    "Many of us, the critical voices of Zionism and Israel, have already
    realised something: it is advisable to avoid using the ‘J’ word. Once
    you use the ‘J’ word you had better expect some serious trouble. But in
    fact, this is not entirely true. You can safely apply the ‘J’ word, you
    just have to make sure you say the right things. As soon as you become
    slightly genuine you will have to face an orchestrated smear campaign,
    you will be then called an ‘anti Semite’, a ‘new historian’ and even a
    ‘holocaust denier’." (Gilad Atzmon ‘The J word, the J people and the J
    spot’ http://www.gilad.co.uk/html%20files/jspot.html c.April 2005).

    Jews-Only Religion.

    It started a couple of thousand years ago when a number of jews decided
    to create a fictitious god who would regard only the jewish people as
    his chosen race. This god deemed all other races inferior because they
    would never win his divine favour. Unlike all other religions, which
    allow anyone to become a member who professes the basic principles of
    that religion, judaism is exclusively for jews. It is next to impossible
    for a non-jew to be admitted into the judaic religion. It is as
    difficult for non-jews to become a member of judaism as it is for them
    to become a jew. In other words, judaism is a jews-only religion. It is
    a racist religion for a specific race of people. For millenia this sense
    of divine specialness, exclusiveness, chosenness, and supremacism, has
    percolated throughout jewish culture. Even secularization has not
    eradicated the remnants of this belief that only jews matter, only jews
    are important, and that all other races are inferior.

    That judaism is a jews-only religion, which makes it difficult for
    non-jews to become believers in judaism, is complicated by the fact that
    converts would be entitled to immigrate to the jews-only state. The
    power to allow gentiles to convert to judaism, and thus gain entry to
    the jews-only state, has been tightly controlled by orthodox jews in the
    jews-only state. However, this power has recently been dissipated by a
    court ruling, "By a majority of 7-4, the court ruled yesterday that
    gentiles who studied for conversion to Judaism in non-Orthodox Israeli
    training courses, completing the process abroad, had an automatic right
    to come back and obtain instant Israeli citizenship under the Law of
    Return. The verdict is being seen by many as a significant step towards
    recognising the right of Reform and Conservative rabbis to carry out
    non-Orthodox conversions in Israel itself. In effect, it redefines who
    is a Jew in Israeli civil law and threatens the iron control of the
    Orthodox establishment in Israel over Jewish marriage, divorce,
    conversion and burial. Would-be converts based in Israel wishing to
    train for conversion in the liberal streams of the Jewish tradition are
    currently unable to complete the process in the country, as a result of
    pressure from the Orthodox Jewish establishment. As a result many go
    abroad to convert, but up until now have been denied the privileges
    accorded to Orthodox Jewish converts. David Ben-Gurion, the founding
    father, explained: "It is not the state which grants the right to settle
    in the state to the Jew abroad. This right is ingrained in him insofar
    as he is a Jew." The first breach in the Orthodox monopoly came in 1989,
    when the Supreme Court held that non-Orthodox proselytes converted in
    their own countries counted as Jews for immigration and citizenship
    purposes. The Reform and Conservative movements represent a majority of
    American Jews and a growing minority in Britain, though they remain
    marginal in Israel. They offer a less stringent entry ticket to
    Judaism." (Eric Silver ‘Israel's Orthodox groups face challenge over
    Jewish identity’
    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=625286
    April 01st 2005).

    The Jews-Only State.

    The modern manifestation of the jewish tradition of specialness and
    supremacism was the violent creation of a jews-only state in palestine.
    To jews, god had given the land of israel to the jews and the presence
    of non-jews on this sacred judaic soil is sacrilegious. Ever since its
    creation, the jews-only state has tried everything it could to push
    palestinians into the sea so that the only people living in palestine
    would be jews. The incessant jewish propaganda that palestinians are
    trying to push the jews into the sea is just a projection of what the
    jews are actually doing to the palestinians. The jews fabricated arab
    threats about pushing jews into the sea as a projection of their own
    desire to rid palestine of all non-jews.

    Zionists have erected a mountain of lies over the jews-only state in
    order to deceive the world into believing that it is just another
    western, multi-cultural, liberal, secular, democracy rather than a
    racist, jews-only state. Most non-jews would tend to accept any one of
    these lies that the jews-only state uses to defend itself and thus cast
    doubts about the rationality of the palestinian cause. Bulldozing these
    lies out of the way to uncover the truth is almost a full time
    occupation.

    Jews-Only Political Rights: The Second Class Status of
    Palestinian-Israelis.

    One of the main lies perpetrated by the jews-only state is that all
    israelis, whether jews or not, are equal. Despite the fact that there
    are many palestinians with israeli citizenship, the zionist state is a
    jews-only state because only jews have full rights.

    Firstly, palestinian israelis have only limited political rights in
    comparison to jews. They have the right to vote in zionist elections,
    form political parties, hold political meetings, contest elections for
    seats in the knesset, and even become members of the jewish parliament.
    But, they are not allowed to form political parties which advocate a
    multi-cultural state in which palestinians and jews share power, "[I]n
    this "outpost of democracy," no party that opposes the existence of the
    Jewish state is permitted to take part in elections. It is as if the
    United States were to declare itself a Christian state, define
    "Christian" not by religious belief but by descent, and then pass a "gag
    law" prohibiting public discussion of the issue." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward
    a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of
    Palestine’ counterpunch
    http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004); "The
    Israeli Supreme Court has even ruled that nobody can run for membership
    in the Knesset (parliament) who challenges the idea that Israel is a
    Jewish state or who challenges the principle of preserving a Jewish
    majority." (1989 Israeli Supreme Court ruling reported in the 1991
    Israel Law Review, Vol. 25, p. 219, published by the Faculty of Law at
    the Hebrew University of Jerusalem ). (John Spritzler ‘Should People
    Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’
    http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).

    Secondly, although palestinian israelis seem to have many political
    rights, they do not have the same legal rights as jews  which surely
    indicates the insignificance of their political rights. It also
    indicates the low opinion that jews have of democracy. "The tours (of
    Palestinian and Bedouin areas inside Israel) proved to be a dramatic
    illustration of the discrimination and racism inherent in a system
    designed specifically to maintain a Jewish majority - a system based on
    the superiority of Jews over anyone else. Palestinians, including
    Bedouin, living inside Israel are citizens of the state. They can vote
    in Israeli elections; Bedouin, although not other Palestinians, serve in
    the Israeli military. As a matter of law and of the institutional
    arrangements inherent in Israel's status as a Jewish-majority state,
    however, Palestinians and Bedouin, because they are non-Jews, do not
    receive anything like equal rights or services from the state. Not only
    do they face the kind of de facto discrimination that blacks have faced
    in the U.S. - their schools are inadequate, their municipal services are
    inadequate, they face job discrimination, their towns often sit next to
    toxic waste dumps and other environmentally hazardous sites - but
    because Israel is explicitly a Jewish state, Palestinians are unable by
    law to enjoy the benefits of the state provided to Jews or in any way to
    live in the state as Jews do." (Kathleen & Bill Christison ‘"Finally It
    Broke My Heart": Random Impressions from Palestine’
    http://www.counterpunch.org/christison09242004.html September 24, 2004);
    "Not only are the subjects of the occupation for more than a generation,
    38 years, not allowed inside the country without a regime of special
    permits, and for the last 15 years prevented from working; and not only,
    when they leave their defined territories to spend a period of time
    overseas, can they lose their homes and property forever, as if they
    were foreigners; but the Arabs who are the citizens of Israel lose more
    and more of their civil rights, like the right to grant their children
    minimum conditions to live with dignity, a public library, a cultural
    center, enough nutrition." (Yitzhak Laor ‘Israel Makes It Harder for
    Non-Jews to Become Citizens: Racism by Any Other Name’
    http://www.counterpunch.org/laor04072005.html April 7, 2005); "Nor do we
    find equal treatment of citizens in the Jewish state; the collectivist
    government of Israel spends far more money on its Jewish citizens than
    it does on the Palestinian citizens of Israel. For example, the housing
    ministry spends about $30 on Jewish towns for every dollar it spends on
    Arab towns." (Stephen j. Sniegoski ‘Sharansky, Weissglas, and the
    Inaugural address: The Israeli connection continues February 2, 2005);
    "Today there are about six million Jewish and one million non-Jewish
    Israeli citizens; of the non-Jewish citizens about 250,000 are
    classified as "present-absentees" (under the Absentees Property Law of
    1950) in consequence of which they are denied - forever - all of their
    property rights which were valid until the creation of the Jewish state
    in 1948. A Jew, however, cannot be classified as a "present-absentee" in
    the Jewish state of Israel. Non-Jews inside the Jewish state of Israel
    are discriminated against in multiple ways, some de jure and many de
    facto. Non-Jews are excluded from Jews-only housing and are segregated
    in Arab villages and towns that receive far less from the government
    than Jewish ones. The difference between the Jewish and non-Jewish
    living environments is like the difference between an inner city ghetto
    in the United States and an upscale suburban residential area." (John
    Spritzler ‘Should People Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support
    Israel?’ http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6,
    2005).

    Palestinian israelis are second class citizens in the jews-only state.
    This situation is entirely temporary as the goal of the jews-only state
    is to drive out or deport these indigenous ‘aliens’ whenever the
    opportunity arises. Paradoxically, in order to win the sympathies of
    people around the world, jews try to hide the second class citizenship
    of israeli palestinians from the outside world  as they do their desire
    for a jews-only state. Whilst pretending to western audiences that the
    zionist state is an open, western, secular, multicultural, society like
    all other western states, zionists are doing their utmost to remove all
    palestinians from their own country whenever they can get away with it.
    The more that zionists try to make conditions for palestinians unlivable
    in order to force them to leave palestine, the more effort that zionists
    make to cover up such ethnic cleansing with the deception that the
    jews-only state is just like any other western state. There are jews in
    the western world who pretend to be anti-zionist in order to
    surreptitiously put forward arguments in favour of the jews-only state
    in palestine. They do this by suggesting that in the jews-only state,
    palestinians have the same rights as jews. Supposedly anti-zionist jews
    invariably expose their pro-zionist views when they claim that jews and
    palestinians are equal.

