A gestalt Theory on the nature of light and related phenomena:

                                                          by Dilip D James M.A., A .T.C.L ( Lond)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Venus in transit

A gestalt Theory on the nature of light and related phenomena:

                                                          by Dilip D James M.A., A .T.C.L ( Lond)

                This year marks the 100th  anniversary of Albert Einstein’s discovery of  the photoelectric effect and as a consequence of this , the elementary particle representing light and electromagnetic radiation which we now call the photon. The discovery of the photon re-awoke the dispute between  followers of Sir Isaac Newton and Christian Hugyens , while Newton held the view that light consisted of a shower of particles , Hugyens thought of light as a wave.  Faced with apparently incontrovertible evidence from both parties , scientists eventually settled on the view that light was both a wave and a particle , in a theory that came to be known as wave particle duality , with the understanding that light could never possess both properties simultaneously.

                Now a new theory called the “Gestalt Theory of light and related phenomenon” has been formulated  which might at last satisfy the followers of both Newton and Hugyens . This theory states  that light is in fact a symbiosis of a particle and a wave based on the fact that high frequency sound waves , for instance , behave under certain circumstances like particles , as for example when used in medical science for the elimination of kidney stones and at other times as waves, as for instance when they undergo diffraction and interference.

       Basing their  research on the  properties of the photon , and extrapolating these facts in a sequenced manner , the Gestalt Theory came up with  a structure of the photon  which according to them , not only satisfies all of the properties exhibited by the photon but also serves to unify many phenomenon which are at present attributed to different causative factors , hence the term Gestalt Theory.

Given below are some of the properties of the photon:-

 1)  The photon is a particle with no rest mass.

2)       Photons always travel at the speed of light they are never at rest.

 3)     Photons possess both wave like properties and particle like properties.

4)       A photon’s wave length is related to its frequency by the relation :  w = c/f

5)       There are innumerable photon frequencies and wave-lengths , thus photons wave-lengths  can  be as small as or smaller than  ( 10 -12  m) and as large as , or larger than (10 6 m)

6)       A photon never loses its energy (identity) it is either absorbed or continues to 

       travel at the speed of light  with its  original energy intact.

7)        Photon’s are always emitted and absorbed by electrons , even when they originate in the annihilation of the nucleus..

8)       All forms of heat and light energy are transferred by photons , with the exception of electricity which is transferred by electrons.

9)       The photon is a neutral particle it carries no charge.

 

    The proponents of Gestalt Theory eventually came up with the hypotheses that since the electron is a charged particle it was logical to expect that what the electron was in fact emitting and absorbing were pulses of electrical energy.

                         

and that these pulses of electrical energy underwent polarization resulting in a solenoidal electromagnetic field being formed around the pulses of energy , this claims Gestalt Theory is the basic structure of the photon.

        Thus the photon model proposed by Gestalt theory , since it resembles a capacitor , would have the capacity to store energy almost indefinitely. Given below is an illustration of the photon with its electromagnetic field.

 

       Gestalt Theory points out that such a structure would fulfill all the attributes of the photon such as its lack of mass , its ability to preserve its energy almost indefinitely and the fact that it carries no charge , it is electrically neutral. This structure would be capable of storing and delivering up energy , which is the main function of the photon.  This is the first part of the equation on the propagation of  electromagnetic waves . The second half involves the resurrection of an idea that has been dead for almost two hundred years , namely that of an aether. Gestalt Theory claims that an aether consisting of “virtual” photons permeates the whole Universe. It has been proven by experiment ( Lamb shift )that all matter is continually emitting and absorbing “virtual” photons. “Virtual” particles are particles which have such low energies or life spans that they are able to flout the Laws of Conservation.

        Thus according to Gestalt Theory the whole of the Universe is permeated with “virtual” photons which because of the photon structure  postulated equates to a weak electromagnetic type of aether. Thus the aether consists of  infinitesimal 8 x 10 –7  solenoidal points  which are oriented at random. All matter would be completely permeable to an aether with these properties. “Virtual” photons because of their extremely  low energy would pass through atoms without being absorbed. In the presence of a real photon the “virtual” photons of the aether line up in the direction of propagation of the real photon forming a line whose end rests on infinity , the energy of the real photon is transported along this line of virtual photons.

