Twin_Towers

The plane that crashed in Pennsylvania did so at a
very steep angle; almost a 90 degree angle from the
ground. We have been told
that this is due to a fight that went on in the
cockpit between hijackers and
passengers. One theory is that the hijackers knowing
that they would never
reach their intended target, decided to plunge the
plane into the ground.
Whatever the actual reason was, there is a slight
problem with all variations.
Modern day aircrafts have a sensor and if they are
going in a steep decline, the plane will override the
pilot and correct the altitude
and raise the nose of the plane. However, there is no
chance a plane can
correct itself if the descent is not occuring from
inside the cockpit but was
shot down instead. If this plane was not shot down,
why did it not correct
itself?

Later it was found out some passenger called from a
cell phone and while explaining said, "Wait a minute,
there's a puff of smoke from outside.....", furthering
the "plane was shot down" explanation.

Washington is not classified as flying space; in fact,
any plane that flies
over Washington is to be shot down if not identified.
When you consider that
there had already been 2 confirmed airplane collisions
with buildings that were
already identified as "apparent terrorist attacks",
why was this plane allowed
to fly into Washington?

International media has footage of an American fighter
circling over the
World Trade Center between the 2 collisions in New
York. Why is this not being
shown anymore and what was that plane doing there?

How in the world did air traffic control not catch on
to 4 seperate airplanes going in
4 completely wrong paths? Especially confusing is the
fact that with 2
collisions already, one would think that the Air
Traffic Controllers would be on
the lookout for such things. If Air Traffic Control
did catch on, why was no
action taken?

It is virtually impossible to hijack a plane in the
United States; one must
think, how much harder if 4?? How can 3-6 seperate
people get on board with
knives and what not and NOT A SINGLE PERSON get
caught? What is the
probablities of that happening?

The Arabic flight manual. Two things arise from this:

Whoever committed these crimes KNEW what he was doing,
they would have
trained monthes to prepare for this "mission". You
wouldn't be trying
to read a flight manual on your way to a mission,
you'd already be
trained.

Of all the vehicles in the airport parking lot, how
did the
authorities know so quickly which van to search into,
within hours of the attacks?

The authorities were quick to tell us that they had
suspects in this case and that they had been taken
into custody;
the two Bukhari brothers from the Emirates. Who then
suddenly were not from the Emirates,
but were from Saudi Arabia. Who then... turned out to
be dead... a year ago? "Bukhari's brother, Ameer
Bukhari, died in a small plane crash in Florida last
year"
{taken from CNN}. How reliable is this "investigation"
if their suspects were
dead a year before the crime was committed?

Moreoever, when CNN quietly corrected itself, {did not
make an apology}, it stated, "Based on information
from multiple law enforcement sources, CNN reported
that Adnan Bukhari and Ameer Bukhari of Vero Beach
Florida, were suspected to be two of the pilots who
crashed planes into the World Trade Center." How is it
that MULTIPLE law enforncement sources viewed the
Bukhari brothers as suspects, when one of them was
dead for a year? It is hard to believe one person
would view a dead person as a suspect, but for
multiple people?

They went on to say that "A federal law enforcement
source now tells CNN that Bukhari passed an FBI
polygraph and is not considered a suspect."

Finally concluding with, "Ameer Bukhari died in a
small plane crash last year." Of course, he is no
longer a supect.

"Air force one is next" read the threat note; and
within the note was the secret code representing Air
Force One that only someone working within the CIA
would know; the note also said something about knowing
where the president was going to be at; the question
becomes, How did these criminals know such sensitive
information?

If this was the work of a terrorist, terrorists work
by trying to "send a message" to the
group/organization/country involved. To do so, the
terrorists behind the attack must identify themselves
and reveal their purposes. No group has done so this
far. Whoever did this wants the world to remain in
speculation and look towards the "obvious" suspects.

Moreover, as we all know, the United States keeps
track of all groups it deems as a "threat" {whatever
that may mean}. How was it that the United States was
totally unprepared for this attack?

Because this is a time of unsurenty there are many stories on WHO did the bombing. There is a theory that the Freemasons who are one of the biggest enemies of Islam planned this. Meaning America planned this bombing so that they could make the whole world hate the muslims by blaming the muslims and then finally their aim would be to kill all the muslims. At this moment in time it appears that the plan has worked as Many Muslims are being attacked because of what happened in the US and yes...People are beggining to hate the muslims very much. Many Muslimas' are afraid to wear their hijab in the fear they will be attacked. This theory to me stands out the most as the freemasons do not care how many human casualtys there are in their aim for globalisation under one ruler who is known to the muslims as the Dajaal. Many evidences have shown that it was not Osama Bin Ladin as he also was not afraid to be taken on trial to proove his innocence. No good Muslim lies after he has sworn on the Qur�n that he will not.