Despotism;
The internal self-destruction of American
(Common Law Copyright 06/16/04 � Naomi Ruth Wallace)
13 pages
"While the laws shall be obeyed, all will be safe. He alone is your enemy who disobeys them." --Thomas Jefferson: Misc. Notes, 1801?. FE 8:1
This includes unlawful judges
"On every unauthoritative exercise of power by the legislature must the people rise in rebellion or their silence be construed into a surrender of that power to them? If so, how many rebellions should we have had already?" --Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia Q.XIII, 1782. ME 2:171
"No government can continue good, but under the control of the people." --Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 1819. ME 15:234
I have found in this life that all have right to passage, but only a few pass threw the gates and become more than another statistic on a different page. We betray our selves to the heart, allowing our hearts to believe in ideas because it gives explanation to our own indignations. Try as we might to over come ourselves; the one place we fail to see our enemy is within our own mind. Life goes on spoilt in the ideas caused by an immoral mask that has blinded truth and is now as a sword edged backwards.
The system of justice will either protect citizens from tyranny or be one means by which tyranny is exercised over them. A just society rests upon an equal application of the law to each and every citizen; it protects the rights of individuals regardless of the inconveniences caused thereby. It is of inestimable importance to the happiness and security of the people that justice be administered strictly, according to the established forms of the law.
"Libels, falsehood and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion, are withheld from the cognizance of Federal tribunals." --Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798. ME 17:382
The over throw of morality has become this countries self-inflicted wound of destruction. Morality is becoming unconstitutional by way of liberal minded people who place themselves in the sanctity of our governing branches. By this they have endangered the lives of all and gave right of way to lawlessness, corruption and confusions. They believe our laws should be held against their purpose and should be deemed expectable by any means found, even by way of manipulation.
�The purpose of a written constitution is entirely defeated if, in interpreting it as a legal document, its provisions are manipulated and worked around so that the document means whatever the manipulators wish. Jefferson recognized this danger and spoke out constantly for careful adherence to the Constitution as written, with changes to be made by amendment, not by tortured and twisted interpretations of the text.� -- Eyler Robert Coates, Sr.
"Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction." --Thomas Jefferson to Wilson Nicholas, 1803. ME 10:419
What will be left if we continue to ignore this war against our values; our moral way of life? What happens to our freedoms when we become oppressed just because we are Christians? Immorality is becoming lawful and morality is slowly becoming unconstitutional. By way of manipulation, courts have begun to use our constitution and laws against their very purpose. We must ask all the upright judges in our court system to come together. We must gather them together under one purpose, to reform our court system and remove corruption these acts have caused. We must press to have removed all the unlawful legislation and unconstitutional corruption created by these who have abused our laws by way of manipulation, and any dishonest idea that we the people cannot prove who we are and who our ancestors were.
"[If] the barrier of the Constitution... [is] swept away from us all, no rampart [would remain] against the passions and the powers of a majority in Congress to protect from a... grievous punishment the minority of the same body, the legislatures, judges, governors, and counselors of the States, nor their other peaceable inhabitants who may venture to reclaim the constitutional rights and liberties of the States and people, or who for other causes, good or bad, may be obnoxious to the views or marked by the suspicions of the President, or be thought dangerous to his or their election or other interests, public or personal." --Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798. ME 17:388
I fear the day has surely come, the day our forefathers warned us about since the foundations of this land we now call America. No one can just take us out of this land, for this is and always has been whom we are, were and will become. Tomorrow pasts not yet for anyone but many believe it is right to have a court ruling against a matter based solely on an Idea that might be possible but has never to this point come to past. This seems as unmoral as blaming our heroes for the evil acts taken against us that they try to protect us from because they didn�t see it coming. I understand the break down of our intelligence gathering, but they did not fly the plains or plain the attack on us. They could also not see into the future and know what those individuals would do.
"Nothing in the Constitution has given [the judges] a right to decide for the Executive, more than to the Executive to decide for them. Both magistrates are equally independent in the sphere of action assigned to them." --Thomas Jefferson to Abigail Adams, 1804. ME ll:50
"The federal judges... cannot issue a mandamus to the President or legislature, or to any of their officers, the Constitution controlling the common law in this particular." --Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1819. ME 15:214
Our forefathers could not see into the future either. Although they knew and warned of what failures could passably arise because of trial and error, they could have never predicted the true destruction of our lives first hand and be able to prevent it before it happens. They could have never corrected what had not been to that point, wronged.
"We fear that [violations of the Constitution] may produce insurrection. Nothing could be so fatal. Anything like force [used against the violators] would check the progress of the public opinion and rally them round the government. This is not the kind of opposition the American people will permit. But keep away all show of force and they will bear down the evil propensities of the government by the constitutional means of election and petition." --Thomas Jefferson to Edmund Pendleton, 1799. ME 10:105
We the people have petitioned, we have waved our means of election. In CA. the majority of the people voted against Gay marriage and the courts are still standing against them. The judges and a Mayor are still allowing Gay marriages to be performed. These people are even marring people from other states with the purpose of forcing the other states to recognize Gay marriage. Marriage is in our national constitution specifically between a man and a woman; amendments should not be needed to enforce what is already there. Most states have this in their state constitution as well. The moral insertion that everyone should be treated equal comes from our Christian foundation. This is not being discriminated against; homosexuality is a personal choice not a civil rights issue. I�ve never met a person, who can claim they choose to be black or white, or disabled or deformed; it would be discriminatory to use the rights of these to impose the people to except and unconstitutional act of immorality upon this nation as law. It is immoral to force our Christian laws to create corruptive acts by reason of our courts and force us as a nation to view gay marriage as a lawful act. This is an oppressive act against the moral fabric this nation rests upon. The dangers of allowing Gay marriage is far worse than many choose to see. Our country is formed on our Christian faith, the laws of our father and the inalienable rights to be free and pursue happiness within our bounds of morality, truth, justice, and equality to all.
