    The reckless words of the Malaysian PM sent waves around the globe and
    caused some quite unexpected consequences. For sure, the US Congress
    objected to the unheard-of idea of Jewish influence, and approved a
    multibillion loan to Israel. JINSA rejected Dr M’s saying the Jews
    promote wars, for the wars promoted by the Jews are called
    ‘democratisation’, or at least, ‘the war to end all wars’.

    Only the French President Jacques Chirac delayed his response, and found
    himself on the line of fire. The oh, so non-existent ‘Jewish influence’
    could cause his political demise, as it did to Charles de Gaulle after
    his ill-calculated weapon embargo on Israel in 1967 (the great general
    lasted just one year). Jacques Chirac took the first flight to Canossa
    and eventually sent a letter of condemnation to the old Dr M. Like
    Emperor Henry IV, he preferred to submit to the power that replaced
    Papacy in the minds of Europeans and Americans.

    Still, he was attacked by the Maariv, an Israeli tabloid. This rag did
    not care much for a far-away Malaysia, but had printed grotesquely
    distorted face of Jacques Chirac above the caption, Antisemitic Mug of
    France. (See below in French, by AFP). Hysterical comparisons of Chirac
    with Marshal Petain were made by Amnon Dankner, the Maariv chief editor.
    His editorial and other articles, notably by Nahum Barnea (he called
    Chirac ‘the collaborator’), were aiming at the French Jews, pouring
    inflammatory venom in order to set them against their non-Jewish
    neighbours and against France.

    However, the Jews of France (predominantly Sephardi descendents of
    Maghreb immigrants) could consider the personality of Amnon Dankner, the
    chief editor of Maariv, before following his orders. A few years ago
    this fighter for the Jewish cause published a long essay called I’ve Got
    No Sister (Ein Li Achot) , where he described the Sephardis as ‘baboons’
    and ‘barbarians from the periphery of the degraded French culture’. Do
    you recognise yourself, Derrida? Is it your portrait, Albert Memmi?

    In the time of tension between Maghrebis (‘Arab Jews’) of Israel and the
    Ashkenazi elite, Dankner wrote: “There is no chance for a fratricidal
    war (between Ashkenazim and Sephardim), for I do not consider these
    baboons my brothers”. He expressed the gut feeling of the Ashkenazi
    elite, of the people who now try to bring the French Jews to their side:
    the Sephardim are at the bottom of the Israeli society, they are hardly
    represented in the universities and the media, while their party is out
    of power, their leaders are ostracised and their culture destroyed.

    Dankner and Barnea of the Maariv dared to speak of ‘the collaborationist
    [with Nazis] past of France’. Well, they should know everything about
    the Nazis. A few days ago, when Maariv was engaged in ferocious
    witch-hunt of the Air Force pilots refusing to fly assassination
    missions, a long article appeared in one of the newspaper supplements.

    Ostensibly condemning the pilots, an unknown patriot wrote:

    “Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to
    fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live.

    "What we must fight for is to safeguard the existence of our people, the
    sustenance of our children and the freedom and independence of our
    country, so that our people may fulfil the mission allotted it by the
    Creator.

    "The war against our enemies cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion.
    This struggle is one of different attitudes to life, and will have to be
    conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. It
    must be thoroughly understood that the land will never be won by solemn
    appeals to God, nor by hopes in any United Nations, but only by the
    force of arms.

    "A single blow must destroy the enemy, without regard of losses. A
    gigantic all-destroying blow. Our message does not have multiple
    shadings; it has a positive and a negative; love or hate, right or
    wrong, truth or lie, never half this way and half that way. Lord God,
    let us never hesitate or play the coward. If we are forced to send the
    flower of the nation into the hell of war without the smallest fear,
    then surely we have the right to remove millions of another race that
    breeds like vermin. For we are fighting not for ourselves but for the
    whole world.”

    The article attracted very little attention, for it was an exact match
    to the rest of the write-up produced by Messrs Dankner and Barnea. Only
    a few days later, a sharp-eyed retiree paid notice to the by-line: the
    article in question was signed A. Schickelgruber, a real-life name of
    Adolf Hitler, and every single sentence was taken from Hitler’s speeches
    and books.

    This new posthumous career of the Nazi leader as a Zionist columnist
    served a sterling proof of advanced Nazification of Israeli society. The
    Zionist sympathisers affect their indignation whenever their black deeds
    are compared with those of Nazis, but publication of Hitler’s article
    and following lack of response by the Israeli public staged a convincing
    experiment: the Israeli discourse fully inverted and appropriated the
    Nazi propaganda. This discovery could act as sobering cold shower to the
    hot heads of Zionist fanatics, but it did not. Instead of tearing their
    tailor-made dress shirts and pouring ashes on their balding heads,
    Dankner and his henchman Barnea fired the brave journalist Yehuda Nuriel
    who composed the article in question and brought the mirror up to the
    ugly face of Israel.

    But here is a good sign: the Sephardi intellectuals
    (http://www.kedma.co.il/), rebelled against their Ashkenazi Zionist
    mentors and supported Nuriel. Could it be the beginning of Sephardi
    awakening? Maybe. From Haim Baram in Jerusalem to David Shasha in New
    York, the Sephardis look for their own way. Let them serve as a guiding
    light for their brethren in France, and as the bridge of peace between
    the communities of Palestine.

    1. http://www.iasa.jlm.k12.il/images/fnisrael/dankner1.gif
    2. http://www.kedma.co.il/opinion/opinionfile/NurielYeoda121003.htm