by Cipha Soundz

Cipha Soundz wrote:

I dunno how or what many of you think and i wont be suprised if you start giving me stick but hell with it im gonna say it, but before i go on any further i want to clarify that i am no fan of the Taliban or Osama or any other punk ass CIA asset.

This war against Terror is a war against Islam because the American-led Crusader alliance knows that true, authetic, Islam is the only serious threat to its power, and to its desire to dominate the world, which domination is political, economic, cultural and military, and is designed to ensure: (1) the plentiful supply of resources, such as oil and minerals, which its industries and infrastructure needs; (2) it has not only a world-wide market for its consumer goods, but also access to cheap labour; that (3) its rapacious materialistic way of life can endure; (4) the domination of the political ideas and social ways of the West. The first avowed intention of this new American-led Crusade is to remove the Islamic government which the Taliban have established, and replace it with a pro-American, or rather, pro-Western, one, the 2nd intention is to build a stable gas pipeline through Afganistan which under the Taliban would have been far more costly because the Taliban demanded a bigger cut, research it it's all there bang in your face, here's a map of what im talking about http://www.mujahideen.fsnet.co.uk/afghanistan-oil.htm.

Definition of The West:

The West is a collection of modern nations which follow a common materialistic, hedonist way of life, which are based upon the idea and ways of capitalism, with its usury, and whose governments are elected, at least in theory, through majority vote. These Western governments all make, and all enforce, laws which represent a basically liberalist view of the world, just as they are all driven by the ideas of "progress" and continual change. In the pursuit of this change, these nations, with their industries, their commerce, their technology, plunder the resources of the world for their own benefit.

The two basic characteristics of the Western way of life are a prideful arrogance and a devotion to selfish pleasure. This prideful arrogance often manifests itself in the belief - by Western peoples of all races - that the Western way is superior, "progressive" and even "enlightened". It is also manifest in the belief - backed if necessary by naked military force - that Western laws have or should have sway over the whole world: that is, that Western governments have the "right" to do what they like, such as invade another country on some pretext or other, or enforce their laws upon another people even if those people do not recognize and do not accept such Western laws (as is the case with the Taliban).

Two further characteristics of the modern West are its outright, blatant, hypocrisy, and its use of modern mediums such as Television and newspapers to spread pro-Western propaganda, which propaganda seeks to demonize anyone, or any cause, the governments of the West deem a threat to their interests.

To ensure its domination, Western countries created organizations such as the "United Nations" (which it controls through the Security Council since Western countries have the right to veto any resolution they do not approve of and generally make any resolution they dislike unenforceable in practice) which United Nations organization is designed to spread, and enforce, Western laws and Western political ideas (such as majority voting), and designed to aid and bring about the assimilation of other countries into what is called "the global economy" with its Americanized mass "culture".

In essence, therefore, the United Nations is a kuffar(non-muslim) organization, based entirely on Western concepts of law and dedicated to propagating, and if necessary enforcing, the Western, un-Islamic, idea of "democracy", of majority voting, and the Western commercialized "culture" which is such a feature of this modern world.

The Hoax of the "War Against Terrorism":

In recent times - and so far as the West is concerned - the threat posed by Islam has replaced the threat posed by Communism, and it is no coincidence that former Soviet-style nations such as Russia and China are now co-operating with America in the new "war on Islam" since both these nations are now part of the global capitalist economy, with China especially seen as a vast market, and a ready resource of cheap labour.

The war by the Crusader Alliance against the Taliban in Afghanistan has been propagated by the governments of the West as a "war against terrorism". However, this is pure hypocrisy, as several Islamic scholars have recently explained:

1) Here, there is a question we will like to ask those who use the word "Terrorism" on what happened in America, and I want their reply.

The question is: When America attacked a Pharmaceutical firm in Sudan, using its planes and bombs, destroying it and killing everybody in it, staff and labourers, what was this called? Shouldn't the action of America on the Sudanese firm be considered as an act of terrorism? Else how can what those people did in America be treated as an act of terrorism? Why is everybody condemning and rejecting what was done to those buildings in America and yet we did not hear any such condemnations on the destruction caused by America of that Sudanese firm?