           Given these two criteria , the existence of an aether composed of “virtual” photons and the solenoidal structure of the photon, Gestalt theory claims that  all  physical phenomenon to do with light and electromagnetism , including , electricity , magnetism , super conductivity and even gravity  can be explained in a single unified theory.

          Strangely enough , the idea of an aether seems to be gaining ground. Quantum mechanics , the same discipline which had at one time trashed the idea of an aether , has come up with its own version of an aether consisting of  quantum entangled pairs which are formed out of  pairs of linked electrons and positrons which since they represent matter and anti matter are constantly undergoing creation and annihilation. This aether  , according to QM permeates the whole Universe. It should be noted here that the quantum entangled pair type of aether postulated by Quantum Mechanics is also essentially a “virtual” photon aether , since “virtual” photons are  the causative and end factor in the creation and annihilation process of electron-positron pairs. Thus both schools of thought ( i.e . the Gestalt theory and Quantum mechanics ) postulate the existence of a “virtual” photon type of aether , although the manner in which this “virtual” photon aether came into existence differs in the two theories.

           In a seemingly bizarre mix-up of facts it turns out that the Theory of Wave particle duality is irreconcilable with the idea of an aether. The two theories are mutually exclusive , if one accepts one theory it means that the other is wrong and vice versa. For instance in the Double Slit experiment , the existence of an aether would account for the interference pattern , without having to resort to the wave particle duality of sub-atomic particles . On the other hand if wave particle duality were false , the only alternative  would be to postulate the existence of an aether.  This is more important than it appears for it means that for the first time the infallibility of  wave-particle duality which is one of the corner stones of Quantum mechanics  comes into question.  Proponents of Quantum Mechanics conveniently ignore the fact that the presence of an aether  effectively negates the findings of the Double Slit Experiment , which is an experiment that is conducted to show that sub-atomic particles have the ability to disassociate ( i.e., be in two places at once) and so pass through both slits simultaneously , which to a large extent underpins the Theory of Wave particle duality, preferring instead to ignore the subject.

    A key concept  in the Gestalt theory of light is that of  limiting the size of the longest wave-length photon that an electron can emit. Present theories hold that low energy electromagnetic radiation like radio waves are emitted by reason of the jiggling or oscillation of atoms and ions within an electrical conductor , while high energy electromagnetic radiation such as light and x-rays are directly emitted by electrons. The problem with this theory is that some radio waves , like those due to a 60 Hz ac current are more than 5 km in length. The question is how can the oscillation of an ion with a size of 10-10 m result in  a wave which is 5 x 106 m in length?  Further  this huge 5 x 106 m wave length possesses all the properties of a normal photon , it travels at the speed of light , retains its energy etc., how can two such identical phenomena (i.e high energy light waves and low energy radio waves) be attributed  to two different causative factors? The Gestalt theory states that there is a limit to the longest wave-length photon that an electron can emit and that the size of this wave-length is about 8 x 10-7 m which is just on the border of the longest wave-length of visible light. Since electrons have been seen to emit and absorb photons with a wave-length of 7 x 10-7 m this seems to be an acceptable conclusion. So how do large wave lengths form ? The Gestalt theory  answer to this is that all electromagnetic waves greater than 8 x 10-7 m in wave length are composite waves , i.e they are made up of joined or connected photons.  This joining up of photons is made possible because of their solenoidal structure and can take place in two orientations ; in series or in parallel.

 

.

  The largest photon wave length which an electron can emit is also , according to the Gestalt theory , the photon which carries electrical energy and hence has been named the “conduction “ photon. Light when it travels through substances such as glass , crystal or water uses a method called “photon conduction” to  pass through the substance , photons  being rapidly absorbed and emitted during its passage.  Yet when it comes to the conduction of electrical energy it is believed that it is electrons that serve to conduct electrical energy. Thus although every other form of energy related to electrons such as radiation and heat is mediated by photons , an exception is at present made in the case of electricity . Photons according to quantum mechanics cannot exist within a conductor due to the provisions of the Pauli Exclusion principle. Yet there are many facts which mitigate against this theory ,  electrons in a conductor have a drift velocity of 10-3 cms /sec while the current is seen to be established at approx the speed of light or 3 x 10 10 cms/secs.  ( three billion millimeters a second), this is  a huge discrepancy , how is it possible to rationalize this inconsistency ? The commonly held theory is :