"To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves." --Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:277
As a Christian, homosexuality is a sin; as an American one must remember where our country is today, not removing our historical past. Homosexuality is not against our laws. Marriage is protected by our constitution and is not unconstitutional any more than the act of homosexuality is unlawful; manipulating our constitution to be held against its intent and morality is.
"[The] law of necessity and self-preservation... [render] the salus populi supreme over the written law. The officer who is called to act on this superior ground, does indeed risk himself on the justice of the controlling powers of the Constitution, and his station makes it his duty to incur that risk. But those controlling powers, and his fellow citizens generally, are bound to judge according to the circumstances under which he acted. They are not to transfer the information of this place or moment to the time and place of his action; but to put themselves into his situation." --Thomas Jefferson to John Colvin, 1810. ME 12:421
We have two choices. We could past a law making homosexuality a crime; to hold this kind of power one must also refrain ones self from becoming an enforcement of tyranny. Passing the Civil Union act would give homosexuals equal rights (by way of the federal government) as a married couple without removing our moral foundation.
"It [is] inconsistent with the principles of civil liberty, and contrary to the natural rights of the other members of the society, that any body of men therein should have authority to enlarge their own powers, prerogatives or emoluments without restraint." --Thomas Jefferson: Virginia Allowance Bill, 1778. Papers 2:231
We must remove the corruption in our judicial system. Passing the civil union act would remove any right to be found by an activist judge or attorney to claim our government as showing favor towards any particular side; both would have a federal recognized union. This would not be a concern if married couples did not receive any financial credit or governmental favoritism. As is it, eventually someone would push this threw. If the Civil Union Act were in place the ideas that claim favoritism would not have grounds. We must protect the future foundation of our laws to assure this will not become an issue our children�s children have to repeat. People should be informed honestly of the intent of such changes to our constitution.
"Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day." --Thomas Jefferson to Pierre Samuel Dupont de Nemours, 1816. ME 14:491
Morality is not a civil issue to be decided by the courts or government. No state has the right to marry gay citizens of other states that does not condone gay marriage; this is a violation of each states rights. No judge have the right to force a state to recognize gay marriage once the couple moves from the state that married them to a state that it is unlawful; this is a violation of each states rights. By manipulation this specific few have undermined the intent of the legislator. All judges must follow the intent of the legislator otherwise our court system will indeed become a despotic communistic oppressive means of control.
"Whenever the words of a law will bear two meanings, one of which will give effect to the law, and the other will defeat it, the former must be supposed to have been intended by the Legislature, because they could not intend that meaning, which would defeat their intention, in passing that law; and in a statute, as in a will, the intention of the party is to be sought after." --Thomas Jefferson to Albert Gallatin, 1808. ME 12:110
An Amendment needs to be made that reaffirms marriage solely between a man and a woman with the recognition of a civil union by the federal government with the sole purpose to give equal treatment by the federal government to those in civil unions recognized by their state. No one person can be recognized on a marriage license and civil union at the same time. No civil union can be recognized except and only when the state by election of the citizens approves its use in that state. Also that no Magistrate, Legislator, Exclusive or another state can overturn the electoral diction of the people of that state concerning their civil unions and marriage laws.
Even though there isn�t anything wrong with difference of opinion it still remands unlawful for these differences to result in the intentional defamation of character, slander, liable, and a complete fictional truth created from opinion and not fact to be presented to the people as facts. The people have the right to view all opinions but be made known of all facts and lack of facts by way of proof not hearsay. No issue should be claimed factual to the people if no proof can be provided of the claim regardless of the idea or intent; this will breed corruption, lies and abuse into society.
"The cement of this Union is in the heart-blood of every American. I do not believe there is on earth a government established on so immovable a basis." --Thomas Jefferson to Lafayette, 1815. ME 14:252
What does a parent have to give to their child if it not be with honesty, love, and hope for a free tomorrow? Without freedom for all, this child can never be. Only a shell of thoughtless emotion or a fear of self; could remain. One could never wish such a cold place to be at the grasp of our children�s tomorrow. The loss of morality isn�t just the chance to allow people to do what ever they want and claim freedom gives them the right. This will change our land, destroy our homes, and remove all rights that call for respect to others. All we fight for and have fought for will be removed, one piece at a time. Once shattered it can never be corrected completely if only tethered thoughts of our moral foundation remain.