    Although palestinian-israelis can form their own political parties and
    be elected to knesset it has to be wondered why they should bother doing
    this when they can’t legislate on property, immigration, racism, roads,
    settlements, planning, foreign policy, the nature of the jews-only
    state, etc, etc, etc. This sole purpose of this sham democracy is to
    prevent the world from understanding the racism of the jews-only state
    in palestine. One can only be amazed at the sheer gall, chutzpah, of the
    jews who resolutely defend the jews-only state whilst advocating a
    permanent revolution to encourage more countries to become democratic.
    The zionist intent is to focus on every ill in the world to prevent the
    world from seeing that it is being poisoned by the jews-only state in
    palestine. One of the leaders of the jews-only state, nathan sharansky,
    who regards even ariel sharon as being soft on palestinians, has become
    a guiding light in the formulation of the bush administration’s foreign
    policies to democratize the world. Sharansky wants all countries to
    become democratic  except the jews-only state in palestine, "In short,
    Sharansky puts the goal of Jewish exclusivism far above the ideal of
    universal democracy. Ethnocentrism trumps the concept of equality in
    citizenship." (Stephen j. Sniegoski ‘Sharansky, Weissglas, and the
    Inaugural address: The Israeli connection continues February 2, 2005).

    The Lebensraum Policy of the Jews-Only State.

    The racist nature of the jews-only state is manifest from zionists’
    attempts to remove all palestinians from palestine. In 1948, the zionist
    military drove 750,000 palestinians out of palestine. "The Zionists knew
    they had to rid themselves of the Arab majority in order to have a
    specifically Jewish state. The war ended with the Zionists in control of
    80% of Palestine. In the next year, nearly 400 Arab villages were
    completely destroyed. This was no accident but the result of deliberate
    policy, as shown in the following statement by one of the most
    authoritative officials of the Zionist state: "Among ourselves it must
    be clear that there is no place in our country for both peoples
    together. The only solution is Eretz Israel, or at least the western
    half of Eretz Israel, without Arabs, and there is no other way but to
    transfer the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, transfer all
    of them, not one village or tribe should remain." (Joseph Weitz, Deputy
    Chairman of the Board of directors of the Jewish National Fund (JNF)
    from 1951 to 1973, former Chairman of the Israel Land Authority quoted
    in Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism
    and the People of Palestine’ counterpunch
    http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004). Since the
    1948 war the jews-only state has continued its lebensraum policy against
    the palestinians. For the last fifty years, it has constantly terrorized
    palestinian civilians in the hope of driving them out of the country.

    Only Jews Exist in the Jews-Only State.

    For the jews-only state, it is not enough to remove all palestinians
    from palestine. The jews-only state also attempts to completely
    eradicate all signs of palestinian existence in palestine. The jewish
    god gave the land of palestine to jews and this sacred land cannot be
    defiled or contaminated by any evidence of palestinians’ existence. In
    1948, after zionists had driven three-quarters of a million palestinians
    from the country, they demolished palestinian villages to make sure that
    palestinians could never return. They then wiped out all traces of
    palestinians’ occupation of the land  much as the nazis tried to
    obliterate the existence of jews in what hannah arendt called ‘the holes
    of oblivion’. The zionists then built jews-only settlements in their
    place, "Moshe Dayan, former Defense Minister, stated in a famous speech
    before students at the Israeli Institute of Technology in Haifa in 1969:
    "Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not
    even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you
    because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not
    exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahial arose in the place
    of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the
    place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman.
    There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a
    former Arab population." (Ha'aretz, April 4, 1969, quoted in Davis, 21).
    (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism
    and the People of Palestine’ counterpunch
    http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004). Since the
    1948 war the jews-only state has continued to obliterate all traces of
    palestinian culture in palestine.

    The Jews-Only Border.

    The jews-only state in palestine is the only country in the world which
    refuses to define its own borders. It refuses to do this because it
    doesn’t want to curb its colonialist ambitions, its lebensraum
    tendencies, with specific boundaries, "Israel is unique in that it
    doesn't have defined or recognized borders ... Israel has always been a
    country with creeping borders - it has an insatiable urge to expand, and
    thus further dispossess the native population. On May 14, 1948, the day
    he proclaimed the new state without specifying its borders, Ben Gurion
    wrote in his diary: "Take the American Declaration of Independence for
    instance. It contains no mention of the territorial limits" A few years
    later, Ben-Gurion wrote: "To maintain the status quo will not do. We
    have to set up a dynamic state bent upon expansion" The current
    construction of the land-grab wall is merely the latest manifestation of
    these expansionist proclivities." (Paul de Rooij ‘Straw Men and Wild
    Fires’ http://www.counterpunch.org/rooij02282005.html February 28,
    2005); "In 1948, the Jewish colony became a state but with ever
    expanding borders. Israel launched six major wars against the
    Palestinian people and the neighboring Arab states. These were launched
    in 1948, 1956, 1967, 1978, 1982, and 2002. In all these wars, Israel
    expanded its borders. In 1948, it annexed the Galilee, Auja area, and
    the Jerusalem corridor, which were Palestinian territories according to
    the 1947 UN Partition Resolution 181. In 1956, Israel collaborated with
    the imperialist European powers of Britain and France in invading Egypt
    and the Palestinian territory of Gaza Strip. Only a firm stand from
    President Eisenhower forced the Zionist Israelis to withdraw from Gaza
    Strip and Sinai. In 1967, Israel invaded and occupied the Arab
    territories of Sinai, Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights.
    In 1978, Israel invaded and occupied South Lebanon. Then, it invaded
    Lebanon, including its capital, Beirut, in 1982. When it withdrew, few
    months later, it expanded its occupation of South Lebanon. In addition
    to these wars, Israel launched major air raids on Syria, Lebanon,
    Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, and Tunisia." (Hassan A. El-Najjar ‘Zionism:
    The Highest Stage of Imperialism’
    http://www.aljazeerah.info/Editorials/2002/May%202002/Zionism

    ,%20the%20highest%20stage%20of%20imperialism%20

    By%20Hassan%20A.%20El-Najjar.htm May 15th 2002); "Unlike many countries,
    including the United States, the Israeli state does not belong, even in
    principle, to those who reside within its borders, but is defined as the
    state of the Jewish people, wherever they may be. That peculiar
    definition is one reason why the state has to this day failed to produce
    a written constitution, define its borders, or even declare the
    existence of an Israeli nationality." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single
    State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine’
    counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html
    17.06.2004). This is another example of jews’ belief in their
    specialness or uniqueness.

    Jews-Only Land Ownership.

    Another jews-only policy implemented by the jews-only state in palestine
    concerns land ownership. "The state owns 94 percent of Israel's land and
    holds it in trust specifically for the Jewish people, meaning that
    Palestinians cannot buy land - even land they once owned before Israel
    was created and they were dispossessed. They usually cannot even rent
    state land." (Kathleen & Bill Christison ‘"Finally It Broke My Heart":
    Random Impressions from Palestine’
    http://www.counterpunch.org/christison09242004.html September 24, 2004).
    Palestinian israelis, who have the right to vote, the right to form
    political parties, and the right to sit in the knesset, do not have the
    right to buy land because the jews-only god has given the land of
    palestine exclusively to jews.

    It is commonplace for the jews-only state to steal palestinian land but,
    even worse is that it also expropriates the land of palestinian israelis
     despite the fact that such israeli citizens are supposed to be
    protected by the law. The only difference between the theft of property
    from palestinians and palestinian israelis is that in the former case
    jews expropriate the land illegally whilst in the latter case jews have
    to carry out the confiscation legally, as the nazis did during the
    second world war. "Israel has nationalised some 93 per cent of the
    country's lands, by appropriating land without compensation from the
    four million Palestinian refugees who live in exile and by confiscating
    the lands of the one million Palestinians who live as citizens. This 93
    per cent of Israel is out of bounds to Palestinians ..." (Jonathan Cook,
    The Electronic Intifada, ‘Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners
    inside Israel’ http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3674.shtml March
    10th 2005). Palestinian israelis have no rights to stop the jews-only
    state from confiscating their land.

    Some zionists have become politically embarrassed about such property
    theft. But what they are embarrassed about is not the racism itself but
    the erroneous perception of racism by the rest of the world. So the
    jews-only state is currently seeking ways to camouflage this racism to
    win the approval of its supposedly anti-racist supporters in the western
    world, "Since 1961, the state has administered the JNF lands through the
    Israel Lands Administration (ILA). Until recently, only Jews were
    permitted to participate in the tenders for the leasing of JNF land, but
    Attorney General Menachem Mazuz decided last week that the ILA could not
    continue this policy because it discriminated between Jews and
    non-Jews." (Amiram Barkat ‘Buying the State of Israel’
    www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=539278
    February 11th 2005); "the Jewish National Fund … maintains and
    implements Israel's discriminatory land policies. Two weeks ago,
    Israel's attorney general determined that all land managed by the Israel
    Lands Administration, including land owned by the Jewish National Fund,
    must be marketed without discrimination or limits including to non-Jews.
    According to the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, "The state prosecutor's
    office believes it will not be able to defend before the High Court the
    policy of allocating Jewish National Fund land to Jews only." Days
    later, news agencies reported, " The Jewish National Fund and the
    Finance Ministry are discussing ways to separate the JNF from the state,
    to allow it to continue selling land to Jews only."" ('QUIT! premieres
    latest line of "Estee Slaughter" products on Valentine's Day'
    http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3627.shtml February 21st 2005).
    However, these political anxieties about the anti-racist sensibilities
    of westerners might be misplaced given that many western governments
    have given so much support to the jews-only state they are now as racist
    as the jews-only state in palestine.

    Jews-Only Police.

