    --------------------------
    --------------------------
    --------------------------
    --------------------------
    --------------------------
    --------------------------

    In Sweden , the Communist newspaper Flamman published letters of Israel
    Shamir and of Jan Myrdal, the leading Swedish intellectual, of Eva
    Myrdal, the editor of a major left magazine, of Hesham Bachari, the
    publisher of Shamir’s Galilee Flowers, as they were attacked by a
    pro-Palestinian philosemitic gate-keeper Andreas Malm. Malm wrote a long
    piece against “Shamir’s antisemitic line in Palestinian movement” and
    called not to ever ever refer to Jews for this is evil racism.

    Here is Shamir’s response as published in Flamman:

    A Jewish legend tells of four men who looked into Paradise; one of them
    died on the spot, one became mad, one came back as he was, and the last
    one changed his views so drastically that he was called “acher”,
    Another. This fable fits well the debate on Palestine . It is hard to
    remain the same after one has witnessed the terrible goings-on in the
    Holy Land . This is a possible explanation of the metamorphosis Andreas
    Malm has gone through. I remember meeting him in Jerusalem ; an eager
    young man, maybe a bit too career-oriented, but still a friend of
    Palestine and Palestinians. Now I read his articles with sadness. He has
    betrayed everything he once fought for; he has joined the enemy and has
    become an ordinary gatekeeper for Zionist forces in Sweden .

    There is an important debate on Palestine , and it crosses boundaries:
    what is the secret of Zionist charm? Why do they get away with their
    crimes? Why and how do they control the discourse? Why do our efforts
    not bring fruit? Tim Llewellyn, an old BBC hand and an expert on the
    Middle East , asked this question:

    “Is it guilt? Weariness in the eye of the unrelenting storm of threats,
    bullying, influence-peddling and propaganda? Keeping in with the US at
    all costs? All of these, and more? But what? I cannot explain it myself.
    There are scores of reasons for it, but they do not seem to add up to
    one convincing one. The cover-up in the Middle East continues to this
    day, more obvious than ever, the Big Lie bigger, its promulgation more
    intense, the all-powerful United States more committed than ever to the
    prosecution of Israel's interests at the expense of all others,
    neighbours, allies, friends, enemies, even its own, American best
    interests.”

    Two important American scholars, Mearsheimer and Walt, brought this
    debate into the limelight and onto the front pages of American
    newspapers when they answered: it is the influence of the Zionist Lobby.
    The debate was intensified by the publication of former US President
    Jimmy Carter's new book, which freely deals with Israeli apartheid. Not
    surprisingly, the book and Carter himself have been attacked by the
    Lobby.

    In Sweden , this debate is still in its infancy, just getting started in
    the FiB discussion list by our friends Lasse Wilhelmson, Hesham Bahari
    (the Alhambra publisher who printed a Swedish translation of my book
    Galilee Flowers) and others. Eva Myrdal’s noble stand for freedom of
    discussion provoked the ire of Malm who attacked her and her father, Jan
    Myrdal, in his effort to stifle this important debate in Sweden by using
    standard Zionist methods.

    Malm wants us to discuss the racism of Ahmad Rami, but let us rather
    discuss Jackie Jacubowski, who is a frequent writer in the DN where Malm
    peddles his wares. Andreas Malm, please reply: is Jacubowski a Zionist
    Jewish racist or not? If yes, why do you provide him with support from
    the left? Why you are not ashamed to write for the DN, Jacubowski’s
    launchpad? Why do you attack FiB and Myrdal – instead of attacking our
    enemies? You want to discuss “Christ-killing libel against Jews” topic?
    Why don’t you write about Tove Johansson of ISM, who was brutalised by
    Jewish settlers in Hebron chanting “We killed Jesus, we’ll kill you too”?

    Why did you turn yourself into the Fifth Column of Zionism within the
    Swedish left? Let us wait for his answer…

    Israel Shamir

    --------------------------

    Here is an entertaining discussion between our friend Gilad Atzmon and
    Deborah Maccoby, a London Jewish activist, who combines her support for
    Palestine with hate to Christ. In this exchange, the argument for
    Palestine is a metaphor, or a synonim of faith. London Jews suspect
    Gilad Atzmon is a Christian, an unforgivable sin for a Jew. Gilad is
    probably on his way to Christ, but tries to keep it private; it's not an
    easy thing to hide one's love, and Christ is love. Besides, in the
    leftist circles Gilad operates, denial of Christ is de rigeur and to
    admit one's faith is to fall from grace. Not many people in the
    pro-Palestinian circles dare to admit that the troubles of Palestine are
    direct result of Christ denial. An interesting reading for those who are
    aware of it.

    http://peacepalesti ne.blogspot. com/2006/ 12/elfen- slurfestdefaming
    -vanunu-and. html

    Gilad Atzmon

    It didn’t take long before Tribal Jewish activist Mark Elf, the man
    behind Jews Sans Frontieres joined forces with someone who critiques
    Goys habitually, Deborah Maccoby, in a total dismissal of the entire
    Christian religious narrative. Seemingly, some ethnic Jewish campaigners
    indeed lack Frontiers, they even lack a minimal tolerance towards other
    people’s beliefs.

