GOVERNANCE

 

The MERJ Action Team is a non-profit organization with 501(c)3 status, which means it is “organized exclusively for charitable, scientific and educational purposes.”  MERJ’s mission is “to engage a broad group of citizens in decisions and actions that foster sustainable economic, environmental, and social progress for Madison, Estill, Rockcastle, and Jackson counties and surrounding communities.”  The MERJ governance model is based on the guiding principles of consensus decision-making, local citizen empowerment, and social and ecological sustainability and diversity.  By utilizing progressive organizational models, we hope to develop and encourage the participation of various individuals and strengthen networks between other organizations in the community. 

 

MERJ CONSENSUS POLICY

Definition | Guiding Principles | Process | Philosophy

 

Definition of Consensus

 

Consensus means mutual gain through unity.

 

Consensus is a process used when agreement among a group of people is required.  Certain instances require consensus when MERJ groups meet according to the MERJ Action Team bylaws.

 

Consensus is defined differently depending on the size of the group and the importance of decisions. This difference reflects an understanding that unanimous agreement is painfully slow and often impossible or impractical with large groups.

 

·        Consensus for the MERJ Steering Committee or Board means an agreement among all participants that all participants can accept and implement.

 

·        Consensus for MERJ groups larger than 13 participants means an overwhelming percent (75%) of people interested in or affected by a particular issue agree to a proposal or package of ideas, when it is determined that unanimous agreement is not practical.

 

Back to the Top

Guiding Principles of Consensus

 

Follow the MERJ guiding principles during group interactions to ensure the creation of a safe and sacred space:

 

  • Focus and stay on topic.
  • Do not interrupt.
  • Listen.
  • Respect other participants.
  • Use a facilitator (and other group roles when necessary).
  • Be brief and stick to the allotted time for agenda items.
  • Do not hold back your contributions/ participate.
  • Choose language carefully.
  • Offer constructive criticism that begins with positive reinforcement.

 

Back to the Top

 

Consensus Process

 

1) Different levels of discussion exist. They should be identified on the agenda before the meeting. These include:

 

  • Information Item: This is a report for information only.  No action is necessary.
  • Discussion Item: This is an item that requires discussion and action, but does not require a final decision until a later time. 
  • Action Item: This is an item that may include additional discussion but requires a final decision made through consensus.  Agenda items should be labeled as an “action item” on the date for which a decision will be made. 

 

2) Reaching consensus:

 

1.      Articulate issue/Put decision on the floor as an action item.

2.    Discuss issue.

3.    Formulate proposal/motion. Allow notetaker to restate the motion/ Get it down in writing.

4.    Second the motion.

5.    Facilitator asks, “Further discussion?” Allow discussion, if necessary.

6.    If the discussion warrants, amend the motion if necessary or

·        Be willing to Stand Aside* if necessary and

·        Go back to step 3.

7.    Facilitator asks, “Any objections?” **

8.    If objections occur, go back to step 2.

9.    If no objections occur, then “Let the minutes show that the motion is approved by consensus.”

10.      Group “AHOH!” *** to celebrate successful CONSENSUS!

 

* Members can “stand aside” or abstain from a consensus vote, and their reasons for abstention should be stated in the minutes.  Abstention should only occur when there is a personal conflict with a proposal.  The group or facilitator may recommend this alternative for an individual so that the group can move forward and take action.

 

** Objections are permitted when member(s) feel a proposal does not fairly reflect MERJ’s mission and policies.  Objections should not be based on individual preferences or concerns.

 

*** “AHOH” is the manner in which consensus is expressed physically by the group.  Everyone gathers in a circle, each placing one hand toward the center.  When everyone’s hands are touching, the group says “AHOH!,” voices starting lowly and slowly until all hands rise up and agreement becomes a shout!

 

Back to the Top

 

Consensus Philosophy

 

The collective knowledge and experience of the MERJ Action Team is a valuable resource that should be shared.  Among the MERJ Steering Committee alone are carpenters, engineers, social workers, educators, farmers, writers, editors, homesteaders, activists, musicians, artists, cooks, and healers; and most people wear more than one of those hats.  We have skills in organic gardening, horse logging, mycology, sustainability education, marketing/publicity, community organizing/public outreach, cultural diversity, researching, and networking.  In addition to the various skills we bring as individuals, we also share a collective skill/practice that we believe is equally as useful: the game of hacky-sack. 

 

Hacky-sack” is a cooperative game that involves the kicking of a small footbag.  Everyone in a hacky-sack circle is on the “same team” and thus works together to achieve a “hack” -- the object of the game.  A hack is achieved when everyone in the circle kicks the ball at least once (using no hands) before it hits the ground (with practice, multiple “hacks” are also possible).  We begin every meeting with a game of hacky-sack, which has proven to be a very valuable part of our group process.  This form of exercise not only inspires the flow of creative energy, but also reminds us that we are working for a common goal with our collective, collaborative energy and focus.  Hacky-sack also mirrors both our grace for meal-sharing and our consensus model, in which we gather in a circle to “AHOH” our agreement and solidarity.

 

Many MERJers are also active participants in a regular community labor exchange and potluck known as the Berea Garden Party.  “The Garden Party is a fun monthly gathering in which people learn about and practice sustainability and social responsibility through the local sharing of food, labor, and goods; through the networking of sustainability-related knowledge, news, and events; and by serving as a model for the formation of other Garden Party groups.”  While our involvement in the Garden Party is based on the shared value of social and ecological sustainability, it is important to note that, while they are similar in motivation, the Garden Party and MERJ Market are not synonymous and are quite different in scope.  The Garden Party is and will continue to be an informal network of individuals who share labor, while the MERJ Market will be a macrocosm of a similar concept with a much more formal organizational structure. 

 

Back to the Top

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1