“that electrons in a metal travel only slowly but that they can transmit a fast electromagnetic wave by "nudging" their neighbours . To this one can only state that… The size of an electron is not known, but it is presumably much smaller than an atomic nucleus, which is about a millionth of a nanometre. That is, the electrons are spaced apart by more than 100,000 times their diameter. “

 

So how exactly is electrical energy conveyed ?  In all other cases of  energy transfer , it is photons that actually transfer the energy , exciting  electrons in the atoms in which they are absorbed and raising their energy levels , giving rise to heat and other types of energy. Yet when it comes to electrical energy it is held that it is electrons which are the causative factor in the  transfer of energy. Even in the case of cathode ray tubes or television sets , which is frequently quoted as the ultimate proof of electrons as charge carriers ,  it is true that electrons are used to excite the phosphor atoms of the screen , but here it is their kinetic energy which is responsible for the excitation of the phosphor atoms resulting in the emission of photons which we perceive as light and not the ‘electrical’ charge of the electrons which results in the excitation. The electrons used in cathode ray tubes are accelerated  to high velocities before they reach the phosphor screen, a little thought shows that it could not possibly be the kinetic energy of electrons which is responsible for electrical energy in an electrical conductor , since they are moving at an average speed of only  hundredths of a millimeter a second and would thus lack any significant kinetic energy. 

        Could this premise , that it is electrons which convey electrical energy ,  which has held sway for more than two hundred years , be wrong ?

        Thus although electrons are responsible for uneven charge distribution which is responsible for  the generation of potential difference , it is unlikely that electrons  convey actual electrical energy. Electrical energy according to the Gestalt Theory is conveyed by  “conduction” photons. To elaborate on this theory , it must be assumed that some sort of force applied to a conductor such as friction  or heat  , gives rise to a redistribution of charges ( electrons) resulting in a potential difference , which in turn gives rise to  “conduction “ photons of relatively low energies ( 1.4 eV approx) being emitted by the excited electrons of the atoms of the conductor. These “conduction “ photons travel through the conductor , being absorbed and emitted by free electrons , or electrons in the outer orbit of the atoms ,  in the conductor in much the same way that light travels through glass , moving through the conductor at near the speed of light. The “conduction” photons originate at the positive end of the conductor and travel through the conductor in the manner above described , at the negative pole they are either absorbed and give up their energy , or alternatively if they are not absorbed , leave the conductor at the negative pole and loop back to the positive pole by traveling along lines of “virtual” photons (  the aether) which orient themselves in the direction of the “conduction” photons travel ,  giving rise to the characteristic lines of force that are observed around a conductor carrying an electrical current.  Why does this happen ? Consider the situation of a free electron within the conductor which has just emitted a “conduction” photon , it is traveling within the vast interstitial spaces of the crystal lattice of the conductor , far from any atoms from  which it can make up the energy it has lost , it has an urgent need to replace the lost energy by immediately re-absorbing a photon of similar energy. The emitted “conduction” photons are in a similar quandary , they need to be absorbed by an electron missing exactly the energy value they possess.  The closest electrons missing such energies are within the conductor , however due to the forces flowing within the conductor , it is not possible for the “conduction” photons  to immediately re-enter the conductor at any point , they have to loop back to the negative end , or similar points along the conductors length, thereby giving rise to the lines of force.SeeFiga. a

      In reality an electrical current flowing in a wire is always part of a circuit and so represents the interaction of two solenoidal fields . The solenoidal field caused by the flow of current in a wire between the positive and negative poles and the   solenoidal field due to the flow of current from the negative to the positive pole of the EMF source. Since the two currents are flowing opposite to each other they diminish each other , tending to cancel out. Thus  the field around a wire carrying an electrical current is not as represented in the simple schematic above which represents  a solenoidal field like that found around a bar magnet but rather the field as would be found between two bar magnets placed side by side north pole to south pole , or the field around a circular magnet . This is the reason that magnetic lines of force around a wire carrying a current appear to be at right angles to the wire.

Now consider what happens when the  “current” or (EMF) is switched off  or the polarity changed  , the photons can no longer have access to electrons within the conductor   they therefore re-orient themselves in a parallel formation ( as explained earlier )  and , no longer connected to the conductor  , leave the vicinity at the speed of light in search of other electrons which can absorb them.