    While a tolerant atheist would respect the fact that billions of people
    for almost two millenniums have held the belief that Christ is the ‘Son
    of God’, the tribal Jewish left activist Maccoby knows better. For her
    “Jesus was a human being and NOT the Son of God”. She, the Jewish ethnic
    campaigner knows better than generations of Christians. But she doesn’t
    stop there. According to Maccoby, Christian belief is a ‘reactionary’
    adventure and to support the democratically elected Hamas is
    ‘regressive’.

    One should expect more from a ‘progressive’ tolerant, universal humanist
    supporter of Palestine . Apparently solidarity with Palestine for the
    Jewish tribal activist is a bizarre amalgam of self-maintenance mixed
    with some hardcore Jewish supremacy. I honestly fail to understand how
    people who claim to be ‘tolerant’, ‘anti racist’ and ‘supportive of the
    Palestinian people’ manage to dismiss the entirety of Christian belief
    as well as the democratic choice of the Palestinian people. Deborah
    Maccoby’s and Mark Elf’s zeal are no doubt a crucial glimpse into the
    subject of current Jewish left political collectivism.

    I do believe that the dismissal of Christianity by Elf, Maccoby and
    others must be exposed so that the Palestinian solidarity movement can
    move on and confront both Israeli racism as well as its crypto Zionist
    moral shield.

    A few days ago, Elf and Maccoby published some isolated extracts of a
    private correspondence between Maccoby and myself (without my permission
    of course). This time they tried to prove that I am a ‘reactionary
    Christian anti-Semite’. It didn’t really take me by surprise. It was
    Maccoby who some time ago accused Mordechai Vanunu of being a
    ‘reactionary Christian anti-Semite’.[1] Somehow, I happen to be in a
    good company. At least with one nuclear whistle blower on my side I
    don’t feel that lonely.

    Apparently, I am now accused of being a reactionary Christian
    anti-Semite. This is not a joke and with Tribal campaigners around, life
    never gets boring. Maccoby, Elf and their ilk must believe this is so.
    One may ask, why exactly am I accused of being a ‘reactionary Christian
    anti-Semite’? It’s simple, because I refuse to accept the authority of a
    Jewish tribal activist who clearly dismisses the entire Christian
    religious narrative. I refuse to allow Maccoby and those like her to
    kill the Son of God twice. I expect them to respect other people’s
    religion. This is indeed unacceptable especially within the racially
    orientated Judeo cyberspace.

    I have been learning recently that extremist settlers in the West Bank
    are now occasionally chanting a new song to the Palestinians whom they
    insist upon oppressing: “We Killed Jesus, We’ll Kill You Too”. I do not
    know who the ‘we’ they refer to is, but I have a feeling that the need
    to kill Jesus’s heritage didn’t bypass Deborah Maccoby or her supporter
    Mark Elf.

    I may as well say it, a tolerant being may not believe that Jesus was
    the Son of God, but he would accept and RESPECT the belief of others.
    Respect for another’s belief is exactly what Maccoby and Elf lack.

    Once again, Maccoby and Elf quoted me out of context. They left me with
    no choice but to publish the entire correspondence.

    In order to maintain the flow of the text, I did some editorial changes
    and cut out some parts that were not relevant to the argument. The
    context remained untouched.

    The debate:

    Professional Goy Critic Maccoby: Anti-Semitism is irrational.

    Hebrew speaking Palestinian Atzmon: This is something you really have to
    prove beyond doubt, and let me tell you it isn't easy! You will have to
    define the notions of anti-Semitism as well as rationality. As you know,
    I argue that anti-Semitism is a myth. Moreover I assume that what you
    really refer to is Anti Jewish feelings rather than anti-Semitism.
    Surely you know that many of the so-called 'anti-Semites' love Arabs. It
    is Jewishness that they despise. Integrity is really crucial in case we
    want to get somewhere.

    Professional Goy Critic Maccoby: It is just unbelievable that you can
    say that Shamir (Israel Shamir) is in "the great Jewish humanist
    tradition". Shamir is a Christian fundamentalist who is really not very
    different from Christian Zionists, except that, whereas the Christian
    Zionists think Islam is the Anti-Christ, he thinks the Anti-Christ is
    Israel and world Jewry.

    Hebrew speaking Palestinian Atzmon: This is indeed true, yet the man is
    aiming to present a humanist argument and it is within his very argument
    where Jewishness stands for evil. Whether we agree with Shamir or not,
    is another question. I think that from time to time Shamir isn't careful
    enough in defining his terminology. Once he stops talking about the Jews
    (as an ethnic origin) and starts to talk solely about Jewishness (as an
    identity), his arguments will be very difficult to attack. The reason no
    one yet has managed to deconstruct my arguments is because I am very
    careful with my terminology. By the way, this isn't to say that my
    argument has a kernel of truth, they are just relatively solid.

