LIMNIC MATERIALS TOUR

[ball] [ball] [ball] [ball] [ball]

21 - 23 October 1997


[ball] Briefing on Past Studies and Sites [ball]

[ball] Difficulties encountered with the present designations[ball]

[ball] Field observations [ball]

[ball] Site visits [ball]

PAST STUDIES AND SITES

[ball] [ball] [ball] [ball]

1975 visit to Indiana by Bill McKinzie and Warren Lynn.

The following sites were visited:

[ball] Montgomery - muck/coprogenous earth/sand/coprogenous earth

[ball] Stuben - muck/coprogenous earth/sand

[ball] Stuben - muck/coprogenous earth/sand

[ball] White - muck/coprogenous earth

[ball] La Porte - muck/coprogenous earth

[ball] Cass - thin muck/coprogenous earth/sand (11 inches muck)


Difficulties encountered with the present designations

[ball] [ball] [ball]

In Elkhart County, IN, Muskego muck presented some difficulties in horizon designations in the coprogenous earth materials. The organic carbon content fluctuated in the layers and the designations fluctuated between "O" and "C" horizons. As limnic layers the designation would remain constant and it would present a warning that these materials would not react like normal "C" materials that can be brought to the surface. Coprogenous earth and marl probably should be sampled for lab analysis. We do not have diatomaceous earth in this area.

Importance of special designations for limnic layers or horizons:

Marl is difficult to consider as a "C" horizon. Marl may have some plant parts present, but not enough to be an "O" horizon. It may also have staining from organic materials and iron that make it darker and more reddish brown than is normally defined in Soil Taxonomy.

Coprogenous earth is also difficult to consider as a "C" horizon. Some coprogenous earth has enough plant parts and organic materials to be considered as "O", but it is vastly different from our normal mucky materials. It reacts entirely differently upon drying and does not rewet. Also it creates problems in farming when exposed on the surface.

Both marl and coprogenous earth present problems with underground drain tiles. Both materials coat the tile and stop or greatly reduce the amount of water entering the drain tile. This often happens within a year of the time the drain tile is installed.

Using an "O" or a "C" designation definitely does not provide needed information for land owners or drainage contractors who are working with these materials. Also this would be helpful for assessments as the organic materials on the surface subside. The soils with marl and coprogenous earth have little or no value for cropping as soon as the organic surface is gone.

The proposal to use the designations found in Soil Taxonomy, 1975, would still do the job. These designations are:

Lcamarl (calcium)
Lcocoprogenous earth
Ldidiatomaceous earth

Special designations are used for all kinds of inclusions in horizons or special properties of horizons. In organic soils we designate the types of organic materials by using "a", "e", or "I". None of these fit the coprogenous earth materials when the organic content is great enough to be called an "O" horizon under the present thinking.

FIELD OBSERVATIONS

[ball] [ball]

Observations in the field by Soil Scientists support having the limnic designations. The reasons have generally been given previously. The materials are definitely different than the organic layers and they definitely are not "C" materials in as much as they are not parent material for any other layers.

[ball] [ball] [ball] [ball] [ball]










[ball]SITE VISITS [ball]

Several sites are to be visited. Information for the sites includes: Descriptions, portions of soil maps, portions of topographic quadrangles of the area, and locations of the sites. Sites to be visited are:

4 La Porte County, Edwards, Martisco, and Muskego muck

4 Pulaski County, Edwards and Muskego muck

  • Starke County, Toto muck (OSD site)


La Porte County Sites:

Stop 1: Martisco muck, 1,000 feet north and 460 feet west of the center of sec. 29, T. 36 N., R. 2 W., Washington twp., LA PORTE EAST, IND. topographic quadrangle. South of 400 S near 150 E., east of US 35. Atlas Sheet 48. (Attachment C).

Hole 1: Latitude: 41 32' 30.7" N, Longitude: 86 40' 7.9" W.

This site had limnic materials that were a mixture of marl, coprogenous earth, and organic matter.

Hole 2: Latitude: 41 32' 30.0" N, Longitude: 86 40' 9.4" W.

This site had limnic material that probalby qualifies as marl.

Stop 2: Edwards muck, 60 feet north and 1,920 feet west of the southeast corner of sec. 3, T. 35. N., R. 4 W., Clinton twp., LA PORTE WEST, IND. topographic quadrangle. On 700 S, between 800 W and 900 W, along the RR right of way. Atlas Sheet 53. (Attachment B).