I certainly don't see any difference between the two acts, except that the money that was used in building the firm is Muslims' and the workers and staff killed by destroying the firm were Muslims; Whereas, the buildings destroyed by those ?hijackers? was built with the money of non-Muslims and the victims of the explosion were non-Muslims mainly.

So, is this the difference that made some fellow brothers to call what happened in America 'Terrorism'!! While at the same time they neither condemned what happened in Sudan, nor called it TERRORISM?

Similarly, what happened to the Libyans was deliberate and imposed 'starvation'; 'starvation' of the Irâqis plus almost daily attacks; the sanctions and attacks launched against Afghanistân, a Muslim Nation: all these, why are they not termed "terrorism"? What else can we term them if not terrorism? Fatwa on Recent Events by Shaykh Humûd al-'Uqlâ

2) Firstly, upon investigating what has happened and is happening of the war of America and her allies, it becomes clear that they have not defined this objective which they have termed 'terrorism'. They have not established that the attack which happened in America was indeed done by Afghanistan or through their support and help - the truth is slowly blowing out into the mainstream and the Bush administartion is blantly denying it, such as the detained Israeli art students/Mossad agents, the phone tapping scandal and the fore warning given to Odigo workers on 9/11 of the coming attacks by israeli sources, all of which the U.S. gov is protecting as saying this is Classified Information,WHY WHY WHY??? it wouldnt be that the actual culprit in this evil hideous crime or the instigator is israeli, Who is the indivdual behind the anthrax scares??, it wouldnt be a jewish insider working inside gov labs??? yet it was made out to be a muslim or should i say referred to as being the work of people like or related to Saddam Hussien, deception is the key here not speaking the truth, this is a fact known to the whole world.

Therefore it is obvious that their understanding of 'terrorism' is none other than Islam itself, hence making this war a Crusade - a truth that has been clearly stated by a number of their leaders such as the President of the United States.

3) It is well known that the Taliban Governments first crime - as far as the United States are concerned - is that they did not submit to their leadership, that they did not abide by the laws of the United Nations, which are referred to as "International Law" that gives the United States the right to veto a decision. Whoever goes outside these regulations undergoes sanctions, which every nation is obliged to abide by EXCEPT ISRAEL, WHY WHY WHY??? . This is the most perfect form of domineering and enslavement.

In addition, all Western nations - with America leading the way - support the repressive Zionist occupationn government in Palestine, supplying that government with weapons, and technological and financial aid, and totally ignoring its avowed terrorist methods which includes assassination of opponents, destruction of homes, the use of torture, detention without trial, and the indiscriminate killing of civilians, including women and children.

Western nations are using and have used the lie that their war is a war "against terrorism" to justify their naked imperialist aggression and to try and morally blackmail other nations into helping them. In effect, this lie of a war against "terrorism" is designed to mask their real, hidden, aim which is to fight, undermine and if possible eliminate the threat which Islam poses to both the political, social and economic domination of the West, and to the Zionist occupation of Palestine.

For in truth, this American-led Crusader Alliance is really a Zionist-Crusader Alliance against Islam, for the very survival of Zionism - the continued occupation of Palestine by Zionists - depends upon the continuing domination of the West and especially upon the elimination of the threat posed by authentic Islam, manifest as this authentic Islam has been and is in the Taliban and those who support them.

