    To the north of prosperous Hertzliya, the capital of Israeli high-tech
    industry with its plentiful sushi-bars, there is a pleasant beach below
    a steep, almost Pacific bank. It is an unattended shore, without
    lifeguards, and it is frequented by nature-loving foreigners and the
    Palestinian families on their outing to the nearby sanctuary of Sidna
    (Our Master) Ali. If you will walk even further north, beyond the signs
    forbidding your advance for the very real danger of avalanche, you will
    find yourself in a secluded cove, a rarity on the straight line of the
    Palestinian shore. It is a beautiful place for a swim in transparent
    waters of the Med. Big earth-coloured boulders guard the cove; at a
    second careful look you will understand that they are not a natural
    formation. They are bastions of the Crusader castle of Arsur, whose
    ruins rise on the plateau well above the beach. The bastions were
    overturned and dropped into the blue-green sea by Baibars, a great Arab
    commander, the vanquisher of Mongols and Crusaders in 13th century.

    Some 150 years earlier, the Crusaders easily conquered the Holy Land,
    and easily settled down. They built their castles and farmsteads,
    married local Christian Orthodox and Armenian women, and could live
    happily ever after. But they used to invite foreign adventurers and
    serve as the beachhead for their landings, and proved their inability to
    fit in as a good neighbour. They were given many chances, but they blew
    them all and remained a potential ally to any foreign aggressor.

    Then, the ‘weak and feminine’ Levant brought forth Baibars. It is not
    enough to expel the Crusaders, he ruled, for it was tried by Saladin;
    but the Franks came back. The only way to get rid of them is to destroy
    the shore of Palestine so they will never be able to snatch it again.
    Castle after castle, settlement after settlement, city after city,
    Baibars ruined the seaside of the Holy Land: Caesarea, Askalon, Jaffa,
    Arsur. He regretted it, but the alternative was an eternal warfare in
    the region.

    It seems that history is about to repeat itself. Unless some unexpected
    turn of events will occur, the sweet land of Palestine is doomed to
    perdition. The German-built, US-equipped nuclear submarines of the
    Jewish state poised to wreck havoc in Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, make it
    abundantly clear – there is no way Israel will become a decent neighbour
    in Levant.

    The Jews were given a good chance to strike root in the land of
    Palestine and make peace with the native population. But they blew it.

    The recent unprovoked Israeli air strike into the depth of Syria
    reminded to those who has forgotten that the Jewish state is an
    aggressive entity dangerous for the region. Thirty years of calm between
    Syria and Israel were dismissed by Sharon’s generals as of no
    consequence. Nobody was fooled by their clumsy attempt to connect Syria
    to the bloody act of personal vengeance meted by the young woman from
    al-Halil whose brother and fiancé were murdered and father refused
    medical help by the Israeli military. Insightful Malaysian Prime
    Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad interpreted that well: "Israel has been
    urging America to invade Syria, but Americans seemed to be reluctant, so
    in order to force the US hand, Israel carried out the air strike".

    The problem of Israel is not the problem of Palestinian suffering
    anymore; it is the problem for the entire region from India to Ethiopia
    (Esther, 1) and beyond. Indeed, the fifth column of Israel-supporters
    instigates wars all over the world, from Chechnya to Philippines, from
    North Korea to Cuba. They push the world straight into Armageddon. John
    Bolton calls for takeover of Iran, Murawiec demands to beat Saudi
    Arabia. The rabidly Zionist New York Post lifts its sights to France,
    "one of America's ugliest enemies" led by Chirac, "a moral pygmy whose
    lack of scruples is, fortunately, balanced by a lack of courage and
    power." "France should be made to suffer, strategically and financially.
    The French stabbed us in the back. In response, we should skin them
    alive", continues the newspaper, and judging by the Zionist record, it
    is not just a figure of speech.