    The following is a story of the way in which jewish squatters are
    allowed to commit crimes against palestinian israelis and when the
    latter protest about their treatment which is illegal under the
    jews-only law they are fined for protesting, "In 1989, a group of armed
    settlers invaded a house in the Old City of Jerusalem and occupied the
    top floor; the Palestinian family managed to fend off the settlers from
    the ground floor. The Palestinian house owner sought police help to
    evict the invaders, but was fined NIS 500 for "disturbing the peace".
    During the ensuing months, the settlers set out to make the Palestinian
    family's life miserable by throwing garbage onto their courtyard,
    pounding on the floor at night, and throwing boiling water onto the
    children when they ventured near the front of the house. The settlers
    eventually drilled a hole through the sewage pipes so that the dirty
    water would drip onto the living room/kitchen below where the eleven
    family members were now forced to sleep. At least two adults were forced
    to stay at home all the time to prevent the settlers from invading the
    rest of the house. The family resisted for more than a year, building
    several contraptions to stem the sewage flow onto their ground floor
    living quarters. I visited this family several times and witnessed the
    menacing, bearded, armed settlers asking the Palestinian homeowner when
    he was going to leave. Furthermore, this type of incident has been
    repeated thousands of times throughout the occupied territories where
    settlers or the army have invaded and confiscated Palestinian houses.
    Such incidents are worse than house demolitions, because in addition to
    their dispossession, Palestinian families are subjected to abuse and
    humiliation. While house demolitions are an impersonal affair conducted
    by soldiers with explosives or Caterpillar bulldozers, the home
    invasions are an exercise in calculated humiliation and intimidation -
    this is up close and personal. It would seem that if the intent is to
    steal the houses, then this could be attained in one fell swoop. The
    fact that the settler or soldier sieges last for months indicates that
    their purpose is also to drive out Palestinians from the area; it is not
    enough to deprive families of their houses or businesses - the intent is
    to drive them out of their cities and "Israel" altogether. Besides the
    house under siege, the message is also meant for the neighboring
    Palestinian families." (Paul de Rooij ‘Saverio Costanzo's "Private"’
    http://www.counterpunch.org/rooij05202005.html May 19, 2005). This story
    is yet more proof that palestinian israelis do not have the same rights
    as jews. Only zionist racists promote the idea that there is an equality
    between jews and palestinian israelis in the jews-only state.

    Jews-only Labourers on Jews-only Agricultural Land.

    Much of the property that jews have stolen from palestinians is
    agricultural land. Jews have then ensured that only jews work on
    jews-only agricultural land, "The problem of building a Jewish society
    among an overwhelming Arab majority came to be known as the "conquest of
    land and labor." Land, once acquired, had to remain in Jewish hands. The
    other half of this project, known as Labor Zionism, called for the
    exclusive use of Jewish labor on the land acquired by the Jews in
    Palestine. The Labor Zionists maintained this dual exclusionism (or
    apartheid, as we would now call it) in order to build up purely Jewish
    institutions." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism,
    Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine’
    http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004).

    Jews-Only Employment.

    The jews-only state also implements jews-only employment policies, "The
    conquest of labor pertained not only to agriculture but also to
    industry. The Labor Zionists formed an institution to organize Jewish
    labor and exclude Arabs: the Histadrut. The Histadrut was (and largely
    is) an all-Jewish combination trade union and cooperative society
    providing its members with a number of services. From the beginning it
    was a means of segregating Arab and Jewish labor and bringing into
    existence a strictly Jewish economic sector." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a
    Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of
    Palestine’ http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html
    17.06.2004); "The overwhelming majority of Palestinian laborers who had
    been incorporated into Israel's workforce, and were therefore part of
    the daily scenery inside Israel, disappeared as their right of entry
    into Israel was revoked." (Neve Gordon ‘From Ghettos to Frontiers’ A
    review of ‘Frontiers and Ghettos’ by James Ron
    http://www.counterpunch.org/gordon05192005.html May 19, 2005).

    This policy continues today, "Israel plans to terminate employment
    opportunities for Palestinians by 2008. Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Moshe
    Ya'alon said Israel no longer maintains a policy of encouraging
    Palestinian employment. Ya'alon said the government has been phasing out
    the number of jobs available to Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza
    Strip in Israel. By 2008, Israel would institute a complete ban on the
    employment of Palestinians, Middle East Newsline reported. The
    government can ban Palestinians from entering Israel and requires entry
    and work permits. "The goal is to stop Palestinians from working in
    Israel by 2008," Ya'alon told the Low-Intensity Conflict warfare
    counter-terrorism [LIC-2005] conference on Tuesday. Ya'alon said Israel
    has been encouraging Western and other donor nations to help the
    Palestinian Authority create jobs in an effort to end its dependence on
    the Jewish state. He said the new policy no longer regards a peace
    agreement with the PA as resulting in security." (Israel to ban hiring
    of Palestinians’ WORLD TRIBUNE.COM March 10, 2005).

    Jews-Only Planning Laws.

    The way that jews steal land from palestinian-israelis who rightfully
    own their own land is through the jews-only planning system. The
    following incident is about a palestinian-israeli called ali living in a
    palestinian village called sakhin. The jews-only state prevents him from
    building an extension to his house on his own land, "But even so,
    couldn't Ali at least find a legal way to build a house inside a
    Palestinian community or inside Sakhin? The problem again is the law. In
    1965, the government passed the Planning and Building Law, which defined
    all the places in which Israeli citizens, Jews and Palestinians, could
    live. Every community's room for expansion was circumscribed on a map of
    the country in the form of a blue line marked around it. Anywhere inside
    the blue line could be developed, anywhere outside the blue line could
    not. In the case of Jewish communities, the blue lines were drawn
    generously to allow for future expansion. The state has also been adding
    new Jewish communities to its list ever since 1965. In Palestinian
    communities, by contrast, the blue lines were drawn tightly around the
    houses that already existed in 1965, leaving no room for expansion. (In
    fact, Israel refused to draw blue lines around dozens of Palestinian
    communities that had existed before the creation of Israel, thereby
    "uncreating" them. Today some 100,000 Palestinians live in these
    "unrecognised villages". In law all the homes in unrecognised villages
    are considered illegal and subject to demolition). Since 1965, no new
    Palestinian communities have been approved." (Jonathan Cook, The
    Electronic Intifada, ‘Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners inside
    Israel’ http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3674.shtml March 10th
    2005).

    Jews-Only Water.

    "Jewish settlers get water for their lawns and swimming pools while the
    Arabs go without …." (John Spritzler ‘Should People Opposed to Bigotry
    and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’
    http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).

    Jews-Only Roads.

    The jews-only state in palestine tries to purify its jewish essence
    through the construction of jews-only roads. "Before there was
    terrorism, there were the roads. Israel has established a 300-mile road
    network throughout the West Bank connecting the settlements. These are
    high-security roads-three football fields wide with their surrounding
    security perimeters-and they are accessible only to Israelis. They
    separate Palestinian population areas from each other and from their
    agricultural land; in fact, before the current warfare, they segmented
    the areas of semi-autonomous Palestinian control into 227 separate,
    non-contiguous patches of land." (Kathleen Christison ‘Before There Was
    Terrorism’ http://www.counterpunch.org/kchristison0502.html May 2,
    2002).

    Jews-Only Settlements/Villages/Towns/Cities.

    The concept of jews-only roads should not be entirely surprising since
    jews have also created jews-only settlements, villages, towns, and
    cities, "They (palestinians) are not permitted, by law, to move into
    Jewish cities or the Jewish neighborhoods of mixed cities. (Kathleen &
    Bill Christison ‘"Finally It Broke My Heart": Random Impressions from
    Palestine’ http://www.counterpunch.org/christison09242004.html September
    24, 2004); "small luxury Jewish communities known in Hebrew as
    "mitzpim". These mitzpim, which have extensive lands on which their
    inhabitants can build, are required by law to vet anyone who wishes to
    live inside them. Again by law, non-Jews are not entitled to apply to
    join these communities." (Jonathan Cook, The Electronic Intifada,
    ‘Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners inside Israel’
    http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3674.shtml March 10th 2005). So,
    although palestinian-israelis are legally allowed to travel on these
    roads in practice this is not possible because the roads link one
    jews-only settlement/town/city to another.

    Jews-Only Cars.

    In order for the jewish army to spot palestinians (all of whom are
    suspected terrorists), the jews-only state in palestine has implemented
    an apartheid licensing system for cars in palestine. Jews have one type
    of car number plate, palestinian-israelis have another type, and
    palestinians have a third. It is surprising that the jews-only state has
    not insisted that palestinians should go around with a yellow armband
    with the letter P inscribed on it.

    Jews-Only Immigration  The Law of Return for Jews-Only.

    In the violent establishment of the jews-only state in 1948, jews drove
    around three-quarters of a million palestinians from their homes and
    their country. Since then, the jews-only state has refused to allow
    these palestinians, or their descendants, to return to their country
    their homes and land have long since been taken over and occupied by
    jewish nazis. In stark contrast, any jew around the world, even those
    who have never had any connection with palestine, is legally entitled to
    immigrate to palestine, become a jews-only citizen, and own jews-only
    property. "The first census of the state of Israel, conducted in 1949,
    counted a total of 650,000 Jews and 150,000 Arabs. The legal foundation
    for the racial state was laid down in two laws passed in 1950. The
    first, the Law of Return, permitted any Jew, anywhere in the world, the
    right to "return" to Israel. This right did not apply to non-Jews,
    including the Palestinian Arabs who had recently become refugees. In
    addition, the Absentee Property Law confiscated the property of Arab
    "absentees," and turned it over to the Custodian of Absentee Property.
    Arab refugees within their own country were termed "present absentees"
    (what a phrase!), and not allowed to return to their property. A number
    of refugees who attempted to do so were termed "infiltrators," and some
    were shot in the attempt. Confiscated property accounted for the vast
    majority of new settlements. These confiscated lands, in accordance with
    the procedures that were established in the Mandate period by the JNF,
    have become Israel Lands, with their own administration. This
    administration, controlling 92.6% of all of the lands in Israel, only
    leases these lands to Jews." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State
    Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine’
    counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html
    17.06.2004); "Wiesel supports "the right of return" for Jews, but only
    for Jews. An American Jew, who can trace his ancestors back to the
    Revolutionary War, has the right to return to Israel, obtain dual
    citizenship, obtain subsidized housing on land expropriated from
    Palestinians, and drive to settlements on roads "for Jews only."
    Palestinians who can trace their ancestors to the same land for
    centuries and who have a title and key to property from which they were
    driven in 1948 have no right to return." (Letter by Daniel A. McGowan,
    Director, Deir Yassin Remembered - February 26, 2005).

