    The Spider Web
    By Israel Shamir

    A new discussion over future of Palestine rages in the Web. Our esteemed
    friend Noam Chomsky replied[1] to Noah Cohen who called his ‘soft’
    position on Palestine ‘Apologetics for Injustice’[2] and was replied in
    turn by Steve Kowit Weigh[3]. In brief, Chomsky proposes to remove
    Jewish settlements and to bring forth a Palestinian state, while
    maintaining the Jewish state in 1967 borders. He calls this ‘the only
    realistic solution to the present situation’.

    We could agree with the words of Steve Kowit-Weigh, “The two-state
    solution is neither a state nor a solution. It is a con game”. We could
    stress that there is no political force or will in Israel to withdraw,
    to remove the settlements from the West Bank and West Jerusalem or to
    transfer the lands to the PNA. Moreover, recent developments, including
    the construction works to the East of Jerusalem, make such outcome
    utterly fantastic (see, for instance, Letting Israel Self-Destruct by
    Danny Seidemann in Washington Post Fri, 27 Aug 2004). The proposed
    redeployment in Gaza is the best proof that removal of settlements is
    too hard an objective for any Israeli government.

    But this argument is irrelevant, for the settlements are not the
    problem, the spirit is. The prevailing mood in Israel and in the Jewish
    communities overseas is anything but defeatist; it is Tehran and Paris
    that are under threat, not Ariel or Maale Adumim. Chomsky discusses the
    fate of Sudetenland, while Wehrmacht marches on Champs D’Elysees. Such a
    discussion presumes that a heavily beaten Israel seeks peace and
    discusses the way to arrange for peace. But Israel is not defeated; to
    the contrary, the Jewish state – comprising its adepts abroad – is in
    the Fast Forward mode. And the dangers ahead are great – for all of us.

    Noam Chomsky tries to deal with the problem of Palestine as if it were
    West Timor or East Kurdistan. But it is not: troubles of the Holy Land
    often have global character. Unwise step of Caliph al Hakim had sent
    Crusaders to our shores. When Turks tried to rearrange hours of prayer
    in the Church of Nativity, it ended with the light cavalry attack on
    Balaclava. Meddling with its holy sites has direct influence upon minds
    of millions.

    As long as there is a Jewish state in the Holy Land and in Jerusalem,
    millions of ex-Christians will be tempted to accept the Judaic narrative
    of history and society including theological significance of Holocaust
    and Jewish Ingathering; millions of Jews will fervently follow their
    leaders, and their super-rich leaders will proceed with their mad
    Zionist plans. This has dire ideological consequences for all of us, as
    the Zionist offensive is fully integrated with another great offensive
    of our days, with an attempt to impose a consumerist Totalitarianism in
    the Brave New World. We shall call Noam Chomsky as a witness for the
    Crown.

    Noam Chomsky in his seminal book Manufacturing of Consent (together with
    Ed Herman) described well the propaganda machine creating uniform vision
    and compliance ‘beyond dreams of a Stalin’. In his Fateful Triangle he
    described the Zionist angle of this apparatus; the distortion of reality
    by the US media causing pro-Israeli bias in the collective consciousness
    of the Americans.

    He should be able to notice that the same disease now engulfs West and
    East Europe and Russia; that the Zionist angle became a cornerstone of
    the new totalitarian World Order he depicted. Some 20 or 30 years ago,
    when these books were written, Chomsky could counterpoise Britain and
    Europe to the US. Not any more.

    Recently, on a front page of the Sunday Times, there was a big headline
    ‘suicide bombers in London’ accompanied by a photo of a Palestinian
    youth in a headscarf sitting under the map of Palestine. Probably
    passers-by and superficial readers remained convinced that Palestinians
    are on the way to bomb them. Careful reading of the article revealed a
    much less troublesome thing: during their house-to-house searches,
    London anti-terrorist squads came across a young Palestinian who applied
    a year ago to the Home Office for the refugee status. He attenuated his
    request by claiming that back home he was asked to become a suicide
    bomber. The Home Office did not believe his claim and rejected his
    request half a year ago. This no-news was presented as the top news on
    the front page of the national weekly.

    Is it part of a Judaic conspiracy to besmirch Palestinians, Arabs,
    Muslims? You bet it is. Is it a part of a totalitarian conspiracy to
    train Brits to love their deep-trailing anti-terrorist squads and to
    give up their freedoms? You bet it is. This congruence of two
    conspiracies makes us wonder whether they are two, or just one.

