| Here's a little something I found on the net. �I figured that
it would be good to snag and look at.
(Before you start this article, please be advised: �While this is a negative article, I do not think that the "police" in general are bad or wrong... I DO believe that THIS -- the actions described here, ARE wrong. �Evil? �Well, I wouldn't put it THAT far. �Un-Constitutional? �Hell yeah! �And I believe that the police that DO these things are criminals, EVEN IF it's "legal" and "sanctioned". �My friends who ARE police know who and what I'm talking about. �To my friend's husband who turned in $40,000 in CASH that he found in the park one night -- despite others who say you were stupid to do it, *I* salute you. �If you're THAT honest, I KNOW you wouldn't do what described here.) |
| Dateline, Friday, Jan 3rd, 1997 [email protected] |
The police do a rough job, often to little thanks from a good-sized segment of society... but then it's hard to be "thankful" to someone you see as a bully, over-bearing, self-righteous, etc, agents of an increasingly distrusted, beligerant beaurocracy. � |
| When police are paid a portion of "forfeited" �('legally'
confiscated) belongings, they become pirates. �Legal pirates. �Sanctioned
pirates. �Much like the pirates who operated during the revolutionary
war, preying NOT only on those who were enemies of our government, police
across the nation are turning on the innocent because it's convenient,
it's lucrative, and it legal. �Yep, piracy, protected by law.
How can this happen? �Well, those folks that "make" the laws, the same ones that are supposed to represent you and me, asked for, promoted, and passed these laws. �I would imagine that the vast majority of people don't know that the laws exist. �Of those that DO know, the VAST majority of people are those that are directly involved... either because they stand to gain from these "legally" obtained, or because they wound up being caught in these bad laws. �Of those who wound up being caught, I would imagine the by FAR, the VASTEST majority have never done anything wrong or worthy of this travesty in the name of justice. �These laws are here to "protect" us. �When folks who DON'T belong to the groups above first hear about the laws, I'm sure that they think the laws are beneficial. �Well thought out. �Carefully enforced. �Not abused. �Effective (against those they were meant to be used against -- drug kings). How would YOU like to be on the receiving end of stolen money? �Illegal?��No, it's all legal -- the money is stolen from 'you', by some police. �Doesn't it seem odd? � �In some locales, the police are PAID -- DIRECTLY, off the top. �Not like the cases in the show, where they had to pretend that the money they spent came from the department -- even tho' they bought things for themselves, took vacations on the money, and basically wound up playing with the money. �Stolen money. �Although the money wasn't paid off the top, it still went to the perpe-traitors.��In one case, of the couple of MILLION confiscated along a stretch of highway,�over $60,000 was given to just one officer. � Over $200,000 turned up missing -- or in this case, DIDn't turn up... AFTER having been turned in as "evidence". Isn't it just the "bad" guys who have this happen to them? �Nope. �Teenagers, older adults, men, women, migrant workers, businessmen, retirees, church-choir members... and that's just on ONE program about ONE state... people who were found by Dateline. �How many others HAVEN'T been able to talk -- for fear of retribution? �Of those interviewed, NONE had charges brought against them. �What were the majority "arrested" for? �What LED to their being stopped and having the products of their work and their lives stolen from them? �"Improper use of lane." �WHEW! �THAT spells drug-king. How about if you WERE a drug-king. �Not a casual user. �Not a pusher. �A drug-king. �You get pulled, and the prosecutor's office if willing to let you go IF you release claim to the $156,000 found in your Mercedes, AND the Mercedes. �COOL! �It happened and was documented on the show.��The Police got to keep 60% of the "take", the Prosecutor's office got 20%, and the final 20% went to a "judicial expense fund" for the judges. �Conflict of interest? �Un-Constitutional? � The police departments, the prosecutor's offices, and the judges don't seem to think so. � What do you think? Legalized rape? �Yes. � Legalized extortion? �Yes. �Will it continue? �Yes. Most people don't have the resources required to get their own belongings back, after having forfeited much (and sometimes ALL) of their belongings. �What if you "lost" $12,000 dollars to "forfeiture". �For "improper use of lane". �How much would you willing and prepared to pay to get that back? �How much time could you dedicate to getting what is rightfully YOURS back? �What if it happened in another state? �Could you afford the time off from work for a long and protracted court battle? �Hey, the state has your money, they can AFFORD to be generous with THEIR lawyers.��Can you afford and would you be willing to pay a large amount to a lawyer to represent you? �We're talking about just getting your money back... chances are the police departments are ABOVE being sued for costs and damages. �"It's the LAW". �And even then, there's a chance that your case'll never get to court. �It could be stone-walled, held up for months or YEARS buried in court, never even seeing the light of day. �Now, how about if you are a migrant worker, and the $12,000 what your life's savings? �Documented in the feature.��Luckily for the men that it happened to, the employer stood up for them and helped them get some (SOME - about two-thirds) of their money back. "This can't happen." �It does. �It did. �As part of the story, the news crew was pulled over several times. �The police deny it. �The chiefs of police deny it, saying, "well, if you were pulled for speeding, I'd have to say you were doing it". �Even though the whole thing was documented. �Five (count 'em, 5) hidden cameras took every thing in. �The police deny it. �This is a "powerful tool in the anti-drug war." �But it's being used against the innocent. �POSSIBLY you, or me. �Remember, you don't have to be FOUND with drugs. �You don't even have to be pulled for a drug-related offense. �But also remember, if you're willing to forfeit what's in the car, you can be let go even if there is evidence against you. �A "powerful tool in the anti-drug war", indeed. |
|
| (Remember, you DO have Fourth Amendment rights -- for the time being.