    The jews-only state allows christians to visit holy christian sites in
    palestine, but it is not willing to allow them to immigrate and become
    israeli citizens  especially if they are palestinian christians.

    Of course, all states around the world have the right to control
    immigration but the jews-only state in palestine allows immigration only
    from jews not from any other race or religion. In other words, the
    jews-only state promotes a racist, jews-only, immigration policy.

    In america, virtually all the main pro-zionists who support racist
    immigration policies in the jews-only state in palestine are ardent
    opponents of limits on immigration into america.

    Jews-Only Cemeteries.

    There are also jews-only cemeteries alongside the jews-only roads
    running between jews-only settlements/towns/cities, in the jews-only
    state. Jews loathe the idea of being laid to rest in the company of
    non-jews  as if even in death non-jews might contaminate or poison
    their jewish essence. As israel shamir has pointed out, "Their separate
    burial is necessary to guarantee their bodily resurrection when the
    Messiah comes. A Jewish body defiled by gentile proximity won’t be
    resurrected, according to the Jews. Even irreligious Jews follow this
    separation rule without giving it a second thought." If non-jews are
    accidentally buried amongst jews this puts all the jews at
    resurrectional risk so they have to be dug up and transferred to a
    non-jewish cemetery, "This squeamish attitude is particularly
    unpleasant: whenever the Jews discover that a person of doubtful
    Jewishness is buried among their lot they remove the body and dump it
    elsewhere. It happened to an Israeli citizen Teresa Angelowitz. She was
    buried in the Jewish cemetery; later on the religious authorities
    discovered that she was a wife of a Jew, but not a Jew. They exhumed her
    body at the dark of the night and re-buried on the dumping ground. It
    happened to many Russian soldiers who died defending the Jewish
    character of Israel and were refused the burial."

    Many jews in the jews-only state were horrified by the tsunami which hit
    south-east asia in december 2004. They were horrified by the idea that
    jewish victims might end up being buried with the tens of thousands of
    goy victims, "While the whole world had sent aid to the tsunami-hit
    South East Asia, Israel forwarded a team entrusted with a unique task.
    Not many Israeli tourists were swept away by the giant waves  official
    death toll stands at three, with some twenty missing; not many comparing
    with the hundred thousand Indonesians or even with three thousand
    Swedes. Still the Israeli teams were very active on the ground. The
    highly trained experts led by Rabbi Meshi Zahav did not go to save
    trapped survivors or alleviate suffering of millions; their job was to
    save dead Jews from fate worse than death  that is to be buried with
    the goyim in the same grave. The Haaretz daily reported: "The Israeli
    rescue teams in Thailand split up Thursday: one team worked on
    identifying bodies in Krabi, while another worked on the same task in
    Phuket. The Israeli crews - from the police and Zaka (a non-profit group
    that specializes in identifying victims of disasters) - are trying to
    locate dead Israelis before they are buried". They pressed upon the Thai
    government to postpone the mass entombment, though it was necessary to
    prevent the spread of epidemics; and Bangkok gave in. Every dead Jewish
    body should be taken to Israel, or at least buried separately from
    impure non-Jews. Witty Gilad Atzmon remarked: "the ‘altruistic’ Jews …
    are in a state of panic, as we all know, dead Jews are precious, they
    deserve a special burial. The fact that 5-10 Jews might be lost forever
    among some other 125.000 gentiles is pretty horrifying, I am sure you
    can see it."" (Israel Shamir ‘Tsunami in Gaza’ January 2nd 2005).

    In the jews-only state, with its jews-only religion, jews-only political
    rights, jews-only legal rights, jews-only culture, jews-only borders,
    jews-only employment, jews-only land ownership, jews-only planning laws,
    jews-only roads running between jews-only
    settlements/villages/towns/cities, jews-only immigration, jews-only
    cemeteries, it is absolutely imperative that, in death, every part of a
    jew’s body is buried in a jews-only cemetery, "A week after the Likud
    referendum, two terrible blows were delivered. An armored vehicle
    carrying a large quantity of explosives entered Gaza city in order to
    blow up buildings, and was hit by a roadside bomb planted by Palestinian
    guerillas. It exploded, tearing the six soldiers to pieces. The day
    after, the very same thing happened on the "Philadelphi Axis": an
    armored personnel carrier full of explosives, which was sent there to
    blow up tunnels under the border, was hit by a Palestinian rocket and
    blew up with its five crew members. The power of each of the two
    explosions was such that body parts were scattered over hundreds of
    meters. The whole country saw on TV how Israeli soldiers crawled on all
    fours, filtering the sand with their bare hands in order to gather the
    body parts of their comrades. The media competed in the orchestration of
    a necrophile hysteria, with endless talk about "body parts" interlaced
    with scenes of funerals. (Uri Avnery ‘Busharon: The Countdown’ May 15th,
    2004). There is no intention here of mocking zionists’ death rituals.
    All cultures have their own rituals concerning the burial of the dead
    and each must be given the same respect. However, the general respect I
    afforded this ritual unexpectedly blew up in my face a few months later
    when I read an article in which the commentator made an aside that
    jews-only state refuses to return to their families what is left of the
    bodies of palestinian suicide bombers. "When Michael Matza, the
    Inquirer's Jerusalem correspondent, wrote a story headlined
    "Palestinians' Remains Fuel a Bitterness," which detailed Israel's
    practice of not releasing the bodies of suicide bombers, it provoked a
    hue and cry from readers who felt the piece was too sympathetic to
    families of the bombers. It didn't matter that Matza had written
    numerous pieces sympathetic to Israeli victims of suicide attacks. He
    was denounced as anti-Semitic and labeled a "self-hating Jew," a
    favorite epithet for Jewish journalists." (Barbara Matusow ‘Caught in
    the Crossfire’ American Journalism Review June/July 2004 issue). This is
    not just a one-off policy. "As I wrote the press release I was almost in
    tears because I was just going through the motions. Three youths,
    apparently trying to sneak into Israel to work, had been shot at, beaten
    and then (had) their organs crudely taken out of their bodies.
    Unceremoniously the bodies were returned four days later, no
    explanation. By any human standard, this is a massive story full of
    political intrigue." (Mark Schneider 'American Media Censorship and
    Israel' http://www.ccmep.org/ccmep/american031902.html 19.3.2002). This
    is part of zionists’ cultural terrorism against palestinians. The
    zionists show their utter contempt for palestinians by doing the exact
    opposite of what is demanded of them by their own death rituals.

    Jews-Only Racism: Jewish Racists in the Jews-Only State.

    There is a lot of ‘jews-only’ racism in the jews-only state. There are,
    of course, racists in every societies and there are even some in a few
    western governments. These days, however, if western politicians were to
    make a racist statement in public they would immediately be attacked by
    their countries’ zionist lobby and, if they didn’t resign, they would be
    sacked forthwith. This is not the case in the racist jews-only state.
    Jewish politicians can make openly racist statements without anyone
    bothering to condemn them. "An Israeli cabinet minister has called for
    the expulsion of some 1.3 million Palestinian citizens of Israel who
    constitute nearly one fifth of the state’s population. Transportation
    Minister Avigdor Lieberman said during an interview with the Israeli
    army radio (Gali Tzahal) on Sunday that the "Arabs of Israel" should be
    expelled in case a Palestinian state was established and Jewish
    settlements in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip were dismantled.
    Lieberman, a former Moldovan immigrant who arrived in Israel in 1978,
    suggested that the existence of a large non-Jewish minority in Israel
    threatened the "Jewish identity" and "ethnic purity" of Israel. But his
    explicitly racist remarks raised no ire in the Israeli political
    establishment. Israeli officials, from Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
    Sharon downward, refused to condemn the remarks, suggesting a sympathy
    with Lieberman’s ideas. Amira Dotan, a spokeswoman for the Israeli
    foreign ministry, told Aljazeera that ethnic cleansing was not "the
    policy of the government". "I do not know what made him say these
    things. He is a free man; he has the right to express his views."
    Lieberman's racism has been well known for many years. A few years ago,
    he called for the bombing of the Aswan Dam in Egypt, the Presidential
    palace in Damascus and Iran’s nuclear facilities. He also called for
    executing Arab Knesset members Tibi and Muhammad Baraka by a firing
    squad for supporting Palestinian rights and calling for ending the
    Israeli occupation. In 2002, he urged the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
    Sharon to carry out "wholesale killings" of Palestinian civilians in
    order to force them to flee to Jordan and other neighbouring Arab
    countries." (‘Israeli Minister Wants Total Palestinian-Arab 'Cleansing'’
    http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_

    service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=1862 May 10th 2004).