    Likewise, there is a conspiracy connected with the recent wave of terror
    acts in Russia (the school, the planes, the Underground explosions) and
    in Beer Sheba in Israel. In today’s (05/09/04) Haaretz, a liberal
    Israeli observer Zeev Shief writes in an article Islamic Terror: from
    Osetia to Beer Sheba: “There is a link uniting the massacre in a school
    in Osetia, genocide in Sudan, bombing of a train in Madrid, terror
    attacks on Istanbul synagogues and explosions on Beer Sheba buses. The
    link is The Islamic Terror, mainly Arab Islamic Terror, the danger to
    the world peace’.

    While we agree with Shief that there is a ‘link’ (another term for
    ‘conspiracy’), is it an ‘Islamic’ or ‘Judaic’ link? And I do not mean
    only a possibility of a False Flag operation, which is also quite
    possible.

    There was a precedent of Achille Lauro operation, deemed a ‘Palestinian
    terrorist crime’. A film and an opera Death of Klinghoffer, telling of a
    Jewish cripple’s murder is vaguely based on the events of 1985, when
    Palestinian guerrillas took over the liner. But “that was, in fact, an
    Israeli 'black' propaganda operation to show what a deadly, cutthroat
    bunch the Palestinians were”, admitted Ari Ben-Menashe, a former special
    intelligence advisor to Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, in his
    book, Profits of War. The operation was ordered by the Israeli secret
    service and organized by their Palestinian agents inside Palestinian
    terrorist organizations[4].

    But we should consider the bigger and more dangerous Judaic conspiracy:
    the undue influence on discourse. A major share of the world media is
    concentrated in Jewish hands, well beyond wild dreams of the mythic
    Elders, and this share is growing daily. In Chile and Argentina, in
    Kazakhstan and Canada, even in far-away Finland with its tiny Jewish
    community, the key media belongs to Jews. In Russia every outrage of
    independence-seeking Chechens is immediately compared by ubiquitous
    Judeophilic editors to ‘Palestinian atrocities’. In the UK, the media is
    cornered by a group of extreme Judeophiles from Conrad Black to Rupert
    Murdoch, and ethnic Jews from Michael Green to Richard Desmond. Just
    recently Haim Saban had bought another German TV network. As for the US,
    we have a good list of Jews in the media drawn by our friend Jeff
    Blankfort, available on the Web.

    The bulk of mainstream media collaborates in both conspiracies, in the
    totalitarian conspiracy and in Israel-connected conspiracy. It is
    difficult to distinguish between prominence of Jews in the media and
    universities, and between their instrumentality in establishment of new
    totalitarianism. The ADL and SPLC, two powerful Jewish organisations,
    are prominent tools for establishing the police state.

    ADL, another Judaic tool of ideological control, runs a network of
    informers, spies after activists and thinkers, and supports every
    oppressive undertaking of the US Government. Our friend Noel Ignatiev
    writes of “a recent fundraising letter from the Southern Poverty Law
    Center, which claims to have "the most extensive computerized files on
    militias and hate groups in existence," including over 11,000
    photographs, reports on 14,000 individuals, and intelligence on over
    3,200 groups. The SPLC boasts of having written to Attorney General
    Janet Reno in October 1994, before the Oklahoma City bombing, warning
    her of impending illegal, violent activity by white supremacist groups.
    It publishes Intelligence Report, which goes out regularly to over 6,000
    law enforcement agencies”.

    Ignatiev asks: “Does this snooping and snitching foreshadow the brave
    new world they seek to build?” Absolutely, professor! The new world does
    not appear ex nihilo, it grows in the dying body of liberal democracy,
    and if we want to stop it we should attend to it now.

    Iran Under Attack

    The case of Iran is a proof of Judaic conspiracy, or if you prefer, of
    Jewish positions in the discourse. There are no real pragmatic reasons
    for the Western media to go for jugular against Iran, as it does. Iran
    is a peaceful far-away land of gentle women and manly men, of stucco and
    ceramics at the high portals of their blue mosques, of delicate
    illuminations and Sufi poetry. I was captivated when I saw young girls
    of Shiraz placing freshly-cut roses on the tomb of Sa’di, the 13 c
    creator of Gulistan: people who venerate their poets can’t be wrong, in
    my book. Iranians do not travel much; they stay home, tend their rose
    gardens and produce best films of our time.

