For instance
    they constantly lie and say in almost these exact words 'We are so
    thankful for Israel, our only friend in the Mideast.' The damning truth
    is that before America became manipulated to support Israel, America had
    not even one enemy in the Middle East.

    And what kind of "friend of America" commits terrorist acts against us,
    spies on us, and leads us into bloody, expensive wars not in our true
    interests?

    So this CNN report by a pro-Israel extremist has inadvertently revealed
    the biased reporting that I speak about every day.

    I did not blast the United States. I love my country -- unlike the
    Jewish supremacists who will harm my country for the sake of Israel.

    I did not blast the United States. I blasted the traitors who send
    Americans to die or be maimed for Jewish neocon lies rather than for the
    true interests and security of America.

    I did not blast the United States. I spoke the truth that it is not just
    the Golan Heights or Palestine that is occupied by the Zionist
    extremists -- they also occupy far too much of the American media and
    far too much of the American government.

    *****************************************************

    An Open Letter to The University of Toronto Friends, Faculty Members,
    Students at the University of Toronto:

    Read this fantastic letter from a brave student at the University of
    Toronto on the outrageous attempt to suppress non-violent freedom of
    political speech and to imprison students and faculty who excercise
    their freedom of speech and conscience. This letter is a classic which
    should be used as a perfect outline for students in addressing freedom
    of speech issues. I salute the courageous students who stand up for the
    truth against the blatant suppression and intimidation of Jewish
    supremacism! This is one of the most well-written and most powerful
    letters I have ever read. -- David Duke

      To the Faculty and Students at the University of Toronto:

      I and a small group of my fellow students have dared to distribute a
      little piece of paper that dares to expose Jewish supremacism. In it we
      dare to quote from from outspoken, former American elected official, Dr.
      David Duke, who has written a book called Jewish Supremacism. Dr. Duke
      has been one of Americas most persistent and eloquent foes of the Iraq
      War and American Israeli policy. Jewish Supremacism is not an
      anti-Semitic book. In fact, it is dedicated to a Jew, the late Dr.
      Israel Shahak, a survivor of the concentration camps during WWII and a
      leader of the Israeli Peace Movement. People can read parts of the book
      for themselves on Dr. Duke's website, www.davidduke.com , and see
      clearly that it is not anti-Semitic but simply opposes the extremist
      Jewish supremacism that drives the Israeli state and its supporters
      around the world. Merely calling someone anti-Semitic doesn't make it
      so.

      At the University of Toronto we are free. We have free speech. We are
      free to expose and condemn White people for mistreatment of Indians, for
      White Colonialism around the world. We are free to accuse White people
      and the White establishment of racism real and imagined. We are free to
      condemn any person who says being straight is better than being gay. We
      can do these things without threat of being expelled from the
      university, without the possibility of the police coming and getting us
      in the middle of the night and throwing us into jail for months or
      years.

      But, if we dare to expose elements of Jewish supremacism, for instance
      the Jewish supremacism that exists in Israel and that is being advanced
      by extremist Jews around the world who support the extremist Jewish
      state, we will find ourselves the criminal. Expose the open
      anti-Gentile, anti-Christian hatred of extremist Jews in Canada or the
      United States and we may well find ourselves charged with hatred and
      face expulsion and even years of imprisonment!

      Why is it that exposing elements of racial or religious hatred among
      extremist Christians deserves praise but exposing it among Jews deserves
      jail?

      Why is exposing White extremism called "love" but exposing Jewish
      extremism is called "hate?"

      Why is it called hate to expose the fact that Israel is a Jewish
      supremacist, Apartheid nation of segregation of Jews from non-Jews? Why
      is it called hatred to expose the fact that in Israel marriage between a
      Jew and Gentile is against the law?" Why is it called hatred to expose
      the fact that Israel is a Jewish supremacist nation that limits
      immigration only to Jews? Why is it called hatred to expose the fact
      that Israel routinely tortures thousands of Palestinians each year but
      will never do so to a Jew, for any crime?