"A spirit of disobedience... must be subdued. Laws made by common consent must not be trampled on by individuals. It is very much the good to force the unworthy into their due share of contributions to the public support, otherwise the burden on them will become oppressive, indeed." --Thomas Jefferson to Garret Vanmeter, 1781. ME 4:417, Papers 5:566
We should not be bartered against our own. People who callously undermined the actions of the government that we the people placed, without solutions or facts of the problems they claim are there. My life is lead by the faith I have and the conscience I carry. The heart may be lead astray briefly and lessons learned, but the conscience will always guide me to do what�s right. I would never use lies and manipulation to press upon people to believe the truths created in the mind of any man. Without truth the heart of the spirit of all mankind will become corrupted, deceived by the hope falsehoods scatter to the blind of mind.
"I must comfort myself with the hope that the judges will see the importance and the duty of giving their country the only evidence they can give of fidelity to its Constitution and integrity in the administration of its laws; that is to say, by everyone's giving his opinion seriatim and publicly on the cases he decides. Let him prove by his reasoning that he has read the papers, that he has considered the case, that in the application of the law to it, he uses his own judgment independently and unbiased by party views and personal favor or disfavor. Throw himself in every case on God and country; both will excuse him for error and value him for his honesty. The very idea of cooking up opinions in conclave begets suspicions that something passes which fears the public ear, and this, spreading by degrees, must produce at some time abridgement of tenure, facility of removal, or some other modification which may promise a remedy." --Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, 1823. ME 15:422
We the people cannot protect ourselves from despotism. We can write letters, briefings, petitions, and even elect whom we think will protect us. We can concur the world for freedom and truth but are helpless to protect our own against the imputable force of immorality and discrimination against God, our way of life, our moral foundation, Christian roots, and the simple right to believe.
"Having found from experience that impeachment is an impracticable thing, a mere scarecrow, [the Judiciary] consider themselves secure for life." --Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Ritchie, 1820. ME 15:297
We cannot depend just on the legislators. Even though the branches our government was divided in (Exclusive, Legislative, and Judiciary) have the right to check the other; many of them believe they have no right to impose on the illegal acts of our judicial system.
"An elective despotism was not the government we fought for, but one which should not only be founded on true free principles, but in which the powers of government should be so divided and balanced among general bodies of magistracy, as that no one could transcend their legal limits without being effectually checked and restrained by the others." --Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia Q.XIII, 1782. ME 2:163
Legislators claim that the Judiciary system checks and balances itself within itself. While this is true once the Judiciary branch has failed to correct the despotism in its own branch it is the responsibility of the other two branches of our government to enforce upon them to correct the insertion of corruption and pursue this with the most swift and steadfast means of correction.
"It is the duty of the General Government to guard its subordinate members from the encroachments of each other, even when they are made through error or inadvertence, and to cover its citizens from the exercise of powers not authorized by law." --Thomas Jefferson: Official Opinion, 1790. ME 3:88
We must seek and push forward all the good of our great government and empower them to correct this despotism. We must ask all to take hold and correct the immoral manipulated ideas that are becoming a form of communistic control. We must ask all the great leaders of this nation to come together for us not their political party. We must remember our laws cannot be used against it�s meaning and moral interpretation passed down with the laws passed by the intent of the legislator.
"I sincerely wish... we could see our government so secured as to depend less on the character of the person in whose hands it is trusted. Bad men will sometimes get in and with such an immense patronage may make great progress in corrupting the public mind and principles. This is a subject with which wisdom and patriotism should be occupied." --Thomas Jefferson to Moses Robinson, 1801. ME 10:237
We the people watch as our Judiciary system falls into corruption. Many claim that we don�t know what the founding fathers intended, thought or believed. By this they choose to change our laws, claim our morality is unconstitutional and discriminating as well as removing this nations Christian roots by claiming that they are not there. They claim we can�t do anything about it and we have no proof. They claim the autonomy of our courts protects all judges. The autonomy of our courts should not be used as a free pass to destroy the intent of our constitution that they swore to uphold. These unlawful judges violate the structure of the autonomy of our court system as well as the oath they took to protect and abide by the constitution as well as the intent of the legislators of the law. This makes no since that they are protected by that which they seek to destroy.
"[Montesquieu wrote in Spirit of the Laws, XI,c.4:] 'Constant experience shows us that every man invested with power is apt to abuse it, and to carry his authority as far as it will go... To prevent this abuse, it is necessary from the very nature of things that power should be a check to power.'" --Thomas Jefferson: copied into his Commonplace Book.
What many fall to realize is that this nation cannot separate from God and our moral way of life, we Christians will fight for who we are. God gave us this land, we will protect our way of life with the life we hold, and this is who we are; this is why we came here. The belief in God is not forced upon anyone in this nation but is the foundation our laws are created to protect. You can�t just strip God from us. This would be like taking the air we need to breath.
"The judges certainly have more frequent occasion to act on constitutional questions, because the laws of meum and tuum and of criminal action, forming the great mass of the system of law, constitute their particular department. When the legislative or executive functionaries act unconstitutionally, they are responsible to the people in their elective capacity. The exemption of the judges from that is quite dangerous enough... The people themselves,... [with] their discretion [informed] by education, [are] the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power." --Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:278
Everyone has the right to choose, but not the right to destroy the lives millions because they choose not to believe and wish to remove what they can�t conceive from us. To us we are watching our nation turn us form God and we pray to the Father for guidance and help to stop the pain these shallow few have bestowed upon our land. How long will it be before our court finds moral opinion unlawful? How long will it be before the Father decides we have suffered enough and send a natural disaster to this nation unlike any this country has seen? Not even the terrorist have the power to chastise us in the manner our Father did Sodom and Gomorra. Christianity isn�t a religion, but a way of life; our way of life.