    Once again, this was not a rare racist remark in an otherwise non-racist
    society. "Recently, a law was passed in one of the Israeli Knesset's
    many committees saying that settlers who will be evacuated following a
    future retreat from the Gaza Strip will be given compensation. There was
    a minimal majority of one committee member for this law, which is an
    essential part of prime minister's Ariel Sharon's plan of "Gaza
    Disengagement", and in order for it to be passed the balance was tipped
    to the side of the government from outside the coalition by Member of
    Knesset Mohammad Barake. Barake, a MK from "Hadash" party (the former
    communist party) is, as his name might indicate, an Israeli Arab. Limor
    Livnat, the Israeli minister of education, who had also voted in favor
    of the law, was one of the most noticeable politicians in a group of
    right wing Knesset members and others who had each expressed outrage
    that an Arab (who had, like any other Member of the Knesset, been
    elected democratically) was the one to determine the future of Israel in
    such an important question. Because of Livnat's high position in the
    government there was a mini uproar in the Israeli media about the fact
    that the minister of education, the person who is in charge of what
    children will be taught in schools, had said something so bluntly
    racist. In actuality, no one was surprised. No one has any illusions
    that Ariel Sharon and the rest of the ministers besides - maybe -
    politicians from the Labor Party, think any differently from Livnat, in
    spite of them remaining more or less silent about the subject. In any
    normal "western" democracy such a thing would have become an immediate
    scandal. I can only imagine that if Germany's education minister would
    say something even remotely close to Livnat's statement about a Jewish
    parliament member, the only question would be whether that minister
    would find him or herself out of a job more quickly than it would take
    the foreign minister of Israel to file an official protest." (Uri
    Yaakobi ‘Limor Livnat and the Palestinian "problem"’
    http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3634.shtml February 23rd 2005).

    There are plenty of other examples of such racism from virtually all
    jews-only politicians. Racist views such as these should not be
    surprising in a racist state. What is surprising is that such views
    should be surprising in a racist state  but then what this indicates is
    the power of zionist propaganda around the world which presents the
    jews-only state as being a multi-cultural society.

    Racism is not just prevalent amongst jews-only politicians in the
    jews-only state but amongst most jews themselves. Israel shamir quotes
    matti golan, the former editor-in-chief of the leading zionist newspaper
    ‘haaretz’ and of the ‘globes’, the paper for the jewish economic elites.
    "My problem is not only with Germany. It is with everything German,
    anywhere. I neither argue nor get upset. I have simply wiped Germany and
    its people off my globe". Shamir explains that, "Golan is not a
    firebrand; he is not one of Jewish religious fanatics who deny goyim
    even descent from Adam. Golan is not a Cabbalist and extremist but one
    of the sane, non-religious mainstream influential Jewish intellectuals.
    When this article was discussed on IsraelForum.com in the internet, a
    typical Jewish response was this: "Matti Golan is a prominent journalist
    and columnist. He represents ideas held by the vast majority of Israeli
    Jews in this subject. My opinion included." If I were a German, I would
    have second thoughts before providing Matti Golan's country with
    nuclear-capable submarines lest he will 'simply wipe Germany and its
    people off our globe'. In my view, Golan sounded a call for racist
    hatred and genocide." (Israel Shamir ‘Children Of A Lesser God’
    Rense.com http://www.rense.com/general52/children.htm 01.05.04).

    Perhaps there ought to be a zionist lobby in the jews-only state to
    enforce the charade that the jews-only state is a non-racist,
    multi-cultural society.

    Jews-Only Sex.

    "The Zionist commitment to racial purity has led to expressions of
    bigotry at the highest levels of Israeli society that would inspire
    outrage in respectable circles in the U.S. An Israeli company has
    required thousands of Chinese workers to sign a contract promising not
    to have sex with Israelis. A company spokesman said there was nothing
    illegal about the requirement. Israeli law forbids the marriage of a Jew
    with a non-Jew." (Associated Press, December 23, 2003)." (Noel Ignatiev
    ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People
    of Palestine’ counterpunch
    http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004).

    Jews-Only Marriage.

    At present, there is no jews-only law barring jews from marrying
    non-jews  it just makes it impossible for them to live together. "A new
    law passed by the Israeli parliament on 31 July 2003 bars family
    unification for Israelis who are married to Palestinians from the
    Occupied Territories. The Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law
    explicitly discriminates against Palestinians from the West Bank and
    Gaza Strip. It also implicitly discriminates against Palestinian
    citizens of Israel, who constitute some 20% of the Israeli population,
    and against Palestinian residents of Jerusalem, for it is they who
    usually marry Palestinians from the Occupied Territories. As such, the
    law formally institutionalizes a form of racial discrimination based on
    ethnicity or nationality. The UN Committee on the Elimination of all
    Forms of Racial Discrimination has expressed concern about this new law
    and has called on Israel to revoke it and reconsider its policy with a
    view to facilitating family unification on a non-discriminatory basis.
    The UN Human Rights Committee has likewise called on Israel to revoke
    the law and to reconsider its policy with a view to facilitating family
    unification of all citizens and permanent residents. Not being able to
    obtain family unification for their Palestinian spouses leaves thousands
    of Palestinian citizens of Israel and Jerusalem residents with two
    options: having their spouse live with them illegally or moving to the
    West Bank and Gaza Strip, where they would be living under Israeli
    military occupation, in a situation of conflict and facing daily
    incursions by the Israeli army, bombardments, house demolition, curfews
    and hundreds of checkpoints, which make it extremely difficult to move,
    work or carry out ordinary daily activities. In addition, it is illegal
    for Israelis and Jerusalemites to enter the Occupied Territories and
    those married to residents of the Occupied Territories may only do so in
    special circumstances and subject to permits and stringent
    restrictions."; "Thus, for Zionism's leaders, it is a terrible thing
    when Jews and non-Jews in Israel/Palestine want to marry each other. God
    forbid! Jewish Israelis and non-Jewish Palestinians do marry each other,
    not in large numbers, but in large enough numbers that the Israeli
    Knesset, on August 1, 2003, felt obliged to enact a law to block
    Palestinians who marry Israelis from becoming Israeli citizens or
    residents. When an Israeli Jew and an Israeli non-Jew decide to get
    married, they are heading down a path made deliberately very difficult
    by Israel's rulers. Israel, by virtue of the Jurisdiction of Rabbinical
    Courts (Marriage and Divorce) Law of 1953, only recognizes marriages
    performed by the official state religious courts: the Jewish orthodox
    Rabbinical, the Islamic Shari'a and the Christian Ecclesiastic courts,
    which do not perform "mixed" marriages. A "mixed" couple's marriage,
    typically performed outside of Israel, is not recognized by Israel. Yet
    despite all of these obstacles, there are married couples, consisting of
    a non-Jewish Arab Palestinian and a Jew, in Israel. Each one of these
    marriages puts the lie to the Zionist claim that Arabs are innately
    anti-Semitic." (John Spritzler ‘Should People Opposed to Bigotry and
    Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’
    http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).

    The jews-only state renewed the law in july 2004, "Also Sunday, the
    Israeli Cabinet extended for six months a rule forbidding Palestinians
    who marry Israelis from living in Israel. Human rights groups have
    criticized the law. Arabs make up about 20 percent of the country's
    population, and many Israelis are concerned about their growing
    numbers." (Ibrahim Barzak ‘Palestinian Authority Offices Burned Down’
    Guardian
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4324486,00.
    html?gusrc=ticker-103704 July 18, 2004).

    Jews-Only Naturalization.

    "Meanwhile, an "emergency regulation" passed in 2003 limits the right of
    Arab citizens of Israel - a right that belongs to not only every Jew in
    Israel but every Jew in the world - to have their spouse and children
    naturalized. That distinction is expressed in the classifications of the
    Central Bureau of Statistics, which formally divides the citizens of
    Israel into two categories: "Jews and others" (Jews, Christians who are
    not Arabs, and people without religious classification); and "the Arab
    population" (Muslims, Druze, Christian Arabs). That is the language of
    the separation. It was announced this week that the government plans to
    stiffen the rules for granting citizenship to non-Jews, through
    amendments to the law that make it difficult to grant legal status to
    Palestinians and other foreigners married to Israeli citizens. The prime
    minister held a special discussion of the issue and decided to establish
    a committee headed by the interior minister. The Interior Ministry
    claims that some 55,000 applications for Palestinian family
    reunification through marriages to Israeli Arabs have been submitted
    since 1968, and that natural growth increased the "naturalized"
    population to some 137,000 Arabs - about one-tenth of the Arab minority
    in Israel." (Yitzhak Laor ‘Israel Makes It Harder for Non-Jews to Become
    Citizens: Racism by Any Other Name’
    http://www.counterpunch.org/laor04072005.html April 7, 2005).

    Jews Only Nukes.

    The jews-only state in palestine neither denies or admits that it
    possesses nuclear weapons, "Officially, Israel does not admit that it
    has nuclear weapons. Since 1965 it has "refused to confirm or deny"
    claims that it possesses a nuclear arsenal. It has refused to sign the
    Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, saying it cannot rely on international
    safeguards when it is in a permanent state of war with much of the Arab
    world. In 1999 the US Department of Energy placed Israel sixth on its
    list of nations possessing nuclear weapons. The document claims Israel
    has 300kg to 500kg of weapons-grade plutonium, enough to produce at
    least 250 nuclear warheads." (Ross Dunn ‘Sharon eyes 'Samson option'
    against Iraq’ http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1223502002
    November 3rd 2002). The jews-only state in palestine believes that it
    should be the only country in the middle east to possess nuclear
    weapons. That is why it is pushing its american colony into fighting a
    zionist proxy war against iran in order to prevent that country from
    acquiring nuclear weapons.

    Jews-only Terrorism.

    For many years the jews-only state has complained incessantly about
    palestinian terrorists threatening to harm the jewish nazis carrying out
    the lebensraum policy of the jews-only state in palestine. The jews-only
    state never considers that anything that it does involves terrorism. And
    yet, somewhat hypocritically, ariel sharon, perhaps the world’s most
    famous terrorist and war criminal, has recently decided to recognize the
    heroism of its very own jewish terrorists involved in the lavon affair
    in 1952. "On presenting the three survivors and the families of the
    deceased with official citations, Israeli Chief of General Staff Lt.
    Gen. Moshe Ya'alon averred, "This is historic justice for those who were
    sent on a mission on behalf of the state and became the victims of a
    complex political affair." Justice? What about justice for the victims
    of those bombs, which exploded in a post office, a couple of movie
    theaters, and the American library in Cairo? I guess they don't count."
    (Justin Raimondo ‘Israel Goes Extremist’
    http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=5495 April 8, 2005). One of the
    terrorists being honoured even called for his terrorist activities to be
    taught in schools. The jews-only state is declaring itself independent
    of all other nations around the world, bound only by its own jews-only
    morality  only jews are allowed to practice terrorism. Interestingly
    the israeli traitors in the bush administration never condemned sharon’s
    recognition of the lavon terrorists.

