    America Vanquished

    By Bob Finch

    Historically, holocaust denial has been a political tactic used
    primarily by extreme right wing political parties. However, a small
    number of anti-racists have gone beyond criticisms of the racist
    policies of the Jews-Only state in Palestine (JOS) to question various
    aspects of Jewish holocaust propaganda. These commentators believe such
    propaganda is used politically to justify the oppression of Palestinians
    so they hope that holocaust questioning might help to undermine this
    oppression. Norman Finkelstein exposed the fabrications and extortionate
    practices of what he’s called the Jewish holocaust industry, ‘There’s no
    business like Shoah business’. Lenni Brenner has highlighted Zionist
    collaboration with the Nazis in the mass slaughter of Jews during the
    second world war (see ‘Zionism in the Age of the Dictators’ and also ‘51
    Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis’).

    Since Ariel Sharon became the JOS’s prime minister in 2001, the
    oppression of Palestinians has reached such heights of obscenity that an
    increasing number of anti-racists have joined the fray against Jewish
    holocaust propaganda. Some have raised questions about particular facts
    believed to have taken place during the second world war. Others have
    questioned the so-called Jewish holocaust on conceptual grounds e.g.
    that the holocaust is a racist concept for focusing solely on the
    slaughter of Jews. Some anti-racists have expressed doubts about the
    wisdom of enshrining the establishment view of the Jewish holocaust in
    law and then making it a criminal offence to challenge such a view. In
    1963, Hannah Arendt, one of the foremost scholars of totalitarianism,
    estimated in ‘Eichmann in Jerusalem’ that the Nazis killed between four
    and a half million to six million Jews. If she was alive today and
    uttered such a view it is possible she would be deemed a "holocaust
    denier" and even thrown in prison. Arendt’s punishment for expressing
    such a view in the mid-1960s was condemnation, and then ostracism, by
    Jewish communities around the world but only the most extreme Zionists
    would have doubted her historical scholarship or thought she deserved
    imprisonment.

    There is no doubt the JOS has used holocaust propaganda to legitimize
    its racist treatment of Palestinians. The Jewish holocaust industry has
    exploited holocaust propaganda to extort huge sums of money from
    European countries which were then used to fund racist causes in the
    JOS. Anti-racists are rightly and justly raising questions about the
    strong links between what happened during the age of totalitarianism and
    what the JOS has been doing to Palestinians over the last sixty years.

    It is paradoxical, however, that whilst some anti-racists are now
    willing to engage in holocaust questioning, the one issue they do not
    address, the last remaining Jewish taboo, is Jewish political power. The
    only well known anti-racist who has confronted this issue is Ralph
    Nader, “The subservience of our congressional and White House puppets to
    Israeli military policy has been consistent. They’re almost all puppets.
    There are two sets: Congressional puppets and White House puppets. When
    the chief puppeteer (Sharon) comes to Washington, the puppets prance.”
    (Pat Buchanan ‘Ralph Nader: Conservatively Speaking’ The American
    Conservative http://www.amconmag.com/2004_06_21/cover.html June 21,
    2004). Nader has never repeated this statement or elaborated upon it or
    sought to use it as the basis for policies to counter such distortions
    of political power. Perhaps the reason for this is that nobody came to
    his defence when the Jewish lobby accused him of anti-semitism. It has
    been quietly dumped into the dustbin of history. (But even Nader
    considers Sharon, the PM of JOS, ‘the chief puppeteer’ instead of seeing
    him as a minor official in the bigger setup. ISH)

