2.1 Ranking for the four system
|
Factor |
Manufacturer |
||||
|
Carrier |
Mitsubishi |
Fujitsu |
McQuay |
||
|
Cooling Capacity |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Air Flow Rate |
3 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
Power Consumption |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
Operation Noise |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
Total Current |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Dimensions |
Indoor unit |
295x1080x185 |
278x850x191 |
260x815x168 |
290x815x179 |
|
(HxWxD in mm) |
Outdoor unit |
590x800x300 |
750x900x300 |
700x900x350 |
646x840x330 |
|
Price (S$) |
5,499.00 |
5,350.00 |
5,788.00 |
5,488.00 |
|
|
Average Value |
3 |
1.75 |
3.5 |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|||||
Figure1-18 Table showing the ranking of the
multi-split system information.
|
2.1.9
Base on the table above, it shown the system
information ranking result.
2.1.10 The
Mitsubishi air conditioner system has much lower average value (1.75) than the
other three systems.
2.1.11 That
means the Mitsubishi air conditioner system has better factor compare with
other systems.
2.1.12 Therefore,
the Mitsubishi air conditioner system is considered has much higher change to
recommend for this condominium project.