    Jews-Only Prerogatives in International Law.

    Jews-only prerogatives exist on the international level as much as they
    do on the level of the jews-only state. The main jews-only prerogative
    is that the jews-only state does not have to abide by united nations’
    resolutions. There are varying estimates as to how many un resolutions
    the jews-only state is flouting. But worse than the jews-only state’s
    refusal to live up to these resolutions is the refusal of the western
    world to insist that the jews-only state lives up to its international
    obligations. Throughout the 1990s the american and brutish governments
    made incessant demands for saddam hussein to abide by un resolutions but
    they never once demanded that the jews-only state in palestine did the
    same thing. Both governments also made incessant demands for saddam
    hussein to abolish his (non-existent) weapons of mass destruction but
    never demanded the jews-only state in palestine abolish its very real
    weapons of mass destruction. Even worse than this is that the only
    countries which the western world insists must abide by un resolutions
    are the enemies of the jews-only state. Worst of all, however, is that
    america and britain launch an war against iraq with no united nations’
    sanction in order to protect the jews-only state in palestine. In other
    words, having demanded incessantly for 15 years that countries abide by
    un resolutions they then go ahead with a war for the sake of the
    jews-only state that has not been sanctioned by a un resolution. The
    fact that the jews-only state refuses to abide by un resolutions
    indicates clearly its belief in jewish uniqueness, that jews are a
    special, chosen people superior to all other races. The people who
    adhere to the jews-only religion refuse to live by man made laws. They
    will abide only by laws handed down to them by their jews-only god and
    inscribed in their jews-only religious books.

    These are not the only jews-only international laws, "On December 13,
    2004 the EU General Affairs and External Relations Council approved the
    EU-Israel Action Plan as part of the EU's New Neighborhood Policy - one
    step below full membership in the EU. According to the released
    EU-Israel Action Plan: "The EU and Israel are now closer together than
    ever before and, as near neighbours, will reinforce their political and
    economic interdependence. Enlargement offers the opportunity for the EU
    and Israel to develop an increasingly close relationship, going beyond
    co-operation, to involve a significant measure of economic integration
    and a deepening of political co-operation." Despite European declarative
    positions affirming Israel's obligations in international law, and
    dismissing Israel's rejection of them, and despite Israel's shocking
    human rights record, the EU-Israel Action Plan states that the "EU and
    Israel share the common values of democracy, respect for human rights
    and the rule of law and basic freedoms." Worse, the EU-Israel Action
    Plan might even lead to Israel deciding on EU policies themselves. It
    stated "the possibility for Israel to participate progressively in key
    aspects of EU policies and programmes." It provides "an upgrade in the
    scope and intensity of political co-operation." Concrete steps include
    that the "EU will continue its efforts to ensure that the condemnation
    of anti-Semitism will become a part of international norms through,
    inter alia, appropriate UN resolutions." Considering Israel's policy to
    equate anti-Semitism with criticism of Israeli state practices vis-a-vis
    Palestinian civilians, this has meant that the EU will censure itself
    when it comes to address Israeli violations of human rights. The
    EU-Israel Action Plan formalised the facilitation of Israel's violations
    of human rights and international humanitarian law by shielding Israel
    from legal and political accountability, and by helping it escape the
    normal penalties or costs that would result ordinarily from the
    violations." (Arjan El Fassed, The Electronic Intifada, ‘In bed with
    Israel: EU's close relationship with Israel supports abuse’
    http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3600.shtml March 11th 2005).

    The Nazis’ Jews-only Slaughter.

    The jewish sense of specialness, chosenness, and supremacism, over all
    other peoples, nations, and races makes itself apparent in jewish
    opinions about what happened during the rise of totalitarianism and the
    second world war. Although the nazis sent jews, communists, POWs, the
    aged, the sick, homosexuals, seven day adventists, slavs, serbs, czechs,
    italians, poles, ukrainians, gypsies, etc. to the extermination camps
    many jews believe the nazis slaughtered only jews, "The centrality of
    the Holocaust in Jewish consciousness caused the Jews to insist on its
    absolute exclusiveness. We are shocked and furious when somebody tries
    to remind us that the Nazis exterminated other communities too, such as
    the Roma, the homosexuals and the mentally ill. We get very angry when
    somebody comes and compares "our" Holocaust with other genocides:
    Armenians, Cambodians, Tutsis in Ruanda and others. Really! How can one
    compare?" (Uri Avnery ‘Memory of the Holocaust - from Jewish property
    into human possession’ http://www.gush-shalom.org/archives.html#articles
    March 19th 2005).

    Only the Jews-only Holocaust happened during the Second World War.

    It has been estimated that over 50 million people died during the rise
    of totalitarianism and the second world war; that the nazis slaughtered
    21 million people during their reign in power; and that around twenty
    million russians were killed during the second world war. And yet to
    jews this colossal slaughter has been reduced one reality - the
    so-called jewish holocaust i.e. the jews-only holocaust in which
    apparently the only people who died were jews  or perhaps what they
    mean is that only the deaths of jews mattered. Whatever the real figures
    for russian and jewish fatalities during the second world war, far more
    russians were killed than jews. And yet how many events are there
    outside russia which lament the slaughter of russians? It is impossible
    to discern from the ridiculous propaganda of the jews-only holocaust
    that any other people died during the rise of totalitarianism and the
    second world war than jews. The phrase ‘jews-only holocaust’ is the
    epitome of jewish racism.

    Jews-Only Compensation for the Jews-only Holocaust.

    Another example of jews-only privileges which extend beyond the
    jews-only state in palestine is jews-only holocaust compensation. The
    jews-only holocaust industry was set up to obtain compensation for
    jews-only survivors of the nazi concentration and extermination camps.
    The moral bankruptcy of the jews-only holocaust industry is transparent
    from the fact that it has fought for reparations only for its own people
    - not for any of the other social groups which also suffered under the
    nazis. Jewish americans used america’s substantial political and
    economic clout to force firstly, european governments to pay
    compensation to jews who suffered during the second world war and,
    secondly, european banks into returning jewish assets deposited with
    them during the second world war. This campaign for compensation
    degenerated into what daniel finkelstein has described as an "extortion
    racket". Even abba eban, a zionist politician, has mockingly said about
    the jews-only holocaust industry, "There's no business like Shoah
    business." (Shoah being the hebrew word for holocaust). Who on Earth
    could possibly have believed that jews would have ended up exploiting
    the biggest disaster in their own history? It is, without doubt, one of
    the most shocking episodes of moral depravity in ooman history. Even
    more lamentable is that whilst the jews-only holocaust industry is
    demanding reparations for the loss of property suffered by jews during
    the second world war, they are refusing to compensate palestinians whose
    homes have been demolished, and their land stolen, by the jews-only
    state in palestine. In other words, jews were demanding reparations from
    european governments and banks whilst at the same time denying such
    reparations to the people they were dispossessing. That’s jews-only
    chutzpah.

    Jews-Only Lies.

    It has already been pointed out that the jews-only state has erected a
    mountain of lies with which to protect its interests. These lies are
    promoted by virtually all jews whether they live in the jews-only state
    or not. Perhaps the most well known is that prior to the second world
    war when jews were thinking about moving to palestine to establish a
    jews-only state, they frequently argued that nobody was living there,
    "Israel Zangwill's 1901 assertion that "Palestine is a country without a
    people; the Jews are a people without a country". It hopes to create a
    land entirely empty of gentiles, an Arabia deserta in which Jewish
    children can laugh and play throughout a wasteland called peace."
    (Michael Neumann ‘What is Antisemitism?’
    http://www.ukar.org/neuman/neuman01.html June 4, 2002).

    Another jews-only lie is that in 1948 jews did not drive palestinians
    out of palestine - they left of their own accord, "Mr. Ben Gurion's
    first claim that the Arab exodus from Palestine was provoked by
    directives from the leaders of the surrounding Arab states has been
    shown by overwhelming historical research to be false." (William Martin
    ‘Who is Pushing Whom into the Sea?’
    http://www.counterpunch.org/martin03112005.html March 11, 2005); "But
    Wiesel cannot even bring himself to tell the truth about what caused
    their diaspora. He continues to spread one of the most insidious myths
    in Zionist discourse saying, "Incited by their leaders, 600,000
    Palestinians left the country convinced that, once Israel was
    vanquished, they would be able to return home." Wiesel knows Arab
    leaders did not tell their people to leave; that lie was thoroughly
    disproved by historians years ago. Second, he knows that the best
    estimates are that 750,000 Palestinians fled in 1948. (Note the outrage
    by Wiesel and others whenever anyone dares to question the number of 6
    million Jews killed in the Holocaust.) And third, these original
    Palestinian refugees did not just leave; they were driven out, often by
    the very terrorists for whom Wiesel proudly worked. The massacre at Deir
    Yassin was emblematic of this." (Letter by Daniel A. McGowan, Director,
    Deir Yassin Remembered - February 26, 2005).