        Thus according to Gestalt theory , photons are not symptoms of electromagnetic radiation as had previously been thought to be the case but are in fact the causative and formative factors giving rise to electromagnetic radiation of low frequency.

              The diagram above illustrates the difference between inductive fields where the photons making up the lines of force are connected in series and the radiative field where the photons undergo a change in orientation and are linked in parallel. It should be noted that when photons are linked in parallel the energy of a single conduction photon is distributed amongst all the Photons in the wave , thus the parallel formation has less energy than when the photons are connected in series.

            According to Gestalt theory the huge discrepancy between the speed of electrons accelerated in a field outside a conductor and within a conductor , (i.e., a free electron between two plates having a potential difference will travel between the plates at high velocities  , while an electron in a wire the two ends of which are under a potential difference will travel at speeds of fractions of a centimeter a second ) can be explained.  The detailed and accurate  work carried out  on the manner of  bonding of atoms in a crystal lattice , serves to explain not only why electrons travel only slowly in an electrical conductor  but also explains how two identical atoms , can because of the manner in which they are bonded into crystalline formations have completely different electrical and physical properties. To take one instance the element Carbon , exists in two allotropic forms that of diamond which has a DC ( Diamond Cubic ) crystalline structure and Graphite which has a weak inter sheet bonding type of crystalline structure. While diamond is an insulator , Graphite is an electrical conductor , although both of these forms consist of identical Carbon atoms. Thus electrical conductivity depends not only on the structure of the atom concerned but also on the manner in which these atoms are bonded together in the crystalline structure of metals. Thus most good conductors of electricity , such as silver , copper and aluminum have the same crystalline structure , namely an FCC ( Front Centered Cubic) crystalline structure. In this structure the atoms are closely packed together allowing free movement of electrons. Under the influence of a difference of potential an electron is freed from an atom and emits a “conduction “ photon which is a low energy photon of about 1.4 eV  , this “conduction” photon proceeds rapidly through the conductor at near the speed of light through alternate absorptions and emissions by free electrons , in the meantime the original electron almost immediately  re-absorbs another “conduction” photon , this results in the movement “ drift “ of the electron  in the direction of the “field” or difference of potential. In good electrical conductors such as silver, aluminum and copper most of the emissions and absorptions take place in free electrons , this results in less resistance and heat. Electrical conductors possessing a FCC structure are paramagnetic.

        In other conductors such as iron , nickel and tungsten the crystalline structure is of the BCC ( Body Centred Cubic ) type , in this structure the atoms are comparatively loosely packed , with fewer free or valence electrons available. In this situation the “conduction” photons are emitted and absorbed by loosely bound electrons in the lattice , resulting in greater resistance and release of heat. For this reason almost all the conductors having a BCC structure are ferromagnetic.

    Similarly most insulators have a Diamond cubic  structure or a hexagonal close packed structure while semi-conductors are either diamond cubic or Hexagonal close packed in structure.

      Thus  the present extant theory which states that electricity is conveyed by electrons , the electrons alternately bumping into ions in the crystal lattice and slowing down and then being accelerated by the  field due to the potential difference , is not accurate. Electrical energy is conveyed by photons.

           To sum up  Gestalt Theory states that, high frequency , high energy , short wave length photons are emitted by electrons and proceed to move away from the electron at the speed of light along lines of aligned “virtual” photons , while low energy low frequency , long wave length photons such as radio waves , are composite waves made up of linked together photons , but also have all the characteristic and properties of  high energy photons, these low energy photons are initially bound to the electrons in the conductor but on their release re-orient themselves in parallel formation and move away from the conductor at the speed of light.        