    Anti-racists, like virtually everyone else in the western world,
    maintain that America is the world’s hyper-power. From this perspective,
    the JOS can be seen only as an American colony - dependent on America’s
    military, technological, and economic, support for survival.
    Anti-racists are willing to risk being condemned as anti-semites for
    challenging the racist nature of the JOS. They are willing to endure
    condemnation for casting the merest conceptual or empirical shadow over
    the establishment view of the so-called Jewish holocaust. But, they are
    not willing to challenge the Jewish taboo over the idea of Jewish
    political power in the western world, "It is an old canard that Jews
    control America and American foreign policy," Foxman said. "During both
    world wars, anti-semites said that Jews manipulated America into war.”
    (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘A War for Israel’
    http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html April 2004). But
    what better way is there of camouflaging Jewish world domination than
    behind such a hoary old canard? Indeed, the fact that this taboo has
    become an accepted norm throughout the western world is yet one more
    piece of evidence pointing to the existence of Jewish world domination.
    It is ironic that anti-racists are willing to challenge the Jewish
    establishment’s view of the holocaust but not the issue of Jewish world
    domination even though, politically, their reasons for doing the former
    also apply to the latter.

    Andrew Winkler's article 'Deadly Chess Game' is a classic of this genre.
    Winkler believes "Iran is also threatening the moral and ideological
    base of Israel: the 'Holocaust Myth'." He encourages the left to
    re-examine the propaganda of the Jewish holocaust because he believes
    this would threaten the survival of the JOS. "If world-opinion came to
    believe, as an increasing number of historians claim, that the Holocaust
    was nothing but a propaganda lie, designed pre-dominantly for the
    purpose of mounting support for the creation of a Jewish state in
    Palestine, it would become impossible for the US government to continue
    pumping billions of Dollars in military and financial aid into its
    de-facto colony Israel and backup Israel's brutal oppression of the
    Palestinian people through the ruthless abuse of its veto right in the
    UN Security Council." (Andrew Winkler 'Deadly Chess Game'
    http://therebel.org/ Feb 16th 2006).

    Whilst Winkler is willing to engage in holocaust questioning because it
    politically undermines the JOS he continues to support the conventional
    idea of the JOS as an American colony. This stance leads him to a
    somewhat distorted conclusion, “The Jewish State wouldn't even exist, if
    it weren't for the combined effort of the Zionist lobby, US government
    and Stalin, of making the world believe in the Holocaust.” The so-called
    Jewish holocaust is certainly used politically around the world to evoke
    political sympathies for the JOS but it is not a myth which sustains
    this apartheid regime – it is Jewish global power. It is power which
    sustains myths. Without power myths cannot survive. The prevalence of a
    myth is a pointer to the power which sustains it. Is it not a little
    bizarre to believe that the “Zionist lobby” would spend time and money
    promoting a myth in the hope of winning the world’s approval for the
    survival of the JOS, when it can manipulate America into providing the
    JOS with military and political protection irrespective of world
    opinion?

    The idea of the JOS as a mere American satellite or colony dates back to
    October 1973 when president Richard Nixon airlifted military supplies to
    the beleaguered Jewish army to save it from defeat by Arab armies. At
    the time, this rescue was commonly perceived as America coming to the
    aid of an ally. It was this highly dramatic event which led to the image
    of the JOS as an American colony. Since then this view has become a
    commonly accepted opinion throughout the western world. It has been
    given the seal of approval by western academia. Zionists love the image
    because although it seems to demean the stature of the JOS, it once
    again allows the JOS to present itself and, by proxy, Jews around the
    world, as innocent victims.

    The best known intellectual exponent of the proposition that JOS is an
    American colony is Noam Chomsky. His promotion of this view helped to
    justify its acceptance by those on the left, the anti-apartheid
    movement, the anti-war movement, and even by liberals. Chomsky is the
    chief Rabbi of the left who absolves the JOS of guilt and responsibility
    for its apartheid regime and its military belligerence against
    neighbouring countries. The implication of seeing the JOS as an American
    colony is that America has ordered the JOS to do everything for which it
    has become despised, so all blame and all responsibility must be placed
    on Americans not the JOS. Thus Chomskyism proposes that the American
    government was to blame when Ariel Sharon invaded the Lebanon because it
    forced him to fight a war he did not want to fight! The clever racist
    assumption that Chomsky allows to fester here is that what he means by
    ‘America’ is a country ruled by White Anglo Saxon Protestants (WASPs).
    Since he refuses to countenance the idea of Jewish power in America, let
    alone Jews controlling American politics, the only people who could be
    responsible for ordering Sharon to engage in violence, terrorism, and
    warfare at every opportunity are American WASPs!