    The third major jews-only lie is that despite being driven out of
    palestine, the palestinians threatened to drive the jews into the sea,
    "On 11 October 1961 Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion declared in
    the Israeli Knesset: 'The Arabs' exit from Palestine...began immediately
    after the UN resolution, from the areas earmarked for the Jewish state.
    And we have explicit documents testifying that they left Palestine
    following instructions by the Arab leaders, with the Mufti at their
    head, under the assumption that the invasion of the Arab armies at the
    expiration of the Mandate will destroy the Jewish state and push all the
    Jews into the sea, dead or alive'. The phrase "push all the Jews into
    the sea, dead or alive" has acquired a life of its own as it is invoked
    by Zionist supporters on a daily basis in order to justify the
    aggressive policies of Israel as well as its recalcitrance in continuing
    the occupation of the Palestinians of the West Bank, Gaza, and East
    Jerusalem. It is a highly emotive phrase invoking images of the
    Holocaust, though adapted to a Mediterranean setting. Mr Ben Gurion
    gives no attribution for this phrase, nor does he claim that it is a
    quote from an Arab source. It is expressed here as if it is his personal
    surmise as to the Arab army's intentions. The phrase has been variously
    attributed by Zionist supporters to Yasser Arafat, Gamel Abdul Nasser,
    or any other of Israel's enemies, but none whom I have challenged,
    including U S Congressman Henry Waxman who made the claim in a letter to
    me, attributing the phrase to Nasser, have been able to provide any
    documentation of support for their claim. The speech by Mr. Ben Gurion
    appears to be the origin of the phrase. The phrase, thus, has a Jewish
    origin and not an Arab origin. Mr Ben Gurion is the originator of the
    phrase, in all likelihood." (William Martin ‘Who is Pushing Whom into
    the Sea?’ http://www.counterpunch.org/martin03112005.html March 11,
    2005).

    The Taboo against Criticisms of the Jews-only State.

    It has to be wondered, how much further this jews-only trend will go? In
    america, the zionists have created a political taboo against criticisms
    of the jews-only state. "Although criticism of specific Israeli policies
    is permissible in the United States, it is more or less forbidden to
    express fundamental criticism of the Zionist state, of America's basic
    policy of support for Israel, or of the Jewish-Zionist grip on the US
    media or America's political and academic life. (Remarkably, this is in
    contrast to the situation in Israel itself, where Jews and even Arab
    citizens of the Zionist state have much greater freedom than Americans
    publicly to criticize Zionism and Israeli policies.) Prominent persons
    who dare to violate this prohibition are immediately castigated as
    "anti-Semitic" (that is, anti-Jewish), and pay a heavy price in damage
    to their reputations or careers. Politicians who publicly speak out
    against America's support for Zionism risk almost certain political
    ruin. Among the political or governmental figures whose careers were
    destroyed because they violated the powerful taboo have been US Senators
    William Fulbright, Adlai Stevenson III, and Charles Percy, Congressmen
    Paul McCloskey and Paul Findley, and Deputy Secretary of State George
    Ball." (Abdullah Mohammad Sindi ‘How the Jewish-Zionist Grip on American
    Film and Television Promotes Bias Against Arabs and Muslims’ Institute
    for Historical Review http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n5p-2_Sindi.html
    c1999).

    The Jews-only Global Anti-Discrimination Law.

    This american taboo is not enough for zionists. They want to pass
    legislation in america which firstly equates criticism of the jews-only
    state in palestine with anti-semitism and, secondly, outlaws
    anti-semitism - thereby making criticism of the jews-only state illegal.
    The americans are then willing to enforce this law against any
    individual around the world. There is no other people in the world who
    insist that their government should be protected against all criticisms.
    What such zionist-induced legislation in america will do is to create
    the only state in the world which is beyond criticism even though it is
    the most racist society on Earth. "Coincidentally, a letter to the
    editor by the same rabbi appeared the following day. It was in the same
    vein, observing that the critical letters to the editor had taken away
    her sense of belonging to the Santa Fe community, and concluding that
    the Jews’ two millennia of persecution should be taken into account when
    considering Israel’s actions, that we do not have the right to talk
    about the conflict because we don’t live there, and that in the end
    "What makes most sense is not to offer an opinion about this complicated
    and painful conflict." The notion that no one who does not live there
    can criticize Israel is a common escape for people like this. These same
    people never have trouble criticizing the Palestinians in the West Bank
    and Gaza although they don’t live there either." (Kathleen Christison
    American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of Israel’
    http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/02/1676420.php February 07, 2004).

    The Jews-Only American Media and the Jews-only American Politics.

    In america, the zionist domination of the media is so great it is almost
    on the verge of becoming a ‘jews-only’ industry. In american politics,
    the zionists are taking over more and more departments of state. "The
    neoconservatives are the greatest threat America has ever faced, and
    they control the Office of the President, the Office of the Vice
    President, the Department of State, the Department of Defense, and the
    police-state apparatus known as "Homeland Security." (Paul Craig Roberts
    ‘Outfoxed by bin Laden’ http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=4898
    February 21, 2005). Wayne madsen has suggested they’re aiming to take
    control of the super secret National Security Agency (NSA) - America's
    premier electronic surveillance body. "What has some NSA officials
    worried is that with pro-Israeli neocons now engrained within the CIA,
    Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), State Department, and National
    Security Council, NSA is ripe for penetration by Israeli intelligence.
    With outside contractors now permeating NSA and a major Israeli
    espionage operation being discovered inside the Pentagon, once again
    there is a fear within NSA that foreign intelligence services such as
    the Mossad could make another attempt to penetrate America's virtual
    "Fort Knox" of intelligence treasures and secrets." (Wayne Madsen ‘The
    neocon power grab at NSA and an attempt to stifle the press’
    http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/052405Madsen/052405

    madsen.html May 24th 2005). The chances of a moslem or arab person
    getting a job in an american administration are virtually zero. If
    current trends continue then we are headed for a ‘jews-only’ american
    state where the only non-jews permitted will be shabbat goys who support
    everything done by ariel sharon.

    Isn’t the Phrase 'Jews-Only' Racist?

    It might be argued that the above criticisms of the jews-only state,
    with its jews-only religion, jews-only political rights, jews-only legal
    rights, jews-only culture, jews-only borders, jews-only employment,
    jews-only land ownership, jews-only planning laws, jews-only roads
    running between jews-only settlements/villages/towns/cities, jews-only
    immigration, jews-only cemeteries, jews-only racists (openly racist
    jewish politicians), jews-only marriages, jews-only prerogatives in
    international law, the nazis’ jews-only slaughter, the jews-only
    holocaust, the jews-only holocaust compensation, jews-only fantasies,
    jews-only taboos, the criticism free jews-only state, etc. might have
    some merit but this is undermined by the use of the word ‘jew’ which
    suggests such criticisms are at the very least anti-semitic if not
    racist. Kathleen and bill christison avoid any charge of anti-semitism
    or racism by talking about "Israeli-only settlements, Israeli-only
    roads" (Kathleen and Bill Christison ‘On Israel/Palestine An Exchange
    with Bennie Morris’ http://www.counterpunch.org/christison10022004.html
    October 2/3, 2004). But, as has been suggested above, this is not
    technically correct. Although palestinian-israelis may theoretically be
    allowed to travel on these roads, in practice this is not possible
    because the roads link one jews-only settlement/town/city to another. It
    is much more accurate to say that they are jews-only roads running
    between jews-only settlements. John Spritzler agrees, "This is why
    Israel makes Palestinians prisoners inside of refugee camps and inside
    areas surrounded by military checkpoints, why it subjects them to harsh
    curfews, excludes them from Jews-only roads …." (John Spritzler ‘Should
    People Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’
    http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).

    But surely, it might be countered, the use of the phrase "jews-only" is
    wrong since it implies that such policies are supported by all jews in
    palestine when such policies are the responsibility of only the zionist
    elite. It has to be pointed out however that, "By integrating all Jews
    in Israel into a society that is entirely based on racist principles -
    that Jews should live on land taken away from non-Jews, that Arab
    villages should be plowed under and made to vanish without a trace, that
    the state should be for "the Jews" rather than for all of its people,
    and that people should be identified as a "problem" merely because they
    are not Jewish (especially if they might become a majority!) - the
    Zionist project makes Jewish civilians seem to many Palestinians, quite
    understandably, just as culpable in the oppression of Palestinians as
    are Israeli soldiers who carry out the actual violence and terror.
    According to an article in the October 2002 issue of Outpost (published
    by Americans for a Safe Israel), "A recent public opinion poll found
    that more than one-third of Israelis favor the transfer of Arabs from
    Judea, Samaria and Gaza [i.e. the occupied territories] to neighboring
    Arab countries. That figure may rise or fall in response to specific
    events in the months to come, but one thing is now undeniably clear: the
    transfer solution is a serious proposition that can no longer be
    ignored." Another source reports, "Polls conducted in February 2002 in
    Israel demonstrated that 46% of respondents supported the transfer of
    Arabs from Judea, Samaria and Gaza, while 60% were inclined towards the
    transfer of Arabs from Israel proper."" (John Spritzler ‘Should People
    Opposed to Bigotry and Anti-Semitism Support Israel?’
    http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Should-People.htm February 6, 2005).

    It might also be countered that the use of the phrase "jews-only" is
    wrong since it implies a condemnation of jewish people around the world
    for what is being done in their name by the jews-only state in
    palestine. Aren’t such "jews-only" criticisms blatantly wrong because
    they have got nothing to do with jews outside the jews-only state in
    palestine? Two points need to be made.

    Firstly, some of the jews-only phenomena outlined above refers to jews
    outside the jews-only state. For example, the jews-only holocaust
    compensation, the jews-only lies, jews-only taboos, the criticism free
    jews-only state, the jews-only american media, the jews-only american
    political system, etc.