    The Jewish state is an extremely dangerous bundle of goods. It is part
    of Israeli military doctrine: act crazy, and people will be scared of
    you. The bogus threat of nuclear Iraq was modelled on the real threat of
    nuclear Israel. Its scientists practice chemical and biological warfare,
    as well. They actually tried nerve gas on demonstrators in Gaza, and
    water poisoning at the siege of Acre, as reported Abu Sitta in Al-Ahram.

    Israel is involved in a long line of kidnapping and assassinations
    carried out on foreign soil. There is no immunity from the long arm of
    Israel: they killed in Norway (the notorious Lillehammer affair), they
    kidnapped in Rome (Vanunu affair), they bombed British library and
    American consulate (Lavon affair), they sunk USS Liberty, they tried to
    assassinate Joseph Mugabe, they probably assassinated the anti-Zionist
    US Secretary of State James Forrestol, were involved in the
    assassination of President Kennedy, as Michael Collins Piper in the
    Final Judgment makes clear, for the American president insisted on
    nuclear disarmament of Israel. Recent assassination of Anna Lindh, the
    Swedish Foreign Minister, who supported boycott of Israel, still remains
    a mystery.

    They are not particularly secretive: today we know who assassinated
    Count Bernadotte in 1948, and who committed mass murder of German POW in
    1946, and who murdered the Egyptian POWs in 1956, for their perpetrators
    boast about it. Tomorrow we shall know who did other atrocities. But our
    knowledge won’t help, for Israel is a safe haven for criminals. Whenever
    caught red-handed, Israel brushed away the world public opinion, for as
    Ben Gurion, our first Prime Minister said, ‘what the goyim say is of no
    importance, only what the Jews do is of importance’.

    This sad record refreshed by the air strike on Syria and the preparation
    for nuclear strike on Iran proves there is no way to make Israel a
    suitable member of the community of nations. It also answers the
    question whether the peace efforts and attempts to roll Israel back to
    its old borders are still relevant. They are not. In borders of 67’, 48’
    or 73’, Israel remains a bridgehead of aggression, a threat to world
    peace and a physical threat to world leaders. Like the bloodthirsty sect
    of Assassins, who once plagued the region, Israel-supporters undermine
    or murder better rulers, and support weaklings who are prepared to act
    on their orders. Israel’s withdrawal from the West Bank will not change
    its nature. The leopard can’t change his spots, as Jeremiah the prophet
    had said (13:23).

    Israel’s behaviour is partly connected to the Jewish superiority
    complex, and its consequence, the apartheid structure. The South Africa
    before Mandela also was involved in destruction of its neighbours,
    Mozambique and Namibia, and in many plots elsewhere in Africa. This
    superiority complex should be treated by dismantling the apartheid
    state. The events of last year proved it beyond reasonable doubt.
    Dismantlement by peaceful means of democratisation is the only viable
    alternative to Israel’s otherwise inevitable ruination. While bringing
    the brinkmanship policy to the level of ‘calculated madness’, Israeli
    leaders failed to predict they will bring to life a whole generation
    that does not care whether they are dead or alive.

    Until recently, fear of Israeli retaliation kept its adversaries at bay.
    In 1991, the Iraqi president Saddam Hussein had powerful WMD, but he did
    not use it against Israel, for he did not feel desperate. He believed
    the threat of Israel to destroy Iraq if he uses WMD. He thought that he
    can survive the defeat. He did not understand that Israeli idea of war
    is drawn on the Jewish religious tradition that knows no mercy. If
    Saddam would know that bodies of his tortured sons would lie in a
    Baghdad morgue, that he would be turned into a homeless refugee, that
    his country will be ruined by ten years of sanctions and afterwards
    become prey to Zionist invader, he might be well tempted to do the
    Samson solution, and take the Jewish state with him into nether regions
    in 1991.

    Saddam Hussein is gone, but by now, every leader in the world knows what
    he should expect if Israel asks its American Golem for his head.
    Paradoxically, the very cruelty of Israel turned its threat into an
    empty sound, for if they will do their worst anyway, it makes no sense
    to surrender to their demands.

