LASIK in La Jolla, near San Diego, in Southern California, by "Doctor" Michael Gordon ==> In 1998, unaware that the experience would leave me with the opinion that  many, if not most, refractive surgeons consider the health of their patients' corneas to be expendable, I consulted 2 high-volume LASIK surgeons, Michael Gordon and Glenn Kawesch.
IS THERE
  This was before LASEK or all laser LASIK.  I did not consult with Perry Binder, Lee Nordan, David Schanzlin, Mitchell Friedlaender, Sandy Feldman, Douglas Miller, or Lusby.  In my opinion, it was a huge mistake to rely on either Gordon or Kawesch for accurate information about LASIK or refractive surgery.
A DOCTOR
  In my opinion, "Doctor" Gordon withheld key information about known LASIK complications, about "dry eye", about chronic pain, about the difference between seeing 20-20 and seeing well.  At the time I was myopic and had myopia, with a little bit of astigmatism ... I hear they're now peddling LASIK, LASEK, and all laser LASIK for hyperopia, as well.
IN THE HOUSE ?
  Opthalmologist, optometrist, MD, OD, surgeon - terms which once evoked respect ... unfortunately now frequently involved in sweeping information about LASIK casualties under the rug.  "Doctor" Gordon's "informed consent" form didn't say anything about living life with constant eye pain - eye pain which onset at the time of my LASIK surgery.
This is not an advertisement for Michael Gordon, M.D. or Perry Binder, M.D.

Links to Related Websites:

LASIK SOS
http://www.LASIKSOS.com/

LASIK Letters
http://www.lasikletters.com/

Ask LASIK Patients
http://www.asklasikpatients.com/

LASIK 101
http://www.lasik101.com/



This is not an advertisement for Michael Gordon, M.D. or Perry Binder, M.D.

~ Michael Gordon, "M.D." ~

Enclosed herein is a description of my experience in the "medical care" of "Doctor" Michael Gordon.

Within a year after the surgery, it was clear that my vision was deteriorating.  This is a letter I wrote to the FDA asking for help, augmented by the belief that they should "know what is happening", in terms of LASIK.  This letter serves to describe my condition at about 1 year post-op.


Did My Experience with "Doctor" Michael Gordon Involve a Deliberate Act of Consumer Fraud ?

My LASIK surgery was on August 14, 1998.  "Doctor" Michael Gordon was my LASIK surgeon.

During a pre-op consultation, I asked "Doctor" Michael Gordon a question about LASIK, tantamount to the inquiry, "OK, what's the downside of this here LASIK, Doc ?"  Michael Gordon responds.  "Well, I've had laser surgery, and I use a few eye-drops every now and then."

There's only one thing - at that time, Michael Gordon had had PRK, not LASIK.  PRK does not involve a micro-keratome cut - the first half of a partial corneal transplant.  The first half of LASIK is like the first half of a partial corneal transplant - a cut is made through the stroma, the middle layer of the 5 layers of the cornea.  In LASIK, the cut stops just short of a complete cut.  What's left is called the "flap."

In a partial corneal transplant, the cut is all the way through.  No flap.

At the time, I didn't know that.  I thought Michael Gordon was answering my question about LASIK by describing his experience with LASIK.  He didn't.  He deliberately answered my question about LASIK by describing his experience with PRK.

Then, during the pre-op consult, Michael Gordon neglects to ask me the simplest of questions about a clear contra-indication to corneal surgery - contact-lens intolerance.  I am contact-lens intolerant, at that time that was the only sign of ocular surface disease.  In addition to double-vision associated with a crossed left eye, I experienced a step-function increase in the symptoms of ocular surface disease on the day of my LASIK surgery.  I was subsequently diagnosed with full-blown Dry Eye Syndrome, Blepharitis, and told to move to Florida - for the humidity.

I believe it was Michael Gordon's responsibility, given that he held and holds himself out to the public as a "Doctor of Medicine", with all the rights and responsibilities pertaining thereto, to ask me a simple question which would have directly addressed my suitability for elective corneal surgery.  All he had to do was ask, "Are you contact-lens intolerant ?"  He neglected to do so.

In the old days, I used to think that the doctors were supposed to know more than the patients.  Not any more.

Should "Doctor" Michael Gordon ever wish to discuss LASIK complications on San Diego television, I am prepared to do so.  Maybe we could do it in game show format.  I've spent thousands of dollars on eye-drops since my LASIK surgery.  I could use the money.



This is not an advertisement for Michael Gordon, M.D. or Perry Binder, M.D.

~ MY PRESENT CONDITION, 3 1/2 years post-op ~

These symptoms onset at the time of my LASIK surgery, and have become progressively worse since then.  My eyes were disease-free until the day of my LASIK surgery, at which time I was 40 years old.

