Steel Bridge Competition 2006

Florida International University

 American Society of Civil Engineers Student Chapter



We Invite you to watch our

FIU-ASCE Regional Conference Informative Video

 
The video will start automatically.
*Using a fast connection (broadband or DSL) the video starts almost immediately.
*Dial up connection may take up to 24 minutes loading the video. 
To watch it, leave the page open until the video begins..

 

 

Every year the FIU-ASCE Student Chapter participates in the Regional Competitions. One of the most important competitions is the STEEL BRIDGE . We started working on the design of the Bridge on August 2005, then the fabrication by the end of February and the Competition was held the University of Florida on March 31st, April 1st and 2nd of 2006.

The Team:

Steel Bridge Captain 2006: Alexandra Andion

Steel Bridge Co-Captains 2006: Enmanuel Espinal  and  Christian Diaz

 

I want to Specially thank:

Chris Rego, Juliana Vazquez, Brensa Solis, Randall Blanchette, and the Co-Captains Christian Diaz and Enmanuel Espinal for all their collaboration during the fabrication of the Bridge. Also to the ASCE members that spend at least a little time helping with something, and Professor Edgar Polo for his support.

I also want to thank our Steel Bridge Sponsors:

Kaushik Dutta, S & F Engineers, Inc.

Dade Steel Sales Corp.

R & D General Welding Services

Dan Becker, Florida International University - Mechanical Engineering

and The Students fro m the Florida International University - Society of Automotive Engineers for all their special help and support during the fabrication of the Bridge.

 

General Idea:

The competition rules this time requires the bridge to be assembled in the shortest time possible and must support a lateral load and 2 different vertical loads that will be located at random on the bridge.


Top View

 
Loading   

    

If you would like to see the official rule click on: Steel Bridge Rules 2006

 

Problems during development of this project:

When we started working of this project we had two things in mind: that we were going to have enough money for the material and help during the fabrication. The design of the bridge was not easy, many conditions had to be fulfilled and our first error was to design the bridge thinking that we could figure the assembly of it later. 

Unfortunately by the time we had to start fabricating the bridge we had a very low budget. More than half of the materials was donated and all the manual labor had to be done by our selves. This was the first time we faced a project so important with such limited resources.  Since we had to fabricate the bridge ourselves there were many imperfections that made the bridge even more difficult to assemble.

Even of all the difficulties and errors, I am very happy that we could fabricate such a difficult bridge. We assembled it a couple of times but we couldn't figure the way to put it together the way the rules required.  This was an incredible experience and we learned many things... for starters, the engineer must think about the construction phase when designing. Things must make sense in real life! We designed a skewed bridge with many angles that made the fabrication extremely complicated and inaccurate.

Also, we learned about cutting and welding. A student from Mechanical Engineering helped us cutting many pieces and with the help of one of the ASCE student's father, the welding could be possible.  But since the person who welded the pieces worked during the day, we had to work with him at night which made this task even more difficult.

And this teaches us to make a budget and better plan when developing a project like this, many situations could have been prevented if we had taken care of that before.

 

Images of errors in Fabrication:

 A bolt was to be welded to the flat side of a 1" channel (One channel on each side of the tube). A square tube had a slot that fit the bolt heads welded to the channels. This was to connect 3 pieces, but the welding on the bolts was too difficult, so when the bolts where to be inserted in the tube the welding didn't allow it since it was taking more space than designed.

Since this bridge had so many angles, it was too difficult to make the pieces match. Another difficulty was to make the drilled holes for the bolts for the assembly to match all the pieces.

This shows how the pieces in some places didn't match at planned.

 

 

 The connection in the bottom chord was the most complicated. It took us about 4 days drilling the holes trying to make the pieces match.

But we didn't consider the space needed to screw the nut in the bolt. The 1" channel flanges had exactly the space to allow the bolt throw but not enough for any tool to be used to put the nut and it was very difficult by had, without mentioning the strength needed to tide the bolt in place as required.

 

 

 

 

 We had to remove part of the flange of the channels to be able to tide the bolts when assembling the bridge. This Obviously lowered the strength the channel was supposed to have when loading the bridge.

 

 

 Since the welding was a night, it was extremely difficult to be accurate with the angles. Unfortunately when putting the pieces together such as in this location, the pieces don't match as needed and the bolts had to be forced in maybe with a hammer.

 

From a top view the horizontal and vertical tubes were supposed to look aligned.

 

 

 

 

 

 When forcing some of the pieces together some members such as the bracing on the top chord was in compression instead of tension as intended in the design.

All these mistakes and problems teach many important things for the future, not only with projects but in real life. I hope all this experience bring us better result in future projects.

 

 

    


Thanks for visiting!

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1