    Given Chomsky’s intellectual stature and authority, few on the left have
    dared to challenge his preposterous, immoral and racist, views. Jeffrey
    Blankfort is one of the few – see for example ‘The Israel Lobby and the
    Left: Uneasy Questions’
    http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html c.2004). See also
    Réseau Voltaire’s interview of Blankfort (‘The Chomsky/Blankfort
    Polemic’
    http://signs-of-the-times.
    org/signs/editorials/signs_TheChomskyBlankfortPolemic.php February 20,
    2006).

    According to Blankfort, Chomsky’s “attempt to portray the US-Israel
    relationship as mirroring that of Washington's relations to its client
    regimes in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua, has no basis in
    reality.” Blankfort argues, “Also, there were no Salvadoran, Nicaraguan
    or Guatemalan lobbies of any consequence in Washington to lavish
    millions of dollars wooing or intimidating members of Congress; no one
    in the House or Senate from any of those client countries with possible
    dual- loyalties approving multi-billion dollar appropriations on an
    annual basis; none owning major television networks, radio stations,
    newspapers or movie studios, and no trade unions or state pension funds
    investing billions of dollars in their respective economies. The closest
    thing in the category of national lobbies is that of Miami's Cuban
    exiles, whose existence and power the left is willing to acknowledge,
    even though its political clout is miniscule compared to that of
    Israel's supporters.” (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘The Israel Lobby and the Left:
    Uneasy Questions’ http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html
    c.2004). It is ludicrous to regard the JOS as if it was little different
    from a country like Honduras which is dominated by an American
    multi-national corporation producing a single monocultural crop.
    Hondurans do not own a substantial proportion of the American media and
    pump out an endless stream of Honduran propaganda on behalf of national
    interests of the Honduran state. They do not posses a hugely wealthy
    lobby which bribes members of congress into passing legislation
    supporting Honduras's foreign policies. There are not huge numbers of
    Honduran intellectuals in America producing policy papers outlining new
    foreign policies for America which, completely coincidentally, are the
    same as Honduras’s foreign policies. There are not large numbers of
    Hondurans serving in the Bush administration. It has to be concluded
    that it is impossible to see the JOS as an American colony.

    This is not the place to outline the history of the Jewish takeover of
    American politics and the rise of Jewish global domination. Suffice it
    to say the JOS has used its nuclear weapons or military power to
    blackmail America into giving it whatever support it needs and that the
    Jewish lobby has manipulated various American administrations into
    fighting proxy Zionist wars. It was pointed out above that America’s
    airlifting of military supplies to the JOS during the October 1973 war
    gave rise to the now commonly accepted view of the JOS as an American
    colony. But this interpretation of the airlift is erroneous. Nixon was
    confronted with the choice of protecting a country with no oil or an
    Arab world with a super abundance of oil. To all those left wingers who
    have for decades blithely insisted that America is interested in the
    Middle East solely because of oil such a decision should have been a
    no-brainer. There is no conceivable reason based on America’s national
    interests why Nixon should have chosen to support the JOS rather than
    the Arab world. (Please do not suggest that America saw the JOS as
    essential because the Jews provided political and military services for
    America it could not provide for itself. Any number of Arab regimes
    could also have provided exactly the same services if asked. Saddam
    Hussein was all too willing to carry out services for America - but when
    he expected Americans to pay for these services they decimated his
    army). The most plausible reason for Nixon’s decision is that the JOS
    used its nuclear weapons to blackmail Nixon into providing it with
    military assistance even though he knew such a decision ran counter to
    America’s interests. Nixon must have known the Arab world would
    retaliate by establishing an oil embargo that would severely damage
    America’s economic and national interests. And this is precisely what
    happened. The embargo pushed America and the global economy into an
    economic recession that lasted nearly a decade. The JOS blackmailed
    Nixon into sacrificing American interests for the sake of the interests
    of the JOS. “the decision to give $2.2 billion in emergency military aid
    during the October War triggered an Opec oil embargo that inflicted
    considerable damage on Western economies.” (John Mearsheimer and Stephen
    Walt ‘The Israel Lobby’ http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html
    March 23rd 2006). In other words, America spent $2.2 billion in military
    aid which then cost it hundreds of billions of dollars in lost economic
    development. This pattern of American sacrifice has been repeated ad
    nauseam ever since. What the 1973 airlift really symbolizes is the JOS’s
    power to extract whatever it needs from America to boost its own
    interests even at America’s expense.