Why Islam is a Threat to the West:

The West considers Islam a threat for several reasons: (1) Islam is, on principle and in reality, opposed to the usury which forms the basis for the capitalism of the West, regarding such usury as evil; (2) Islam is opposed to the excessive materialism, the decadence, the lack of moral standards and the lack of discipline which are now rife in all nations of the West; (3) Islam is opposed - in principle and in reality - to the so-called "democratic process" and instead seeks to create what the West would describe as a theocratic society (which Islam calls the Khilafah), ruled by a Khalifah; (4) Islam is opposed in principle and in practice to the type of law and the system of so-called justice which dominates Western countries and instead seeks to establish the rule of Shari'ah, of Islamic law; (5) Islam, correctly understood, seeks to use Jihaad, if necessary, to establish an Islamic way of life - Islamic societies - since Muslims are enjoined to fight repression, injustice and evil, and have a duty to live in the Way Allah has commanded; (6) Islam seeks the return of Palestine which is currently occupied by Zionists (who have the full and uncritical support of the West) and regards the return of Islamic rule to Al-Quds (Jerusalem) as a sacred duty; and, last but not least, (7) Islamic countries (such as Saudi Arabia) control many of the world's oil reserves, which reserves are regarded as crucial by the West in order to maintain their materialistic, capitalist, energy-squandering, way of life.

In particular, the American government views Osama bin Laden and his followers as a threat to the current government in Saudi Arabia, which government - controlling vast oil reserves - is currently well-disposed to America, and even allows American military bases in what most Muslims regard as the Holy Lands. The Americans are and have been greatly concerned that Osama bin Laden and his followers could undermine if not overthrow the current government in Saudi Arabia, and establish there an Islamic State, which State being hostile to America, would refuse to export oil to America, thus threatening America's materialistic way of life and its wealth, fuelled as this wealth is and has been by petrochemicals and machines and vehicles which use oil, petrol and diesel.

Therefore, America has decided to eliminate what it perceives as a serious threat to its domination, its wealth and its way of life, for America knows - as many Muslims do - that the Taliban, as well as Osama bin Laden and his followers, not only regard it as their Islamic duty to undertake Jihaad in order to fight corruption and establish an Islamic society, but also refuse to compromise with the kuffar. That is, they desire to establish a genuine Islamic society, governed by Shari'ah: a society which totally rejects the decadent, materialistic, god-less, immoral, Western way of life.

By eliminating the Taliban and Osama bin Laden and his followers, America, and its Crusader allies, believe they can undermine, if not stifle and destroy, the progress of true Islam - the Islam that does not compromise with the ways of the kuffar and which seeks instead to create true Islamic communities. The hope and the desire of the infidels of America and elsewhere is to humiliate Muslims, and show - by naked aggression - that no real, practical, opposition to the domination of the West will be allowed or tolerated.

In effect, the Crusader Alliance is saying: "we want the world to be re-made along Western lines, and will not tolerate a society, a government, a nation, which does not follow our laws and which does not recognize our right to rule over them through our international treaties."

The only reason for the humiliation of the Muslims, and their following of their enemies, is that they have turned away from their religion to the extent that they have abandoned Jihad in the Cause of Allah. Thus are they weak and disunited, this is the main cause to all the problems many muslims face.

Many Muslims have come to regard the Taliban as an example to follow and be inspired by, just as Western government and the Western Media have been conducting an intense, lying and hateful propaganda campaign against the Taliban for many years in order to try and discredit them. Having failed in this propaganda campaign, Western governments have now decided to destroy them through war. For the West greatly fears the resurgence of pure, authentic Islam of which both the Taliban and Osama bin Laden are examples to a certian extent if correctly understood.

The Taliban government in Afghanistan is the only country in the World in which there are no man-made laws and legislation. Further proving the (Islamic) validity of the Muslim Taliban Government are:

1. Its efforts to support the Mujahideen and defend them against their enemies. This has been witnessed in this government. 2. It does not contain any forms of media which are forbidden in the Shariah. 3. Indeed it is adamant, sincere and honest in its efforts to implement Shariah from its establishment of the Islamic Penal Code (hudood) to forbidding open acts of disobedience to Allah and His Messenger, meting out suitable punishments for them and Islamicising education and media. 4. Indeed it is the only country in the World which is striving for women's rights according to the Shariah and not according to the ways of the Secularists who encourage the women to display their beauty, cast off their hijabs, mix freely with men, drive cars alone and other things like that. 5. It is the only country in the World which has a separate ministry by the name of the Ministry to Encourage Good and Forbid Evil.

