It is true that Sadam is an evil man that should not be running the country. But do you really think that bombing innocent civilians will be the answer. Hell, he's killed a lot of his own people. Think he'll care if the US offs a few thousand more
of them. Besides, according to UN policy, there are only two reasons and two reasons only that you can go to war. That is if you are invaded or there is a threat of civil war in another country, you can step in and "mediate".
And it's pure bullshit what Bush is saying. How they're a threat to the US. He's a threat to his own people, but not the US. Personally, I think Mr. Bush has it set in his messed up little coke head, red neck mind that the majority of brown people are terrorists. He probably wouldn�t be so excited for this war if it wasn�t for all the oil in Iraq.
A better solution would be, instead of bombing the crap out of the country, they should work with the civilians to
overthrow Sadam. Help and protect them from him instead of killing them.
I would also like to point out that the Israelis are known to have weapons of mass destruction (the A bomb), but the US isn't picking on them because they're on their side. It's hypocritical, because they are probably more of a threat to the entire world than Iraq is.
Another point of interest is, and most of you probably have not noticed this because you're all too doped up on fear that Bush and the media has spoon fed to you. But the American economy is not doing so well. So Bush is trying to keep your mind off this by making you fear for your lives. Sound familiar? It should, Hitler did it. Germany's economy was failing, so he sets it in all the peoples minds that all the Jews are evil and they're to blame. And look at the out come of that one. The only exception is that while Hitler was an evil, but pretty intelligent man, Bush is... well not evil, just dumb.

Rorie's "two motherfucking cents"...
Well that's what I gotta say! YAY!
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1