    It is often mentioned that America provides a huge annual subsidy to the
    JOS. Over the decades this has amounted to something in the region of
    $150 billion. “Since the October War in 1973, Washington has provided
    Israel with a level of support dwarfing that given to any other state.
    It has been the largest annual recipient of direct economic and military
    assistance since 1976, and is the largest recipient in total since World
    War Two, to the tune of well over $140 billion (in 2004 dollars).” (John
    Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt ‘The Israel Lobby’
    http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html March 23rd 2006). But
    these are not subsidies. They are tribute payments that the vanquished
    pay to their conquerors.

    Since the October 1973 war Jewish power in America has grown immensely.
    Jews now constitute America’s ruling elite. There is no longer any
    necessity for the JOS to use its nuclear weapons or military power to
    blackmail America into fighting wars on its behalf. Jewish political
    power in America is now so dominant it can politically manipulate the
    country into wars for the benefit of the JOS – even if these wars are
    contrary to America’s national interests. Over the last decade and a
    half, America’s Jewish ruling elite has manipulated America into two
    proxy Zionist wars. The first was to remove Saddam from Kuwait and the
    second was the invasion of Iraq. A third one against Iran is pending
    even though such a war could lead to the political, economic, and
    military, collapse of the United States. “When a parasite invades, it
    hides as long as it can, sucking the vital juices and draining the
    energy of its host. Yet there is a limit to what the host can tolerate:
    eventually, it either builds up an immunity to the depredations of its
    "guest," or it is sucked dry and exhausted to the point of near-death.
    Having used up nearly all available military and economic resources in
    Iraq, the U.S. has a choice: it can either build up an immunity to
    Israeli influence, even a partial one, or it can let itself be turned
    into a dry husk, a casualty of Tel Aviv's ambitions.” (Justin Raimondo
    ‘Spy With a Heart of Gold?’
    http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8441 January 25, 2006). The JOS
    and the Jewish lobby in America doesn’t care how much it costs America
    to fight proxy Zionist wars or how many American troops are injured or
    killed as long as these wars boost the regional power of the JOS in the
    Middle East.

    Over the last decade or so the Jewish colonization of the American
    political system has been comprehensive. The JOS’s defence strategy has
    been adopted by America. Its foreign policies have been adopted by
    America. The JOS’s contempt for international institutions and
    international law has become a critical part of American politics. Its
    enemies have now become America’s enemies even though they pose not the
    slightest threat to America. The racism endemic in the JOS has now
    become rife throughout American politics. This amazing political
    transformation did not happen because a group of WASPs sat down and
    looked into a crystal ball to determine which policies would maximize
    America’s interests over the long term. These policies were introduced
    by Jews living in America who put the interests of the JOS first. They
    were then pushed through the American political system by the combined
    weight of the Jewish lobby, the Jewish dominated media, and the
    increasing proportion of Jews in successive presidential
    administrations. "With the assault on Iraq," wrote the distinguished
    historian, David Hirst, "the U.S. was not merely adopting Israel's
    long-established methods - of initiative, offence and pre-emption - ; it
    was also adopting Israel's adversaries as its own...” (quoted in Jeffrey
    Blankfort ‘A War for Israel’

    http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html April 2004).