*  Escalating, chronic pain in my left eye.  I now lay with my eyes closed about 4 hours a day because they hurt, and that is the only way I've found to make them feel better.  I am not referring to sleep.  I'm saying that, of the approximately 16 hours a day that I am awake, I spend approximately 4 hours of that time with my eyes closed, because it hurts to have them open.
*  Crossed left eye - causing me to see double when I look at anything more than 5 feet away.
*  Reading hurts my eyes so i stopped doing it ... I used to read 10 magazines an hour.
*  No more making stuff. I used to be able to make things with my hands.  Of course, this means being able to see up-close, without eye-strain.  As an ophthalmologist told me, "Yes, LASIK burns away your near-sighted vision.  Your surgeon should have told you."  Before LASIK, I was good at making things with my hands -
my computers
my jewelry
my web programming
Not any more.  Now, my tools collect dust.  I do not have the "eye-time", evenings and weekends, to "make stuff" anymore.
*  Reduced Workout Time.  At the time of my LASIK Surgery, I worked out twice a day ... usually, a 2500 yard swim, followed by a 2 hour yoga class - with one day off a week.  As my corneal dis-ease has progressed, I have been forced to allocate less and less time for exercise, from which I once extracted a huge amount of enjoyment.  I now work out once a day on weekends, and about once during the week.  That's a big change - from 12 rigorous workouts a week to 3.&nbbsp; I don't have a shortage of discipline - I recently cranked out a 5K swim and hit a second-best personal time.  I have a shortage of eye-time.
*  Early Retirement.  Given the degradation in the condition of my eyes, Prudence says:  prepare for forced early retirement.  In fact, I've met another patient, an RK patient, whose eyes were over-corrected during RK surgery.  When presbyopia onset, she became unable to do her job, and she was forced to retire early.  She advised me to prepare for the same fate.  Coincidentally, her refractive surgeon's name is ... very familiar.



This is not an advertisement for Michael Gordon, M.D. or Perry Binder, M.D.

"Doctor" Michael Gordon has, via LASIK, introduced me to the world of corneal dis-ease and disease.  The list of symptoms above describes my present eye condition.  Based on the escalation of my eye pain, the decrease in my daily eye-time, and the loss of vision required to build things with my hands - that ability that I practiced daily for the last 40 years, from playing with Lego bricks to building cell-phone base stations, the experience that I am having is - the experience of going blind, and living with chronic pain in my eyes.

Following the LASIK surgery performed by "Doctor" Michael Gordon.

Unfortunately, many other patients have many other stories to tell.

In a state of true informed consent, the rate of reduction of new casualties is reduced.  That is one of the purposes of this website - to participate in the act of informing potential pre-op LASIK patients about the true medical and lifestyle effects of LASIK surgery.

Thank you for visiting.  This website does not have a forum.  Online forums for people who need help with refractive surgery problems and questions can be found at Surgical Eyes, and also at the USENET Newsgroups named "sci.med.vision", and also "alt.lasik-eyes"

I have a friend, on disability, with torturous, frequently excruciating, constant pain, following her own LASIK, performed by a high-priced surgeon associated with a large publicly held laser chain - a surgeon with academic affiliations and "famous" patients.  That friend used to love to read.  But not any more.  Now she listens to Books on Tape.  She is 3 years post-op and no doctor has stepped forward to champion the marathon project of helping her see without pain.  She has seen 20 ophthalmogists, seeking medical help.  It is impossible for me to be in her company without realizing that I am witnessing a medical dilemma that is appropriately treated as an emergency, warranting massive efforts by the medical community to come to her assistance.

Yet, no such efforts are forthcoming, yet.  We need to help this woman.  She deserves a dream team of doctors dedicated to the restoration of her vision.

What good is seeing an eye-chart 20/30 if your eyes hurt, and opening your eyes makes the pain worse ?

Again: the symptoms of that patient's ocular disease onset at the time of her LASIK.

I did not expect to learn so much about ophthalmology, in general, and refractive surgery, in particular.

Other patients are welcome to email me at the address below.

Nor can we forget the patients who have been harmed by PRK and RK, older forms of refractive surgery.

I was once, and may still be, a darn good hands-on design engineer.  Because of my vision, I run a 21" monitor at 800 x 600 resolution.  Before LASIK, though I was near-sighted, in terms of pixels, my vision was better than 8000 x 6000 pixels, and my eyes were open and seeing effortlessly 16 hours a day.  Now, I'm down to 800 x 600, and my vision is rarely effortless.  Because my eyes hurt, I close them 4 hours a day.

I can still see some of the letters on "Doctor" Michael Gordon's Snellen charts.

I wonder if he considers me a surgical success ?

Thank you for visiting this website.

Sincerely,

~ Roger ~

Roger Bratt

PS  Patients are welcome to email me at
[email protected]

Please note ... that's "roger@" ... no "d" in "roger".  Just a web programming technique to avoid email-harvesting spyders that roam the web.

Copyright 2002



This is not an advertisement for Michael Gordon, M.D. or Perry Binder, M.D.

More LASIK Websites & Online Forums.

Websites Run By "Patients"

I use the term "Patients" in quotes because most of the useful medical assistance I have received - the anti-inflammatory for my eye-pain, the Salagen to increase tear-flow - were suggestions that came from other patients - resulting in a prescription written by my general practitioner.  In other words, the patients I am meeting during my refractive surgery experience seem to know more about ophthalmology as it pertains to complications of refractive surgery, than the refractive surgeons themselves.  You be the judge.

The Surgical Eyes Foundation
http://www.surgicaleyes.org/
Surgical Eyes Bulletin Board
http://surgicaleyes.atinfopop.com/4/OpenTopic

Brent Hanson's Website
http://www.lasikcourt.com/tlc/brenthanson/

LASIKDisaster.com



This is not an advertisement for Michael Gordon, M.D. or Perry Binder, M.D.


QUESTION:  "Doctors" Michael Gordon and Perry Binder:  Do they have any refractive surgery patients who have experienced "sub-optimal" outcomes ?
ANSWER:  YES.
NOTE:  This is not a comprehensive list.

Ar*** v Binder

Ba*** v Gordon

Bratt v Gordon

A patient who retired early after RK performed by Gordon

Ha*** v Gordon

Hi*** v Binder

Ka*** v Binder

Kr*** v Gordon

Ku*** v Gordon

Li*** v Binder



This is not an advertisement for Michael Gordon, M.D. or Perry Binder, M.D.

IS THERE

A DOCTOR

IN THE HOUSE ?

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1