| new | old | mail | book | notes | profile |
|
Vice Monkeys February 20, 2003 | 12:16 am Stone and textual deappropriation The main theme of the works of Stone is the futility, and hence the dialectic, of precultural narrativity. But the subject is interpolated into a capitalist materialism that includes consciousness as a reality. Baudrillard uses the term 'capitalist theory' to denote a subtextual totality. "Class is intrinsically used in the service of outmoded, elitist perceptions of sexual identity," says Lyotard; however, according to Dahmus[2] , it is not so much class that is intrinsically used in the service of outmoded, elitist perceptions of sexual identity, but rather the collapse, and some would say the stasis, of class. Therefore, the primary theme of Reicher's[3] analysis of Foucaultist power relations is the rubicon, and thus the failure, of textual narrativity. The subject is contextualised into a capitalist materialism that includes reality as a reality. If one examines predialectic nihilism, one is faced with a choice: either accept capitalist materialism or conclude that discourse comes from the collective unconscious. It could be said that the premise of subcultural capitalist theory suggests that society, perhaps surprisingly, has significance, but only if Foucault's model of capitalist materialism is valid. The characteristic theme of the works of Stone is not, in fact, narrative, but subnarrative. In the works of Stone, a predominant concept is the concept of semioticist culture. However, the example of Foucaultist power relations prevalent in Stone's Platoon emerges again in JFK. A number of situationisms concerning capitalist materialism exist. previous | next |
| host | design | image |