    At its annual conference this year AIPAC boasted that over the previous
    year it had managed to persuade the American Congress into passing one
    hundred pieces of legislation for the JOS. “AIPAC helps pass more than
    100 pro-Israel legislative initiatives a year through more than 2,000
    meetings with members of the U.S. Congress, according to AIPAC
    statistics.” Despite the fact that two of AIPAC’s most important
    employees are currently on trial for treason against the United States,
    America’s politicians turned out in force to pay homage to their AIPAC
    paymasters, “AIPAC’s influence was underscored by the seeming multitude
    of government leaders in attendance at the conference, the biggest in
    its 52-year history. This year, half the Senate, a quarter of the House
    and many White House administration officials, including vice president
    Dick Cheney, participated.” (Denyse Tannenbaum ‘“European media is
    questioning Israel’s right to exist”’ www.ejpress.org/article/6686 March
    10th 2006).

    The JOS is a racist rogue state and, over the last decade and a half, it
    has transformed America into a rogue hyper-power with increasing racist
    tendencies. It has become absurd to believe that the JOS is an American
    colony. On the contrary, America now resembles a Jewish colony. America
    is not merely ruled by a Jewish elite, it has become the biggest prize
    in the global Jewish empire. It is quite true that the American military
    remains the world’s only hyper-power but it is America’s ruling Jewish
    elite which controls America’s military not WASPs. Many of America’s
    WASP military leaders are aghast at the idea of being ordered to attack
    Iran and yet this is precisely the direction in which the American
    military is being pushed by the Jewish dominated congress and Bush
    administration.

    It is the Jewish elite’s takeover of the American political system and
    its ability to use America’s military hyper-power for the benefit of the
    JOS that gives rise to Jewish global domination. However, Jewish world
    domination is far from complete. For a time Russia was controlled by a
    Jewish elite with allegiance to the JOS but Putin managed to wrestle
    back control of his country for the sake of the Russian people although
    whether he’ll be able to fight off the next Jewish political assault is
    far from certain. In Britain, the ruling elite is composed of Jews and
    the landowning aristocracy. The aristocrats own much of the countryside
    whilst the Jewish elite owns much of the country’s high streets. Whilst
    the former dominates over domestic issues, the latter dominates in
    foreign affairs.

    There is little evidence that Jews started the second world war. But
    currently there are many Jewish commentators trying to provoke world war
    three (or world war four depending on which commentator you are
    listening to). During its lifetime, the JOS has created millions of
    victims in Palestine, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and Iraq, and it is
    about to create a whole lot more if it manages to manipulate its
    American colony into a long war against Iran, Syria, and rest of the
    Moslem world in the Middle East. Under these circumstances, it would be
    folly for political commentators to spend so much time researching
    events surrounding the racist Jewish holocaust that they fail to notice
    that Jewish political power is promoting a new catastrophe not merely
    against six million Palestinians but the Moslem world in the Middle
    East.

    It is almost certainly true that Jews were nothing like as much victims
    of totalitarianism as the racist concept of the Jewish holocaust
    suggests – after all roughly 20 million Russians died during this time,
    far more than the number of Jews. If anti-racists continue to focus on
    the so-called Jewish holocaust, albeit in the hope of undermining
    legitimacy for the JOS, they will perpetuate the fixation on Jews as
    victims – the scope of their argument being confined to determining what
    sort of victim the Jews were. The Jewish people suffered terrible losses
    during the second world war but, since then, the JOS has brought about a
    huge loss of life and, given the chance, it will bring about even
    greater losses in the future. It has to be suggested that stopping the
    next world war is more important than dissecting the bowels of the last
    world war.

    The way in which Jews have acquired economic, media, and political,
    power in America and other western countries since the end of the second
    world war until they are now able to push the world’s military
    hyperpower to the brink of a third world war, is an issue on which
    almost no research has been done. (A new work on this issue has just
    been published as this article was being written - John Mearsheimer and
    Stephen Walt ‘The Israel Lobby’
    http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html March 23rd 2006). In
    comparison, the amount of research into the so-called Jewish holocaust
    is huge. Surely ascertaining how Jews living in America acquired
    political power in America, and what they are going to do with it, is a
    more urgent priority than politically exploiting events that happened 60
    years ago?