      Why is called hatred to expose the fact that Jews in Israel have stolen
      huge swaths of Palestinian land and oppressed, tortured, and murdered
      thousands of Palestinians in the occupied territories? Why is it called
      hatred to point out that Jewish supremacist Neocons such as Wolfowitz,
      Perle, Feith, Wurmser and Libby lied to the world about Iraqi weapons of
      mass destruction and have led the efforts for the murderous Iraq War
      resulting in the deaths of at least 100,000 and a rise in world
      terrorism and hate?

      Why is it called hatred to tell the obvious truth that the Iraq War is a
      war conceived and driven by Jewish supremacists - a war for Israel? Why
      is it hatred to point out that Jewish Neocons seek to exacerbate
      relations between the Christian and Islamic world and wash the world in
      blood in what they call proudly World War IV? Canada oh Canada, fellow
      students and faculty, where is the freedom of our fathers?

      Where has gone the most important of human rights, Free Speech, the
      right upon which all other rights are hinged?

      Who has taken these rights from you?

      It is not we who put our ideas on a small pieces of paper who should be
      investigated by the police. You should investigate the authorities and
      groups who promote these laws against free speech, free thought and free
      conscience!

      You will find they are most vigorously promoted by the same Jewish
      Supremacist organizations, such as the Canadian Jewish Congress, who are
      desperate for you not to learn of their own supremacism. These
      organizations support the Apartheid State of Israel, a state that
      routinely tortures thousands of Palestinians each year, but never will
      torture a Jew for any offense no matter how heinous. They support Israel
      which is a state that is based primarily on genetics, more so than
      religion. A person of Jewish descent who is an atheist from anywhere in
      the world can immigrate to Israel while a Palestinian who was born there
      cannot! And, the Canadian Jewish Congress works desperately to stop
      intermarriage of Jews and Gentiles in Canada, an act by itself which
      would be universally condemned if any White Canadian group did so!

      Why is the Canadian Jewish Congress afraid of free speech? Is it not
      afraid that free speech would expose its own hypocrisy, its own
      supremacist theology? What truth is so weak that it must imprison human
      beings who dare to question it?

      What's happening at this university is no different than the darkest
      chapters of human suppression. In the middle ages the masters of
      intolerance called those who loved science and truth "heretics," and by
      that label imprisoned them. In modern times the masters of intolerance
      call those who expose Jewish extremism, "anti-Semites" or "haters," and
      by that label imprison them.

      I and my fellow student and faculty free speechers are opposed to
      supremacism wherever it exists. We are opposed to supremacism and hatred
      whether it be White, Black, or multi-hued, whether it is Christian or
      Jewish, gay or straight, male or female. But, unlike the Canadian Jewish
      Congress and this supine administration, we believe the way to oppose
      supremacism is through discussion and debate not with imprisonment
      worthy of some tin-pot dictatorship.

      The truth is that those who seek to hunt down like criminals, to expel
      and imprison those who have dared to express their freedom of
      conscience, thought, opinion and speech are the true enemies of
      diversity and tolerance.

      They are the ones who should be prosecuted for violations of human
      rights. They are the enemies of freedom. None our fellow students and
      faculty who courageously oppose Jewish supremacism support jail for
      those who support free speech in the Jewish Apartheid State. But, those
      who conspire to imprison people for daring to utter an opinion, no
      matter how unpopular, are guilty of the real human rights violations.
      Many officials have been tried in the World Court for imprisoning people
      who exercises their freedom of speech.

      The efforts of the University head to expel and imprison we who
      expressed our freedom of speech is a REAL human rights violation!

      With all due respect, I must respectfully report that the head of our
      esteemed university should be the one investigated. Maybe Amnesty
      International will do it?

      I urge all other students whether or not they agree with the substance
      of our arguments to support the rights of their fellow students and
      faculty to our human right of free speech.

      Signed - Sincerely,

      By Freedomus