"If once [the people] become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, Judges and Governors, shall all become wolves. It seems to be the law of our general nature, in spite of individual exceptions." --Thomas Jefferson to Edward Carrington, 1787. ME 6:58
People do not know what they are up against; our father will not allow such malice to change his will and our faith in it by the power of our love for him. The majority of Christians don�t know who we are, but they feel it from the inside; this will not change and is why many believe regardless of the circumstances life holds (it is a part of us, place there by our father, our soul; �nephesh�). Discriminating against monuments of our Christian heritage is oppression of our freedoms. These monuments of our fruitful beginnings bare no meanings of suppression but act as a symbol of our history, faith, culture and founding roots.
"In executive cases, where promptitude and decision are all-important, an adherence to the letter of a law against its probable intentions (for every law must intend that itself shall be executed), would be fraught with incalculable danger. Judges may await further legislative explanations, but a delay of executive action might produce irretrievable ruin." --Thomas Jefferson to James Barbour, 1812. ME 13:128
Please reconsider trying to destroy us, we mean harm or disrespect to no one. We cannot breath without our God; we cannot live without our faith and Christian foundation. We cannot change what we know and we cannot force upon anyone that which we belief, feel, and live with the conscience of our hearts. We can only pray that our Government and courts will stand and defend the foundation we created it in. Legislators should amend the constitution. We the people must protect our way of life. Each state should be given imputable right to issues of our moral state of affairs. An electoral vote of the citizens of that state and the enforcement of those peoples decision must be swiftly pursued. A judge, or state must not be allowed to force upon another state or court any law not created by way of proper legislation or against the imputable rights of it�s citizens to vote for the issue at hand.
"The authority of [the] people [is] a necessary foundation for a constitution." --Thomas Jefferson to John Hampden Pleasants, 1824. ME 16:28
"In an encampment expecting daily attack from a powerful enemy, self-preservation is paramount to all law." --Thomas Jefferson to James Brown, 1808. ME 12:183
These people are trying to remove our rights to be Christian. They don�t believe Christians should be allowed to run for public office, the reading of God�s word should not be allowed on televisions or public radio. Christian churches should not be allowed to display their denomination; the president should be allowed to say, �May God bless America�. They have created so many acts against Christians threw out this nation that the Christian [even being the majority] is being oppressed by opinion against our foundation that have never been a symbol of any illegal intention toward a single individual. These people claim their rights are being violated. I wish to know what right has been violate and what cases are they that can prove that anyone has been imprisoned or unlawfully charged of a crime because of their lack of faith in God.
"Unless the mass retains sufficient control over those entrusted with the powers of their government, these will be perverted to their own oppression, and to the perpetuation of wealth and power in the individuals and their families selected for the trust. Whether our Constitution has hit on the exact degree of control necessary, is yet under experiment." --Thomas Jefferson to M. van der Kemp, 1812. ME 13:136
China's Persecuting Christians, Arabs in Sudan are cleansing their land of Christians. Threw out history the Christians have been persecuted by the entire world; the Jews, the Japanese, Chinese, Arab, everyone, and even by our own.
The Christian tyranny when the church rule, was against the Christian faith and it was the Christians who where killed and lamed more so than non-Christians. If a Christian was accused, they were tortured till they repented. If they did not repent they were sent to the father to face judgment, witch means they were killed. No court, no trial, no justice; the innocent of the accused would not repent for what they did not do and died.
The separation of church and state was to prevent religion from creating in our land the Christian tyranny we fled here from; radical religions of any faith is not welcome here. Christianity is a way of life and should not be used as a means of control, even of those of different faith; the true Christian way is that ALL have the right to choose. Out side this nation is a world consumed in the materialistic ideas of a secular society.
The French dislike our leader because of his faith; they don�t feel that a faith-based man should be allowed to have control over any nation. They know the illegalities their nation has indulged in and don�t care, the profit deludes the consequences of their means. It offends them that we confront them over their inhuman and unethical corruption, they think they have the right to undermine and overstep the laws and we are the ones in the wrong for catching them. They feel that our government bring out the corruption their nation and others is involved with the UN was nothing more that our government trying to undermine them, they don�t see or care to see the evil in their ways. Our standards are the ones based on humanitarian reasons; they see our cause to help the world as a way for them to profit materialistically, nothing more. Our ethics are for everyone to have the right to choose, not theirs.
Christians are oppressed all over this world, past and present. Our nation and a small few other countries are all that�s left for us to be free from religious tyranny and ethical cleansing of people of the Christian way of life. Secular means worldly, material, non-spiritual, without God or religious belief. Secular don�t mean Christians have their place and non-Christians theirs. It does not mean we have the freedom to choose and they have the freedom not to, this is what we have now. If this nation became a secular society the cleansing of the Christians in Sudan is only part of what we have to face here, the imprisonment of Christians in China for not following a particular Christian religion approved by their government is only a glimpse of what we have to come. Morality is part of the Christian roots this nation rests upon. If you removed this foundation from beneath our feet you will remove the one important part of America, you will rip out the heart that binds the lives we live. Our choices will become silenced and our government will become cold and destructive; self involved and consumed in the greed of a materialistic world as our kinfolk have, the French.