Conclusion:

The current attacks on the Taliban are an openly declared war - by the Zionist-Crusader Alliance - against Islam. One of the fundamental aims of this war is to eliminate the threat posed by authentic Islam, as manifest by Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah and the Mujahideen of Afghanistan and elsewhere.

It is obligatory upon the Muslims to aid their oppressed brothers against the oppressive infidels. The Messenger of Allah - sallallahu alayhi wa sallam - said, "The Muslim is his fellow Muslim's brother. He does not oppress him and he does not surrender him".

It is obligatory upon all the Muslims to stand as one united rank against their enemy and to beware of his plot which aims to disunite them and cause them to fight each other so that they may be weakened and ultimately fall under their control. It is obligatory upon them to actively strive towards being strictly disciplined, uniting their words and ranks.

The governments of the West will accept, and indeed condone and even encourage, a "modernist Islam" where fundamental Islamic values and principles are sacrificed to enable Muslims to live in a Western way, and where Islam is understood, perceived and practised as a private religion, confined to homes, Mosques and one's local community, and where there is no attempt made to create an Islamic society, governed according to Shari'ah and certainly little if any perception, by the modernist Muslims, of Islam as a total way of life, a way which does not separate "State" and "Mosque".

However, the West will not accept, and will not tolerate, authentic Islam which seeks to establish an Islamic way of life, which understands the establishment of the Shari'ah as a necessary duty, which demands the liberation of Palestine and the overthrow of corrupt rulers and corrupt governments if necessary through practical Jihaad andf that includes the saadi monarch and many corupt muslim leaders, this should be our foremost priority.

Authentic Islam accepts that Islam is a complete, and prefect, Way of life and rejects the ways of the kuffar, believing that these ways are the ways of the Ignorant, and indeed, that these ways are Ignorance (Jahiliyya) itself. There is, for a Muslim, only the complete, the perfect, way which is Islam, or there is Jahiliyya: ignorance of the will of Allah, either through wilful ignorance, or because of a submission to human-derived ideas, ways, principles and laws, or through submission to a person or persons who represent, or are representatives of, such human-derived things.

The truth which we Muslims must proclaim in these days of Crusader aggression is the truth of authentic Islam, for by openly declaring and supporting this truth we are struggling in the way of Allah (SWT) against the Zionist-Crusader Alliance, an Alliance which is seeking, through its imperialism, its terrorism and its propaganda, to not only cover up this truth, but also to kill or humiliate the Mujahideen who are defending this truth with their lives.

p.s. Palestinians are not only muslim but also christians, this might be news for you TheSeeker.

Allah knows best.

Nashid wrote: Islam as threat to Zionism!

I give you a lot of credit Cipha as a non-Muslim (not Kuffar) for posting this article. That is awful brave of you. There is a lot of interesting information contained but overall the threat of Al-Islam as a way of life to Zionism is clear.

There are some points that I disagree with and parts of the post appeared to be written strongly by someone who is extremely pro-Taliban. Also other parts come off as wrongful perceptions of what Muslims believe and are all about. But you make some powerful points that are very true. You are truly brave!

First the word Kuffar means disbeliever. It does not mean non-Muslim or refer particularly to all in the western world. The enemies of Al-Islam like the Zionists and the evil members in American government whose aim is to destroy Al-Islam and Muslim countries are Kuffars. But following the strict terminology and understanding as given in Quran and also the example shown in Prophet Muhammad's life, the ordinary decent God fearing Christian, Jew, etc. are referred to as "People of the Book", Christians or Children of Israel. Kuffar is too strong a term to use and it is true that some Muslims uses that and even use terms like Infidel for non-Muslims but they cannot show in Quran that those terms refer to decent God-fearing people. I could understand why they use those terms. It is because of the amount of injustice and wrong doing to Muslims caused by prople from the western world. They are angry and justifiably so.

