The question for the United States government was “in an age of high-tech terror, what is the proper balance between national security and the privacy of millions of Americans, whose personal information is already more widely available than ever before?”*. For weeks, in a patriotic bi-partisanship movement, the Bush administration, Congress, and other government officials set out to find that right balance between protecting the United States from other terrorist attacks and not infringing on United States citizens’ rights. At the same time, they had to amend the Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 and The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Both of these acts limit the abilities of the intelligence officers to spy domestically and the use of tracking devices, pen registers, trap, and trace devices*. The United States government wanted to ease those restrictions to better track terrorists because intelligence officers and law enforcement community found it so restrictive in trying to track down terrorists, prevent other terrorist acts, and pass information to other intelligence officials. The laws of the United States was designed at a time were the idea of trying to stop and prevent this kind of terrorism was not on the forefront of governmental policies.