�Christianity is a way of life. Many religions have grown from this one perfect way.�
Withered by man, life goes on embraced by the hands of time. The future seas of fear cast to the edge of hope and washed away with a silent tear. Beyond the years we have traveled throughout the sands of this world, forgotten not to the heart of our own; the spirit of �The Lord�s one perfect truth� shall always walk with the meek and comfort the soul. We ask not for the shadows of our past, nor for profits of gold, only that the will of one will never be alone. Freedom destroys not one for another; nor takes a single life beneath its own.
Life is but a fragile tear compelled by a stream of light. The innocent of a child�s heart is perfect devoid of a single flaw.
We make our own mistakes in life but many refuse to blame themselves. People become cold inside not seeing the cost before they choose to buy. We teach our children from our own knowledge and some teach from their pain. To find the sea of tears that mask to true knowledge of an honest heart you must find your conscience. You must understand inside yourself the pain you choose to hide, and why.
We cannot blame ourselves inside for lessons that we learn, but we cannot blame others outside for the actions our conscience didn�t clearly understand. We must allow our conscience to comfort our heart while leading it with the ethics we in our hearts have learned.
When you are able to understand, everything you know. The things you do not know. Will no longer frighten you.
Our Government branches should be wise with the conscience and less manipulative with their works.
I never realized individuals had the right to oppress large assemblies of people because they disagree with their view. I never realized that one person could force everyone in that community into oppression of their Christian rights. I remember lying my head down in class instead of doing the morning prayer, I don�t recall being picked on or singled out over it. I fail to understand how the courts have come to the point of preemptive action against Christianity. Allegations of something that could or might be possible but has not been proven with fact to have already happened is in my idea preemptive oppression on the part of the judiciary branch. Where�s the proof of illegal acts that have been cause by the belief in God in this nation today? Where is our right to choose? Where are the freedoms we hold so dear if we lose our moral attributes? The definition of freedom is not that we are forced to give way to immorality just because some choose to act in immoral lifestyle and believe our freedoms should allow them to remove our moral laws an act as if our constitution proclaims personal sexual choice and a civil issue. Civil law protects against the immoral oppression, and the unethical treatment of an individual or group based upon differences such as race, physical disabilities and differences uncontrolled by man. This law was never mean to be manipulated to claim right of passage to any immoral act clearly written against in our constitution. Amendments to our constitution are manipulated when they are used against the foundation in which the laws were written by and legislation never creates a law for the purpose of finding other parts of the constitution unlawful by it.
"When the legislative or executive functionaries act unconstitutionally, they are responsible to the people in their elective capacity. The exemption of the Judges from that is quite dangerous enough." --Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:277
A government (state or federal) branch prescribing religious exercises to the citizens living within that sector is against the separation of church and state. Our government assuming authority over a particular religions beliefs is against the separation of church and state; the oppression of Christian rights is against the separation of church and state.
The Ten Commandments is not a violation of the constitution. It cannot force anyone to believe in a religion (prescribe religious exercises), nor can it run out of that courtroom an assume control of a church down the street (assuming authority over a particular religious belief); the enforcement of it�s removal however was assuming authority over a particular belief witch is in itself hold historical meaning to our nation. It is a monument, a piece of stone. Is there a single case from Mr. Roy Moore�s Courtroom that proves any person was convicted of a crime based on religious belief or lack of belief and not the crime that brought them to that courtroom?
"[How] to check these unconstitutional invasions of... rights by the Federal judiciary? Not by impeachment in the first instance, but by a strong protestation of both houses of Congress that such and such doctrines advanced by the Supreme Court are contrary to the Constitution; and if afterwards they relapse into the same heresies, impeach and set the whole adrift. For what was the government divided into three branches, but that each should watch over the others and oppose their usurpations?" --Thomas Jefferson to Nathaniel Macon, 1821. (*) FE 10:192
"Leave no authority existing not responsible to the people." --Thomas Jefferson to Isaac H. Tiffany, 1816. ME 15:66
Mr. Moore was removed from his seat for violating an unlawful court order that violated the constitution of that state. It was said that he violated the laws, but violating the constitution of that state is unlawful. I understood the law as being based on the constitution and not to be set against it, also that each courtroom is separated from the other. The federal judge who violated the state constitution remains in seat while the judge who stood against this unlawful act of oppression was removed for violating an illegal court order (not law) that violated the constitution (our laws).
"The Constitution... meant that its coordinate branches should be checks on each other. But the opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch." --Thomas Jefferson to Abigail Adams, 1804. ME 11:51
The manipulation of our constitution to allow unlawful and unmoral acts a right of passage to be imbedded into our laws without or even against legislation. They go against the electoral vote of the people and claim we don�t know what we want, what�s good for us, or what�s in the best interest of our country. People really should use understanding and an honest heart when interpreting the rules our father placed before us.
