Faithful readers, please take note. This OneTrueView
(TM)
contains MAJOR plot spoilers. If you haven't seen this episode
within the last month, go back and watch it before you read this.
Thank you.
What an amazing episode.
Apart from the memorable features of this episode -- the
first ghost appearance of Fraser Sr., and some of the most exacting comedy
in the series (which is why I
LOVE the Haggis-written eps), plus the
always wonderful layers of injokes and artifice that make the series so endearing
to me -- apart from all that, there's something else that sticks with me.
I haven't noticed this the other times I've watched this
ep, but it seems clear as day this time. The show is an allegory for the
Christmas story. A Father plans to sacrifice himself to save his child, just
like (as Christianity teaches us -- and also appears in the story of Odin,
and countless other religions and myth systems) God the Father sacrificed
Himself (in the form of Christ) to save our souls. But what's interesting
here is the atheist turn of the allegory
*. If you'll
indulge me, I'm going to dig around through it for a bit.
The son in this episode (at the age of six, as kids tend
to do) believed that his father went away (to prison) because of his own
wrongdoing. In the Old Testament, men wrote the story of how they distanced
themselves from God through their own sin -- that if only Eve hadn't succumbed
to that fleshly temptation (represented in this episode by toys and bikes),
God would still dwell close to man, and vice versa.
But the Father returned. He had a
PLAN. He would
sacrifice Himself in order to leave a legacy for his child. The child didn't
want to hear about it. Like the biblical Pharisees, the child was so afraid
to actually call on the Father for help that the Father had nothing to offer.
Or, actually, the Father believed he had nothing to offer that the child
would want.
All the Apostles wanted from Christ was to be in his presence.
(Well, okay -- one or two continually ask for miracles, but they're just
fools.) They wanted to feel His love and His power, to listen to His teachings.
They gave freely of themselves to Christ (as the son does in this episode),
just out of gratitude for His company.
The Apostles were, biblically speaking, short-sighted.
Those who wanted Christ to escape His only true destiny couldn't see the
big
PLAN. But here, in this silly cop show, we see through the eyes
of the Apostles. We see that, hey, Jesus can do what he wants. He's in charge!
Just as William Sydney Porter holds complete power over all his pursuers
at the climax of this episode, Jesus held all the cards.
+ Jesus was GOD! He made the rules! God could have chosen
to live FOREVER on earth, in human form. To walk beside us, to listen to
our complaints, to touch us. To heal us, to wash our feet, to reprimand us
when we went astray.
But that's not as dramatic a story. It's hard to found
a religion on the story of one man just doing everything he can for others,
every minute of every day. Think about it -- Mother Theresa has STILL not
be canonized by the Catholic Church, but there are dozens of recognized saints
who did less good but died of flaming arrows or being stoned.
A father who doesn't fight to stay with his child is no
father, this episode says. Even when he can only provide bad examples, like
Ray's father (also here in ghost form), he still stays. Because that's what
fathers do.
If I'm reading the subtext of this episode correctly,
Fraser's father provides the perfect example of this. Fraser Sr. dies. After
a short period (granted, more than three days), he returns to teach his child
more than was possible in life.
Many Christians would say that the point of Christ's life
was not His life, or even His death. They say Christ is important because
of His resurrection: that after He rose from the dead, he taught more in
that short period than the 33 years before that. Fraser Sr. certainly is
a better father, and better teacher, after his death than he was before.
(Now, never mind if he's all a figment of Fraser's imagination. This comes
down to a topic of personal choice, with lots of "evidence" on either side
of the argument. Kind of like belief in the Resurrection of Christ.)
But here's where Fraser Sr. differs from Christ. He doesn't
say, okay, I taught you to be a man, see you on the other side. He STAYS
with Fraser, counsels and guides him (and annoys him too, obviously, which
is the other main difference between Fraser Sr. and Christ -- Jesus couldn't
be maddeningly, insanely, loudly WRONG on most issues. The fact that Fraser
Sr. can is what makes him human.
**)
Now there's other evidence of all this in the episode
(the writer-as-God metaphor is quite the cliché ++). But you can watch
the episode and decide for yourself. I know this will be too much for some
of you to swallow -- after all, it's got car chases and reindeer and {COMEDY
SPOILER}
Elvis impersonators. It's just
a buddy cop show with a weird sense of humor.
But, at times, it can be so much more. And that's why
I love it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* I'd like, just for the
fun of it, to tell you about the first Christmas allegory I figured out,
all by myself. It's Stan Freberg's
record "Yulenet
(Christmas Dragnet)." It exists largely because Freberg's "
Saint George and the Dragonet"
was such a big hit, but Freberg (a minister's son) added such a rich layer
of allegory that it exists on its own terms -- one need not even know "
Dragnet" to enjoy the record. Two police
detectives investigate a man who doesn't believe in Santa Claus. They take
him to the North Pole, but he spouts science and refuses to believe what
his eyes see. He writes off the big workshop and the reindeer. Finally, he
notices a large pile of presents. They belong to the one man who simply won't
claim them, the man who doesn't believe in Santa Claus. The nonbeliever asks
if there's any way he can, you know... He's told, sure, he can claim his
reward, just as soon as he believes. And, this is sad but true, this is one
of two times since my loss of faith that I've wished I could believe again.
(The other: a moment in Kevin Smith's
Dogma,
honestly.)
+ The child says, no! Don't
go. You don't have to leave to save me. Staying can save me. Staying
will
save me. And for the purposes of this episode, the child is right.
The Father says, no, of course I could stay, but I won't. It isn't the
PLAN...
Matthew 26:53-54: "Do you think I cannot call on my Father, and he
will at once put at
my disposal more than twelve legions of angels? But how then would the Scriptures
be
fulfilled that say it must happen in this way?"
The Father intends to follow the
PLAN. No matter the logic presented
to one by Fraser and his son, no matter the pleas of the Other's Apostles,
the Father is determined.
But one father listens. One father evolves his plan, and lets go of the reins.
One father has the serenity to accept the things he cannot change (at least
for the better). And for the purposes of this episode, that father is right.
** Of course, it's probably not really fair to even
mention most of this. I assume that Paul Haggis didn't comb through every
subsequent script, trying to extend the allegory throughout the series. I
haven't watched any of those later eps yet with this in mind, but off the
top of my head I can't think of another single case wherein Fraser Sr. shares
any characteristics with Jesus.