�While I think that the majority of police are ok, there are enough
(even if it's only a few) bad guys out there that EVERYBODY needs to be
VERY aware of their rights. �LEARN 'em. �NEVER -consent- to be
searched. �A warrant is needed unless you consent. �Then, anything
they find, EVEN if it has nothing to do with what you were originally questioned
about or detained over.��NEVER -invite- police into your home,
(or -consent- when they ask if they can "just come in to ask a few
questions") �This is implied and implicit consent.��
�Have an adult magazine? �Could you be arrested for child abuse?
�Yes. �Have a firearm? �Could you be arrested for child
abuse? �Yes. �Have ANYTHING that would be considered either out-of-the-ordinary,
POSSIBLY bought from ill-gotten gains, or even looks vaguely attractive
to the policeperson "casing" your joint? �YOU could be served
with a warrant based on that officers "reasonable suspicion"
about your "guilt". His "best guest" as to "probably
cause". The conditions for probable cause have been...�relaxed.
�Remember that new TV you bought yourself? �Hey, they would look
nice in the officer's rec. room, or in the squad lounge. �If the police
want to question you, go to the station, or answer questions on your front
door. �Don't even leave the door open. �If the questions start
to be about YOU, then politely refuse to answer them until you "have
council present". �Get pulled over? �Did you see the "snatch-and-grab"
routine worked up by those nice boys from Georgia? �Georgia's finest?
�They target out-of-town plates, for drivers matching that day's profile,
and pull the car for some minor infraction. �A quick Q&A session
to make sure the driver isn't likely to come back and fight, and then they
let you go. �"THANKS OFFICER!" �(Hey, you're getting
away with murder here. �EVERYbody knows that folks on the interstate
from out of state speed when traveling. �Such a nice man, he's letting
you go. �There are some good cops AFTER-all. �What a relief.)
�Well, have a nice trip, and remember, drive safely. �"Thanks
officer, I will." �Oh, and by the way, mind if I search your
vehicle? �Routine. �You know. �(You're over-come by this
sudden generosity - heck yeah, after all, he's a good guy). �Gotcha.
�First, call a couple extra cars. �Then, separate the passengers
from one-another and start questioning. �Mean-while, some of the boys
go over the car. �Good. �Is that an open can of beer? �"Hey,
it's a month old." �Smells like alcohol to me. �That's probably
cause. �Hey, what about that $400 in your pocket. �"It's
vacation money!" �NO it's not, it's evidence. �We'll also
have to impound your car. �And your luggage. �What? �You
think it's un-fair? �Hey, I think we have to take you "down-town"
for questioning. �You, and your spouse. �And your kids/ friends.
�Man, I really feel for you, those cavity searches are tough. �But
if you think we're not doing the right thing, we have to do it all by the
book...
At that point, you talk him into forgetting what you said. �Hey, you've got to get to your job on Monday, and hey, your wife is already upset. �And, ... OK, I'll just forget it, but you better watch it, most cops wouldn't be as nice as ME! Can't happen? �It's been on TWO TV shows. �So, who are you going to believe? You've been warned. |