Indian Gharial
Kingdom ANIMALIA
Phylum CHORDATA
Class REPTILIA
Order CROCODYLIA
Family GAVIALIDAE
Common Names FISH-EATING CROCODILE (Eng)
GAVIAL (Eng)
GHARIAL (Eng)
INDIAN GAVIAL (Eng)
INDIAN GHARIAL (Eng)
LONG-NOSED CROCODILE (Eng)
GAVIAL DU GANGE (Fre)
GAVIAL DEL GANGES (Spa)
Year
Assessed: 2007
Assessor/s: Choudhury, B.C., Singh, L.A.K., Rao,
R.J., Basu, D., Sharma, R.K., Hussain,
S.A., Andrews, H.V., Whitaker, N., Whitaker, R., Lenin, J., Maskey,
T., Cadi, A., Rashid, S.M.A., Choudhury,
A.A., Dahal, B., Win Ko Ko, U., Thorbjarnarson, J &
Ross, J.P.
Assessment
Information
Evaluator/s: Fergusson, R., Elsey, R.,
Velasco, A. & Dacey, T. (Crocodile Red List
Authority)
Justification
Criterion A: Gharial qualify for Critically
Endangered (CR) listing under criterion A2 ("reduction in population size
based on an observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size
reduction of ≥80% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever
is the longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not
be understood OR may not be reversible"), based on (b) an index of
abundance appropriate to the taxon and (c) a decline
in area of occupancy, extent of occurrence and/or quality of habitat). Very
conservative estimates of population decline over a three-generation period
(from 1946 to 2006) indicate there has been a 96 to 98% population decline (see
details below), and the once widespread population has been reduced to a very
small number of widely spaced subpopulations.
Criterion C: The Gharial also qualified for CR
listing under criterion C1 - ("population size estimated to number fewer
than 250 mature individuals and an estimated continuing decline of at least 25%
within three years or one generation"). Estimates of adult population size
indicate that there has been a decline from 436 adult gharials
in 1997 to 182 in 2006. This represents a 58% drop across its range over a
period of nine years, well within the span of one generation (see details
below).
Rationale for Criterion A:
The generation length for the species is 20 years (the age
at which 50% of total reproductive output is achieved) (Rao
et al. 1995). The Red List Criteria require "declines measured over
the longer of 10 years or 3 generations", in this case the population
decline since 1946.
Early Records:
The early records for the gharial
are mainly subjective and rarely quantitative. Old references indicate the gharial's abundance in the past: Common in the Indus River
in Pakistan (Francis 1910, Rao 1933); Gandak River in Nepal (I.A.K. 1921); Jumuna
River in Uttar Pradesh (Hornaday 1885), Kosi river in Bihar (Shortt
1921). Several authors mention seeing groups basking together and in 1885 Hornaday wrote that he could count 64 gharials
in two hours on the banks of the Jamuna. Andrew Leith Adams (1867) wrote: "abounds in all the great
rivers of
Current population status:
By 1976, the estimated total population of wild Gharial in the world had declined from what is thought to
have been 5,000 to 10,000 in the 1940s to less than 200 (Whitaker et al.
1974), a decline of about 96%. In 2006, the mature Gharial
population in
The drastic decline in the Gharial population over
the last 60 years (three generations for the gharial)
can be attributed to a variety of causes including over-hunting for skins and
trophies, egg collection for consumption, killing for indigenous medicine, and
killing by fishermen (for example: Biswas 1970 and
Whitaker 1975). While hunting is no longer considered to be a significant
threat, the construction of dams, barrages, irrigation canals, siltation, changes in river course, artificial embankments,
sand-mining, riparian agriculture, and domestic and feral livestock have
combined to cause an extreme limitation to gharial
range due to this excessive, irreversible loss of riverine
habitat. For instance, Hussain (2001) documents plans
for 276 irrigation projects in the
Based on the above, the Gharial qualifies for CR
under Criterion A2bc. However, the lack of quantitative population estimates
for three generations in the past makes the calculation of exact rates of
decline over the period problematic (see Table 1 in the attached PDF for
further information on how the reduction was calculated).
Rationale for Criterion C:
Once thought to be relatively stable or even increasing, the
wild population of gharials has undergone a drastic
decline over the last nine years. This decline, as outlined below, qualifies it
for Critically Endangered listing.
The mature Gharial population was estimated by using gharial nest counts as they are easily visible and can be
counted at well known locations that have been monitored for decades. This is also
a more accurate assessment for numbers of mature animals because of the unknown
number of immature males (which take five or more years longer to mature than
do females) that are routinely counted as 'adults'. Using the only published
data on ratios of males in the mature Gharial
population (Hussain 1999), it can be inferred that
14% of all 'adults' reported in Gharial censuses are
actually subadult males.
The
Since most female Gharial nest every year in
captivity, it is reasonable to assume that the above cited nest counts indicate
the presence of 90 reproducing female Gharial in
Other crocodilians are reported to nest less frequently than every year.
Estimates of reproductive frequency (% females laying
per year) range from 10% to 90% with a median value of 63% (Thorbjarnarson
1996). Although we believe that most gharials nest
annually, some females may have migrated downriver away from where the few
males still exist. Applying this median crocodilian value to our estimate and
adding the estimates for all Indian and
There are two other small, non-reproducing populations of Gharial
in
In
Based on these estimates the number of wild, mature gharials
across the species' range (presently only India and Nepal) is 182 in about
eight non-contiguous, fragmented habitats (but until further research tells us
otherwise, note that 14% of these 'adults' can be inferred to actually be subadult males bringing the total figure down to 157).
In 1997, the peak year with the highest number of wild mature gharials and nests recorded in the last 30 years, 226
mature animals and 81 nests were recorded in the Chambal
(Sharma and Basu 2004). There were no nests in the
Son, where there were about 10 adults and no nest data for Katerniaghat
where an estimated 30 adults were present. No nesting data from
The decline from an estimated 436 adult gharials in
1997 to 182 in 2006 represents a 58% drop across its range. This drastic
decline has happened with a period of nine years, well within the span of one
generation, qualifying the Gharial, under criterion
C1, to be listed as Critically Endangered. Using the highly conservative
estimate of 220 (based on only 63% of the adult females nesting annually) this
is a 36% decline, still well within the 25% decline criteria for Critically
Endangered (see Table 2 in the attached PDF for details of declines by
subpopulation).
Conclusion:
The Gharial has undergone both chronic long term and
a rapid short-term declines. The use of Criterion A illustrates the long term
decline, which was in part addressed during conservation efforts for this
species in