Magnetism

      According to present Quantum Theory Magnetism is due to  the spin and orbital motion of electrons in  atoms , as a result of this  atoms in which no vacancies are present have no magnetic properties , since the spin on the electrons would cancel out , it is only atoms in which vacancies are present that magnetic phenomenon can be observed. , since in this case the spin is reinforced.  However , there is something about this theory of magnetism that seems familiar and if we think about it the answer soon comes to mind. This is exactly the theory proposed by Henri Lorentz ,  Maxwell and other scientists to explain the origin of electromagnetic radiation , this is the same theory that led to the Ultra Violet catastrophe and subsequently to  Planck’s discovery that electromagnetic energy is radiated in discrete amounts and not as a continuous frequency. It is held that it is  not so much the electrons orbit around the nucleus that contributes to  magnetism so much as the spin of the electron . This does nothing to explain  why if the spin of the electron can be responsible for magnetism , the orbit of the electron around the nucleus cannot be responsible for electromagnetism !  The reason , of course , is that we already know that electromagnetic energy comes in discrete units i.e., it is emitted in discrete packets of energy which are termed photons . Low frequency electromagnetic radiation is according to extant theory not supposed to originate in electrons at all , but in the jiggling or oscillation of atoms and ions. As can be seen the present quantum theory is very complicated involving no less than three different causes in order to explain what is more or less the same phenomenon.  Thus although it has been proved that electromagnetic radiation ( including radio waves ) comes in discrete units , magnetism which is indistinguishable from electromagnetism  comes in the form of a continuous radiation. Is this possible , or even plausible ?

                Gestalt Theory states that there is no separate phenomena which can be called magnetism , there is only electromagnetism ,  this  electromagnetism , whether it is in the form of an electromagnetic field around a wire carrying a current or the “magnetic” field around a permanent magnet , is due to the flow of  “conduction” photons. Thus the phenomenon of magnetism is due solely to the nature of the material through which the “conduction” photons are flowing. In materials like iron or steel , the conduction photons are passed from electron to electron in the outer orbits of the atoms , this makes it possible for the flow of  “conduction” photons to be stabilized , the same electrons being repeatedly involved in the emission and absorption process. In this way the “magnetic” field is maintained even when the current is turned off , since the process is self sustaining. The conduction photons continuing to flow from electron to electron in the outer orbits of the atoms of the magnet , leaving the magnet at the North pole and re-entering the  magnet at the South pole  thereby forming the “magnetic” field. Since every electron emitting a photon in such an arrangement has its own dedicated photon , it is not possible to draw current from such a system because the system is neutral, no difference of potential exists  to be exploited , there are no excess photons or electrons. Magnetism is made possible because of the comparatively stable nature of the manner in which the “conduction “ photons flow through and around  the conductor. Materials in which this phenomenon is observed correspond to ferromagnetics. In other materials such as copper or aluminum , the “conduction” photons are passed on mainly by free electrons within the conductor , this means that no formation is possible after the current is switched off and that these materials can be considered non-magnetic , i.e they do not display the property of magnetism. Such materials are known as para-magnetics.  Yet other materials , when subjected to an external field , display the same characteristics as di-electrics , the atoms of the material do not conduct electricity but are polarised , thus seeming to form an internal field opposed to the external field such materials correspond to diamagnetics.  

         All permanent magnetism is due to a flow of current through the material which then displays residual magnetism. Thus there is no difference between the electromagnetic field around a wire carrying a current and the “magnetic” field around a conductor , both fields , as shown by Oersted ,  are exactly the same , yet the field around a wire carrying a current is said to be due to the oscillation of ions within the crystal lattice while the field around a permanent magnet is said to be due to the motion of the electron around the atom and the spin of the electron. Once again there is a schism , two identical and indistinguishable phenomenon have been attributed to two distinct causative factors.

Superconductivity

                The significant feature of superconductivity as proposed by Gestalt theory is that it is possible given the nature of electrical energy as enumerated in the gestalt theory for the field to be contained  wholly within the conductor. In ordinary manifestation of  magnetism , there is always a north and south pole , a super conducting magnet has no north or south pole . A current in the form of conduction photons is flowing within the super conductor , however since this current forms a full circle , there is no definite  negative or positive point , the current flows in a continuous circle of conduction photons . This means that there is no need for the conduction photons to leave the conductor at any point in order to re-enter the conductor in order to be absorbed by a free electron , thus  there will be no electromagnetic field around the super conductor. The whole cycle takes place in a continuous manner within the conductor. However , parallel connections with the “virtual” photons of the aether can still take place , resulting in an electromagnetic field having no negative/positive orientation. This explains the diamagnetism manifested by super conductors , an external electromagnetic field will appear to be ejected from the super conductor.

             The present theory  of super conductivity states that at very low temperatures electrons can link together to form cooper pairs , this is a highly controversial idea, since the natural repulsion experienced by electrons is one of the strongest forces in nature. Gestalt theory states that at very low temperatures electrons within the conductor display far less mobility , as has been shown in bose-einstein condensation , this means that conduction photons are able to move from electron to electron in a very stable manner , establishing a stable current which can exist almost infinitely and accompanied by the peculiar , neutral ( i.e., having no positive or negative poles ) electromagnetic field described earlier.