    Now we witness the concerted Judaic drive to bomb Iran. The reasons are
    various: some want to bomb Iran because its women are forced to wear
    hijab, and others for they do not like religious states (if the religion
    is not a Judaic one), some perceive it as a threat to Israel, and others
    for Iran has no gay marriages; but the bottom line is one: bomb Iran. It
    is so unified that I am ready to propose a new definition of a true
    member of Jewry (as opposed to an individual and reluctant Jew) – it’s
    one who wants to bomb Iran. The Jewish American newspaper Forward
    writes:

    "AIPAC is obsessed with Iran," said a Washington executive with a major
    Jewish organization[5].

    Charles Krauthammer calls[6] for an ‘urgent pre-emptive attack’. He
    openly admits that this is the dear wish of the Jewish state, but, he
    says, ‘for Israel, attacking Iran is a far more difficult proposition.
    It is farther away… But there are 146,000 American troops and highly
    sophisticated aircraft standing by just a few miles away -- in Iraq’.
    America exists to take Judaic orders – that much is clear for
    Krauthammer and for the Washington Post, his preferred tribune.

    Haim Harari, a leading Israeli strategist, a theoretical physicist,
    former President (1988 to 2001) of the Weizmann Institute of Science
    gave recently a talk called Eye of the Storm. He says:

    “Now that Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya are out, two and a half terrorist
    states remain: Iran, Syria and Lebanon. As a result of the conquest of
    Afghanistan and Iraq, both Iran and Syria are now totally surrounded by
    territories unfriendly to them. I do not know if the American plan was
    actually to encircle both Iran and Syria, but that is the resulting
    situation. In my humble opinion, the number one danger to the world
    today is Iran and its regime. It definitely has ambitions to rule vast
    areas and to expand in all directions. It has an ideology, which claims
    supremacy over Western culture. It is ruthless. It has proven that it
    can execute elaborate terrorist acts without leaving too many traces
    (read: there is no proof for this claim.- ISH). It is clearly trying to
    develop nuclear weapons.”

    One of the most popular Jewish scribes on the web, American writer Irwin
    N. Graulich, whose most recent article has been posted on over 100
    websites worldwide, as well as in numerous publications, writes in his
    Let Israel Do Iran[7]:

    “Iran is a terrorist organization with a flag and an example of
    virtually everything that could possibly be wrong with a
    government--totalitarian, autocratic, religious, fundamentalist and a
    tyranny over its populace”.

    The media of new totalitarianism, being Jewish-dominated media, follows
    this line. Let us consider the case of the Guardian, a newspaper with
    long record stretching back to Balfour declaration (they supported it).
    In May 2004, our relentless efforts to bring attention to the Neo-Cons,
    the right-wing Jewish fraction in Washington, as the engine behind the
    Iraqi war, bore fruit and splashed from Internet to the printed media.
    Reports appeared showing Perle and Wolfowitz pushing for the war in full
    accordance with their plans drawn for Benjamin Netanyahu and with
    doctrine of the wicked wizard Leo Strauss.

    Immediately, the Guardian sprung into action. On May 25, 2004, the
    Guardian’s main headline rolled the blame on … Iran. It read: “US
    intelligence fears Iran duped hawks into Iraq war”. The report by Julian
    Borger quoted unidentified ‘some intelligence officials’ who ‘believe
    that Iran used the hawks in the Pentagon and the White House to get rid
    of a hostile neighbour’. I have no doubt that this ‘report’ originated
    in JINSA milieu, but the audacity of the Guardian duty editor who pushed
    the vague and baseless insinuation in the front page speaks volumes of
    the Judaic power.

    Why the Jews want to bomb Iran? Why they induced the US and partly
    Europe with the idea that the Iranian A-bomb is so much worse than an
    Israeli one? Are they afraid that nuclear Iran will defend Palestinians
    and stop the Israeli outrage? Alas, experience does not show that Iran
    either any Arab or Muslim state is ready to fight for Palestine. It is
    well known in Tel Aviv and in New York.

    There is only one eventuality when the Doomsday weapons are liable to be
    brandished: if and when the Jews will destroy al-Aqsa mosque in
    Jerusalem to erect their temple.

    The Judaic conspiracy to bomb Iran is a sterling proof that this plan is
    hatched and countdown began. Mezvinsky and Shahak (Jewish
    fundamentalism, Pluto Press) describe the immense influence of this
    idea. From being an obscure thought of a few nuts, the plan of the Third
    Temple grew into mass obsession.

    If and when it will happen, Armageddon will come into news, and it won’t
    stop at Euphrates. Let me quote Irwin Graulich once more:

    “The world is divided into three groups. Those who would like Israel
    destroyed. Those who support nations (directly or indirectly), that want
    Israel destroyed. And the United States of America. [After destruction
    of Iran], the only serious problem remaining will be, "What the heck to
    do with Europe and Scandinavia?"