Latitude: 41 30' 22.6" N, Longitude: 86 51' 42.3" W.

The concensus was that the limnic layers look and act like marl but the colors are too dark to be defined as marl.

Stop 3: Muskego muck, 1,980 feet west and 1,320 feet north of the southeast corner of sec. 32, T. 35 N., R. 3 W., Noble twp, HANNA, IND. topographic quadrangle. On 1,200 S between 375 W and Hunsley Road, west of O'Hara Ditch. Atlas Sheet 72. (Attachment D).

Latitude: 41 26' 15.6" N, Longitude: 86 46' 54.0" W.

This site had good coprogenous earth. The concensus was that this was the best example of coprogenous earth shown on the tour.


Starke County Site:

Stop 4: Toto muck, 580 feet west and 800 feet south of the center of sec. 34, T. 33 N., R. 2 W. Center twp., KNOX WEST, IND. topographic quadrangle. On 350 E just north of Toto Road. Atlas Sheet 24. (Attachment E).

Latitude: 41 15' 49.2" N, Longitude: 86 37' 55.0" W.

The coprogenous earth was thin at this site and was considered fair. The marl is questionable. The materials probably fit the thinking of coprogenous earth and marl, but do not meet the normal requirements for the criteria.

Pulaski County Sites:

Stop 5: Muskego muck, (mapped as Carlisle muck), SE ¼ SW ¼ of sec. 8, T. 31 N., R. 2 W. and NE ¼ NW ¼ of sec. 17, T. 31 N., R. 2 W., Franklin twp., DENHAM, IND. topographic quadrangle. On 600 N approximately 375 W. Atlas Sheets 5 and 13. (Attachment G).

Latitude: 41 8' 33.6" N, Longitude: 86 40' 24.2" W.

The coprogenous earth at this site was fair for meeting the criteria. It probably is similar to much of the coprogenous earth that is normally seen during mapping.

Stop 6: Edwards muck, (mapped as Edwards), brownish marl, NW ¼, SW ¼ of sec. 21, T. 31 N., R. 2 W. Franklin twp., RIPLEY, IND. topographic quadrangle. On 300 W and 430 N. Atlas Sheet 13. (Martisco muck and Muskego muck are present at this location.) (Attachment H).

Latitude: 41 7' 4.7" N, Longitude: 86 39' 34.4" W.

The coprogenous earth at this site was very good. It seemed to represent the concept of coprogenous earth very well. Marl that was south of the ditch was fair. It exhibited the explosive effervescence of marl, but the colors of the sample were darker than had been allowed previously. This was the next best example of coprogenous earth (after stop 3) shown on the tour.

Edwards muck, (typical pedon), NW ¼ NW ¼ sec. 25, T. 29 N., R. 1 W. Van Buren twp., GRASS CREEK, IND. topographic quadrangle. On 600 E. and 800 S. Atlas Sheet 72. (Attachment F). This site was not visited on the tour.

Edwards muck, (brownish marl), NE ¼, SE ¼ of sec. 29, T. 31 N., R. 1 W., Tippecanoe twp., WINAMAC, IND. topographic quadrangle. On 300 E and 350 N. Atlas Sheet 23. (Attachment I). This site was not visited on the tour

La Porte County Site:

Stop 7: Warners silt loam, 2,320 feet west and 940 feet north of the southeast corner of sec. 33, T. 37 N., R. 4 W. Coolspring twp., WESTVILLE, IND. topographic quadrangle. On Holmesville Road at Division Road. Atlas Sheet 31.

Latitude: 41 36' 28.8" N, Longitude: 86 53' 7.5" W.

The marl underlying this soil was considered to be an excellent example of marl. Also the colors were well within the concept of colors of marl. The materials had violent effervescence and were considered to be excellent marl. The concensus was that this is the best example of marl shown on the tour.

Porter County Site:

Stop 8: Warners silt loam, SE ¼ of SE ¼ of sec. 3, T. 36 N., R. 7 W. Portage twp. PORTAGE, IND. topographic quadrangle. Along a service road on the north side of I-94 and just south of the Little Calumet River. Atlas Sheet 8.

Latitude: 41 35' 55.5" N, Longitude: 87 12' 21.1" W.

The marl at this location had more brownish colors than had been allowed for marl. It appeared to have the other qualities of marl. Effervescence was violent, snail shells were present, and it seemed to be light weight.

[ball] [ball] [ball] [ball] [ball] [ball]



BACK TO SPECIAL STUDIES



Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1