    By far and away the most important political issue at present is Jewish
    world domination. What matters is not the second world war brought about
    by the German master race but the third world war currently being
    instigated by the Jewish master race. Times have changed. The JOS is now
    far more powerful militarily than the nazis ever were. The JOS is
    creating so many millions of victims it is drawing ever closer to the
    total achieved by the nazis. Jews around the world currently agitating
    for the third world war are just as much racist supremacists as the
    nazis who provoked the second world war. Blair and Bush are modern day
    Chamberlains giving succour to the world’s new nazis – the Jewish master
    race.

    There are many facts and figures in the works of Jeffrey Blankfort that
    could contribute towards making the case for Jewish world domination. He
    does not use such a phrase – he talks only of the Israelization of
    America’s Middle East policies. His focus has been primarily on the
    Jewish lobby in America so he has overlooked the critical role of the
    JOS’s nuclear and military blackmail in transforming America’s foreign
    policies. He has also failed to appreciate the role the JOS is playing
    in fostering a Greater Kurdistan to help break the Arabs’ grip on the
    Middle East. But he has inadvertently raised an important issue in any
    understanding of the nature of Jewish world domination. Is the world’s
    global Jewish elite so attached to capitalism and profiteering that it
    has become entirely rootless with no political loyalties to any
    particular country? Or is it so committed to Zionism that it would be
    willing to sacrifice profits and perhaps even capitalism itself if this
    ensured the political and military supremacy of the JOS in the Middle
    East and beyond? This issue bears upon whether there will be a war
    against Iran. If the global Jewish elite is like the former then it will
    avoid an attack on Iran because such a war could seriously damage the
    global economic system. If, however, it is like the latter then it will
    demand a war because no matter how much the world, or the capitalist
    system, or America, might be damaged it would be a huge boost to Jewish
    supremacism in the Middle East. “If there are truly elites who are
    pulling the strings in Washington and control Tel Aviv, as we are often
    told, there will be no attack because those elites would certainly be
    aware of the consequences it will have for the free-market capitalist
    system that they cherish. If there is an attack, it will be yet another
    proof that Washington is Israel's most important occupied territory,
    despite the efforts of a handful of brave individuals there to expose
    and bring a halt to the Israelization of US Middle East policy. I don't
    like the concept of elites, but I do not think there will be an attack
    and that the drum beats are designed to scare Iran because there are no
    other realistic options available. Nevertheless, beware the Ides of
    March.” (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘War within Range? Another Neocon beats the
    drums for war and says it will happen in 10 weeks’
    jblankfort@earthlink.net c. Jan 7th 2006). In other words, does the
    Jewish global elite have a god-given sanctuary in Palestine or does it
    not care about this Judaically sacrosanct land?

    This article does not present the case for Jewish world domination. It
    suggests the time has long since passed when the idea of Jewish world
    domination should be deemed to be preposterous or treated as morally
    abhorrent. There is plenty of evidence pointing in the direction of
    Jewish world domination. For example: the willingness of American
    politicians to criticize the president of the United States but their
    total reluctance to criticize the JOS. Western governments’ acceptance
    of the JOS as a western, liberal, secular democracy rather than
    criticizing it for being a racist state. It is more absurd to believe
    that America is the world’s hyperpower and that the JOS is just an
    American colony than it is to believe in Jewish world domination. This
    article seeks to change political priorities from the so-called Jewish
    holocaust of the past to the Jewish inspired catastrophe of a third
    world war. The so-called war against terrorism is a racist war initiated
    by Jewish supremacists designed to boost Jewish world domination. We can
    either live in world that seeks to combat racism or in a world where
    Jewish racism is accepted as a normal part of everyday life. In the
    latter case Jews would rule the world.

    Bob Finch