    What to do? Mordechai Vanunu brought us irrefutable images of hundreds
    nuclear bombs in Israel’s possession. Such an amount is not needed for
    subjugation of the Middle East. It points to a bigger goal.

    In this situation, the discussion of Israeli withdrawal is premature, to
    say the least. As out of place as the discussion of German withdrawal
    from Prague in 1941. The ‘limited option’ of rolling back the Jewish
    state does not exist, unless one considers creation of enclaves in Gaza
    and elsewhere as the way to Two States Solution. But if by some
    miraculous means, say by Aladdin’s Genie, it could be done, it would not
    solve the problem. Even a smaller Jewish state with capital in Jerusalem
    would act like a focus for Jewish efforts all over the world. It will
    still endanger its neighbours. It will still drive crazy millions of
    ordinary people in the US who were bewitched by the big lie of
    prophecies fulfilled. It will still empower the apparatus of new
    totalitarianism build by the media lords, unless it is, as our friend Dr
    Miriam Reik proposed, just a small demilitarized Jewish statelet on 10%
    of the Palestinian land, encircled by a wall.

    The international support for Israeli withdrawal asserted by Chomsky has
    very little value, for none of the international bodies and/or states
    dares to say ‘boo’ to Jews. In the US, Bush and Kerry compete who loves
    Jews most. In Europe, last act of political will expressed by Germany
    was providing Israel with nuclear-capable submarines, by France –
    reciting mea culpa for Israel-organised anti-jewish actions, and by IAEA
    – turning blind eye to Dimona and demanding disarmament of Iran. PNA has
    very little authority and its popularity among Palestinians is in rapid
    decline. Arab states have no will to challenge Israeli dominance. Even
    the pro-Palestinian activists, instead of forcefully moving forward,
    argue endlessly what one may say without being targeted as ‘antisemite’.

    Chomsky writes: “Israel would oppose it (forced democratisation) by any
    possible means: that includes the ultimate weapons, which Israel has
    available and can use”. The world can’t acquiesce in a threat of
    Israel’s ‘ultimate weapons’. It is too much of a danger, much more than
    weapons of peaceful Iran.

    I totally agree with Noam, we should look for a realistic response to
    the danger. However, realism and pragmatism call us – not to give in to
    the nuclear blackmail, not to daydream about Israeli withdrawal, but to
    eliminate the danger inherent in the Jewish state by most humane means
    in our disposal. Such means are transformation of the Jewish state into
    a state for all its citizens. Jewishness or otherwise of the citizens
    should not have any bearing on their status in Palestine as elsewhere;
    and ‘bi-national idea’ does not conform to this rule.

    For sure, Israeli elites would not like this solution: they prefer to
    bomb Tehran, demolish al Aqsa, establish Judaic Jerusalem as the seat of
    the world government. Ordinary people of Israel are ready for peace, but
    who asks the ordinary people’s opinion? The real dilemma we face is to
    give in to these demands or to dismantle the Jewish state and bring
    forth democracy.

    However, democratisation of Palestine can’t be achieved until another
    realistic measure is attended to: the discourse should be taken out of
    the Judaic hands and their hold on media broken. Hundred years ago,
    Americans broke down the empire of Rockefeller, the mighty Standard Oil.
    Hundred fifty years ago they put paid to slavery. They can complete this
    task, as well.

    Noam Chomsky, a great man with a wonderful record, can play an important
    role in this transformation. His Jewish background may help to promote
    the idea and bring its fruition by peaceful means. Though Suffragettes
    were women, their victory was granted by men in power. Though black
    slaves rebelled, the white abolitionists brought them freedom. Likewise,
    liberation of discourse from the Judaic clutches may be achieved by men
    like Noam Chomsky and Noah Cohen.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [1] (see http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=22&ItemID=6110)

    [2] http://mail.onepalestine.org/mailman/listinfo/staff_onepalestine.org

    [3] http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/printer_11412.shtml

    [4] Read Profits of War: Inside the Secret U.S.-Israeli Arms Network
    by Ari Ben-Menashe or Google: Ari Ben Menashe Achille Lauro

    [5] http://www.forward.com/main/printer-friendly.php?ref=nir20040901935

    [6] Axis of Evil, Part Two By Charles Krauthammer Washington Post - July 23, 2004; Page A29

    [7] http://michnews.com/artman/publish/article_4191.shtml