You wrote:

"The West considers Islam a threat for several reasons: (1) Islam is, on principle and in reality, opposed to the usury which forms the basis for the capitalism of the West, regarding such usury as evil; (2) Islam is opposed to the excessive materialism, the decadence, the lack of moral standards and the lack of discipline which are now rife in all nations of the West; (3) Islam is opposed - in principle and in reality - to the so-called "democratic process" and instead seeks to create what the West would describe as a theocratic society (which Islam calls the Khilafah), ruled by a Khalifah; (4) Islam is opposed in principle and in practice to the type of law and the system of so-called justice which dominates Western countries and instead seeks to establish the rule of Shari'ah, of Islamic law; (5) Islam, correctly understood, seeks to use Jihaad, if necessary, to establish an Islamic way of life - Islamic societies - since Muslims are enjoined to fight repression, injustice and evil, and have a duty to live in the Way Allah has commanded; (6) Islam seeks the return of Palestine which is currently occupied by Zionists (who have the full and uncritical support of the West) and regards the return of Islamic rule to Al-Quds (Jerusalem) as a sacred duty; and, last but not least, (7) Islamic countries (such as Saudi Arabia) control many of the world's oil reserves, which reserves are regarded as crucial by the West in order to maintain their materialistic, capitalist, energy-squandering, way of life."

I agree with most of this and strongly disagree with item 3 and have some feelings about item 4 which needs better explanation. Al-Islam is not against a democratic government as defined by the people and of the people. Most people don't understand that Muslim countries just recently became free to rule themselves after centuries of domination by western rule. Western occupation was resident in those countries for many years and as a result their social, religious, and intellectual lives have been strongly influenced by western ideas. Most of the Muslim countries got their freedom maybe about 50 - 70 years ago. Even Pakistan and India became free of British rule around 1947. At best most of these countries are making an attempt to rule themselves after years of subjugation and having to face serious problems in that attempt.

A dictatorship and kingdoms are not sanctioned in Al-Islam. How do I know that? I go to the Quran and the examples left by Prophet Muhammad. In the life of the Prophet when major decisions had to be made affecting the Muslim community, the Prophet went before the people and posed the issues. The final decision was what the majority decided. Many times the majority decision was not in agreement with his. But he put aside his agreement to go with the majority opinion. This is called Shura. Government by consensus of the majority of the people. If a dictatorship or monarchy was the type of government Muslims should have Prophet Muhammad would have established it in his life time. But instead the examples in his life showed a type of government that was governed by the consensus of the people even over ruling his decisions. The great Kaliphs that followed Muhammad governed in the same fashion.

I can boldly say and am ready to stand up and fight anyone to prove it, the system of government practiced in the U.S. with the Constitutional rights, liberties, etc. are more in line with Al-Islam than most Islamic governments. Even average Saudis that I ha met agree with me and criticize the form of government that is in their country.

Lastly the Taliban has been lied about. But if some of the reports about the Taliban regarding treatment of women, education, intolerance of other faiths, etc. are true then I will join in condemning them for that. That is NOT "Authentic Islam"!!! If authentic Islam is suppose to deny women education and basic rights and also show intolerance for people of other faiths then why in the life of the Prophet Muhammad education of women was encouraged, the right to own properties, etc was guaranteed for them and why would the Quran teach that ANY who believe in God and work righteousness will receive their rewards from God. "On them shall be no fear nor shall they grieve!" By ANY it is referring to people of other faiths like Christians, Jews, etc.

It is not the Muslim extremists message of Islam that the Zionists fear. It is the true humanitarian message of the Quran and Islam that they fear. This message has the ability to win the hearts and mind of decent people of the world, thereby making it the fastest growing religion in the world. Yes...they will portray extremist and women walking in bags and tell you THAT IS ISLAM! But they will never give you the humane, excellent teachings and example of Prophet Muhammad.