"History has informed us that bodies of men as well as individuals are susceptible of the spirit of tyranny." --Thomas Jefferson: Rights of British America, 1774. ME 1:190, Papers 1:124
Believers of faiths can�t defend themselves without being passed off as religious radicals. Christian�s ideas and opinions are cut short by those who wish to claim Christians are oppressive in nature. These people see Christianity as a corrupt oppressive ideological simple-minded view. These same people view our morality as unconstitutional. These people wish to bring about a secular society in this country. These few wish to remove God and eventually the right to faith based groups to gather in public places, broadcast on public air waves, rally for personal faith driven causes. Secular means worldly, materialistic, without God or religion. In a society such as that there would be no �we the people�, life is consumed with self; a materialistic ideology would replace faith and morality. This would indeed become a self-destructive wound to the whole of this nation. Once morality is removed only time will stand between our future and the dog eat dog world we would undoubtedly become. All acts of faith are to be looked at non-discrepantly. Christianity is not a religion but a way of life.
"If, indeed, a judge goes against the law so grossly, so palpably, as no imputable degree of folly can account for, and nothing but corruption, malice or wilful wrong can explain, and especially if circumstances prove such motives, he may be punished for the corruption, the malice, the wilful wrong; but not for the error: nor is he liable to action by the party grieved. And our form of government constituting its respective functionaries judges of the law which is to guide their decisions, places all within the same reason, under the safeguard of the same rule." --Thomas Jefferson: Batture at New Orleans, 1812. ME 18:130
Removing God from the public and the monuments we hold so dear you remove us as well. Christianity is a way of life not just an opinion, ideology, or religion. Christians depend on God, we hold him above all and we call for his protection and guidance. Forcing the removal of God from our money, pledge of allegiance, prayers, and public buildings, Inc. will start a massive fear in the midst of this nation or a nation wide anger. We have a right to be proud of the progress of our founding Christian fathers, our Christian roots, moral, values, and way of life. This is not decimator toward anyone nor forces anyone to believe. Some claim we should be removed, change or we should not ask for guidance from the Almighty as a nation because we should place our trust as a nation on more solid materialistic progresses this nation has accomplish. I believe that this world is made up of many well-accomplished nations. China, Japan, Germany, Britain, France, Russian; the list goes on and on. We have what we have because of who we are, how we view life, and how we choose.
"It is not right for those who are only to act in a preliminary form, to let their own doubts preclude the judgment of the court of ultimate decision." --Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe, 1797. ME 9:423
Christians will feel you are removing his protection from this land. You will choose to turn our back against him; this is enforcing authority in religious discipline. If a man chooses not to believe he has that right, if he chooses to teach his innocent children to not believe he will account for his own that�s not my choice to make; again he has that right. Our Christian beliefs he holds such hatred for created the laws that allow him to do so in this Christian nation (the right to choose). In God We Trust on our money does not prescribe any religious exercise; nor does it assume authority over a religious discipline. If nothing else it recognizes our Christian heritage, but it does not force all our citizens to believe. Next will be our flag, it is made up from Christian colors too.
"Certainly, no power to prescribe any religious exercise or to assume authority in religious discipline has been delegated to the General Government. It must then rest with the States, as far as it can be in any human authority." --Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Miller, 1808. ME 11:428
Our government at this time requires a two-thirds vote to impeach a judge. This truly sheds some light on the fact that holding a judge accountable for his actions by way of the legislator and impeachment is not only impracticable but also in effect impossible; our congress can even agree enough to pass a bill. Impeachment of a judge is an insecure security blanket so people believe they can be protected until the protection is need and not there.
"If this would not be independence enough, I know not what would be such short of the total irresponsibility under which we are acting and sinning now... We require a majority of one house and two-thirds of the other [for removal of a judge]--a concurrence which in practice has been and ever will be found impossible; for the judicial perversions of the Constitution will forever be protected under the pretext of errors of judgment, which by principle are exempt from punishment. Impeachment, therefore, is a bugbear which they fear not at all. But they would be under some awe of the canvass of their conduct which would be open to both houses regularly every sixth year." --Thomas Jefferson to James Pleasants, 1821. FE 10:198
Our Government already has laws against unlawful legislation from the bench, it is very clear our courts must stand with the intent of the legislator. Slander is an unlawful thing as well as all the other illegal actions being ignored and claimed as freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, and the freedom to pursue happiness. The idea that freedom gives way to any personal choice to be found lawful is very dangerous. Serial killers often find they�re indulgent into murder enjoyable; this is their personal choice of pursuing happiness. Lawful or unlawful the fact is that the intent of the legislator gives no way to create lawful out of unlawful acts. The intent of the legislator is just as important to the law and justice as the law itself. The intent of the legislator must be protected with the law created for this intent.