    Professional Goy Critic Maccoby: See his essay "The Second Coming". He
    (Shamir) represents a regressive, medieval Christianity which is the
    opposite of humanism.

    Hebrew speaking Palestinian Atzmon: Sorry Deborah, for me medieval
    Christianity is where Scholastic philosophy was born. Indeed nothing
    (too clever) really came out of the Jews (along those centuries) except
    the racist Maimonides. Let me tell you, Christian scholarship of the
    middle ages is something I can never get enough of. Scholastics is the
    aim to ground religion on reason. You better do your homework.

    Professional Goy Critic Maccoby: It is interesting too that you yourself
    show something of this regressive tendency in your enthusiasm for the
    Islamic fundamentalism of Hamas.

    Hebrew speaking Palestinian Atzmon: Your Judeo-centric sense of
    'progression' and 'regression' is something I do not want to engage with
    unless you clearly define what regression and progression stand for.
    Indeed I love Islam and I love Christianity. Both religions try to
    repair the non-humanistic message entangled with core Judaism. Surely
    you know that Judaism predates Christianity and Islam. So if to be
    honest, Christianity and Islam are both models of progressive and
    reformist thinking. I suggest that you think about it for a while….

    Professional Goy Critic Maccoby: Re your comments about Jesus - I had
    actually always meant to write to you, ever since I read your piece The
    Protocols of the Elders of London, to point out that it is not at all a
    "historical narrative" that the Jews killed Jesus. All the historical
    evidence shows that it as the Romans and their quisling collaborators -
    the High Priest and his henchmen - who were responsible for Jesus's
    death and not the real Jewish religious authorities, the Pharisees, or
    the main body of the Jewish people in Judea at that time.

    Hebrew speaking Palestinian Atzmon: Ok, now we will challenge your
    intellectual integrity... .. a few days ago you mentioned that you were
    outraged with the BOD acts against our beloved Mayor. As you know, the
    BOD presents itself as THE 'representative of British Jews'. Funny
    enough you claimed that your shtetle mates (the J-pukers) sent many
    letters in support of the Mayor because they probably believed that they
    represent another pan of Jewishness. Apparently you Jews like to think
    collectively. You all represent each other.

    Probably something to do with the old Judaic saying 'Kol Bney Israel
    Arevim Ze Baze' (The entirety of Israel are accountable to each other).

    Down to the point, the Big Cohen was the representative of the Jews at
    the time as much as the BOD represents UK Jews, as much as you and the
    JPukers (JPUK) represent another aspect of Jewishness. You all represent
    something unlike my very proud self hater friends who talk merely for
    themselves. This is what I love about Eisen, Shamir, Blankfort and many
    others, rather than talking in the name of the Jews they talk in the
    name of reason and ethics. They talk in the name of their naked self.
    This is why Paul (Eisen) is so hesitant always. Unlike you, Paul doesn't
    think that reason is his private Jewish property. Unlike you Paul
    doesn't take a pride of the achievements of other 'humanist Jews!

    Again the question I would like to raise is how come a Jew like yourself
    is so concerned with the association with Christ killers. Why Italians
    aren't that concerned with very similar accusations? At the end of the
    day, it was their Roman ancestors who made the crime. The reason is
    simple. While Italians developed an ethical thinking, your resemblance
    to the murderous great priest is shockingly apparent. It is something
    you try to push under the carpet. You know so well that you are a modern
    day Christ killer. You (and your 3rd category ilk) insist upon acting as
    kosher commandants. You are there to decide who is dangerous, who is
    right and who is wrong. Who is good for the Palestinians, You are there
    to Crucify the enemies of the Jewish people. In your private list Paul
    Eisen is a shining yellow star. Shamir is the devil and slowly but
    surely you learn to recognise that I am the 'most dangerous' of them
    all. Let me tell you, somehow, you are not as talented as the great
    Cohen. You are not even as talented as myself. You have to practice a
    lot before the next lesson.

    End

    I do tend to believe that the emerging panic performed by Elf and
    Maccoby having to do with ‘Reactionary Christian anti-Semitism’ may have
    something to do with the Christmas Holiday season. Living in London
    surrounded by Christmas decorations and millions of Christmas shoppers
    must make some tribal secular Jewish activists feel alienated. While the
    religious Jews have Hanukah, a Jewish alternative holiday of lights, the
    Tribal secular Jew has no collective bond rather than anxiety. At
    Christmastime Elf and Maccoby are apparently threatened by Christ the
    ordinary human being (rather than a Son of God). I can't wait and see
    what kind of fears they may bring up at Easter.