    Secondly, with some notable exceptions on what is regarded as the
    political extremes, no mainstream jewish organization anywhere around
    the world has demanded an end to the jews-only state; criticized the
    jews-only state’s jews-only policies; opposed jews-only racists from
    entering the jews-only government; insisted that the jews-only state
    abides by un resolutions; or asked that the jews-only state gives up its
    weapons of mass destruction in the same way as these organizations
    demanded such things of saddam, "Leading pro-Israeli organizations in
    the United States have pointedly refused to condemn Ariel Sharon's
    inclusion in his new government of the National Union alliance parties
    whose members ran for election on a platform openly advocating the
    "transfer" or ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. The National Union
    is made up of three parties, Moledet, Tekuma and Israel Beitenu and won
    seven seats in the recent Israeli election. The Anti-Defamation League
    (ADL), which boasts of "90 years fighting anti-Semitism, bigotry and
    extremism," also remained publicly silent. The very high tolerance for
    racist and potentially genocidal ideas that Foxman evinces when they
    come from Israelis is not evident in other, lesser cases. For example,
    when the far-right Freedom Party made gains in Austria's elections in
    2000 on an anti-immigrant platform, Foxman issued a statement saying,
    "It is astonishing that a significant portion of the [Austrian]
    population is ready to embrace a party and leadership that espouse
    xenophobic and nativist positions and statements." (ADL press release, 1
    February 2000)." (Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada,
    http://electronicIntifada.net/v2/article1210.shtml 3.3.2003).

    In america very few jews have objected to the racism of the jews-only
    state in palestine so it would seem safe to assume they support what is
    happening. David horowitz’s extreme racist views are probably common
    amongst the jewish community in america. Most jews support what gilad
    atzmon calls the ""lachrymose" view of Jewish history: the inevitability
    of Jewish suffering at the hands of non-Jews". Given that such a racist
    view is the basis of the jews-only state in palestine then this suggests
    that virtually all jews support the jews-only state and its racism. It
    has been pointed out above that jews all around the world are legally
    entitled to immigrate to palestine and become citizens of the jews-only
    state. Their unwillingness to renounce their ‘de-jure’ citizenship of
    the jews-only state indicates their support for that state. The number
    of jews outside the jews-only state who have made any criticism of the
    state’s jews-only policies is so miniscule as to be politically
    irrelevant. In other words, virtually all jews around the world support
    the jews-only state in palestine, the racism of the jews-only state, and
    the jews-only state’s flouting of international law.

    Kathleen christison paints an accurate picture of widescale jewish
    support for the jews-only state in palestine. She starts off by talking
    about the views of the jewish historian benny morris. "This was a day or
    two after this paragon of dispassionate Israeli scholarship had
    expostulated in an interview published in Ha’aretz on the benefits (if
    you’re Jewish) of ethnic cleansing, the critical miscalculation of David
    Ben-Gurion in not having completed the total ethnic cleansing of
    Palestine from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River in 1948 when he had
    a chance, and the barbarity of Arab and Muslim culture. "The Arab world
    as it is today is barbarian," Morris declared. Islamic and Arab culture
    is "a world in which human life doesn’t have the same value as it does
    in the West," in which freedom and democracy are alien, in which there
    are "no moral inhibitions." He was speaking in sweeping terms, of entire
    cultures, of the mass of individuals in the Arab and the Muslim worlds,
    not merely of governments that are oppressive or undemocratic.
    Palestinians in particular, Morris believes, are barbaric, "a very sick
    society," and should be treated "the way we treat individuals who are
    serial killers. . . . Something like a cage has to be built for them."
    (Kathleen Christison ‘American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of
    Israel’ http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/02/1676420.php February 07,
    2004).

    Morris’s comments are blatantly anti-palestinian and racist, and yet he
    regards himself as still being a leftist. If leftist jews hold such
    views then just imagine the views of those on the right of the political
    spectrum. Christison concludes, "Benny Morris - who still considers
    himself a leftist, still favors establishment of a Palestinian state in
    part of Palestine, still exposes Israeli atrocities against the
    Palestinians in his examination of early Israeli history - is one of
    those people Meir Kahane was describing, and he speaks for large numbers
    of his fellow Israelis and his fellow Jews throughout the world.
    Morris’s blunt soul-bearing has lifted the last barrier of propriety to
    the open expression of raw Arab hatred. One longs for some gigantic
    outcry of opposition or disgust over this confession of deep bigotry,
    but there has been none. Except for a few letters to the editor of
    Ha’aretz from American Jews, the interview has aroused little attention
    in the Jewish-American community: no denunciation, no shock, little or
    no discussion on any but the most progressive Jewish e-mail lists. You
    have to assume that, however awkward Morris’s blunt language may be, he
    is speaking for a large segment of American Jews who say they oppose the
    occupation, say they hate Sharon, say they hate Israel’s oppression of
    the Palestinians, but who do nothing about any of these things and who
    in the end would not grieve, either for the Palestinians or for the
    Jewish soul, if Israel wiped the Palestinians off the map." (Kathleen
    Christison ‘American Jewish sensitivities to criticism of Israel’
    http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/02/1676420.php February 07, 2004).

    Michael neumann reaches similar conclusions to christison but from a
    philosophical standpoint, "Do we want to say it is antisemitic to
    accuse, not just the Israelis, but Jews generally of complicity in these
    crimes against humanity? Again, maybe not, because there is a quite
    reasonable case for such assertions. Compare them, for example, to the
    claim that Germans generally were complicit in such crimes. This never
    meant that every last German, man, woman, idiot and child, were guilty.
    It meant that most Germans were. Their guilt, of course, did not consist
    in shoving naked prisoners into gas chambers. It consisted in support
    for the people who planned such acts, or - as many overwrought,
    moralistic Jewish texts will tell you - for denying the horror unfolding
    around them, for failing to speak out and resist, for passive consent.
    Note that the extreme danger of any kind of active resistance is not
    supposed to be an excuse here. Well, virtually no Jew is in any kind of
    danger from speaking out. And speaking out is the only sort of
    resistance required. If many Jews spoke out, it would have an enormous
    effect. But the overwhelming majority of Jews do not, and in the vast
    majority of cases, this is because they support Israel. Now perhaps the
    whole notion of collective responsibility should be discarded; perhaps
    some clever person will convince us that we have to do this. But at
    present, the case for Jewish complicity seems much stronger than the
    case for German complicity. So if it is not racist, and reasonable, to
    say that the Germans were complicit in crimes against humanity, then it
    is not racist, and reasonable, to say the same of the Jews. And should
    the notion of collective responsibility be discarded, it would still be
    reasonable to say that many, perhaps most adult Jewish individuals
    support a state that commits war crimes, because that's just true. So if
    saying these things is antisemitic, than it can be reasonable to be
    antisemitic. In short, the real scandal today is not antisemitism but
    the importance it is given. Israel has committed war crimes. It has
    implicated Jews generally in these crimes, and Jews generally have
    hastened to implicate themselves. This has provoked hatred against Jews.
    Why not? Some of this hatred is racist, some isn't, but who cares? Why
    should we pay any attention to this issue at all?" (Michael Neumann
    ‘What is Antisemitism?’ http://www.ukar.org/neuman/neuman01.html June 4,
    2002).

    Gilad atzmon has stated, "Today, knowing that the vast majority of
    Israelis support the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian population;
    that most Israelis support Sharon's latest genocide of innocent
    Palestinians; that the "Jewish state" is the first "democracy" to
    conduct an ethnic cleansing within its borders; that 100,000 French Jews
    have gone out into the streets of Paris to show their support for
    Sharon, we should ask ourselves what is Zionism? What is modern Judaism
    all about?" (Gilad Atzmon ‘On Blindness’
    http://www.gilad.co.uk/html%20files/blindness.html May 2005). Jeff
    blankfort has concluded, "the distinction that we are always careful to
    make between being Jewish and being Zionist is essentially deceptive and
    that while all Jews are not Zionists, the organized Jewish communities
    throughout the world, despite whatever differences they may have, are
    totally behind the Zionist project. To pretend that these organizations
    do not speak for the overall Jewish community, one, that without any
    doubt, supports Israel as a Jewish state, is illusory." (Quoted in John
    Spritzler ‘Do Jews Really Rule the World?’
    http://newdemocracyworld.org/War/Do%20Jews%20Rule_1.htm December 6,
    2003).

    Paul eisen is clear that most jews are complicit in the crimes of the
    jews-only state in palestine, "Indeed, almost the entire organised
    Jewish establishments throughout the western world, in Israel, Europe
    and North America have used their power, influence and, most
    importantly, their moral prestige to support Israel in its attempts to
    subjugate the Palestinians. And not only have they offered their support
    for these crimes. These same groups and individuals are also telling the
    rest of the world that it's not really happening, that Israel is not the
    aggressor, that Israel is not trying to destroy the Palestinian people,
    that black is white. And not only do they deny this reality, anyone who
    dares say otherwise is branded an anti-Semite and excluded from
    society." (Paul Eisen ‘In Sight of Yad Vashem…. Jews and Deir Yassin
    Remembrance - January 2003). He points out the dangers of such a stance,
    "The crime against the Palestinian people is being committed by a Jewish
    state with Jewish soldiers using weapons with Jewish religious symbols
    all over them, and with the full support and complicity of the
    overwhelming mass of organised Jews worldwide. But to name Jews as
    responsible for this crime seems impossible to do. The past is just too
    terrible. All of us know of the hatred and violence to which accusations
    against Jews have led in the past. Also, if we were to examine
    critically the role of Jews in this conflict, what would become of us
    and of our struggle? Would we be labelled anti-Semites and lose much of
    the support that we have worked so hard to gain?" (Paul Eisen ‘Jewish
    Power’ http://www.righteousjews.org/article10.html August 19, 2004). As
    hannah arendt once argued, "If you do not dissent then you consent."

    The jews-only state in palestine and its racist policies are the
    manifestations of perennial jewish religious belief in their divine
    chosenness, that as people of the book they should abide only by laws
    handed down to them by their jews-only god, and their divine superiority
    over all other races on Earth. Even secular jews uphold the
    non-religious counterpart of such supremacist attitudes in so much as
    they believe in the jews-only state in palestine, the racist policies of
    the jews-only state, and that the jews-only state in palestine should be
    the only state in the world which is racially pure. All western
    societies, and most other societies around the world, are becoming
    increasingly multi-cultural. Only the jews-only state is going in the
    opposite direction of ethnically cleansing its population to produce a
    racially pure state.

    http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/MCtfirm/10tf26/10tf26mg.html