Gravity:

          Ever since Galileo first demonstrated the  concept of inertial mass by showing that all objects are attracted to the earth at the same rate, scientists have been fascinated by the concept that a heavy iron ball and a feather (in a vacuum) when released from a fixed height , take the same time to fall to earth. Newton was able to explain the effects of gravity but was not able to throw any light on what gravity actually was. Now finally with the proposition of the  concept of a weak electromagnetic aether , the working of gravity finally begins to make sense.

         The gravitational force is extremely weak , it is in fact one of the weakest forces known in nature , being a fantastic 10 39  times weaker than the electromagnetic force. Yet  it is the force of gravity which eventually shapes everything in the Universe. Gravity has the ability to act over huge distances.

       The experiment known as the Lamb shift has shown that all electrons are continually absorbing and emitting “virtual” photons. It follows that atoms with a greater atomic weight (i.e., those atoms having a greater number of constituent parts and therefore a greater number of electrons) would show evidence of a higher degree of “virtual” photons activity than atoms with a lower atomic number. We must assume that although “virtual” photons emitted by electrons in the atom possess low energies they still possess enough energy to align the “Virtual” photons of the aether. This means that the emission and absorption of “virtual” photons within the atom results in  a constant on/off alignment of the “virtual” photons of the aether. This results in a weak force of attraction , since the electromagnetic force is an attractive force. Based on this theory we can now understand the concept of inertial mass and the problem which had mystified both Galileo and Newton , namely how the concept of inertial mass works.  When an iron ball and a feather in a vacuum are both poised at a certain height above the earth , the “virtual” photon activity within the iron is far greater than the “virtual” photon activity in the feather , consequently the iron ball experiences a greater force of attraction away from the earth than the feather does , exactly balancing out the difference in their weight , similarly the earth experiences a greater attraction towards the iron ball than it does to the feather with the result that both objects fall to the earth at the same time. This very briefly is the Gestalt theory of Gravity.

             It has been seen that as promised Gestalt theory has delivered a single unified theory to explain all the concepts to do with light and related phenomena. The mathematics of Gestalt Theory is simple , elegant and accurate.

Conclusion:

            In general a sound scientific theory is one which reflects nature. A few basic precepts should be applicable over a wide range of related phenomenon. To take one notable instance , the building blocks of the vast Universe of which our Galaxy forms just a small part , consist of a mere 100  different types of  atoms . Diverse combinations of these atoms give rise to everything in the Universe. Similarly the amazing varieties of life forms we see on earth are based on variations of  simple DNA sequences involving no more than four basic amino acids. A scientific  theory should therefore  contain within itself  the capacity for  repetition , at the same time giving rise , by means of these repetitions or iterations , to innumerable variations so that it emulates the pattern set by nature. 

        A theory which is fragmented does not succeed in fulfilling this objective since the origins of similar or related phenomenon cannot be attributed to a common causative effect using such  fragmented theories but are split into a multiplicity of causative effects to explain what is  essentially the same phenomenon.  

       At present numerous contradictions exist both in the implementation and explanation of  various phenomena , often two separate theories are used to explain the working of a single phenomenon . This is bad physics , to use an analogy , it is like trying to attribute the distance a ball is projected with the person who is throwing the ball , if the ball is thrown by an amateur it travels a lesser distance than when thrown by a professional. Although this might appear to be both a logical and  reasonable statement ,  it is not an accurate representation of the facts, numerous causes can be attributed to account for the distance the ball travels. It is not until the concept of force is introduced that a uniform explanation is found , the distance that the ball travels under a given set of circumstances depends upon the force used to propel it. This covers all possible conditions and makes no difference if the ball had been propelled out of a canon or if it had been merely pushed. Yet fundamental errors of this sort are to be found throughout  present day physics. Scientists are in almost Universal agreement that remedial work is necessary in order to evolve a more coherent and unified theory of physics.   Gestalt theory  offers such a Unified Theory.

Dilip D James

“Arden Villa”,

St. Ann’s Rd.

Ootacamund 643 001

Nilgiris: S. India

Ph: 2443284    or 9894315543

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1