a. A state of open, armed, often prolonged conflict carried on between nations, states, or parties.
b. The period of such conflict.
c. The techniques and procedures of war; military science.
2.
a. A condition of active antagonism or contention: a war of words; a price war.
b. A concerted effort or campaign to combat or put an end to something considered injurious: the war against acid rain.
To begin, violence is derived from our natural animal isntincts of aggression in order to solve problems, express emotions, when words fail to, or aggression, impatience, etc. gets the best of the mind. When a person becomes very frustrated, or angry, and cannot express this through words or passive action, violence is then lead to. This happens because we are, naturally, animals. Unlike other animals, we have grown to a much higher degree of intelligence and culture, although, we still have the base roots of animal instincts and goals. Thus, when a person cannot do something to express how they feel in our intelligent and cultured world, we restort to our natural ways that we feel keen to; violence. This is derived from frustration and anger however because of the negative feelings connotated with it. With love and passion, come careful touch, grace, etc. All the same connotated feelings related to love and passion. This applies to other feelings and actions, like war.
War, originally, was a test to the youth to become a man and gain a wife in accordance to his display in "war". Although, because of our cultivation and ever-growing intelligent nation, we have come to gain larger vendetta's, problems, thus, politics has become related and connotated to war.
Those of you in North America, I can only give influence to for I have not been raised in any other country (I was too young in Germany to recall any propoganda). Although, I proceed.
(I will supply links to media in regards to these subjects once I find, scan, type, etc. them)
Pearl Harbours secret:
Before the "surprise" attack upon americas Pearl Harbour, american submarines made their way into Japanese waters. They encountered two Japanese merchant submarines which did not reply to radio contact due to different frequencies; they didn't hear them. The american sub then attacked and sunk the two submarines which could not fight back. In retaliation to this un-provoked attack, Japan launched the assault upon Pearl Harbour. In this attack, the Japanese killed approximately 4 000. In retaliation to Japans retaliation, america dropped the first offensive nuclear bomb on Hiroshima on August 6th, then they did again, on August 9th, on Nagasaki. The attack on August 6th killed, approximately, 140 000 instantly. On August 9th, approximately 70 000 were killed instantly. There are still Japanese people disabled and dying of their exposure to these bombings. Indeed, in this past year alone, 5,021 survivors died of lingering radiation symptoms -- 55 years after the bombings. The death toll of these two bombings in 1945 to date is now 217,137. Thus, for every 1 American killed, approximately 55 Japanese were killed. Take this whichever way you like...
September 11th Loop:
(Date not confirmed) - Bill Clinton launches missles upon embassay in Afghanistan as a "warning". Hundreds are killed in collateral damage. In accordance to Geneva Convention Regulations, Usama Bin Laden declares a MAD treaty (Mutually Assured Destruction).
1993 - Usama Bin Laden detonates a bomb in the first floor building of the World Trade Center which kills 6 people.
2000 - September 11th, World Trade Center and related incidents occur. Relatively 5 000 are killed. Videos of Usama Bin Laden are broadcasted throughout the american media of confessing to these actions. Society easily accepts this and exaggerates possibilties. Remember, a nation that feels uninformed and lacking information due to terrorist attacks, causes chaos. The quicker ones nation feels in control, the easier to make them feel safe, and the easier it is to avoid chaotic. If america told the nation that they did not know whom did this attack for any delayed period of time, chaos would have erupted. To continue, Bush decalres a MAD treaty upon Sept. 11th's events. Thus, Bush declares a MAD in retaliation to a MAD. For an easy example of how stupid this is; Bushy slaps Sally. Sally slaps Bushy back. Bushy beats the shit out of Sally for slapping him.
Do I think america should have not retaliated and let things be? No. I think that america should not have continued to wage war upon other "terrorist states" and attack those whom, most likely, had no affiliation with the attacks.
Fidel Castro & Geneva Conventions
Through all my research, I could not find any reason for Fidel Castro attacking america. Although, at the time, america had signed their (approximately) 125th military dictatorship at the geneva conventions. America also presented several democratic dictatorships in which every other country signed, except for america themself. In simpler terms; america, indirectly, is "bossing" around the world. Fidel may have noticed the tyranny of the mighty usa and decided to take matters into his own hands. But of course, this is all based upon information given to me and I may be completely wrong, as always.
Who's land was North Americas first? What happened to those people? When you can't get a country to agree with your terms, what do you do? When resources are running low, gas prices getting high, and your citizens are becoming chaotic, yet other countries have boundless resources; what do you think you should do?
