http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/fun.games/10/15/game.xxx.reut/index.html

 

Welcome to the 21st century.  Where profit takers are the ‘moral’ voices of our society.

 

Since when did toy stores get all moral?  Last time I was in a toy store I could buy GI Joe™ and plastic guns.  Not that those things are bad, but if someone is going to stand up and feign a higher morality, why be so selective over what this morality is suppose to be?

 

Frankly, I’m insulted on two fronts.  One, it’s okay to sell plastic guns to the future adults of this country, thus encouraging them to associate violence with a sense to normal behavior, but it’s wrong to teach children that sex is okay?  What the fuck?  I’ve never understood that mentality.  If sex and sexual behavior is such a sin, why the fuck did god require that we use it to procreate?  It’s completely dim-witted to believe that, if god exists, he really thinks sex is a bad thing (and of course, if god doesn’t exist, then sex is natural, anyway).  And to assume that some how teaching children to appreciate the human form is morally wrong is just plain stupid.

 

The second reason, it’s just a game for Christ sake!   It carries an “M” rating, and any parent worth their salt will decide whether or not their child is mature enough for an M rated game.  If you are a parent and you think that someone else telling you what to believe is the proper way to behave; shame on you!  The idea of being an adult is solely bases on the premise that you are responsible for your life.  The minute we say that we don’t want that responsibility we relegate ourselves back to child status.  And if you think I want to have the status of a child again, but all the responsibility of an adult, you’re more than sadly mistaken.  I hate the fact, that parents like you, ruin it for the rest of us.  Maybe it would be easier if you fools who think sex is morally objectionable just have your reproduction organs removed.  Trust me, we’d all be happy with that. 

Besides, the reality is that most game systems are owned by 20 something males.  I doubt that I’m being simplistic there.  And I would think that a 20 year old, who is an adult in our society, has the legal right to entertain his fantasies as he sees fit, and if the toy stores of the this country some how think that a 20 year old doesn’t have that right, then what the toy stores are doing amounts to censorship.  I don’t know about you, but the first inkling of censorship is already too much.  It’s all those wacko’s with their it takes a village crap.  Just so you know, it’s that mentality that births serial murderers and breeds anti social behavior. 

 

In fact, some high school in Berkeley attempted to have organic lunches at school:

 

 http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2002/09/28/MN178113.DTL

 

It failed.  Of course, the media is portraying the event as yet another bad PR program.  Saying that it was all just a marketing error and that some how the word didn’t get to the students.  Or some crap like that.  The truth is probably a lot simpler than that.  It probably relates to typical rights of passage.  The young all rebel against their parents.  It’s the natural order of things.  A young person always needs to strike out for self-identity.  In Southern Baptist homes the teenage daughter tends to become a drunken slut, who parties while daddy preaches the good word.  Are we to assume then that in the liberal household this rebellion is some how none existent?  I doubt it.  It would only make sense that a young person growing up with a father and mother who were flag burning, pot-smoking, Birkenstock wearing, long hairs would rebel by being what ever fit for them at that time.  If for example, a child’s parents were organic vegetarians, would it seem so strange then that the children of such parents would prefer to eat at Taco Bell than to have yet another boiled yam for lunch?  I would think after about 3000 softened carrots for dinner, the appeal of such dry and bland meals would loose their luster in the face of such attractions as Carl’s Jr., or In-n-Out.  This would especially make itself known by the 13-17 year old mind.  So even, with in the village, these high minded ofay cry about, there is rebellion.  

 

Since this ‘perfect food’ system failed in Berkeley and since they blamed it on bad marketing, how long do you think it will be before they go before the state and ask for tax monies to sponsor a “Get to know your veggie” program?

 

What ever the outcome.  I don’t want to live in this village and the best way to accomplish that is simply to get up ever day and drink myself to oblivion, hoping the dark gods finally hear my prayers and pull me off of life support.

 

or·gan·ic

  1. Of, relating to, or derived from living organisms: organic matter.
  2. Of, relating to, or affecting a bodily organ: an organic disease.
  3.  
    1. Of, marked by, or involving the use of fertilizers or pesticides that are strictly of animal or vegetable origin: organic vegetables; an organic farm.
    2. Raised or conducted without the use of drugs, hormones, or synthetic chemicals: organic chicken; organic cattle farming.
    3. Serving organic food: an organic restaurant.
    4. Simple, healthful, and close to nature: an organic lifestyle.
  4.  
    1. Having properties associated with living organisms.
    2. Resembling a living organism in organization or development; interconnected: society as an organic whole.
  5. Constituting an integral part of a whole; fundamental.
  6. Law. Denoting or relating to the fundamental or constitutional laws and precepts of a government or an organization.
  7. Chemistry. Of or designating carbon compounds.


n.

  1. A substance, especially a fertilizer or pesticide, of animal or vegetable origin.
  2. Chemistry. An organic compound.

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1