"The cautious maxims of the bench, to seek the will of the legislator and his words only, are proper and safer for judicial government. They act ever on an individual case only, the evil of which is partial, and gives time for correction. But an instant of delay in executive proceedings may be fatal to the whole nation. They must not, therefore, be laced up in the rules of the judiciary department. They must seek the intention of the legislator in all the circumstances which may indicate it in the history of the day, in the public discussions, in the general opinion and understanding, in reason and in practice." --Thomas Jefferson to James Barbour, 1812. ME 13:128
Our judicial system must have a restructure of its autonomy. The autonomy of our courts must protect the structure of our court system as a whole. Autonomy should be use to protect the integrity of our court system which clearly dictates that the intent of the legislator must be followed. The autonomy of the courts should be a reliable source of correcting and punish unlawful judges. It should also be a protection for upright judges who find themselves in honest manners of conflict in the law concerning individual cases. If it can be proven that a judge intentionally went against the intent of the legislator, we should have a means of action. If a judge insists to impose his personal view by creating legislation from a judicial seat, we should have a reliable means of action. At any time it is found that by their actions a judge violates the oath of their seat we should have a sound means of action. Even if unlawful judges are removed, the autonomy of the courts is set up to a point that not one is held accountable by means of punishment for their crimes against the people and our court system. Imposing punishments above just being removed from seat is dangerous. Rare cases need lawful judges to sometime error on the side of law to preserve true justice; this is why the intent of the legislator must be a factor in the autonomy.
"The original error [was in] establishing a judiciary independent of the nation, and which, from the citadel of the law, can turn its guns on those they were meant to defend, and control and fashion their proceedings to its own will." --Thomas Jefferson to John Wayles Eppes, 1807. FE 9:68
We are Anglo Saxon and Britain is our brother. Together Britain and America are the stick of Joseph.
Below are a few sites to help find research concerning the United States and Manasseh.
britam.org
historicist.com
encyclopedia.com
originofnations.org
Many Anglo Saxon (sons of Isaac) tribes and Vikings traded with the Indians in this land before Columbus came. Manasseh is in the history of some Cherokees and settled in this land many, many years before the Pilgrims came. The Pilgrims were for the most part Ephraim along with parts of all the tribes. T he tribe of Dan was among the many Anglo Vikings who came here before Columbus (Bjarni Herjulfon, Eric the Red and his son Leif Ericsson was of the tribe of Dan). Cherokee Indians who had Blonde hair and Blue eyes may be part of the Cherokee people who mixed with the tribes of the Anglo Saxon Vikings. Some believe that this shows claim that these Indians were indeed Manasseh, however Manasseh was the oldest son of Joseph of the tribes of Israel. It may be possible that these Indians were Manasseh-Indian race, but not Manasseh as a whole.
Cherokee people called themselves ANI YUNWIYA Which means: "Principle People" CHEROKEE, means "People who use another language"
The most familiar name, Cherokee, comes from a Creek word "Chelokee" meaning "people of a different speech.�
It is possible that Indians mixed with the Manasseh settlers and these peoples (threw time) became known as Cherokee Indians or one of many Indian tribes, but if true these historical events are lost to documented proof. I believe that if you could follow the history of all the Indian creeds in this land back far enough you will find they were once just one race of Indian people. Threw the timeline of history they became different peoples and races of Indians.
Abraham conceived a son with Hagar his wife�s Egyptian servant and this is how the great people of Arab decent came to be. It is not hard to come to the idea that God used this same natural human nature to create the multitude of Indian creeds in the history of this great land as well.
The "seven times" of punishment upon Israel have been fulfilled. In the scriptural usage elsewhere, as seven symbolic times, or years, i.e., seven periods of 360 years each, making 2520 (7 x 360 = 2520) years.
Reference Links Below
Reference 1
Reference 2
A study of the dates when the various tribes were taken into captivity shows they were all not taken out of captivity at the same time. In 721 B.C. the capital of northern Israel, Samaria (Ephraim) fell to the Assyrians. Exactly 2520 years later Great Britain became a commonwealth on Jan. 1, 1881.
In 745 B.C. the Assyrians conquered the tribe of Manasseh. Exactly 2520 years later America became a nation on July 4. 1776.
A great Scottish Pyramidologist and Bible Chronologist, Dr. Adam Rutherford told the Icelandic nation many years ago that on a certain day and certain years, they would become an independent nation. They laughed at him and said it would be impossible since they were under the control of Denmark. Benjamin was �lent as a light unto Judah�. As their captivity started last they be expected to end last. Exactly 2520 years from the exile of Benjamin, Iceland became an independent nation.
This ironically documents the punishment of Israel by God seven times because they persisted in sinful ways.
Genesis 17:vs 4-5
As for me, behold my covenant is with thee, and thou shall be a father of many nations. Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee.
This covenant was an everlasting contract. In Hebrews 6:vs 13-20 God swore to it by an oath. God does not lie therefore the covenant is immutable. Abraham is the father of Ishmael whose children became the Arab nations. Isaac was also Abraham�s son and his son Esau�s children became Russia. Isaac also had another son Jacob whose name was changed to Israel by God in Gen.35: 10 and his descendants became the tribes of Israel.
The coat of many colors given to Joseph was passed down to his sons. The adoption of the two sons of Joseph by Israel in Gen. 48:16-20 created another tribe. Crossing of the hands gave Ephraim his father�s place among the tribes and this left Manasseh to become the thirteenth.
Ephraim was given to become a company of nations (the U.K. Great Britain) and Manasseh was given to become a Great and mighty nation, one out of many was part of the legacy of Manasseh. Manasseh would become a great and mighty nation. Ephraim would be larger in number than Manasseh. Manasseh would become the super power of this world and be used by God to fight for freedom and liberty for all. Anyone can research and find the migrations of the tribes and follow many of them to their present destinations.