    The Jews of Israel repeated the folly of Napoleon in Jaffa. In 1799, the
    young Corsican general crossed the Sinai desert and marched north into
    Palestine. Rafah and Ramleh surrendered to his troops, for the
    Palestinian soldiers saw no reason to fight the passing European force.
    Napoleon proceeded to the port of Jaffa, where six thousand strong
    garrison of the city also preferred to surrender. They thought they will
    be disarmed and sent home, to their villages, but Napoleon was reluctant
    to leave so many enemy soldiers behind his lines and ordered to kill
    them all. It took the French three days to kill such mass of people.
    They were brought in groups from the Armenian St Nicolas’ Convent to the
    shore and bayoneted.

    After this massacre, all Palestine took to weapons. Napoleon’s troops
    were ambushed at every orange grove, and when he came to the walls of
    Acre, there was no talk of surrender. People understood that it just
    makes no sense. They could as well die fighting. After a few months of
    fruitless efforts, Napoleon turned back, leaving his wounded soldiers to
    be slaughtered by advancing enemy. In the gentrified centre of Jaffa,
    there is a squat papier–mache figure of le petit caporal in his
    triangular hat reminding the tourists and the locals of backfiring
    nature of cruelty, but probably the Israeli leaders did not pay it
    sufficient attention when their policies brought the country on the
    brink of destruction.

    The heavy feeling of looming disaster is one of the unmentioned reasons
    behind the ‘One State Solution’ we proposed and advocated. True, ‘one
    state’ would be good for the Palestinians; it would be good for
    Israelis. But a new partition, Two States’ solution could also alleviate
    the Palestinian suffering, as Prof Neumann and many moderate peace
    activists rightly noted. It could be even preferred by the Israeli and
    Palestinian elites, though an independent state in the West Bank and
    Gaza won’t solve the problem of refugees. However, in no way the
    partition would alleviate the threat to the world peace poised by the
    rogue Jewish state, and it won’t prevent the imminent disaster in the
    Holy Land.

    Even a smaller Jewish state will be the seat of Mossad and its
    assassination unit, Kidon. Even a smaller Jewish state will possess
    nuclear weapons. Even a smaller Jewish state will be poisoned by its
    deeply rooted and extremely xenophobic ideology, and will remain a
    source of ideological contamination. Even a smaller Jewish state will be
    heavily involved in politics of subversion from Moscow to Washington,
    DC. And then, it is just a question of time, when a pushed too far
    leader of a state – be it North Korea, Iran, Egypt, or Russia - will
    remember the bodies of Saddam’ sons and decide to follow the path of
    Baibars and of Mongol sultans who removed the Assassins from their eagle
    nests. For without Israel, the US forces would hang around their bases
    in Georgia and Texas instead of seeking the Jew-haters in the five
    continents. Demise of Israel is inevitable; the only question whether it
    will be forcibly removed and the land destroyed, or it will be
    peacefully absorbed in the region.

    Equality in the Holy Land – it is not only a moral demand; it is the
    only way to save the country of approaching destruction. Not us, not the
    do-gooders or peace-lovers, but the inevitable course of events leads us
    to the choice: equality or death.

    Israeli cruelty, vengefulness and inability to respect others called
    hundreds of Palestinians to the horrible martyrdom. If, or rather when a
    potential martyr will be equipped with a miniaturised nuclear device
    instead of home-made dynamite, the sad story of the Jewish state will be
    over.

    The Jewish belt of Israel is quite small, and just two well-placed
    half-megaton nuclear devices can wipe it off the face of Earth. It is
    possible that in its last throes, it will make true its threat vocalised
    by Prof van Crefeld of Hebrew University and ‘go down by taking the
    world along’, for Israeli nuclear weapons are trained, according to van
    Crefeld, at European capitals, as well as on the neighbours. But no
    amount of security measures will be able to stop a nuclear suicide
    bomber, and she may disregard the fate of people who failed to protect
    her and her family.

    And then, some years later, the ruins of Tel Aviv will blend smoothly
    with the ruins of Arsur.