Our Pilgrim father�s called themselves �the seed of Abraham, God�s servant and the children of Jacob, his chosen.� It is biblical that Joseph was Jacob�s chosen, his favorite. By destiny of the coat of many colors and the adoption of Joseph�s son�s our fate was then sealed in stone.
From Manasseh, the thirteenth tribe of Israel comes our numeric marking.
Our national number is 13 and our first colonies were 13.
There are thirteen letters in our national emblem, the �American Eagle�
(Job 39: 27-30; Deut. 28:49; Psalm 103:5; Exodus 19:4).
In the right talon of our eagle is an olive branch with 13 leaves (Jer.11: 16; Psalm 128:3; Gen. 49:22) and in it�s left, 13 arrows. This illustrates God�s command given to the Israelites Deut. 20: 10-12).
A scroll in held in the beak that in 13 letters says �E Pluribus Unum,� (one out of many) and above the scroll is a cloud with 13 stars. Luke 2:9; Num. 9: 17: 10: 34: Psalm 105: 39; Exodus 13: 21; 14: 19-20; 16: 10; 24: 16; 34: 5; 40: 38).
We have 13 bars on our flag and 13 rods in our National mace.
The great pyramid of Gizeh (Isaiah 19: 19-20) is represented with the suspended apex stone portraying the almighty seeing eye of God; God is our capstone.
The pyramid consists of 13 courses of stone and has written above it in 13 letters �Annuit Coeptis� (He has favored our beginnings).
Our flag is made up of Scarlet (blood, signifies justice �the blood of Christ�), blue (love, the color of the heavens it is representative of God) and white (purity and holiness, the color of snow �Psalm 50: 7: Isaiah 1: 18�), the colors of Israel of old. These are the colors that covered the table of shew bread within the tabernacle.
Many try to claim that we are not Christian because this would be discriminatory against other religions or non-believers. In 1776 Washington, Franklin, and Jefferson showed that they did establish this nation under God. The concluding words of our National Anthem summarize the fact that the United States of America was born out of a commitment to God and his principles.
In 1620 the Pilgrims in their own words expresses in their now famous compact: �Having undertaken for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith and the honor of our king and country a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia.�
In the same year, King James I, in answer to another petition, granted the New England Charter, in which was included the following clause: �We according to our princely inclination, favoring much their worthy disposition, in hope thereby to advance the enlargement of Christian religion, to the glory of God Almighty.�
During the Christian dispensation, the lost tribes of Israel were to posses many marks of identification. While Israelites remain in many other countries, America is the home of millions of all the thirteen tribes (one out of many). We have also become the home of many people of many races. Regardless of the fact that we are many nations today, our foundation will never change and the legacy of this land will never fall; we are the seed of Joseph. By faith, Christians of all races believe here and have the right to choose their own way of life. Israel is no longer just a bloodline of a particular race, but many races through bloodline and through faith.
The Charter Massachusetts Bay granted by King William and Queen Mary, and preceding the one by King Charles I, stated in part: �may win and incite the natives of the country to their knowledge and obedience of the only true God and Savior of mankind, and the Christian faith.�
The fundamental order of Connecticut, under which a provisional government was instituted in 1638-1639 stated: �and well knowing where a people are gathered together the word of God requires that to maintain the peace and union of such a people there should be an orderly and decent government established according to God, to order and dispose of the affairs of the people at all seasons as occasion shall require; do therefore associate and conjoin ourselves to be as one public state of commonwealth; and do for ourselves and our successors and such as shall be adjoined to us at any time hereafter enter into combination and confederation together to maintain and preserve the liberty and purity of the gospel of our Lord Jesus which according to the truth of said gospel is now practiced.�
We could go on and on showing by history, traditions and statistics that America was founded on Christian beliefs and we are indeed a Christian nation regardless of the corruptions that has absorbed itself into our way of life.
Being a Christian nation does not mean we require others to be the same to live among us. Our courts and government cannot force you to believe in our Lord nor force you to learn of him. All have the right to choose or not or even not care, but do not hate us for who we are; for if it not be for that history we would not be standing in this Great and powerful nation we call home today, �Annuit Coeptis� (He has favored our beginnings). America would not be, and the nation here today would be no different than the ones many people flee here from! I care not of what people speak in their own house, their business, their life, and their choice.
Christians are not second-class citizens. Christian does not mean a church or a religion. Christian does not mean a right to judge, but we have a right to be and Christian simply means Christ like (threw the truest of efforts we try).
It was God�s will and purpose to hide Israel. God could work unhindered with and in the lost tribes till he had finished his predetermined work, and without them knowing they were really the people of the book. Only as Israel�s time of punishment has ran out and the whole of God�s purpose at the point of being fulfilled will the identity of Israel�s people to be known.
We are many people today. For hundreds of years our families began and set out to find a life of hope, freedom and opportunity. Every part of the world has found a chance to be who ever they will to be here. The heart of our nation must rest upon the moral intent that all are to be treated equal. Equality does not rest on the oppression of one to give way to another, these ideas lack moral discernment for all.
"At the establishment of our Constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions nevertheless become law by precedent, sapping by little and little the foundations of the Constitution and working its change by construction before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life if secured against all liability to account." --Thomas Jefferson to A. Coray, 1823. ME 15:486
NRW�2004
Home